- Report: #1115981
Report - Rebuttal - Arbitrate
Complaint Review: Judge Don Pierson
Judge Don Pierson100 West Weatherford Street Fort Worth, Texas USA
Judge Don Pierson Republican of Tarrant County Court at Law #1 Threatened Pro Se litigant before court, showed clear bias for Landlord's Attorney, Refused Jury Trial Illegally, Smirked at Pro Se Litigant as if to say "What do you have to say now?". No Justice for Pro Se. Very Hostile Court. Fort Worth Texas
*General Comment: Ken You Are Wrong. Just because one is poor doesn't mean they should not engage the courts to protect their rights.
*Consumer Comment: First of all, "a defendant representing himself has a fool for a client"...
*Consumer Comment: AXTD,
*Consumer Comment: "JUDGE POEM"...
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
Click here now..
I had the weirdest experience of my life representing myself as a pro se litigant in an appeal against my Landlord in front of Judge Don Pierson. These Fort Worth courts are absolutely terrible. They show clear biases for landowners and landlords and the wealthy and privileged. They are outright hostile to racial minorities and the poor. You can buy justice in many parts of Texas, especially in Fort Worth. Recently a case involving a young, wealthy white teenager named Ethan Couch made
Headline news all over this country and actually all over the world too because he was able to walk away from court after killing four people and critically injuring others because he was "rich". He suffered from "affluenza". This shocked people but I want to say these types of rulings are made in court rooms across Texas and across Fort Worth every single day. [continued below]....
Now Back to Judge Don Pierson. I have never seen a judge behave as he behaved. First off, he acted like he had a familliarity with the Attorney who was representing the Landlord. That is not surprising as others around the court knew the attorney personally as it is a very small court. But the judge should have at least tried to remain impartial. I had been approved for a Jury Trial which the attorney argued against and which the Judge immediately agreed with the attorney. Even
before the judge had ruled on the Jury Trial, while the Court reporter was out the room and before trial he quizzed the attorney and I about our case. I was not allowed to really speak and it seemed he already had his mind made up. How is that fair? When I had to remind the judge about the jury he immediately denied the request even though I had paid the jury fee and been approved and been given the jury names and information. All because the attorney asked him not to approve it. I heard the attorney ask him to waive it while the attorney was at his desk.
Then as I mentioned before the court reporter was called into the court room the judge had already essentially ruled on both the validity of the notice and refused to hear my concerns about other issues I had with the landlord that were crucial to my case in disputing the validity of the notice. The judge looked at me several times "before" the court reporter was called in and "before" the trial was in session and said "well, yeah, I agree with the attorney". On every single issue the judge would ask me very pointed questions and say the answer is "yes or no" yet the other sides's attorney was allowed to expound on his issues. Again, how is "that" fair?
Both sides should have been given "Equal Consideration" and that did not happen. This is the SECOND time this has occured out here in Fort Worth. In the Justice of the Peace court who preceded the trial court because I was not represented I was not afforded the opportunity to speak. The judge asked three questions of everyone and refused to get into the legalities of the notice. Judges have to address arguments and afford the respondents a "fair hearing" and a "right to be HEARD". For some reason if you are poor and black in Fort Worth and especially if you are unrepresented the judges do not do this.
I understand that in a court proceeding there will be a winner and a loser. That is understandale and that is how our court systems work. However, what I can not understand is a judge clearly being so partisan and so partial. I can not understand how a judge can do the job of a defense attorney or a plaintiff attorney FOR THEM. That is SHAMEFUL. That is not justice.
It hasn't only been my experience with the courts out here in Fort Worth but I've spoken to several other poor minorities who have stated they had the same exact experience. With judges violating their due process rights and working outside of established court procedure. One woman I spoke to stated she had a jury trial scheduled in court against a police officer on a traffic violation and the judge circumvented court room procedure and PICKED HER JURORS!!! and he picked ALL POLICE OFFICERS!! Of course she lost the case as anyone would guess because she was up against another police officer.
Not only that, the judge at one point during the trial referred all of his questions and answers to the attorney and let the attorney basically have the floor for the majority of the trial and I had to remind the judge that I was sitting there.
Right before the trial the other sides attorney called me into the Exhibit room to discuss the exhibits and he quizzed me on what I was going to say. It was my first time in a court setting and I answered his questions and he immediately walked out and called his client and together they formulated rebuttals to all of my arguements. How is this ethical?
Once when I was speaking I stated I had spoken with an attorney and immediately the judge screamed "WELL, WHERE IS HE!!!?" I asked a question about his ruling on the first issue and he shouted at me "I'M NOT YOUR ATTORNEY!!!"
Last, the judge, who had already decided the case from his behavior and how he spoke to me, looked over at me and smirked. yes the judge SMIRKED!!! It was a clear smirk which is a sideways "grin" and said "now what do you have to say?". He sat back in his seat and kept grinning at me and this made my skin crawl. This guy in my opinion is SADISTIC. A sociopath and I'm not sure why Texans like electing these kinds of folks to the bench. By that time I was so disgusted I simply
walked out of his court. I told him I would appeal. The judge did not make any effort to be impartial. He was clearly partial and was clearly biased in favor of the attorney who had stood before him many times. It was laughable. It was a joke. I was so shocked by the entire proceedings from being threatened before trial to how the judge acted during trial I literally could not speak and it was no use of me staying in there.
The media does not put a spotlight on Texas courts for no reason. These judges here are zealots. Religious zealots. Racist. Ultra republican, biased in favor of corporations and landlords against the poor. If you are poor are thinking about representing yourself in one of these racist, redneck bastions of Texas I suggest you get a lawyer because even if you are knowledable you will not be afforded the same consideration as an attorney. Your arguments will not be given "Equal Weight" which you are guaranteed under the Due Process Clause of the 5th Amendment to the constitution.
SHAME ON JUDGE DON PIERSON. SHAME ON ALL WHO ELECTED HIM.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 01/16/2014 08:31 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Judge-Don-Pierson/Fort-Worth-Texas-76196/Judge-Don-Pierson-Republican-of-Tarrant-County-Court-at-Law-1-Threatened-Pro-Se-litigan-1115981. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:Search Tips
In order to assure the best results in your search:
- Keep the name short & simple, and try different variations of the name.
- Do not include ".com", "S", "Inc.", "Corp", or "LLC" at the end of the Company name.
- Use only the first/main part of a name to get best results.
- Only search one name at a time if Company has many AKA's.