- Report: #225375
Complaint Review: LAB CORP
| LAB CORP 5103 KINGSTON PIKE S#200
KNOXVILLE, Tennessee U.S.A. |
|
LAB CORP EMPLOYEE FIRED ON 12-07-06 FOR WHAT SEEMS TO BE wrongfull termination retaliation Ripoff KNOXVILLE Tennessee
*UPDATE EX-employee responds: Labcorp Should Just Call Themselves A Temporary Agency
*UPDATE EX-employee responds: RETALIATION
*Consumer Comment: What was the problem
Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
T.
KINGSTON, Tennessee
U.S.A.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 12/14/2006 10:43 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/LAB-CORP/KNOXVILLE-Tennessee-37748/LAB-CORP-EMPLOYEE-FIRED-ON-12-07-06-FOR-WHAT-SEEMS-TO-BE-wrongfull-termination-retaliation-225375. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on LAB CORP
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
Search Tips#1 UPDATE EX-employee responds
Labcorp Should Just Call Themselves A Temporary Agency
AUTHOR: Kim - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, February 01, 2009
POSTED: Sunday, February 01, 2009#2 UPDATE EX-employee responds
RETALIATION
AUTHOR: Whatever23 - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Friday, January 18, 2008
POSTED: Friday, January 18, 2008Like yourself, I was a employee there for a number of years. I did my job & kept my nose clean. I was not happy there, by any means. I had to take an attitude of 'leave me alone to do my job & in return, I'll do it & leave you alone, too.' Hardly the best scenario for a team effort, but as previously mentioned, the management situation there was a joke of immense proportions. The less one was involved in the drama, the better.
The "reason" behind my termination was as nebulous as smoke. A new company program was instigated that had a lot of problems & glitches. Not only did it not work properly - it was not needed. The program was an incredible waste of time, money & resources - but decisions had been made & millions of dollars spent. To admit to a mistake would've meant somebody upstairs losing face. Better to "downsize uncooperative employees" than to actually admit the error or fix the technology.
Also like yourself, the decision to axe me came from a faceless entity above, passed down through my supervisor in the form of "They don't understand why there are problems & as a consequence, why you are still here." Which basically translates as "If we can your ass, it's the path of least resistance that makes it appear as if we're on top of the problem."
LabCorp has problems. Financial problems. Management problems. And an ever-growing reputation of poor customer service that will be their undoing in the months & years to come. What they (and many companies today) fail to grasp on even the most fundamental level: Communication is only possible between equals. If you make it stridently clear to the people under you that they are nothing more than beanfield hands; not important to long-term growth & easily replacable, then why bother giving 100% to the cause?
In your instance - and mine - the correct path would've been to have upper-echelon folk sit down with us & hash out some sort of workable compromise. That's the way you treat employees who come in every day & do the work. That's the definition of teamwork. A term that gets tossed around an awful lot during meetings... but is as empty & hollow as a cold wind blowing down a deserted street.
#3 Consumer Comment
What was the problem
AUTHOR: Heidi - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Friday, December 15, 2006
POSTED: Friday, December 15, 2006

