• Report: #162217

Complaint Review: NaviComm - Opticom - One Call Communications

Thank You

Read how Ripoff Report saves consumers millions.

  • Submitted: Wed, October 26, 2005
  • Updated: Sat, September 23, 2006

  • Reported By:Colton California
NaviComm - Opticom - One Call Communications
PO Box 3141 Carmel, Indiana U.S.A.

NaviComm - Opticom - One Call Communications Fradulent Billing Ripoff Carmel Indiana

*Author of original report: FCC Reply

*Author of original report: FCC Reply

*Author of original report: FCC Reply

*Author of original report: FCC Reply

What's this?
What's this?
What's this?
Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Ripoff Report
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™

SEO Reputation Management at its best!

I received a bill from my local telephone company which included 2 charges on the same date for One Call / Opticom / NaviComm totalling $64.92. When I called the phone number for billing inquiries I was told this was for long distance charges through the internet from my home phone number.

I told them no one in my household accessed long distance on the internet and asked what web site was used. They could not tell me the web site, only that it was accessed through my home telephone number.

I called my local phone company and had them remove the charges and block future usage on this company. I since received a bill directly from OneCall Communications Inc. telling me I am obligated to pay. I have sent a letter of dispute to One Call Communications and filed a complaint with the FCC.

Kimberly
Colton, California
U.S.A.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 10/26/2005 02:49 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/NaviComm-Opticom-One-Call-Communications/Carmel-Indiana-46082/NaviComm-Opticom-One-Call-Communications-Fradulent-Billing-Ripoff-Carmel-Indiana-162217. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.

Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.

Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on NaviComm - Opticom - One Call Communications

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Search Tips
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author 4Consumer 0Employee/Owner
Updates & Rebuttals

#1 Author of original report

FCC Reply

AUTHOR: Kimberly - (U.S.A.)

In March, 2006, I received a reply from my complaint to the FCC on Navicomm telling me that they forwarded my complaint to the company. The FCC went on to say that they received a response from Navicomm and I should have received one as well (which I didn't!). The FCC also said to write them a letter if I did not receive a response from the company.

I wrote back to the FCC on April 25, 2006, to advise that I did not receive a response. So far, I have heard nothing, but a least I haven't received any more bills.

What amazes me is that companies like this could still be in business.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Author of original report

FCC Reply

AUTHOR: Kimberly - (U.S.A.)

In March, 2006, I received a reply from my complaint to the FCC on Navicomm telling me that they forwarded my complaint to the company. The FCC went on to say that they received a response from Navicomm and I should have received one as well (which I didn't!). The FCC also said to write them a letter if I did not receive a response from the company.

I wrote back to the FCC on April 25, 2006, to advise that I did not receive a response. So far, I have heard nothing, but a least I haven't received any more bills.

What amazes me is that companies like this could still be in business.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 Author of original report

FCC Reply

AUTHOR: Kimberly - (U.S.A.)

In March, 2006, I received a reply from my complaint to the FCC on Navicomm telling me that they forwarded my complaint to the company. The FCC went on to say that they received a response from Navicomm and I should have received one as well (which I didn't!). The FCC also said to write them a letter if I did not receive a response from the company.

I wrote back to the FCC on April 25, 2006, to advise that I did not receive a response. So far, I have heard nothing, but a least I haven't received any more bills.

What amazes me is that companies like this could still be in business.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#4 Author of original report

FCC Reply

AUTHOR: Kimberly - (U.S.A.)

In March, 2006, I received a reply from my complaint to the FCC on Navicomm telling me that they forwarded my complaint to the company. The FCC went on to say that they received a response from Navicomm and I should have received one as well (which I didn't!). The FCC also said to write them a letter if I did not receive a response from the company.

I wrote back to the FCC on April 25, 2006, to advise that I did not receive a response. So far, I have heard nothing, but a least I haven't received any more bills.

What amazes me is that companies like this could still be in business.
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.



Ripoff Report Legal Directory