• Report: #449934

Complaint Review: Mel Harris & Associates

Thank You

Read how Ripoff Report saves consumers millions.

  • Submitted: Fri, May 08, 2009
  • Updated: Thu, January 13, 2011

  • Reported By:Rochester New York
Mel Harris & Associates
116 John St., #1510 New York, New York U.S.A.

Mel Harris & Associates Never contacted me, put a lien on bank account of disability pay, wants to garnish wages also New York New York

*Consumer Comment: RICO case currently in progress for "Sewer Service"

What's this?
What's this?
What's this?
Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Ripoff Report
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™

SEO Reputation Management at its best!

I have never been contacted by this individual regarding a debt that I owe. I found out about this because they put a lien on my bank account and took all of my disability pay. When I called the number my bank provided to me, I was transferred to a voice message and could not talk to a person. I looked online for some information on this person and read many many reports from people who say they were victimized in the same fashion. I read reports of this person sending notifications to old addresses and using that to claim the person was contacted. I am afraid to make further efforts to contact this person for this reason.
If I have a debt I would like to set up a payment arrangement, but as I stated, I have never been contacted and he is getting my money for an unknown reason. I need to know what this is about as I have found someone had used my social security number to open a credit card and I need to be sure if there is something out there with my name on it that it is in fact my debt so that I can pay that back.

Nme1170
Rochester, New York
U.S.A.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 05/08/2009 10:19 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Mel-Harris-Associates/New-York-New-York-10038/Mel-Harris-Associates-Never-contacted-me-put-a-lien-on-bank-account-of-disability-pay-449934. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.

Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.

Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Mel Harris & Associates

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Search Tips
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author 1Consumer 0Employee/Owner
Updates & Rebuttals

#1 Consumer Comment

RICO case currently in progress for "Sewer Service"

AUTHOR: Steve - (U.S.A.)

Check this out.

A RICO case and a Class Action Lawsuit has been brought against Mel Harris & Associates for "Sewer Service" and fraudulent default judgements and garnishments!

>>



A federal appeals judge in New York has allowed a potential class action lawsuit to proceed alleging that a debt buyer, the law firm it hired to litigate cases, and the process company it hired to serve debtors conspired to fraudulently collect millions.



Some of the charges allege violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). But the lawsuit also asserts that the companies conspired in a way that could be interpreted as racketeering under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) .



The alleged racketeering claims, if proven, would have a chilling impact on how debt buyers validate debt and how collections are pursued through the court system. If proven, many ARM firms would have to re-examine common business practices.



In the case Monique Skyes et al, vs. Mel Harris & Associates, LLC et. al, eight debtors allege that over the course of three years debt buyer Leucadia National Corp., process server Samserv and debt collections law firm Mel Harris engaged in a massive scheme to fraudulently obtain default judgments against them and more than 100,000 other consumers in state court. The lawsuit claims that the defendants committed the fraud by engaging in sewer service, the practice of failing to serve a summons and complaint and then filing a fraudulent affidavit attesting to service. When the debtors didnt appear in court because they did not have notice of the lawsuits, Leucadia and Mel Harris obtained default judgments against them, which allowed them to freeze debtors bank accounts and threaten to garnish wages or property to obtain settlements.



Debt collection defense attorney Barbara Sinsley said it is important that the debt collection industry follow the case, but that there is no need at this point for firms to make changes to their business model.



At this time I dont think this lawsuit raises questions about law firms business practices or that their model should be changed, said Sinsley, a partner with Florida-based Barron, Newburger, & Sinsley PLLC. But its always important for collection attorneys to do management by wandering around. Know what their vendors are doing,



Debt collection industry trade group ACA International agreed. Clear, accurate and respectful communication between collectors and consumers is essential to maintaining a balanced debt collection system, said Valerie Hays, ACAs general counsel and vice president of legal and government affairs. The same is true when collectors work with the courts to seek default judgments or other action,



All of the firms named as defendants are based in New York, where the state attorney general has brought sewer service charges against process server American Legal Process and launched investigations into other process servers and debt collection firms. Process servers are typically paid based on verified delivery of court papers, a model that is currently under heavy scrutiny.



Although Samserv is not among the companies being investigated, Plaintiffs Attorney Claudia Wilmer told insideARM.com that the lawsuit alleges similar practices.



What we see is that practices American Legal Process used are standard practices across the industry when it comes to these debt collection lawsuits, Wilmer said.



Arthur Sanders, a partner with Mel Harris, disagrees but said he wasnt surprised that U.S. District Judge Denny Chin allowed the lawsuit against the firm and its associates to proceed because the law required that the judge assume the pleadings in the motion are true. When you take into account that the court has to treat it as true, its hard for us to win the motion. But we are still optimistic that the right outcome will happen because there was not conspiracy. The other side has a lot to prove, Sanders said



Sanders acknowledged that the allegations are enough to send chills down the spines of debt collection professionals who must pursue payment on most of their accounts through the courts.



The complaint notes that Leucadia, a publicly traded holding company with interests in financial services, filed more than 100,000 consumer debt collection lawsuits between 2006 and 2009 in New York City civil court and that Mel Harris represented the company 99 percent of the time. It also notes that Todd Fabacher, Mel Harris designated custodian of record, signed the vast majority of the approximate 40,000 affidavits of merit the firm filed each year.



Assuming 260 business days a year, Fabacher had to have personally (and purportedly knowledgeably) issued an average of 20 affidavits of merit per hour, i.e., one every three minutes, over a continuous eight-hour day, Judge Chin wrote in his ruling last month allowing the case to proceed. Chin said after the default judgments were issued, Leucadia and Mel Harris threatened to garnish debtors wages or seize their property, causing them to incur litigation costs and impaired credit ratings.



Chin noted in his ruling that government agencies have recognized that abusive debt collection practices are a public concern and he mentioned the Federal Trade Commissions report last year that discussed industry-wide problems with debt buyers failing to substantiate their legal claims against consumers.



Wilmer, a senior staff attorney with the Neighborhood Economic Development Advocacy Project (NEDAP), likened Fabachers sworn affidavits to the robo-signing practices banks have allegedly used to expedite mortgage foreclosures. She said NEDAP operates a legal hotline for low-income residents and attorneys there have taken numerous calls from New York area residents sued by Mel Harris over credit debt.



They all have similar stories, she said. We believe that the same thing that happened to them happened to our clients.



Wilmer said that all the lawsuits Mel Harris filed against the plaintiffs in the lawsuit have been dismissed. But she said the case isnt about whether or not the plaintiffs owed the debt and the lawsuit doesnt seek to keep debt collectors from pursuing legitimate debt.



Our case revolves around the way these defendants allegedly obtained judgments though false means, she said. The primary motivation for this lawsuit is to put an end to these fraudulent and deceptive practices.



Sanders agrees that the lawsuit attempts to draw similarities to the robo-signing mortgage scandal that briefly halted housing foreclosures last October, but he said I think at the end of the day they are not going to be able to do that.



Sanders said Mel Harris and its business associates acted appropriately and the firm has no plan to change how it does business because the allegations against the firm at its associates are not true.



Theres only the allegation that we didnt act appropriately. Our client bought debt thats valid debt. Its not our practice to give instructions to process servers not to deliver notices, Sanders said. When all the information is out there, we will be vindicated.





Permalink: http://www.insidearm.com/daily/collection-laws-regulations/collection-laws-and-regulations/rico-case-against-arm-firms-proceeds-as-industry-watches/

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.



Ripoff Report Legal Directory