- Report: #974473
Complaint Review: Lobel Financial
| Lobel Financial 1150 N Magnolia Ave.
Aneheim, California United States of America |
|
Lobel Financial Can not get Car back after Car was repossed with no notice Aneheim, California
*Consumer Comment: How?
*Consumer Comment: Temporary Restraining Order to Stop LOBELs Unlawful Harassment
*Consumer Comment: You Are Entitled To What?
Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 11/27/2012 01:37 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Lobel-Financial/Aneheim-California-92801/Lobel-Financial-Can-not-get-Car-back-after-Car-was-repossed-with-no-notice-Aneheim-Calif-974473. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Lobel Financial
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
Search Tips#2 Consumer Comment
Temporary Restraining Order to Stop LOBELs Unlawful Harassment
AUTHOR: Rhett - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Temporary Restraining Order to Stop LOBELs Unlawful Harassment
Plaintiff seeks an order of this Court to stop the harassing, threatening, and abusive conduct in the course of collecting on a consumer debt as discussed more fully below.
Plaintiff brings this action to enjoin Defendants, Lobel Financial Corporation, Gary Dean Lobel, Harvey Lobel, Murray Lobel, Alan Lobel and David Lobel (collectively "Defendants'*) from continuing with their campaign of deceptive and unlawful business practices and to recover for damages caused by Defendants' harassing, threatening, and abusive conduct in the course of collecting on a consumer debt.
Defendants' abusive collection practices are so pervasive and substantial that they drew the attention of the California Attorney General in 2009. In that enforcement action, some of the allegations against Lobel included:
a. Calling its customers repeatedly and allowing the phone to ring continuously;
b. Calling a customer's employer and family members; and
c. Using a false name when calling.
Rather than litigating the action filed by the Attorney General, Lobel stipulated to an entry of Final
Judgment and a Permanent Injunction. Under the stipulation, Lobel was permanently enjoined from engaging in the following practices:
d. Violating the provisions of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act as set forth in California Civil Code section 1788 et seq.
e. Violating California Civil Code section 1788.11 (b) by placing calls without disclosure of the caller's identity.
f. Violating California Civil Code section 1788.11 (d) by causing a telephone to ring repeatedly or continuously to annoy the person called.
#3 Consumer Comment
You Are Entitled To What?
AUTHOR: Jim - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, November 27, 2012

