- Report: #945608
Report - Rebuttal - Arbitrate
Complaint Review: Mary Prantil
Mary PrantilInternet United States of America
Mary Prantil loses lawsuit 9 Criminal charges, Internet
Here she is in the courts enter Mary Prantil: http://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/webcrim_attorney/DefendantSearch Mary Prantil's SOON upcoming January 11 TH 2011 Criminal Court Trial -she is facing not one but SEVERAL CRIMINAL CHARGES including a FELONY STALKING CHARGE ( 3rd degree stalking ) Log in as a public user, then type in the defendant's name, Mary Prantil to pull up and verify her criminal charges- this is a government public records website, which is the Manhattan New York District Attorney web site, court cases look up information: *http://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/webcrim_attorney/DefendantSearch* Defendant Search ResultsYOU SEARCHED ONDefendantMary Prantil CountyAll CountiesModify Search
New Sea Search Results 1 through 3 of 3Note: To view case details, click the case # link (opens in new window).Case #DefendantSummons #Appearance DateCourtJudgePart 010NY022485 Prantil, Mary 0/14/2010New York Criminal Court
009NY002655 Prantil, Mary T 0/14/2010New York Criminal Court
009NY046033 Prantil, Mary T 0/14/2010New York Criminal Court
Case Details - ChargesCASE INFORMATIONCourtNew York Criminal Court Case #2010NY022485 DefendantPrantil, MaryThis one is for FELONY E STALKING, MORE COUNTS ON AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT:ChargeDetailDisposition/Sentence L 240.30 02 Misdemeanor, 1 count, Arrest charge, Arraignment chargeDescriptionAgg Har-2nd:telephone
L 120.50 03 Misdemeanor, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment chargeDescriptionStalking - 3rd
L 240.30 01 **TOP CHARGE** Misdemeanor, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment chargeDescriptionAgg Harass-2:communicate/alarm
Back to top "Case Details - ChargesCASE INFORMATIONCourtNew York Criminal Court Case #2009NY002655 DefendantPrantil, Mary TTHIS ONE IS FOR RESISTING ARREST, AND YET ANOTHER AGGRAVED HARASSMENT CHARGE:ChargeDetailDisposition/Sentence L 205.30 00 **TOP CHARGE** Misdemeanor, 1 count, Arrest charge, Arraignment chargeDescriptionResisting Arrest
L 240.30 01 Misdemeanor, 1 count, Arrest charge, Arraignment chargeDescriptionAgg Harass-2:communicate/alarm
Back to top Case Details - ChargesCASE INFORMATIONCourtNew York Criminal Court Case #2009NY046033 DefendantPrantil, Mary TMORE, AND MORE AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT, THESE ARE ARRAIGNMENT CHARGES- ALL OF THEM.ChargeDetailDisposition/Sentence L 240.30 02 Misdemeanor, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment chargeDescriptionAgg Har-2nd:telephone
L 215.50 03 Misdemeanor, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment chargeDescriptionCrim Contempt-2nd:disobey Crt
L 240.30 1A **TOP CHARGE** Misdemeanor, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment chargeDescriptionAggravated Harassment-2nd Deg
"*Be sure to visit this website often for more and current updates on the CRIMINAL that keeps saying "she has a clean criminal record"....."has never been arrested"..........MARY PRANTIL. ** **Prantil is all over the Internet trying to cover this information up, blaming innocent others with her OWN CRIMES, telling lies, making up tons of false stories, etc. concerning this.**
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 09/24/2012 12:19 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Mary-Prantil/internet/Mary-Prantil-loses-lawsuit-9-Criminal-charges-Internet-945608. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:Search Tips
In order to assure the best results in your search:
- Keep the name short & simple, and try different variations of the name.
- Do not include ".com", "S", "Inc.", "Corp", or "LLC" at the end of the Company name.
- Use only the first/main part of a name to get best results.
- Only search one name at a time if Company has many AKA's.
Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.