- Report: #322765
Report - Rebuttal - Arbitrate
Complaint Review: Hotels.com
Hotels.comhttp://www.hotels.com Internet U.S.A.
Hotels.com New York Palace Hotel, WAMU, Providian, VISA and consumer blamed for fraudulent booking by IACs Expedia-owned hotels.com, travelnow.com Dallas, Texas Internet
*Author of original report: Quotation marks...
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
Click here now..
The New York Palace Hotel referred me to hotel.coms Matt M., whose last name, extension and very email address are fiercely guarded by John at 417-864-3600, deep within what must be a secure, undisclosed location. Told that Matts voicemail is also inviolate, I left a message with John for Matt M. about the situation, carefully choosing words like the potential fraud he was discussing with the New York Palace Hotel just yesterday, my name and phone number.
As the business days flew by, and without hearing anything. I called again and left a recorded message at Johns number which was promptly returned by a Laraine Mobley, email@example.com 417-864-3600x8807, fax 800-864-8811. She was very pleasant and helpful, despite emphasizing her impending departure at one oclock that day for some reason.
The very next morning, I sent her the relevant information. A few hours later, I received one of the most disingenuous responses I could have ever imagined, effectively blaming every other party involved, and in fact damaged, by a fraudulent transaction that indisputably originated from the Expedia/hotels.com/travelnow.com organization alone:
You were billed by the hotel, as we are only the booking agent and do not charge the client.
What part of: The only reason I was billed by the hotel was because of your companys error, did they not comprehend? They have not even bothered to deny it, using language like: Again, I do apologize that are unable to do anything for you. Thats verbatim.
You tell me if that is a purposefully nonsensical sentence or not. It looks to me like a pile of something no one wants to step in. You are able to give me my money back now, so do it. You deal with the hotel. Youre hotels.com, arent you? You caused this whole matter, right? Own it.
This is a clear attempt at a brush-off. The New York Palace Hotel billed me for a fraudulent reservation made through hotels.com, thats the bottom line. The fault does not lie with me, the hotel, the credit card company or the issuing bank, period. The responsible entity needs to undo its error immediately and without further obstructing the process. Suck up the loss or make an insurance claim. Stop wasting everyone elses time and effort. E-commerce is based on reliability and trust, show some.
With all the concern about internet fraud and identity-theft, youd think they would take these matters seriously. I guess matters of trust and repute arent worth a lousy 600 bucks to them. I am glad I found this website. Ill be linking this post up to all of the other relevant parties to this if I dont get a full refund post-haste. Maybe someone with settlement authority and business sense will chime-in, pay up and get rid of this right now. In the alternative, they can provide me the contact information for the general counsel at IAC.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 04/01/2008 06:46 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Hotelscom/internet/Hotelscom-New-York-Palace-Hotel-WAMU-Providian-VISA-and-consumer-blamed-for-fraudulent-322765. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:Search Tips
In order to assure the best results in your search:
- Keep the name short & simple, and try different variations of the name.
- Do not include ".com", "S", "Inc.", "Corp", or "LLC" at the end of the Company name.
- Use only the first/main part of a name to get best results.
- Only search one name at a time if Company has many AKA's.