- Report: #322204
Complaint Review: Glenn Neasham, Neasham Financial Insurance Group & Oxyboosth2o
| Glenn Neasham, Neasham Financial Insurance Group & Oxyboosth2o 383 Lakeport Blvd
Lakeport, California U.S.A. |
|
Glenn Neasham, Neasham Financial Insurance Group & Oxyboosth2o Who does he think he is.... That's right.... "The Heavenly Father" Lakeport California
*REBUTTAL Individual responds: Some of these posters were sued April of 2010 for a large cash settlement
*REBUTTAL Individual responds: My response
*Consumer Comment: Glenn Neasham's Arrest: CA Press Release
*REBUTTAL Owner of company: This case has been settled in mediation after I sued them.
*REBUTTAL Owner of company: The ex employee is lying for her friend who was fired by me.
*Consumer Comment: Projection
*REBUTTAL Individual responds: Gregg accountability man!
*Consumer Comment: Good Guy, Don't lose faith...
*UPDATE EX-employee responds: Glenn Neasham.........many many mistakes, loan fraud
*REBUTTAL Individual responds: "Goodguy" Gregg Franks is NOT a previous employee.
*Consumer Comment: Where is Glenn Neasham These Days?
*Consumer Comment: Where is Glenn Neasham These Days?
*Consumer Comment: Where is Glenn Neasham These Days?
*Consumer Comment: Where is Glenn Neasham These Days?
*UPDATE EX-employee responds: Please let me know when and where the TRIAL is to take place
*Consumer Comment: Some More "Dribble" for Glenn
*REBUTTAL Individual responds: "Advocate for Justice"
*REBUTTAL Individual responds: Please come on out. Its going to be a slam dunk!The evidence against them is OVERWHELMING.
*Consumer Comment: GLENN NEASHAM PLANS TO "LOAN" OUT CONFIDENTIAL DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPTS?
*UPDATE EX-employee responds: Please send me copies of the depositions........
*REBUTTAL Individual responds: TRUTH WILL SET ME FREE......
*REBUTTAL Individual responds: TRUTH WILL SET ME FREE......
*REBUTTAL Individual responds: TRUTH WILL SET ME FREE......
*REBUTTAL Individual responds: TRUTH WILL SET ME FREE......
*Author of original report: 21 years of serving THIS community?
*REBUTTAL Owner of company: P.S. SIR,
*REBUTTAL Owner of company: Read verified cross complaint it will open your eyes.
*Consumer Comment: Who to contact
*Consumer Comment: Help is Available
*REBUTTAL Owner of company: Im sorry....
*REBUTTAL Owner of company: False claims.Vindictive X Employee???
*REBUTTAL Owner of company: False claims.Vindictive X Employee???
*REBUTTAL Owner of company: False claims.Vindictive X Employee???
*REBUTTAL Owner of company: False claims.Vindictive X Employee???
Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
Another victim
Lake County, California
U.S.A.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 03/29/2008 01:35 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Glenn-Neasham-Neasham-Financial-Insurance-Group-Oxyboosth2o/Lakeport-California-95453/Glenn-Neasham-Neasham-Financial-Insurance-Group-Oxyboosth2o-Who-does-he-think-he-is-322204. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
Search Tips#1 REBUTTAL Individual responds
Some of these posters were sued April of 2010 for a large cash settlement
AUTHOR: Glenn - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, March 17, 2012
Prior to moving back to Lake County in 2006 to raise my family I spent the last twenty years in the Sacramento area. I was the publisher/owner of the Citrus Height's City Times, and Gold River News newspaper's while at the same time in the insurance business.I served in Rotary,member of Citrus Height's Chamber of Commerce,Better Business bureau A+ rating,National Ethics Bureau,and very active in my church(Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints).I am a devoted family man and love this community.
#2 REBUTTAL Individual responds
My response
AUTHOR: Mr. Neasham - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, October 25, 2011
February 4th Lou, and Fran came back.At this time I did the presentation which took about one hour and thirty minutes.(presentation and completion of the application).During this time Deanna Jones was in my office for most of the presentation,as my assistants typically are. Deanna Jones testified Fran appeared "very competent" and was not at all confused during the presentation.During the beneficiary part of the application Fran wanted to name Lou the primary(he was on CD sincre 2004) and she wasn't sure who she wanted as contigent beneficiary.They finally agreed on Betty Koenig Lou's daughter. Fran was told she could change that at anytime.Deanna Jones witnessed that too)After the presentation Fran, and Lou went to the bank to get the funds made payable to Allianz.Lou Jochim called me from the bank and said the bank was giving them problems in reference to moving the money.I called Susie Robinson to talk to her per Lou's request.Susie told me she was concerned about Lou's influence, and said she doesn't have a problem with Fran her concern was with Lou.She also said Fran was confused about the investment.However Fran knew she wanted to withdrawl $175,000.00 made payable to Allianz.
I went over the product with Susie on the phone for about five to ten minutes and Susie said "she doesn't have a problem with the annuity her problem was with Lou" .During Susie testimony she denied me going over product with her, and my attorney never asked her if she said to me 'I dont have a problem with Fran I have a problem with Lou"The bank at no time said anything that led me to believe Fran was confused other than Fran being confused about the benefits of the annuity.They never expressed to me that Fran was incapable of understanding the transaction.When Fran and Lou came back to my office to give me the check I asked Fran if she understood the annuity and she said yes.
On 12/05/2008 ten months after the sell I met with Fran and Lou in my office after Lou called me to say that an investigator came to their home from the Dept. of Insurance on December 3rd to ask them some questions. During our meeting I asked Fran if she understood the investment and went over the letter the courts referred to as the CYA letter.The letter was signed by Fran and Lou and the reason for the letter was because when Fran and Lou came in for policy delivery 2/13/08 I wanted to make sure Fran was still ok with her choices of beneficiary.I've never had a client choose someone other than a spouse or child as beneficiary.Again during application process Fran wasn't sure who she wanted to name as contigent beneficiary.After our meeting I called Lou at Fran's home and asked him if Fran has ever had a diagnoses of Alzheimers or Dementia and Lou said " no".
On February 5th 2008 one day after Fran bought the annuity I called the son Ted Schuber and told him what his mom did and set up a meeting with him February 6th 2008 at my office at 3:00 pm.(The date is in my 2008 planner)Ted testified under oath we met the summer of 2008. Which never happened.We only met once which was February 6th.During our phone conversation Ted said "he was concerned about his moms overall health" at no time has he ever told me his mom had alzheimers or dementia.During our meeting her health never came up again.If he would of told me his mom had Dementia or Alzhiemers I would of immediately stopped the transaction from going thru.The policy wasn't even issued yet and the client had a thirty day free look period.I would of called Allianz immediately and asked them and my FMO what do I do in this situation.I would of also contacted the client and asked further questions about her health. During my first interview Fran said she was in good health.
I was concerned about Lou only after the bank said they were concerned about Lou. I never understood why son Ted wasn't at least contigent beneficiary?I tried to set up a meeting with Ted and his mom at an annual client appreciation dinner.Ted said he didn't want to do that.He loved his mom, wanted her to do what she wanted and he wanted her to be happy.The CYA letter was written because I was concerned about Fran's choice of beneficiary,I felt Ted should be beneficiary or atleast contigent beneficiary. I also felt like I needed to protect myself from having to use my E & O insurance because Ted wasn't named as beneficiary.I felt more than ever after meeting with him he should be the beneficiary. Fran's money was her's and his deceased dad's.I even contacted Fran and asked for a copy of the CD statement to show Lou was the beneficiary of the CD. He was since 2004 and I still have the postmarked envelope that show's a date of February 6th 2008.
During my conversations with the Dept. of Insurance investigator Kristian Schriber. I told her certain things that were not in her reports.She in my opinion withheld critical evidence. One was about why I had the client and boyfriend sign the CYA letter.Her response to me was "no it wasn't it was because you knew something was wrong with Fran" I said "no that's not true.Fran was completely fine during the presentation. It was a good case".The second thing was I told her I left my client with $100,000.00 in liquidity, and she Fran liked to gamble and she said "you should of left her more money to gamble with".The third thing I told her was the bank said they were concerned about Lou not Fran.In none of her reports does it mention any of this.
Another concerning fact is on 4/1/08 Investigator Martina Santor met with Fran and Lou.Fran told Martina she moved the money to help out with taxes and no one forced her to do it.She made her decision of her own free will.Fran further explained that she purposely removed her son Ted Schuber as beneficiary.She said that when Ted married Karen,Karen made it very clear that she believed all of Fran's assets would one day be hers and actually referred to them as hers. She no longer communicates with them,and has essentially disowned the whole Schuber family.Fran also thanked Martina for looking into suspected elder abuse,however she denied being forced by anyone.Under oath Martina said she had no video or audio recordings of the 4/1/08 meeting with Fran,however the day before closing arguments at 10:30 am Martina produced a audio tape to the court of six and a half minutes of a fifteen to twenty minute meeting(the audio wasn't complete it malfuntioned) and on this audio you can hear Fran saying no one forced her to do it and why she did it.It was not introduced into evidence and the jury didn't hear it.
I wish I would of testified but my attorney said the things I would of said mostly were on the twenty minutes the jury heard on the audio tapes.My attorney said the people haven't proved anything and that was one reason to rest and not call any of my twenty five satified client witnesses who were on our witness list and others who knew me and worked with me now or in the past.Alot of these things I'm telling you now were not on the audio tapes.
My witness list including but not limited to are Ed Robey,Roy Parmentier,Dennis Day,Ken Marshick,William Craig,Don Hummell,Robert Swim,Clark and Lou Miller,Gene Frazell,Jan Baker,Paul Brisco,Margie Dias,Frank Bowen,Roy Dufrain,Carlton Jennings,Pat Sanchez,Richard and Scotty Latham,Virginia Dilaberto,Vince Metzger,Bill Fargusson,Tom Engstrom,Roy Disney,Carolyn Greenlea,Lucille Ramoni,Yvonne Walter, and others.
Another thing the jury didn't consider was Dr.Rosaffs testimony. Dr.Rosaff said unless I witnessed her day to day activities a sporadic or one time meeting with Neasham wouldn't of known she had any problems, and the doctor said the condition she's in today has taken one year to get there as well he testified when she went to the doctor from 2005-2009 she seemed competent according to the medical records.
Dick Duff testified the product had alot more benefits than negatives and the product paid an average commission. Dick is an author of five financial books and has appeared on CNBC,CNN,and also has a radio show. He is an attorney of about 47 years and stills sells annuities in Colorado,and is licensed in many other states.
This simply was a product the client wanted and she met the criteria of the insurance company to buy this product and I earned a nominal commission to serve her and the rest of my clients for as long as they own the product. I even tell my clients that if something happens to them I will also help their spouses, or even the kids.The commission earned comes out to about one half of 1% per year for the life of duration of the policy.
I also called Lou Jochim three days after my arrest on 12/17/2010 at 10:42 AM and asked him again if Fran has ever had any diagnosis of alzheimers or dementia and he again said "no she doesn't".No doctors diagnoses period".I also asked him about a year and a half earlier if I asked you if Fran had Alzheimers or Dementia and he said yes you did and "no she didn't"."I asked if Fran was happy with investment and he said "yes". "She's very happy she's made money".
In closing I want to say my client earned $42,000.00 in three years and seven months.Fran came to me and she's satisfied with the choice she's made according to long time boyfried Lou..She had plenty of liquidity,$100,000.00 in other accounts and access to another $17,500.00 per year if she wanted it for atleast five years or half that amount for ten years, and the annuity could of given her a monthly income for the rest of her life.Her account today has grown to over $217,000.00. I noticed no sign's at all of anything wrong with Fran in 2008. During our annual review in September of 2009 Fran left her purse in my office and a minute or so later came into retrieve it.One of my assistants at the time Penny Patrick who worked for me on and off from 2007-2010 met with Fran prior to the meeting with me as well as during the annual review testified Fran did not appear at all cofused during the 2009 annual review. Penny is now a medical assistant,Chaplian for years at St.Helena hospital in Clearlake and does disaster relief testified she has worked with many people who have dementia and noticed nothing wrong with Fran during our September 2009 meeting.I haven't seen Fran since other than two times at the court house during my trial.She is remarkebly different today then in 2008 and 2009.
The arrest I understand for this type of thing is unprecedented.This completely ruined my business. My family and I have lost almost everything.Our house, two cars,retirement and other things such as health insurance.I've got four kids.This verdict I feel is unjust because of some of the facts that weren't introduced.Like I said I've been in business for 23 years. My client satisfaction rate is atleast 98% or better.My BBB rating was A+ while i was a member until June of this year.( I couldn't afford to renew) I've never had any disciplenary action by the Dept. of insurance prior to my arrest.I still feel I've done nothing wrong and have significantly improved my client's financial position.I plan to appeal. Thankyou, Glenn Neasham
#3 Consumer Comment
Glenn Neasham's Arrest: CA Press Release
AUTHOR: The Eagle - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, December 16, 2010
|
#4 REBUTTAL Owner of company
This case has been settled in mediation after I sued them.
AUTHOR: Glenn - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, July 15, 2010
I filed a lawsuit against some of those who reported the defamatory information to ripoff report and I have agreed to a settlement in mediation. I cant discuss my settlement because i have signed a confidentiality agreement.I am satified with the outcome though.
#5 REBUTTAL Owner of company
The ex employee is lying for her friend who was fired by me.
AUTHOR: Glenn - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Monday, November 17, 2008
#6 Consumer Comment
Projection
AUTHOR: Advocate For Justice - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Monday, August 25, 2008
"A defense mechanism in which the individual attributes to other people impulses and traits that he himself has but cannot accept. It is especially likely to occur when the person lacks insight into his own impulses and traits."
"Attributing one's own undesirable traits to other people or agencies."
"The individual perceives in others the motive he denies having himself. Thus the cheat is sure that everyone else is dishonest."
"People attribute their own undesirable traits onto others."
"An individual who possesses malicious characteristics, but who is unwilling to perceive himself as an antagonist, convinces himself that his opponent feels and would act the same way."
from wikipedia
#7 REBUTTAL Individual responds
Gregg accountability man!
AUTHOR: Glenn - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, August 21, 2008
#8 Consumer Comment
Good Guy, Don't lose faith...
AUTHOR: Avenger - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, August 14, 2008
Good Guy, the side of right will win. Be patient, it has taken a lifetime for Mr. Neasham to get to where he is today. There are many things in the works to get this all straightened out, many good people are doing their best to get to the bottom of the many irons Mr. Neasham has had in the fire over the years.
Mr. Neasham has been able to fool many people, this at his own admission, for his entire life. He works very hard at dammage control, it is a normal pass time for him, so much time wasted.
Thank you for sharing your experience with the rest of us, at least a voice of warning has gone out to people. If nothing else at this point, that has been accomplished. Good behaviour on the part of Mr. Neasham at this time does not erase the past. It just reinforces the pattern that he himself has put into place by his own actions.
Don't get lost in all this, life goes on. It is changed a bit because of what you go through, but at least your conscience will be clear. When you've done all you can do to right a wrong, put it in the Lord's hands, even if the people of this Earth don't get it, rest assured that the Good Lord does.
Avenger
#9 UPDATE EX-employee responds
Glenn Neasham.........many many mistakes, loan fraud
AUTHOR: Goodguy - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, August 12, 2008
You made a big mistake when tried to bully me into compensating you for your abrupt (and welcome) departure from Granite Bay........and you crossed many boundaries with you numerous threatening, insane phone calls. But you really snapped me in line with your sermons and cry's for repentance............my tears runneth over.
Glenn....your reckless trail of destruction is a long one........the fact that some insurance companies have revoked your appointments speaks volumes. Now that you have rekindled the passion of your dear friends in Lower Lake............you must be in heaven!
Is it true........neasham, did the bank foreclose on your property? Dang........those damn brokers.............greedy banks........they will ruin this country! What do your clients think of you now? tch-tch.
Fraud.........that's right..........loan fraud. Care to prove me wrong mr. financial counsler? Pony up your tax returns for 2005...........surely a good mormon like yourself would not have lied on their loan application?
#10 REBUTTAL Individual responds
"Goodguy" Gregg Franks is NOT a previous employee.
AUTHOR: Glenn - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, August 03, 2008
#11 Consumer Comment
Where is Glenn Neasham These Days?
AUTHOR: Advocate For Justice - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, July 31, 2008
#12 Consumer Comment
Where is Glenn Neasham These Days?
AUTHOR: Advocate For Justice - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, July 31, 2008
#13 Consumer Comment
Where is Glenn Neasham These Days?
AUTHOR: Advocate For Justice - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, July 31, 2008
#14 Consumer Comment
Where is Glenn Neasham These Days?
AUTHOR: Advocate For Justice - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, July 31, 2008
#15 UPDATE EX-employee responds
Please let me know when and where the TRIAL is to take place
AUTHOR: Goodguy - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Monday, July 28, 2008
Thank-You in advance.
#16 Consumer Comment
Some More "Dribble" for Glenn
AUTHOR: Anonymous - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Monday, July 28, 2008
If I was afraid of Glenn, I might back down and not assist the DOI in their investigation. In fact, he must be very surprised that all of us "losers" haven't backed down already.
I know that the Plaintiffs are looking forward to many more "special interrogatories," since they aren't lying about anything and because they don't have to pay one dime in attorney's fees to represent themselves.
The case management conference for the claim of wrongful termination/sexual harassment/assault, etc., is calendared for August 4, 2008 at 1:30 pm at Lake County Superior Court. If Glenn chooses not to settle this matter with Plaintiffs, they will be setting a date for the trial.
#17 REBUTTAL Individual responds
"Advocate for Justice"
AUTHOR: Glenn - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, July 27, 2008
#18 REBUTTAL Individual responds
Please come on out. Its going to be a slam dunk!The evidence against them is OVERWHELMING.
AUTHOR: Glenn - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, July 26, 2008
#19 Consumer Comment
GLENN NEASHAM PLANS TO "LOAN" OUT CONFIDENTIAL DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPTS?
AUTHOR: Advocate For Justice - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, July 26, 2008
Glenn, you have already admitted to enough crimes on this website. You must have a strong urge to self-destruct.
Better to wait until your precious depositions are entered into evidence at trial rather than risk further action against you.
When is that trial, by the way? I need some advance notice to request time off, this is one I don't want to miss.
#20 UPDATE EX-employee responds
Please send me copies of the depositions........
AUTHOR: Goodguy - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, July 22, 2008
Cheers!
#21 REBUTTAL Individual responds
TRUTH WILL SET ME FREE......
AUTHOR: Glenn - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, July 12, 2008
#22 REBUTTAL Individual responds
TRUTH WILL SET ME FREE......
AUTHOR: Glenn - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, July 12, 2008
#23 REBUTTAL Individual responds
TRUTH WILL SET ME FREE......
AUTHOR: Glenn - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, July 12, 2008
#24 REBUTTAL Individual responds
TRUTH WILL SET ME FREE......
AUTHOR: Glenn - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, July 12, 2008
#25 Author of original report
21 years of serving THIS community?
AUTHOR: Another Victim - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, April 19, 2008
#27 REBUTTAL Owner of company
Read verified cross complaint it will open your eyes.
AUTHOR: Glenn - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Friday, April 04, 2008
#29 Consumer Comment
Help is Available
AUTHOR: Anonymous - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Friday, April 04, 2008
Good luck to everyone, including Glenn Neasham. May he just stop pretending that everyone else is lying and only he is telling the truth. It's just so ridiculous.
#30 REBUTTAL Owner of company
Im sorry....
AUTHOR: Glenn - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, March 30, 2008
I, Glenn Neasham, wanted to take this opportunity to respond to reports that have been posted on www.ripoffreport.com. It is my opinion these false reports are being made by former working members of an LLC where I am also a working member. I believe they are being made maliciously with the intent to cause me harm. These reports are completely false and seek to damage my reputation in the community. I have been operating a business for twenty-one (21) years and have many satisfied clients. I will vigorously defend my reputation against these false, defamatory claims. I want to thank all of my clients for their continued support of me and Neasham Financial.
#31 REBUTTAL Owner of company
False claims.Vindictive X Employee???
AUTHOR: Glenn - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, March 30, 2008
#32 REBUTTAL Owner of company
False claims.Vindictive X Employee???
AUTHOR: Glenn - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, March 30, 2008
#33 REBUTTAL Owner of company
False claims.Vindictive X Employee???
AUTHOR: Glenn - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, March 30, 2008
#34 REBUTTAL Owner of company
False claims.Vindictive X Employee???
AUTHOR: Glenn - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, March 30, 2008

