- Report: #265728
Complaint Review: Monitronics Internatinal & Platinum Protection
| Monitronics Internatinal & Platinum Protection 580 South State Street
Orem, Utah U.S.A. |
|
Monitronics Internatinal & Platinum Protection FAULTY SYSTEM AND NO MONITORING SERVICE Orem Utah
*Consumer Comment: Dog Labrador Dog Dogs
*Consumer Comment: poodle dog breed
*Consumer Comment: Dogs DOgs Dogs
*Consumer Comment: Labradoodle Labradoodle Labradoodle
*UPDATE Employee: Employee percpective
*UPDATE Employee: Employee percpective
*UPDATE Employee: Employee percpective
*Consumer Comment: Are they really that bad?
*Author of original report: Monitronics, solved
*REBUTTAL Owner of company: I will help you with the problems you have had
*Consumer Suggestion: You have ability to take action
*UPDATE EX-employee responds: Yeah they are crooked
*Author of original report: Monitronics International & Platinum Protection
Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
When we moved in the house there was already an existing system, but we never set it up. She explained that they could upgrade the control panel and add to the system at no additional cost. Since there was no fire protection in the existing system, and they would add the fire alarm at no cost, with keyless entry, and a few more sensors, we figured why not. Sounds like a good promotional deal.
We agreed to a 3 year contract @ $44.99 with a $99.00 install fee spread over the first three months. This did not seem like a bad plan since we did not have a landline phone, just voice over IP, they threw in a 499.00 cellular transmitter at no additional cost.
All in all we received (2) Keyless Entry Remotes, an additional window sensor in the basement, a motion detector in the garage, an incorporated fire alarm, an upgraded control panel, and a cellular transmitter. They said this was all free in exchange for putting their sign in our front yard.
On 4/10/2007 we signed the contract around 7:00pm. During this process our sales representative called her company Platinum Protection, to verify personal information and set up the account. We PERSONALLY GAVE OUR PRIMARY, SECONDARY, HOME, AND WORK phone numbers to call in case of a security breach, emergency, and/or a fire.
After that was concluded she called the "Installation Team" to set up an appointment. She said that the install would only take an hour or so and that they could squeeze one more in for the night. The appointment was made for 8:30pm on that same day. This did not seem like a reasonable business practice to us, but we agreed. I should have known from this point on that this was not going to be an unpleasant experience.
This "Install Team" did not show up until 9:30pm, they were not in any sort professional uniform, neither was the sale representative, expect for some cheesy ID card around their necks. They did not get the job done until around 11:00pm, and that was after sitting on hold with their own activation team for about 20 min.
When they left, they assured me that the monitoring company was receiving signals and that the system was working. They gave me a demonstration and instructions for basic operation of the system.
My wife and I went out of town from 5/4/2007 to 5/6/2007. We set the alarm before we left. We assumed everything went ok while we were gone. We did not receive any phones calls regarding burglary or fire.
On 5/12/2007 I was mowing my lawn when my neighbor approached me. He said "Did you get the alarm thing figured out? I was puzzled; I did not know what he was talking about. He said that on 5/6/2007, prior to us returning I guess, that our alarm system was going off "all morning" as he put. He never seen any police dispatched or anyone else for that matter check on our house. He walked over, got the phone number of the MONITRONICS sign and called them. Opposed to contacting the correct people they are obligated to under contract, they remotely shut off the system.
While our system was going off, our home potentially being robbed or burned down, we were not notified. They did not call the authorities, primary contacts, secondary contacts, home phone (pointless) or work phones.
I would like to say at this point, Platinum Protection & Montronics both breached their own contract. The first clause of the contract that I signed with Platinum Protection says, and I quote, "Company, or its contractor, upon receipt signal from Customers Premises indicating that the System has been activated, IS RESPONSIBLE ONLY FOR ENDEAVORING TO NOTIFY THE POLICE, FIRE, MEDICAL SERVICES UNIT, GUARD SERVICE, OTHER AUTHORITIES, OR OTHER PERSONS WHOSE NAMES AND TELEPHONE NUMBERS ARE SET FORTH IN THE SUBSCRIBER CONTACT LIST TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED TO COMPANY"
So by failing to contact myself, my wife, the police, the fire department, our secondary contacts, our home phone (pointless), and our work phones, they breached their own contract.
This is where the run around starts.
Being very puzzled and confused I called Monitronics, the company name and number posted in my front yard. They confirmed receiving signals and notifying the property owner. They didn't call me or my secondary contacts. He read several different phone numbers, none of which were my listed contacts on the contract I had right in front of me. He advised me to call the "broker" of the contract, Platinum Protection.
I then did as he instructed and called Platinum Protection. After being transferred a few times I finally got to tell my story. They told me I need to call Monitronics back and verify my contact information. I said that I had already talked to Monitronics, and they told me to call you. (Platinum Protection). They then transferred me again to a "supervisor". She told me that she would call Monitronics and see what was going on.
She called me back about 20 minutes later and said she had set up the account correctly with the right information. She assured me that everything was ok.
I then took it upon myself to call Monitronics back to test the system. The Monitronics customer service representative had me trip the system. He said they received the signals and that everything was ok. He than abruptly ended the conversation saying, he needed to cancel the call, if any, to the authorities.
Again, we assumed everything was ok with the system. We figured that we were entitled to a credit for the first month of monitoring service that we paid for but did not receive due to the account being set up incorrectly. No fault of our own mind you.
So again, I called Platinum Protection. I, again, got the usual run around until I was pawned off on some poor sap. I, again, told my story. The customer service representative then told me she would have to contact Monitronics, verify what I had said, talk to her accounting department, and then calls me back with a verdict.
She called me back about a half an hour later. She told me that they could give me a credit for the first month of service. (Admitting I was not being monitored.) She then informed that they needed to send a technician out because it appeared that my system was not working. (Relayed through her from Montitronics.)
This is where I lost it. I was pleased with them giving me a credit that I was entitled to. HOW WAS MY SYSTEM NOT WORKING? THEY TOLD ME SEVERAL TIMES THAT IT WAS!!!
By this time I was sure that I was dealing with two very incompetent companies that are not in the least bit customer oriented. Can I trust them with my house and everything I had worked for? Absolutely not.
I refused to have a tech come to my house. I wanted to cancel my service, and demanded a refund for the monitoring service. I had paid for installation of the new equipment. (I paid for the installation of a system that did not work, and paid for a monitoring service that I did not receive.)
She then told me that we would have to pay 80% of the contract per the cancellation terms of the contract. I was outraged. Why should I be entitled to hold my end of the contract if they did not hold theirs?
To me, that is like getting a car loan to buy a new car. , paying all of the payments on time for the first few months. Then the bank comes and takes the car back, then expects you to pay 80% of the loan. That is nonsense and a scam. Or should I say MON-sense?
I pleaded my case to the representative, even the breach of contract on their part scenario, to no avail. She said that since they offered to fix the problem, it was not a breach of contract. Even though no where in their contract does it state that they reserve that right.
After a very heated conversation I refused to give them another dime. I immediately closed the checking account they were withdrawing the money from.
A few weeks later we received a bill for another month's service. Fearing judgment and/or credit damage, we contacted them (PLATINUM PROCTECTION on 8/6/2007. They said they would review the matter.
I have to call back, again, tomorrow to talk to a customer service manager. I don't feel that they will resolve this tomorrow.
Further more, in the bottom clause it is read as follows:
"THIS AGREEMENT SHALL NOT BE BINDING UPON COMPANY UNLESS EITHER APPROVED IN WRITING BY AN OFFICER OF COMAPNY OR COMPANY BEGINS MONITORING SERVICE." An officer from the company never signed the contract on their behalf; and according to their customer service team was I never properly being monitored. Contract was never legally binding. Thanks for playing.
Brianmilliner
west valley city, Utah
U.S.A.
Click here to read other Rip Off Reports on Monitronics International
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 08/07/2007 12:41 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Monitronics-Internatinal-Platinum-Protection/Orem-Utah-84058/Monitronics-Internatinal-Platinum-Protection-FAULTY-SYSTEM-AND-NO-MONITORING-SERVICE-Ore-265728. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Monitronics Internatinal & Platinum Protection
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
Search Tips#1 Consumer Comment
Dog Labrador Dog Dogs
AUTHOR: Rabi Cityr - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Friday, July 15, 2011
(millions)Labrador
registrationsRegistrations per
million pop.Finland5.22,236426.0France60.59,281153.4Sweden9.05,158570.5United Kingdom59.718,554311.0USA307.010,83336.3OFA statistics suggest that yellow and black Labradors are registered in very similar numbers (yellow slightly more than black); chocolate in lesser numbers.[65][66]Note: number of registrations is not necessarily the same as number of living dogs at any given time.[edit]US Military Working Dogs (War Dogs); Labrador Retrievers in the Vietnam WarThe Vietnam War is the only war in American history in which US war dogs, which were officially classified by the military as "military working dogs" were not allowed to officially return home after the war.[67] Classified as expendable equipment, of the approximate 4,000 US K-9s deployed to the Vietnam War it is estimated that only about 200 US war dogs survived Vietnam to be put into service at other out posts stationed over-seas.[68]The predominate canine selected by the US Military during the Vietnam War was the German Shepard which was utilized in the roles of Scout Dogs, Sentry Dogs, Mine Detection Dogs, and the US Navy used Water Dogs to detect enemy under water divers in South Vietnam. The Labrador Retriever was the military's choice for their Combat Tracker Teams (CTTs). Combat Tracker Teams consisted of one Labrador and four men; the handler, an observer, a security man, and the team leader.[69]Labradors were selected by the military for tracking because of their distinct smelling qualities, and were utilized to locate wounded US servicemen, enemy patrols, and downed allied airmen in Vietnam. The US Army Labrador Retrievers received their combat training at the British Army's Jungle Warfare School in Malaysia.[70]Of the over 4,000 US war dogs serving in the Vietnam War 232 were killed in action[71], and 295 US servicemen deployed as "dog handlers" were killed in action[72], of which one dog handler was awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor. Of these numbers 6 Labrador Retrievers were killed in battle while assigned to the 62nd and 63rd US Army Combat Tracking Teams.[73] During the course of the war the US Army lost 204 dogs, while the US Marine Corps and US Air Force lost 13 and 15 dogs respectively.In November 2000 President Clinton signed into law an amendment that allowed retired US military working dogs (war dogs) to be adopted by personnel outside of the military, leaving the Vietnam War as the only war in US history in which American war dogs never returned home.[74][75][edit]Famous labradorsMain article: List of LabradorsAs both the most popular breed by registered ownership and also the most popular breed for assistance dogs in several countries, there have been many notable and famous labradors since the breed was recognised.A selection of a few of the most famous labradors within various categories includes:Endal wearing his PDSA Gold Medal.Assistance dogsEndal, a service dog in Britain. Among other distinctions, "the most decorated dog in the world" (including "Dog of the Millennium"[76] and the PDSAs Gold Medal for Animal Gallantry and Devotion to Duty),[77] the first dog to ride on the London Eye and the first dog known to work a 'chip and pin' ATM card. By Endal's death in March 2009, he and his owner/handler Allen Parton had been filmed almost 350 times by crews from several countries, and a film of a year in Endal's life was in production.[78][79]Police, military, rescue and detection dogsZanjeer, a detection dog who detected arms and ammunition used in 1993 Mumbai (Bombay) serial explosions. During his service, his haul was excellent. He helped recover 57 country-made bombs, 175 petrol bombs, 11 military bombs, 242 grenades and 600 detonators. His biggest contribution to the police force and the city was the detection of 3,329 kg of RDX. He also helped detect 18 Type 56 rifles and five 9mm pistols.Lucky and Flo, twin Black Labrador counterfeit detection dogs who became famous in 2007 for "sniffing out nearly 2 million pirated counterfeit DVDs" on a six-month secondment to Malaysia in 2007.[80] Following the multi-million dollar, 6-arrest Malaysian detection, they became the first dogs to be awarded Malaysia's, "outstanding service award",[81] and software pirates were stated to have put a 30,000 contract out for their lives.[82][83]Sabi, an Australian special forces explosives detection dog that spent almost 14 months missing in action (MIA) in Afghanistan before being recovered safe and well in 2009.[84][85]PetsFormer President of the United States Bill Clinton's Labradors Buddy and Seamus.Former Russian President, and current Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin's Labrador 'Koni'.Fiction and mediaLabradors have featured variously as pets and significant characters in sitcoms and other TV shows, as well as other portrayals in the media. Bouncer in Neighbours, and Luath in The Incredible Journey, are two TV examples.Marley is an American Labrador featured in Marley & Me, a best-selling book by John Grogan, and a subsequent film based on Grogan's life and times with Marley.On the BBC the children's television series Big Barn Farm, Digger is a yellow Labrador puppy.Some Labradors have been featured in the manga/anime series Ginga Densetsu Weed, one of the most notable being Hook.Rowdy on Scrubs is a taxidermy golden Labrador Retriever involved in various gags on the show.Mascots and advertisingSince 1972, a yellow Labrador pup known as the Andrex Puppy has been an advertising symbol for Andrex (Cottonelle) toilet tissue.Michigan State University has an ongoing tradition of Zeke the Wonder Dog. The original "Zeke" was a yellow Lab, as is the current "Zeke III", and "Zeke II" was a black Lab.[edit]Labrador hybridsFurther information: Dog hybrids and crossbreedsThe Labradoodle is a "designer dog" that is a cross-bred Labrador and Poodle. A concept that originated in Australia, the intent of breeding this cross was to try and create a service dog suitable for allergy sufferers. However, there is no guarantee such a cross will inherit the hypo-allergenic poodle coat. Some assistance-dog groups use Golden RetrieverLabrador Retriever hybrids because they believe this cross produces dogs with excellent temperaments.[63]The assistance dog organisation Mira utilises Labrador-Bernese Mountain Dog crosses ("Labernese") with success.[86]
Dogs were domesticated from gray wolves about 15,000 years ago.[6] They must have been very valuable to early human settlements, for they quickly became ubiquitous across world cultures. Dogs perform many roles for people, such as hunting, herding, pulling loads, protection, assisting police and military, companionship, and, more recently, aiding handicapped individuals. This impact on human society has given them the nickname "Man's best friend" in the western world. In 2001, there were estimated to be 400 million dogs in the world.[7]
Over the 15,000 year span the dog had been domesticated, it diverged into only a handful of landraces, groups of similar animals whose morphology and behavior have been shaped by environmental factors and functional roles. Through selective breeding by humans, the dog has developed into hundreds of varied breeds, and shows more behavioral and morphological variation than any other land mammal.[8] For example, height measured to the withers ranges from a few inches in the Chihuahua to a few feet in the Irish Wolfhound; color varies from white through grays (usually called "blue'") to black, and browns from light (tan) to dark ("red" or "chocolate") in a wide variation of patterns; coats can be short or long, coarse-haired to wool-like, straight, curly, or smooth.[9] It is common for most breeds to shed this coat.
Contents
[hide]
* 1 Etymology and related terminology
* 2 Taxonomy
* 3 History and evolution
o 3.1 DNA studies
o 3.2 Roles with humans
+ 3.2.1 Early roles
+ 3.2.2 As pets
+ 3.2.3 Work
+ 3.2.4 Sports and shows
+ 3.2.5 As a food source
+ 3.2.6 Health risks to humans
+ 3.2.7 Health benefits for humans
+ 3.2.8 Shelters
* 4 Biology
o 4.1 Senses
+ 4.1.1 Sight
+ 4.1.2 Hearing
+ 4.1.3 Smell
o 4.2 Physical characteristics
+ 4.2.1 Coat
+ 4.2.2 Tail
o 4.3 Types and breeds
o 4.4 Health
+ 4.4.1 Mortality
+ 4.4.2 Predation
o 4.5 Diet
o 4.6 Reproduction
o 4.7 Neutering
* 5 Intelligence and behavior
o 5.1 Intelligence
o 5.2 Behavior
o 5.3 Dog growl
* 6 Differences from wolves
o 6.1 Physical characteristics
o 6.2 Behavior
o 6.3 Trainability
* 7 Mythology
* 8 Gallery of dogs in art
* 9 See also
* 10 References
* 11 Further reading
* 12 External links
Etymology and related terminology
Dog is the common use term that refers to members of the subspecies Canis lupus familiaris (canis, "dog"; lupus, "wolf"; familiaris, "of a household" or "domestic"). The term can also be used to refer to a wider range of related species, such as the members of the genus Canis, or "true dogs", including the wolf, coyote, and jackals; or it can refer to the members of the subfamily Caninae, which would also include the African wild dog; or it can be used to refer to any member of the family Canidae, which would also include the foxes, bush dog, raccoon dog, and others.[10] Some members of the family have "dog" in their common names, such as the raccoon dog and the African wild dog. A few animals have "dog" in their common names but are not canids, such as the prairie dog.
The English word dog comes from Middle English dogge, from Old English docga, a "powerful dog breed".[11] The term may derive from Proto-Germanic *dukkon, represented in Old English finger-docce ("finger-muscle").[12] The word also shows the familiar petname diminutive -ga also seen in frogga "frog", picga "pig", stagga "stag", wicga "beetle, worm", among others.[13] Due to the archaic structure of the word, the term dog may ultimately derive from the earliest layer of Proto-Indo-European vocabulary, reflecting the role of the dog as the earliest domesticated animal.[14]
In 14th century England, hound (from Old English: hund) was the general word for all domestic canines, and dog referred to a subtype of hound, a group including the mastiff. It is believed this "dog" type of "hound" was so common it eventually became the prototype of the category hound.[15] By the 16th century, dog had become the general word, and hound had begun to refer only to types used for hunting.[16] Hound, cognate to German Hund, Dutch hond, common Scandinavian hund, and Icelandic hundur, is ultimately derived from the Proto-Indo-European *kwon- "dog", found in Welsh ci (plural cwn), Latin canis, Greek kon, Lithuanian u.[17]
In breeding circles, a male canine is referred to as a dog, while a female is called a bitch (Middle English bicche, from Old English bicce, ultimately from Old Norse bikkja). A group of offspring is a litter. The father of a litter is called the sire, and the mother is called the dam. Offspring are generally called pups or puppies, from French poupe, until they are about a year old. The process of birth is whelping, from the Old English word hwelp, (cf. German Welpe, Dutch welp, Swedish valp, Icelandic hvelpur) .[18]
Taxonomy
The domestic dog was originally classified as Canis familiaris and Canis familiarus domesticus by Carolus Linnaeus in 1758,[19][20] and was reclassified in 1993 as Canis lupus familiaris, a subspecies of the gray wolf Canis lupus, by the Smithsonian Institution and the American Society of Mammalogists. Overwhelming evidence from behavior, vocalizations, morphology, and molecular biology led to the contemporary scientific understanding that a single species, the gray wolf, is the common ancestor for all breeds of domestic dogs;[21][22] however, the timeframe and mechanisms by which dogs diverged are controversial.[21] Canis lupus familiaris is listed as the name for the taxon that is broadly used in the scientific community and recommended by ITIS; Canis familiaris, however, is a recognised synomym.[23]
History and evolution
Main articles: Origin of the domestic dog and Wolves
Ancient Greek rhyton in the shape of a dog's head, made by Brygos, early 5th century BC. Jrme Carcopino Museum, Department of Archaeology, Aleria
Domestic dogs inherited a complex social hierarchy and behaviors from their wolf ancestors. Dogs are pack hunters with a complex set of behaviors related to determining each dog's position in the social hierarchy, and they exhibit various postures and other means of nonverbal communication that reveal their states of mind.[3] These sophisticated forms of social cognition and communication may account for their trainability, playfulness, and ability to fit into human households and social situations, and these attributes have given dogs a relationship with humans that has enabled them to become one of the most successful species on the planet today.[21]
Although experts largely disagree over the details of dog domestication, it is agreed that human interaction played a significant role in shaping the subspecies.[24] Shortly after domestication, dogs became ubiquitous in human populations, and spread throughout the world. Emigrants from Siberia likely crossed the Bering Strait with dogs in their company, and some experts[who?] suggest the use of sled dogs may have been critical to the success of the waves that entered North America roughly 12,000 years ago,[citation needed] although the earliest archaeological evidence of dog-like canids in North America dates from about 9,000 years ago.[25] Dogs were an important part of life for the Athabascan population in North America, and were their only domesticated animal. Dogs also carried much of the load in the migration of the Apache and Navajo tribes 1,400 years ago. Use of dogs as pack animals in these cultures often persisted after the introduction of the horse to North America.[26][page needed]
The current consensus among biologists and archaeologists is that the dating of first domestication is indeterminate.[24][26] There is conclusive evidence dogs genetically diverged from their wolf ancestors at least 15,000 years ago,[6][27][28] but some believe domestication to have occurred earlier.[24] It is not known whether humans domesticated the wolf as such to initiate dog's divergence from its ancestors, or whether dog's evolutionary path had already taken a different course prior to domestication. For example, it is hypothesized that some wolves gathered around the campsites of paleolithic camps to scavenge refuse, and associated evolutionary pressure developed that favored those who were less frightened by, and keener in approaching, humans.
The bulk of the scientific evidence for the evolution of the domestic dog stems from archaeological findings and mitochondrial DNA studies. The divergence date of roughly 15,000 years ago is based in part on archaeological evidence that demonstrates the domestication of dogs occurred more than 15,000 years ago,[21][26] and some genetic evidence indicates the domestication of dogs from their wolf ancestors began in the late Upper Paleolithic close to the Pleistocene/Holocene boundary, between 17,000 and 14,000 years ago.[29] But there is a wide range of other, contradictory findings that make this issue controversial.
Archaeological evidence suggests the latest dogs could have diverged from wolves was roughly 15,000 years ago, although it is possible they diverged much earlier.[21] In 2008, a team of international scientists released findings from an excavation at Goyet Cave in Belgium declaring a large, toothy canine existed 31,700 years ago and ate a diet of horse, musk ox and reindeer.[30]
Prior to this Belgium discovery, the earliest dog fossils were two large skulls from Russia and a mandible from Germany dated from roughly 14,000 years ago.[6][21] Remains of smaller dogs from Natufian cave deposits in the Middle East, including the earliest burial of a human being with a domestic dog, have been dated to around 10,000 to 12,000 years ago.[6][31] There is a great deal of archaeological evidence for dogs throughout Europe and Asia around this period and through the next two thousand years (roughly 8,000 to 10,000 years ago), with fossils uncovered in Germany, the French Alps, and Iraq, and cave paintings in Turkey.[21] The oldest remains of a domesticated dog in the Americas were found in Texas and have been dated to about 9,400 years ago.[32]
DNA studies
DNA studies have provided a wider range of possible divergence dates, from 15,000 to 40,000 years ago,[6] to as much as 100,000 to 140,000 years ago.[33] This evidence depends on a number of assumptions that may be violated.[21] Genetic studies are based on comparisons of genetic diversity between species, and depend on a calibration date. Some estimates of divergence dates from DNA evidence use an estimated wolf-coyote divergence date of roughly 700,000 years ago as a calibration.[34] If this estimate is incorrect, and the actual wolf-coyote divergence is closer to one or two million years ago, or more,[35] then the DNA evidence that supports specific dog-wolf divergence dates would be interpreted very differently.
Furthermore, it is believed the genetic diversity of wolves has been in decline for the last 200 years, and that the genetic diversity of dogs has been reduced by selective breeding. This could significantly bias DNA analyses to support an earlier divergence date. The genetic evidence for the domestication event occurring in East Asia is also subject to violations of assumptions. These conclusions are based on the location of maximal genetic divergence, and assume hybridization does not occur, and that breeds remain geographically localized. Although these assumptions hold for many species, there is good reason to believe that they do not hold for canines.[21]
Genetic analyses indicate all dogs are likely descended from a handful of domestication events with a small number of founding females,[21][29] although there is evidence domesticated dogs interbred with local populations of wild wolves on several occasions.[6] Data suggest dogs first diverged from wolves in East Asia, and these domesticated dogs then quickly migrated throughout the world, reaching the North American continent around 8000 BC.[6] The oldest groups of dogs, which show the greatest genetic variability and are the most similar to their wolf ancestors, are primarily Asian and African breeds, including the Basenji, Lhasa Apso, and Siberian Husky.[36] Some breeds thought to be very old, such as the Pharaoh Hound, Ibizan Hound, and Norwegian Elkhound, are now known to have been created more recently.[36]
There is a great deal of controversy surrounding the evolutionary framework for the domestication of dogs.[21] Although it is widely claimed that "man domesticated the wolf,"[37] man may not have taken such a proactive role in the process.[21] The nature of the interaction between man and wolf that led to domestication is unknown and controversial. At least three early species of the Homo genus began spreading out of Africa roughly 400,000 years ago, and thus lived for a considerable time in contact with canine species. Despite this, there is no evidence of any adaptation of canine species to the presence of the close relatives of modern man. If dogs were domesticated, as believed, roughly 15,000 years ago, the event (or events) would have coincided with a large expansion in human territory and the development of agriculture. This has led some biologists to suggest one of the forces that led to the domestication of dogs was a shift in human lifestyle in the form of established human settlements. Permanent settlements would have coincided with a greater amount of disposable food and would have created a barrier between wild and anthropogenic canine populations.[21]
Roles with humans
A Siberian Husky used as a pack animal
Early roles
Wolves, and their dog descendants, would have derived significant benefits from living in human campsmore safety, more reliable food, lesser caloric needs, and more chance to breed.[38] They would have benefited from humans upright gait that gives them larger range over which to see potential predators and prey, as well as color vision that, at least by day, gives humans better visual discrimination.[38] Camp dogs would also have benefitted from human tool use, as in bringing down larger prey and controlling fire for a range of purposes.[38]
Humans would also have derived enormous benefit from the dogs associated with their camps.[39] For instance, dogs would have improved sanitation by cleaning up food scraps.[39] Dogs may have provided warmth, as referred to in the Australian Aboriginal expression three dog night (an exceptionally cold night), and they would have alerted the camp to the presence of predators or strangers, using their acute hearing to provide an early warning.[39] Anthropologists believe the most significant benefit would have been the use of dogs' sensitive sense of smell to assist with the hunt.[39] The relationship between the presence of a dog and success in the hunt is often mentioned as a primary reason for the domestication of the wolf, and a 2004 study of hunter groups with and without a dog gives quantitative support to the hypothesis that the benefits of cooperative hunting was an important factor in wolf domestication.[40]
The cohabitation of dogs and humans would have greatly improved the chances of survival for early human groups, and the domestication of dogs may have been one of the key forces that led to human success.[41]
Couple sitting on the lawn with a pet British Bulldog
A British Bulldog shares a day at the park.
As pets
The most widespread form of interspecies bonding occurs between humans and dogs[39] and the keeping of dogs as companions, particularly by elites, has a long history.[42] However, pet dog populations grew significantly after World War II as suburbanization increased.[42] In the 1950s and 1960s, dogs were kept outside more often than they tend to be today [43] (using the expression in the doghouse to describe exclusion from the group signifies the distance between the doghouse and the home) and were still primarily functional, acting as a guard, childrens playmate, or walking companion.[43] From the 1980s, there have been changes in the role of the pet dog, such as the increased role of dogs in the emotional support of their owners.[44] People and dogs have become increasingly integrated and implicated in each others lives,[45] to the point where pet dogs actively shape the way a family and home are experienced.[46]
There have been two major trends in the changing status of pet dogs. The first has been the commodification of the dog, shaping it to conform to human expectations of personality and behaviour.[46] The second has been the broadening of the concept of the family and the home to include dogs-as-dogs within everyday routines and practices.[46]
There are a vast range of commodity forms available to transform a pet dog into an ideal companion.[47] The list of goods, services and places available is enormous: from dog perfumes, couture, furniture and housing, to dog groomers, therapists, trainers and care-takers, dog cafes, spas, parks and beaches, and dog hotels, airlines and cemeteries.[47] While dog training as an organized activity can be traced back to the 18th century, in the last decades of the 20th century it became a high profile issue as many normal dog behaviors such as barking, jumping up, digging, rolling in dung, fighting, and urine marking became increasingly incompatible with the new role of a pet dog.[48] Dog training books, classes and television programs proliferated as the process of commodifying the pet dog continued.[49]
An Australian Cattle Dog in reindeer antlers sits on Santa's lap
A pet dog taking part in Christmas traditions
The majority of contemporary dog owners describe their dog as part of the family,[46] although some ambivalence about the relationship is evident in the popular reconceptualisation of the dog-human family as a pack.[46] A dominance model of dog-human relationships has been promoted by some dog trainers, such as on the television program Dog Whisperer. However it has been disputed that "trying to achieve status" is characteristic of doghuman interactions.[50] Pet dogs play an active role in family life; for example, a study of conversations in dog-human families showed how family members use the dog as a resource, talking to the dog, or talking through the dog, to mediate their interactions with each other.[51] Another study of dogs roles in families showed many dogs have set tasks or routines undertaken as family members, the most common of which was helping with the washing-up by licking the plates in the dishwasher, and bringing in the newspaper from the lawn.[46] Increasingly, human family members are engaging in activities centred on the perceived needs and interests of the dog, or in which the dog is an integral partner, such as Dog Dancing and Doga.[47]
According to the statistics published by the American Pet Products Manufacturers Association in the National Pet Owner Survey in 20092010, it is estimated there are 77.5 million dog owners in the United States.[52] The same survey shows nearly 40% of American households own at least one dog, of which 67% own just one dog, 25% two dogs and nearly 9% more than two dogs. There does not seem to be any gender preference among dogs as pets, as the statistical data reveal an equal number of female and male dog pets. Yet, although several programs are undergoing to promote pet adoption, only nearly a fifth of the owned dogs come from a shelter.
#4 Consumer Comment
Labradoodle Labradoodle Labradoodle
AUTHOR: Turk - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, April 06, 2011
Standard Poodle at Guide Dogs Victoria.
Conron's aim was to combine the low-shedding coat of the Poodle with the gentleness and trainability of the Labrador, and to provide a guide dog suitable for people with allergies to fur and dander. He'd received a request from a vision impaired woman in Hawaii for a guide dog that did not aggravate her husband's allergy to dog hair. Originally he planned to train a Standard Poodle, but hair and saliva samples of thirty-three different poodles sent to the woman's husband all caused an allergic reaction. A Labradoodle litter was bred, and the husband did not have an allergic reaction to one of the puppies from the litter. This puppy, Sultan, was successfully trained by Guide Dogs Victoria, and became the first Labradoodle Guide dog.
Although Guide Dogs Victoria no longer breed Labradoodles, they are bred by other guide and assistance dog organizations in Australia and elsewhere. The Association for the Blind of Western Australia have introduced Labradoodles into their training program, and their first, Jonnie, graduated in November 2010. Labradoodles are now widely used around the world as guide, assistance, and therapy dogs as well as being popular family dogs.
Appearance and temperament
The Labradoodle as a dog breed is still developing, and puppies do not have consistently predictable characteristics. While many Labradoodles display desired traits, their appearance and behavioral characteristics remain, from an overall breed standpoint, unpredictable.
A black first-generation F1 Labradoodle puppy only a few days of age.
As such, Labradoodles' hair can be anywhere from wiry to soft, and may be straight, wavy, or curly. Many Labradoodles do shed, although the coat usually sheds less and has less dog odor than that of a Labrador Retriever.
Like most Labrador Retrievers and Poodles, Labradoodles are generally friendly, energetic and good with families and children (although as with any dog the temperament may vary between individuals). Labradoodles often display an affinity for water and strong swimming ability from their parent breeds.
Like their parent breeds, both of which are amongst the world's most intelligent dog breeds, Labradoodles are very intelligent and quite trainable, often seeking commands and finding pleasure in learning.
Types of Labradoodles
A group of Labradoodle Assistance Dogs.
There is no consensus as to whether breeders should aim to have Labradoodles recognized as a breed. Some breeders prefer to restrict breeding to early generation dogs (i.e. bred from a Poodle and Labrador rather than from two Labradoodles) to maximise genetic diversity, to avoid the inherited health problems that have plagued some dog breeds.
Others are breeding Labradoodle to Labradoodle over successive generations, and trying to establish a new dog breed. These dogs are usually referred to as Multigenerational (Multigen) or Australian Labradoodles.
Example of Australian Multi-Gen Labradoodle
Australian Labradoodles also differ from early generation and Multigenerational Labradoodles in that they may also have other breeds in their ancestry. English and American Cocker Spaniel/Poodle crosses (i.e. Cockapoos), Two Irish Water Spaniels and Soft-Coated Wheaten Terriers were used in some Australian Labradoodle lines. The Curly Coated Retriever were used too, but these lines did not work out and they were discontinued.
Jonnie, the first Labradoodle Guide Dog to graduate in WA.
Labradoodle coats are divided into three categories: wool (with tight curls, and similar in appearance to that of a Poodle, but with a softer texture); fleece (soft and free-flowing, with a kinked or wavy appearance); or hair (which can be curly, straight or wavy, but is more similar in texture to a Labrador's coat). Labradoodles coat colors include chocolate, cafe, parchment, cream, gold, apricot, red, black, silver, chalk, parti colours, (i.e. generally, any color a Poodle can have). They can be different sizes, depending on the size of poodle used (i.e. toy, miniature or standard).
Health
9 month old male Australian Labradoodle bred as companion dog still with a wool puppy coat.
Although most Labradoodles are healthy they can suffer from problems common to their parent breeds. Poodles and Labrador Retrievers can suffer from hip dysplasia, and should have specialist radiography to check for this problem before breeding. The parent breeds can also suffer from a number of eye disorders, and an examination by a qualified veterinary eye specialist should be performed.
Australian Labradoodles have been known to suffer from Progressive retinal atrophy (PRA), an inherited disease causing blindness, which occurs in both Miniature Poodles and Cocker Spaniels. It is recommended that Australian Labradoodles be DNA tested for PRA before being bred.
A significant number of Mutigenerational and Australian Labradoodles have also been found to suffer from Addison's Disease. The Australian Labradoodle Association of America is currently conducting a study to try and determine how widespread the problem has become.
#5 UPDATE Employee
Employee percpective
AUTHOR: Rmprob - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, March 12, 2009
#6 UPDATE Employee
Employee percpective
AUTHOR: Rmprob - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, March 12, 2009
#7 UPDATE Employee
Employee percpective
AUTHOR: Rmprob - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, March 12, 2009
#8 Consumer Comment
Are they really that bad?
AUTHOR: Soirfer - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, December 21, 2008
Did Platinum Protection fail to pay you what you had agreed to? They do promise a lot of money and I'm trying to weigh my options because I would hate to work with them and end up making very little money.
Get back to me.
#9 Author of original report
Monitronics, solved
AUTHOR: Brianmilliner - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, October 27, 2007
#10 REBUTTAL Owner of company
I will help you with the problems you have had
AUTHOR: Jake Pruitt - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, October 23, 2007
#11 Consumer Suggestion
You have ability to take action
AUTHOR: D - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, September 13, 2007
Lodge your complaint, I would do it over the phone (They provide a number) by asking directly for an investigator. These complaints are taken very seriously by the compliance divisions.
Whether you choose to pay or wait until you speak with the investigator is your decision, but I would not inform the company of the complaint and speak with the investigator as to binding contract for payments. Make certain you provide any documentation you can, including any other complaints against the company.
Hope info helps.
#12 UPDATE EX-employee responds
Yeah they are crooked
AUTHOR: Ex Employee - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, September 13, 2007
First and foremost they really don't have the licenses they are supposed too. In fact for the two and a half months that I did work for them I was never doing it by the law. Now we already have them without licenses that is disregard for the law #1. They also force their sales people to knock on homes until 9 p.m. which is also against the laws. Most cities require you to stop before 7 P.M.
Joshua Dooley one of the Managers for this company, would mislead people into thinking that he was with their previous Alarm company and just there to upgrade the system. His Brother Brandon Dooley, another manager for this company is actualy famous for setting up contracts under dead people's names if the living person has poor credit. They also give you a little card to fill out and they tell you its just to confirm that you are the home owner and you don't have any warrants for your arrest. TRUTH IS IT'S A CREDIT CHECK!!! The only place they have an actual office is in Orem Utah. Other than that they have little make shift apartments that they turn into offices. No permanent locations outside of Utah.
I was told by one of the "owners" Jeremy Pixton that they don't really worry about permits and laws, because the only way there would be a problem is if the sales person brought it on themselves. I actually gave up the only job I loved going to every day, for the promise of great cash. Now I have neither. Because of how this company operates my family and I are struggling to make it financialy now. For the first time in my life I am getting food stamps. I completely understand how you feel, the best solution I can give you would be this. Don't pay them the monthly fee. Instead just pay them $1.00 a month. They will shut off your service, but cannot report you to collections because you are making payments. Your contracts are worth a little over $1400.00 by just sending them one buck a month it would actually take 100 years to pay it in full. I know it sucks you still have to pay something. Look at it this way for paying $1.00 a month for the rest of your life they won't get paid off, and you do have a noise maker to scare people off. If you need anything else from me I am happy to help just respond to this and give me a way to contact you Email, phone whatever you prefer. I am sorry that they got you too!
#13 Author of original report
Monitronics International & Platinum Protection
AUTHOR: Brianmilliner - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, August 07, 2007

