- Report: #162217
Complaint Review: NaviComm - Opticom - One Call Communications
Related Reports
Featured Ripoff Reports
Ripoff Reports
Ripoff Report on CBS 19
Ripoff Report on CBS 19 - Global Marketing Alliance
Ripoff Report on ABC 15 - Smart Shopper
Ripoff Report - Girls Gone Wild
Ripoff Report on Fox 11 - Car Repair
Special Features
-
Doctored Reviews is designed to help patients, doctors, and websites understand the problems created by Medical Justice, a company trying to restrict online patient reviews, and to offer some ways that let patients freely talk about their healthcare experiences. -
The government should serve voters, not corporate special interests. Public Citizen works to empower ordinary citizens, reduce the influence of big corporations on government, open the government to public scrutiny, and hold public officials accountable for their misdeeds. -
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE BBB: NOT a government agency as listed in your local phone book. Instead the BBB is a private non-profit / franchise operation. 20/20 exposes the BBB, Hamas Terror Group Gets 'A' Rating - BBB is running a "pay for play" scheme.
| NaviComm - Opticom - One Call Communications PO Box 3141
Carmel, Indiana U.S.A. |
|
NaviComm - Opticom - One Call Communications Fradulent Billing Ripoff Carmel Indiana
*Author of original report: FCC Reply
*Author of original report: FCC Reply
*Author of original report: FCC Reply
*Author of original report: FCC Reply
Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
I received a bill from my local telephone company which included 2 charges on the same date for One Call / Opticom / NaviComm totalling $64.92. When I called the phone number for billing inquiries I was told this was for long distance charges through the internet from my home phone number.
I told them no one in my household accessed long distance on the internet and asked what web site was used. They could not tell me the web site, only that it was accessed through my home telephone number.
I called my local phone company and had them remove the charges and block future usage on this company. I since received a bill directly from OneCall Communications Inc. telling me I am obligated to pay. I have sent a letter of dispute to One Call Communications and filed a complaint with the FCC.
Kimberly
Colton, California
U.S.A.
I told them no one in my household accessed long distance on the internet and asked what web site was used. They could not tell me the web site, only that it was accessed through my home telephone number.
I called my local phone company and had them remove the charges and block future usage on this company. I since received a bill directly from OneCall Communications Inc. telling me I am obligated to pay. I have sent a letter of dispute to One Call Communications and filed a complaint with the FCC.
Kimberly
Colton, California
U.S.A.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 10/26/2005 02:49 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/NaviComm-Opticom-One-Call-Communications/Carmel-Indiana-46082/NaviComm-Opticom-One-Call-Communications-Fradulent-Billing-Ripoff-Carmel-Indiana-162217. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on NaviComm - Opticom - One Call Communications
Search for additional reports
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
Search Tips#1 Author of original report
FCC Reply
AUTHOR: Kimberly - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, September 23, 2006
In March, 2006, I received a reply from my complaint to the FCC on Navicomm telling me that they forwarded my complaint to the company. The FCC went on to say that they received a response from Navicomm and I should have received one as well (which I didn't!). The FCC also said to write them a letter if I did not receive a response from the company.
I wrote back to the FCC on April 25, 2006, to advise that I did not receive a response. So far, I have heard nothing, but a least I haven't received any more bills.
What amazes me is that companies like this could still be in business.
I wrote back to the FCC on April 25, 2006, to advise that I did not receive a response. So far, I have heard nothing, but a least I haven't received any more bills.
What amazes me is that companies like this could still be in business.
Respond to this report!
What's this? #2 Author of original report
FCC Reply
AUTHOR: Kimberly - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, September 23, 2006
In March, 2006, I received a reply from my complaint to the FCC on Navicomm telling me that they forwarded my complaint to the company. The FCC went on to say that they received a response from Navicomm and I should have received one as well (which I didn't!). The FCC also said to write them a letter if I did not receive a response from the company.
I wrote back to the FCC on April 25, 2006, to advise that I did not receive a response. So far, I have heard nothing, but a least I haven't received any more bills.
What amazes me is that companies like this could still be in business.
I wrote back to the FCC on April 25, 2006, to advise that I did not receive a response. So far, I have heard nothing, but a least I haven't received any more bills.
What amazes me is that companies like this could still be in business.
Respond to this report!
What's this? #3 Author of original report
FCC Reply
AUTHOR: Kimberly - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, September 23, 2006
In March, 2006, I received a reply from my complaint to the FCC on Navicomm telling me that they forwarded my complaint to the company. The FCC went on to say that they received a response from Navicomm and I should have received one as well (which I didn't!). The FCC also said to write them a letter if I did not receive a response from the company.
I wrote back to the FCC on April 25, 2006, to advise that I did not receive a response. So far, I have heard nothing, but a least I haven't received any more bills.
What amazes me is that companies like this could still be in business.
I wrote back to the FCC on April 25, 2006, to advise that I did not receive a response. So far, I have heard nothing, but a least I haven't received any more bills.
What amazes me is that companies like this could still be in business.
Respond to this report!
What's this? #4 Author of original report
FCC Reply
AUTHOR: Kimberly - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, September 23, 2006
In March, 2006, I received a reply from my complaint to the FCC on Navicomm telling me that they forwarded my complaint to the company. The FCC went on to say that they received a response from Navicomm and I should have received one as well (which I didn't!). The FCC also said to write them a letter if I did not receive a response from the company.
I wrote back to the FCC on April 25, 2006, to advise that I did not receive a response. So far, I have heard nothing, but a least I haven't received any more bills.
What amazes me is that companies like this could still be in business.
I wrote back to the FCC on April 25, 2006, to advise that I did not receive a response. So far, I have heard nothing, but a least I haven't received any more bills.
What amazes me is that companies like this could still be in business.
Respond to this report!
What's this? 
