• Report: #153831

Complaint Review: Liberty Wireless - Inphonic

Thank You

Read how Ripoff Report saves consumers millions.

  • Submitted: Tue, August 16, 2005
  • Updated: Wed, August 31, 2005

  • Reported By:oakland California
Liberty Wireless - Inphonic
1010 Wisconsin Ave Nw Ste 600 DC, District of Columbia U.S.A.

Liberty Wireless - Inphonic Ripoff withheld information led to higher charges, committment DC District of Columbia

*Consumer Suggestion: Response from Inphonic does not address complaint

*UPDATE Employee: Inphonic - Customer Service Response

What's this?
What's this?
What's this?
Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Ripoff Report
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™

SEO Reputation Management at its best!

Bottom line: my belief is that because Inphonic, the Liberty Wireless parent company, is located in DC, where there is no consumer complaint investigation, the company has little incentive to improve unless someone litigates.

I called the Liberty Wireless sales line on May 28, 2005 and spoke with someone whose name sounded like Phillipe. I asked him about the different phone options and told him that I didn't want a commitment and might just be a customer for 1-2 months. He strongly suggested the LG 5225, saying that it was a really good phone and deal. I asked what the terms were and he confirmed the cost and told me that I would receive a rebate in 4-6 weeks.

I went to the Web site to look at my new phone, and read that I have to use the phone for 24 weeks continuously to be eligible for the rebate. Only then would the rebate be processed and I'd wait an additional 4-6 weeks!

I called the sales line back and Phillipe answered and (it seems to me sheepishly) confirmed this. He gave me the customer service number so that I could cancel. It was very difficult to reach customer service since I needed to input a Liberty Wireless phone number to get through.

When I finally spoke with customer service two days later they opted to cancel my contract rather than keep me as a customer by switching me to one of their truly "no commitment" phones.

The fact that Phillipe was apparently the only sales person and that customer service was willing to lose a customer who wasn't signed up for the presumably really profitable LG 5225 plan made me suspect I wouldn't get my money back...but I did, and very quickly.

Nonetheless, I was worried about the deceptive practices and the legitimacy of the company so I sent a report similar to what's written above to customerservice@libertywireless.com and the Maryland Attorney General.

Maryland referred the report to DC because the parent company, Inphonic, is headquartered in DC. I spoke with a DC investigator today who said that DC does not fund/allow investigations of consumer complaints anymore. So, I thought others who had similar experiences might want to know that DC seems to have been selected deliberately for the location of this company with a national customer base because no action can be taken from far away (small claims court would be the only recourse).

Aaron
Oakland, California
U.S.A.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 08/16/2005 10:22 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Liberty-Wireless-Inphonic/DC-District-of-Columbia-20007-3676/Liberty-Wireless-Inphonic-Ripoff-withheld-information-led-to-higher-charges-committment-153831. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.

Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.

Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Liberty Wireless - Inphonic

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Search Tips
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author 2Consumer 0Employee/Owner
Updates & Rebuttals

#1 Consumer Suggestion

Response from Inphonic does not address complaint

AUTHOR: Aaron - (U.S.A.)

It is nice to receive an ostensibly helpful response from Inphonic, although it is the same generic, unsigned response everyone gets.

The offer to personally investigate has no meaning to me if you don't identify yourself as a person. Why should I believe that you, generic person or automated process, will investigate now when I emailed you initially and received no reply?

But in any case, I posted for the benefit of other complainants, not to ask Inphonic to address my problem. The message from my post is that consumers should not rely on (generic promisses or) the District of Columbia to investigate or mediate problems -- court seems to be the only productive recourse in this case.

And, beware in the future of businesses that are incorporated in DC.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 UPDATE Employee

Inphonic - Customer Service Response

AUTHOR: Inphonic - (U.S.A.)

Dear Valued Customer,

We are sorry to hear of your experience. Our goal is 100% customer satisfaction. Please send an e-mail including your original order number to customerinquiry@inphonic.com, and I will personally investigate your situation and ensure that somebody follows up with you.

Thank you for your patience.

Regards,

Customer Support
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.



Ripoff Report Legal Directory