- Report: #994156
Report - Rebuttal - Arbitrate
Complaint Review: JAMIE PICON
JAMIE PICON123 MAIN STREET, METHEUN, MA METHUEN, Massachusetts United States of America
Complaint Review: JAMIE PICON | Notice: Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration Decision: A neutral and independent Arbitrator has determined that the following Report contained one or more false statements of facts. The false statements have been redacted as ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)) | JAMIE PICON LIAR, SEXUAL HARASSMENT, UNPROFESSIONAL, CON- ARTIST, INAPPROPRIATE, THIEF AND SHOULD NOT BE TRUSTED METHUEN , Massachusetts
*REBUTTAL Individual responds: David Antoni Bussiere of Loudbus
*REBUTTAL Individual responds: False Accusations
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
Click here now..
SUMMARY OF ARBITRATOR’S DECISION
Jamie Picon, Complainant
Author of Ripoff Report #994156
Complainant Jamie Picon (the “Complainant”) has challenged the truthfulness of 6 specific statements (each, a “Statement”) posted by the Author “MOZI” (the “Author”) on the Ripoff Report website at www.ripoffreport.com, identified as Ripoff Report No. 994156 (the “Report”). The Author failed to and did not submit a response to the Complainant or any contact information. Therefore, in accordance with the Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration Rules (the “Rules), the Author waived their right to participate in this Arbitration. In accordance with the Rules, the Arbitrator was asked to decide whether the challenged Statements were an opinion or a fact. If, and only if, the Statement was determined to be a statement of fact, the Arbitrator was asked to further decided if, by a preponderance of the evidence, to determine if the Statement was true or false. If the statement identified by the Complainant is determined to be an opinion, no determination will be made as to that particular Statement because an opinion cannot be determined to be true nor false. In this case, the Arbitrator had only the evidence submitted by the Complainant to consider. The evidence submitted included Ripoff Report #994156, the Complainant’s sworn Arbitration Statement and a series of emails between Complaint and the Author. Each Statement challenged by the Complainant has been considered, together with any Witness Statements and Documents provided by the Complainant for determination of the truth or falsity of the Statement. The Author did not provide a response to the Complaint. The Arbitrator determined that the statements challenged in the Report were false. Therefore, according to the VIP Arbitration Rules, those statements have been redacted.
Decided July 31, 2013 Sandra J. Franklin, Arbitrator
*A copy of the full Arbitrator’s Decision is available upon request. Please e-mail email@example.com with the name of the Complainant and Report number.
JAMIE IS A HOPELESS WANT TO BE RESTURAUNT OWNER, HE HAS THIS BIG IDEA FOR A BBQ RESTURAUNT BUT WAS SELF ADMITED HORRIBLE AT BUSINESS AND WAS PLANNING ON “USING” HIS PARENTS FOR MONEY. ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)), He was unrelenting about his advanced. David disclosed his business experience. Jamie was not going to let us. He asked David to be a business partner, david said no but said he would be willing to help with Marketing. Jamie claimed he did not need help. David then asked what he could do, Jamie said he needed someone to write for him, and manage the business. David said no problem, David at this same time was going through a rebranding of his business. (Due to a public relations nightmare) and could not supply all of the initial documents. So he asked to just sit down with Jamie. Jamie refused and started yelled about scams, when David had never disclosed any intention of money, or contracts. he just wanted to help. so he went out of his way to help and after a personal sexual rejection, and confusion about business, he became irate and went after David.
David welcome anyone whom wished to hear about this story, ask him anything. There is no secrets, no scams, no closed doors.
mind you, david and Jamie never met in person. They have never seen each other. AFter Jamie’s sexual advances were rejected and he could not manipulate David, he used business.
THERE IS NO SIGNAL EVIDENCE THAT DAVID DID ANYTHING TO DAVID. JAMIE USED WEB MARKETING TO SMEAR HIS NAME.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 01/09/2013 03:17 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/JAMIE-PICON/METHUEN-Massachusetts-/Complaint-Review-JAMIE-PICON-Notice-Ripoff-Report-VIP-Arbitration-Decision-A-neutral-994156. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:Search Tips
In order to assure the best results in your search:
- Keep the name short & simple, and try different variations of the name.
- Do not include ".com", "S", "Inc.", "Corp", or "LLC" at the end of the Company name.
- Use only the first/main part of a name to get best results.
- Only search one name at a time if Company has many AKA's.