- Report: #807592
Report - Rebuttal - Arbitrate
Complaint Review: Good Dog Rescue
Good Dog RescueInternet United States of America
Good Dog Rescue Mike McHann Questionable Adoption Practices Internet
*General Comment: Thanks, Dawg Mom
*Consumer Comment: Lucky you did not BUY from them
*General Comment: JZ, hope you and yours are safe
*Consumer Comment: Response to JZ: I get it!
*General Comment: Too many puppies...
*General Comment: Too Many Purebreds Being Offered
*General Comment: Puppy Mill Concerns
*General Comment: judy from long Island
*Consumer Comment: DEBBIE MITTLEMAN HAS TOO MUCH TIME ON HER HANDS
*Consumer Comment: "NOT LIKES" ALL POSTED BY DEBBIE
*Consumer Comment: Happy to be associated with Good Dog Rescue
*Consumer Comment: HAPPY ADOPTER
*Consumer Comment: Another Happy GDR Foster Family
*Consumer Comment: I'm a happy GDR foster mom
*Consumer Comment: SO WHAT?
*Consumer Comment: SOUR GRAPES
*Consumer Comment: FROM A GDR SUPPORTER
*Consumer Comment: DISGRUNTLED FORMER FOSTER MOM
*General Comment: Deb Mittleman says: check facts please :)
*General Comment: We are not in 8th grade anymore
*UPDATE Employee: DEBORAH MITTLEMAN WAS A BAD FOSTER MOM
*UPDATE Employee: DEBBIE MITTERAND WAS A BAD FOSTER MOM
*General Comment: From a Former Foster: RIght To Be Concerned
*Consumer Comment: Don't Fear Good Dog Rescue!!!!
*Consumer Comment: Mike McHann - Kudos for caring about dogs
*Consumer Comment: Good Dog Rescue is really GOOD!
*Consumer Comment: Don't understand rebuttal
*Consumer Comment: Get over it
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
Click here now..
One of the questions on the app was would I be enrolling my dog in obedience training, to which I answered 'no'. I've had two Goldens, I've never had any behavior problems. I would not expect them this time either.
To my amazement, Mike McHann called me later that day. He said he review my application, told me a little about the process. Told me I was to call the 'foster mom' keeping 'Mandy'. He gave me the name Margo Syndor and number 901 413-3896. So I called her, we had a lovely conversation. After the fact, I found out Margo Syndor is actually Margo McHann, Mike's wife, and employee of Peterson Transport Company.
Later, Mike called me to verify I wanted to adopt 'Mandy', that he had to submit my app to 'the board'. He DID call my references. Of COURSE I wanted the dog. I DID try to find info on them, feverishly googling different combinations of words. But seemed pretty up and up to me. So Mike sent me a contract to sign. Thing is, on the contract #12 states 'Adopter agrees that puppies younger that 1 year will be enrolled in Obedience Training within 30 days of adoption'. Since I had already said on the app, I would not be doing this, I sent Mike an email, asking where do we go from here? Of course I want 'Mandy', but I can't sign this contract because I would be lying. And #13 goes on to say how if I breached the contract, my dog could be taken away, I could be sued, I would be agreeing to pay Good Dog's legal and court fees, etc, in very legally formal language.
I am a smart girl and it makes me uncomfortable to deliberately breach a contract. I asked if he could send me another contract without #12, or if he could write and sign something acknowedging the situation that I would sign too. Mike got very irrate, said I was being 'nit picky', all his OTHER adoptees signed it even though they had no attention of enrolling in Obedience Training. I asked why I would even be called, investigated, and APPROVED BY 'THE BOARD' if on the original application I should've been disqualified by my answer to that one question.
By this time he was yelling at me, DO YOU WANT THIS DOG OR NOT?!! I said again, yes I want the dog, and he yelled THEN YOU NEED TO SIGN THE CONTRACT AS IT IS. I said, wow, I'm very sorry, I cannot deliberately lie in a contract.
This was yesterday. I have been looking and looking for anything at all on them. I feel a legit organization would not request it's approved adopters to do this. I have found a few interesting things, but am unable to piece it all together.
I believe they DO actually successfully match rescues with owners to a large degree. But they have some extremely unethical practices.
I plan to put a call in this week to someone I know who is an investigative reporter for our local news channel. I am hoping she will be able to dig a little further then I have.
If I HAD signed the contract, and PayPalled my $1150, I THINK I would have been given a Golden Retriever puppy. It's unlikely it would've been the puppy whose picture and video and 'story' were under the title Mandy.
I have tried to call both Mike and Margo, they have not answered or returned my messages. I'm just at a complete loss at what to do next.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 12/10/2011 10:39 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Good-Dog-Rescue/internet/Good-Dog-Rescue-Mike-McHann-Questionable-Adoption-Practices-Internet-807592. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:Search Tips
In order to assure the best results in your search:
- Keep the name short & simple, and try different variations of the name.
- Do not include ".com", "S", "Inc.", "Corp", or "LLC" at the end of the Company name.
- Use only the first/main part of a name to get best results.
- Only search one name at a time if Company has many AKA's.