- Report: #39691
Complaint Review: M. Stewart, Bartley Johnson, Robert Hancock, John Craig.
| M. Stewart, Bartley Johnson, Robert Hancock, John Craig. P.O. BOX 90931
Henderson, Nevada U.S.A. |
|
M. Stewart, Bartley Johnson, Robert Hancock, John Craig Stuffing Envelopes Scam I was saved from the hassle Henderson Nevada
*UPDATE Employee: when errors like that happen it is an employees error and not that of John Craig and Mr. Hancock.
Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
M. Stewart P.O. BOX 90931 henderson, nv 89009-0931. Bartley Johnson P.O. BOX 91086 Henderson, nv 89009-1086. and S.R. P.O. BOX 96712 Las Vegas,NV 89193-6712. All with the same flyers from Robert Hancock and John Craig. thanks all for saving my back side. I hope this helps you also.
Eric
Las Vegas, Nevada
U.S.A.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 12/31/2002 05:38 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/M-Stewart-Bartley-Johnson-Robert-Hancock-John-Craig/Henderson-Nevada-89009-0931/M-Stewart-Bartley-Johnson-Robert-Hancock-John-Craig-Stuffing-Envelopes-Scam-I-was-save-39691. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on M. Stewart, Bartley Johnson, Robert Hancock, John Craig.
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
Search Tips#1 UPDATE Employee
when errors like that happen it is an employees error and not that of John Craig and Mr. Hancock.
AUTHOR: Michelle - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, March 04, 2003
I must say since the $25 fee was so low I did not bother checking for any such reports as these since I figured it was a small risk.
I received the confirmation which told me to send my $5 and SASE, which I did, and promptly received all of the information needed to get started.
They have kept in close contact with me with any help I have needed, and I have found them profitable. There are some slight production costs after you begin, copies of mere cents each and advertising costs can range from free to very high depending on how much work you do.
As far as why the addresses are different and you are finding peoples information for assumed names of the company, it is because along with other services the company uses home workers for recruiting and applications. It is a company based on home workers, so they use them for all positions. Each recruiter receives the payments and applications and is then supposed to respond with a confirmation and forward the application and payments to the company. If you are sending in your $25 and not receiving a response than sadly it is an employee who is giving the company a very bad name by not doing the work properly or not doing it at all.
I am not trying to minimize the damage done to those of you that have been ripped off by this, but when errors like that happen it is an employees error and not that of John Craig and Mr. Hancock.
This can be a good legitimate money making opportunity, but you definately do have to use caution do to the possibility of a bad employee.

