Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #682278

Complaint Review: Home Credit Law Center - Santa Monica California

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: llrchica — San Jose California United States of America
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Home Credit Law Center 806 Idaho Avenue Santa Monica, California United States of America

Home Credit Law Center Brian R. Linnekins, Linnekins Law This Company Does Nothing But Take Your Money Santa Monica, California

*REBUTTAL Owner of company: We understand the frustration of these clients given the challenges encountered in their case.

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..
We initially called the NationalMortgageHelpCenter, spoke with them at length, and were referred to HomeCreditLawCenter as the ideal firm to help us with our loan modification. Initially, we dealt with Ryan Caton of Home Credit Law Center, then Pam Daniels of AFCAPS, and Brian Linnekens of Linnekens Law (aka Home Credit Law Center), and finally the head of his elite internal team, Frank Waters who apparently used to work for Linnekens Law but now works for some company called Rhombus Tech.

Communication was spotty at best unless we hounded them with emails and phone calls. It was hard to get a hold of any of them, and they kept changing company names and personnel on us. Even though the phone numbers remained the same, they were not answered when you called instead you were promised a call back within a certain time frame (which rarely happened).

We gave them $2900 on March 4, 2010 and they promised that they would work with us quickly to modify our home loan. They told us that we needed to send inmortgage papers with signatures, copies of our pay stubs, SSN, loan papers, financial statements, income tax recordsand just about anything it takes to steal an identity.We kept on calling, emailing and got the runaround all the time. They shifted us from one person to another and one company to another.

At one point we were so disgusted with their non-communication and stalling tactics that we complained directly to Brian Linnekens and he emailed us:

I have just had a staff meeting in which we discussed your file. Given the continuing difficulties that you have had with Pam, I have decided to pull your file from her and handle it with my own elite in-house division.You will be getting a call from my Director of Underwriting, Sergio, this afternoon to discuss your file. I know that you will find the experience very different.

With Your Success in Mind,

Who the heck is Sergio? Another new name and yet more requests to have the exact same paperwork filled out because:

I am very sorry that you are so upset. You have expressed your concerns with the past service, which is why I have escalated your file to our in-house team. But I am asking you to please understand that this step requires us to re-assemble your file and perform an (sic) new underwriting of your case. This is the reason that we have asked you for additional documents. I know this step may seem redundant, but it is this process by which we can make absolutely sure that no mistakes were made by the prior underwriters, and it is absolutely essential to achieve a successful outcome.

We have come this far together, and I ask you to please allow us to continue our work so we can demonstrate the effectiveness of our service and earn back your trust. Please send us the documents and information that we have requested so we can continue to work for you.

With Your Success in Mind,

When we demanded our money back and told them we would contact the State's Attorney's office and the Attorney General's office and the BBB, Brian told us they had done nothing wrong and were diligently working on our case. In fact, Brian told us that:

My staff and I have continued to make every effort to satisfy your rather demanding needs, and yet you continue to insult and attack us.

If wanting to avoid foreclosure and wanting action from a group you have paid andwho says they are dedicated to resolving your loan modification is demanding, hes entirely right. I guess we are demanding.

Again and again they made us fill out the same paperwork with the same information. Finally, Brian and his team told us not to fill in any of the forms sent to us by our lender saying that they would take care of it; that they knew best how they should be filled out. In fact, they wanted us to send them the blank forms from the lender with our signatures on them we sent the blank forms but, of course, refused to sign them without seeing them filled out first. Never happened. How can a lawyer, in good conscience, ask a client to sign something they havent seen or read? According to the loan company, nothing has been sent to them. I found this out when I finally phoned the loan company and was told no one contacted them nor did any correspondence come into their office regarding our case.The only thing they show in our file is that HCLC can request information on our behalf nothing more. We are now in foreclosure because of their non-action. (Update: They finally sent some paperwork in when we demanded the name of the person they spoke with so we could check up on them.)

We have emailed and called over and over and over. When Brian communicates with us he states, like a broken record, "we will continue to work diligently for you"and signs all his emails With your success in mind which is exactly where it ends. In his mind. The only successful entity in this is HCLC its owners, certainly not the poor homeowner who is losing their home and their fee. No money back because he is still working for us. It looks like not only will we lose our home, but the money already paid to these scam artists. These people should be made to pay for what they have done to the hundreds of other unsuspecting people wanting a little help in this time of financial crisis.

Update:

We just got a phone call after months of silence from one of his underlings (United Processing Center) telling us they were still working on our case and would get back to us in a couple of days. Funny, a month ago we received two notices from the lender telling us we had been denied again. No communication from Linnekins or his minions on the subject. They probably still dont know. The only thing that saved us from a Christmas foreclosure sale was a local lawyer here in San Jose certainly not Linnekins.

Dont fall for his help. There is none in this quarter but Im sure hell respond that he did everything he could for us as hes responded to others with the same complaint. Dont believe it. Hes done nothing and continues on his merry way doing nothing!

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 01/13/2011 02:52 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/home-credit-law-center/santa-monica-california-90403/home-credit-law-center-brian-r-linnekins-linnekins-law-this-company-does-nothing-but-tak-682278. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
0Consumer
1Employee/Owner

#1 REBUTTAL Owner of company

We understand the frustration of these clients given the challenges encountered in their case.

AUTHOR: Brian - (United States of America)

POSTED: Wednesday, February 02, 2011

These clients initially hired our firm to perform a financial evaluation and legal analysis of their file only. They hired a separate company named MMS to perform their loan modification services. When the clients had difficulty with this company we agreed to step in, even taking over their file completely when that company went out of business and abandoned their file in mid-July, 2010. We undertook the burden of this additional work without any additional compensation from the clients because we wanted to help them stay in their home.

Over the course of the next five months we worked constantly on their file, calling to follow-up and negotiate with their lender, Provident Funding, over 25 times (on average, more that once per week) see specific dates below. We also placed over a dozen update calls to the clients (dates below), and I personally sent over 30 e-mails to the clients during this same time frame.

Despite our efforts, the clients grew increasingly frustrated that their lender was taking so long to make a decision and they consistently blamed us for the delay. We encountered repeated difficulty getting the clients to submit the documentation that Provident was requiring, culminating in a denial of their file on December 20. Provident informed us that we had the option of re-submitting their application to postpone the sale date and we relayed this information to the clients. But instead of allowing us to re-submit their package they chose to file a bankruptcy. Although we believe that this was the wrong choice, we respect the clients decision.

To those reading this posting, please understand that your bank negotiation company will request many, many, many updated documents from you throughout this process. It may often seem redundant and tedious, but it is absolutely necessary to prevent your lender from finding an excuse to deny your application. If you understand this fact, then you will be prepared to withstand your lenders tactics, but if not, then your bank negotiation company will not be able to help you.

Dates of Bank Calls

January 11, 2011 8:50:02 AM, January 10, 2011 9:00:49 AM, December 30, 2010 9:34:28 AM, December 21, 2010 1:57:45 PM, December 20, 2010 3:33:10 PM, December 17, 2010 2:53:06 PM, December 15, 2010 2:48:20 PM, December 13, 2010 9:51:48 AM, December 10, 2010 9:31:07 AM, December 09, 2010 1:54:56 PM, December 08, 2010 3:37:40 PM, December 07, 2010 9:35:33 AM, December 01, 2010 11:11:14 AM, November 23, 2010 2:37:36 PM, November 16, 2010 11:31:48 AM, November 09, 2010 12:05:38 PM, November 03, 2010 12:25:48 PM, October 15, 2010 1:00:27 PM, September 29, 2010 9:16:56 AM, September 22, 2010 2:14:50 PM, September 10, 2010 10:55:57 AM, September 02, 2010 10:22:21 AM, August 20, 2010 10:12:04 PM, August 19, 2010 5:58:06 PM, August 11, 2010 4:27:08 PM, July 29, 2010 1:35:48 PM.

Dates of Client Update Calls

December 20, 2010 4:34:43 PM, December 13, 2010 4:11:44 PM, December 08, 2010 4:21:12 PM, December 02, 2010 10:07:13 AM, November 23, 2010 3:48:05 PM, November 15, 2010 2:09:12 PM, November 04, 2010 08:46:15 AM, October 06, 2010 10:37:38 AM, September 24, 2010 12:08:40 PM, September 07, 2010 4:37:26 PM, August 20 2010 04:29:06 PM, August 10, 2010 5:27:41 PM, August 05, 2010 6:01:56 PM

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now