John B Webster - National Prison And Sentencing Consultants Rip Off Artist East Providence Rhode Island

 John Webster promises a lot of great services and delivers NONE! He did absolutely notthing for our family. He never provided documents or proof of services. As soon as he received $1500 he left us without any information.

John, Did she get in her contract what you were suppose to do. I didn't. Why now are you explaining what you was of was not not done. Her word is better than yours . Because it is her money not yours that was spent.

I learned that you will lead a person to believe that you can walk on water , Until you get their money.

Refunding on half of a person's money is scamming. You should prove to that person what the money is for in a contract. I learned the hard way. So has this lady.

Reason they will take half , half is better than none. I got none and $7500 is a lot of money . $12500 is a lot of money . What did you do take a private jet? You are doing a job for this lady.

If you did not explain to her , how was she to know what you were doing. Give her back her money or prove to her what you did

Ms. Kendall is correct in at least one respect. She did in fact retain our firm . She does fail to mention a great number of facts, however. She does fail to mention that our involvement required me taking a three day trip to the DC area to meet with counsel, friends, family and background witnesses. The memo written for counsel was 48 pages and including sections on Statutory and Regulatory Scheme, Background in the Defendant, Penological Considerations, Rehabilitation Potential, Specific and General Deterrence, Specific Mitigating Factors, and a Sentencing Disparity Analysis. Ms. Kendall's suggests that the disparity analysis came from newspapers is just plain wrong. Rather, they all came from a painstaking and detailed analysis of comparable cases throughout the country.

Our engagement, as she correctly noted, was to prepare the research for counsel of record, not for submittal to a court, and the memorandum was submitted to counsel three days before it was needed. This was plenty of time. As well counsel of record made it clear that due to several unrelated factors, the court had made up its mind well before the hearing and that since the crime involved the death of a relatively young man, little more could be done.

We did try to reach an accommodation with Ms. Kendall and she did threaten to file all these complaints unless we refunded all or most of her money. We considered filing an extortion complaint against her but decided that our goal is to keep people out of prison rahter than help them go tot prison. We refused to pay her demands as we stand by our work and did perform the work as contracted. We view this complaint as another attempt to force us to give her a refund for work completed. I suggest that she is still rather upset about the length of the sentence involved and is taking it out on us. We find no validity to her accusations.