- Report: #329898
Complaint Review: John J. Pugh Attorney, National Credit Acceptance
| John J. Pugh Attorney, National Credit Acceptance 9738 Lincoln Village Dr
Sacremento, California U.S.A. |
|
John J. Pugh Attorney, National Credyt CorpJohn J. Pugh Attorney, National Credit Acceptance Unethical practices on unexpecting citizens Sacremento California
*Consumer Suggestion: You may have a case
*Consumer Comment: File A Complaint w/ The State Bar & Sacramento County District Attorney
Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
This is not an isolated incident. I tried to talk to him and find out what it was all about but I was given the Credit compaies number and that is how I found out about the court hearing that took place 3 years ago.
Mindi
Tempe, Arizona
U.S.A.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 05/01/2008 12:10 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/John-J-Pugh-Attorney-National-Credit-Acceptance/Sacremento-California-95827/John-J-Pugh-Attorney-National-Credyt-CorpJohn-J-Pugh-Attorney-National-Credit-Acceptan-329898. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on John J. Pugh Attorney, National Credit Acceptance
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
Search Tips#1 Consumer Suggestion
You may have a case
AUTHOR: Larry - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, May 06, 2008
A court has no jurisdiction over a defendant until he has been served with a summons. The plaintiff has the burden of proving that the defendant was properly served. The plaintiff also has the burden of locating the defendant.
Normally, serving someone who resides with you would be legal but the plaintiff would still have the burden of proving that you do actually reside there.
In this case it sounds like Mr. Pugh failed to locate you and served someone you do not reside with. Mr. Pugh obtained a judgment by fraudulently representing to the court that you had been properly served with process.
Since the judgment was the result of fraud perpetrated by the plaintiff upon the court, there was never a lawful judgment.
You also have a claim that the court had no jurisdiction due to insufficient process. In Arizona, the issue of jurisdiction may be raised at any time.
#2 Consumer Comment
File A Complaint w/ The State Bar & Sacramento County District Attorney
AUTHOR: Mike - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, May 06, 2008
This is horrible and Mr. Pugh is long overdue for an inverstigation by the State Bar and the Sacramento County District Attorneys Office.
You should promtply file a written complaint today and attached supporting documents showing that you have not lived at the supposed address service was performed:
Office of the Chief Trial Counsel/Intake
The State Bar of California
1149 South Hill Street
Los Angeles, California 90015-2299
I have also filed complaints for the same exact thing. Using an old address to service and waiting for the 2 year statue to burn off and then starting aggressive collection efforts.
Don't allow this dirtbag to get away with it and file your complaint today. The more complaints the better the chance the Mr. Pugh will be held accountable.

