- Report: #1016922
Complaint Review: High Tech Automotive
| High Tech Automotive 117 W Main St Norton, MA 02766
Norton, Massachusetts United States of America |
|
High Tech Automotive formerly Kenwood Automotive & Tire failure to inform about charges Norton, Massachusetts
*Consumer Comment: Missing the customers point, completely!
*Consumer Comment: inappropriate customer
*REBUTTAL Owner of company: MANGER
*UPDATE Employee: About charges when you come in
Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
I told them I was about 99% sure I had a small exhaust leak and questioned if it could have been near the O2 sensor since my MPG had abruptly gone down and asked if they could check it out.
They asked for my keys which I gave them.
They pulled my car into one of the bay doors and opened the hood (I watched through the window).
He then put it up on the lift and in less than 5 minutes they came in and said it was the flex pipe.
I asked what he would charge to replace it.
He replied "$70 for the part and 1 1/2 hrs labor, $230 plus a $25 diagnosis fee"
I said what do you mean a diagnosis fee...you didn't tell me there would be a diagnosis fee.
I told you I was 99% sure there was a leak or I wouldn't have come in here.
I asked if he thought it would be appropriate to have informed me before looking at my car that there would be a $25 diagnosis fee at which time I could have made the decision to have them proceed.
He replied "No".
Moral of the story, if a business person doesn't think it is appropriate to inform a consumer of charges prior to doing work then I don't think it's appropriate to do business with that company.
Make your own choice personally I will never go back and will certainly not recommend this busuness to anyone.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 02/19/2013 03:38 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/High-Tech-Automotive/Norton-Massachusetts-02766/High-Tech-Automotive-formerly-Kenwood-Automotive-Tire-failure-to-inform-about-charges-No-1016922. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on High Tech Automotive
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
Search Tips#1 Consumer Comment
Missing the customers point, completely!
AUTHOR: ByronMarx1972 - ()
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, April 03, 2013
In fact regarding the diagnosis fee one of the employees acknowledges that they never even mentioned the fee until after the car was looked at. There is a law in Massachusetts that clearly states that prior to touching a customers car you must have written authorization and disclose any fees or charges "prior" to any work or diagnostics. The employee states in reference to the diagnostics "I would expect it anywhere I went". That's not how the law works. The law is there to protect the consumer from unscrupulous businesses. There is no accommodation for assuming that the customer should "expect it anywhere they went. That's why the law requires the business to get written consent and disclose all fees prior to doing "anything".
Also if you read the first employees comment he states that the customer came in "making a stink" and would only provide his name. Does that really make sense. Why would you walk in to a business and start giving them a hard time before anything had even happened, then give your name, then let someone work on your car after you pissed them off.
The owner tells a different story, he says the customer came in saying he was a long time customer and wanted the business to take a look at his car. Why would a longtime customer have to walk in and announce that he was a longtime customer, wouldn't the business manager already know if he was indeed a longtime customer. It sounds like the manager is embellishing his story to try and gain sympathy for himself and damage the credibility of the customer. He even goes so far as to evoke the name of God, that's a dead give away for someone not telling the truth. Hiding their sins behind God.
It seems to me that the employee and manager are trying to put together a believable story the only problem is that they are contradicting each other. The truth doesn't contradict itself.
Nice try, but I wouldn't go to that business either.
#2 Consumer Comment
inappropriate customer
AUTHOR: boostedzx2 - ()
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, April 03, 2013
Estimate was roughly an hour and a half, which is reasonable on a very rusted exhaust and removal of a front pipe to weld in a new flex pipe and install new gaskets. $70 for parts (which sounds about right, is the going rate,) and an hour and a half's labor was a low price for the job quoted. Than he asked us what we though the engine light would have been caused by. We told him that we would have to diagnose that and it would be probably around an hour for a good answer, and we didn't have the time that night. He asked if we charged for the service and we told him yes we do. I asked him if he would like to book an appointment to have the exhaust work completed, and he said: "No, I'm going to go somewhere else to have that done." When he was told he was going to be charged $25 for a lift charge for both technicians to inspect the vehicle, (which it takes about 10 mins. to properly set up a vehicle on the lift safely.) he was extremely rude about the entire visit and claimed he would never come back as a customer. He would not even give us his information at the time he came in.
That's the Gods honest truth and I have three technicians that witnessed this. I would like to know what Mr. Hadden does for work, so I could ask for all free services and see if I get the same answer. He had no intention on doing any work in our facility, and made that very clear. He wanted someone to look at his car for free so he could go elsewhere for someone else to do the work.
#4 UPDATE Employee
About charges when you come in
AUTHOR: Anonymous - ()
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, March 27, 2013

