• Report: #232560

Complaint Review: Newport Coast Capital Corporation

  • Submitted: Thu, January 25, 2007
  • Updated: Fri, May 20, 2011

  • Reported By:newport California
Newport Coast Capital Corporation
620 Newport Center Dr. Suite 1100 Newport Beach, California U.S.A.

Newport Coast Capital Corporation Newport Coast Entertainment Tim Cho Timothy Cho fraud, embezzlement, misrepresentation, stole over $300K, ripoff, con artist, grand theft investment rip off, ceo a conman and ripoff and liar Newport Beach California

*REBUTTAL Owner of company: Extortion: All these fraudulent complaints are by one individual - Sandra Richmond

*REBUTTAL Owner of company: These are fraudulent complaints used as extortion

*REBUTTAL Owner of company: These are fraudulent complaints used as a extortion tactic

*REBUTTAL Owner of company: These are fraudulent complaints from one person

*Author of original report: Newport coast entertainment

*UPDATE EX-employee responds: WHAT OFFICE/WHAT PHONE NUMBER?

*UPDATE EX-employee responds: WHAT OFFICE/WHAT PHONE NUMBER?

*UPDATE EX-employee responds: WHAT OFFICE/WHAT PHONE NUMBER?

*Author of original report: THE TRUTH

*UPDATE EX-employee responds: READ FTC COMPLAINT/ALSO READ FINAL ORDER

*UPDATE EX-employee responds: More documentation

*UPDATE EX-employee responds: FTC Sues Day Trading Seminar Promoter Over Deceptive Ad Claims

*UPDATE EX-employee responds: other accusations

*UPDATE EX-employee responds: Beware everyone

*UPDATE EX-employee responds: Beware everyone

*REBUTTAL Owner of company: These are fraudulent complaints from one person

*Author of original report: Theft Amounts

What's this?
What's this?
What's this?
Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Ripoff Report
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™

SEO Reputation Management at its best!

Newport Coast Capital Corp. was TCI Corp who was attacked by the FTC so they went under. Then the owner Tim Cho opened Newport Coast Capital Corp. And then Newport Coast Entertainment.

He has always done day trading, through brokers as he is not licensed. He is now raising money for movie production company offering a 35% guaranteed and bonded return in 12 months or less. The problem is he did not register this as a security and has been selling it as one and without license. The amount of the return has been dropped to 25% which is still illegal and called usury. He, Cho, takes and immediate 15% out of the persons investment for a commission without disclosing that, and then passes the funds to Alliance Entertainment Group.

The CEO of that company has many names and was convicted for credit card scams on innocent people upwards of 25 Million dollars. Since he changed his Iranian name several times, no one can get an accurate search of him done. So people invest and have no idea how bad an idea that is. My experience is that Tim Cho, stole through his company and with the help of the CEO of Alliance, my whole movie investment with an expected return of 35% and the principal amount of 225K.

These two are partners in crime, and have made up many stories. They are under investigation and until that is completed, everyone beware. I am hitting them with a civil/criminal suit with damages, etc.... for over a Million dollars.

These are masterminds and crooks with sheets of fraud and dishonesty. They also have no remorse, no ethics or values.

Kendra
newport, California
U.S.A.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 01/25/2007 01:17 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Newport-Coast-Capital-Corporation/Newport-Beach-California-92660/Newport-Coast-Capital-Corporation-Newport-Coast-Entertainment-Tim-Cho-Timothy-Cho-fraud-e-232560. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.

Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.

Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Newport Coast Capital Corporation

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Search Tips
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author 12Consumer 5Employee/Owner
Updates & Rebuttals

#1 REBUTTAL Owner of company

Extortion: All these fraudulent complaints are by one individual - Sandra Richmond

AUTHOR: Tim - (U.S.A.)

The individual responsible for generating all these complaints is a professional scam artist and extortionist. She has used these simular methods to extort other companies and individuals as well. We have discovered she has had 2 criminal convictions and involved with more than 25 civil cases, Below are her information:

Sandra Richmond, Alias: Sandra C. Richmond, Sandra E. Richmond, Sandra Colleen Moyer, Sandra Savicky, Sandra Schutt, Nikki Sabo, Sandra Cho, Deborah Susan Reckling,

CRIMINAL RECORDS LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Case No. CP-36-CR-0002538-1996
Name: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania vs. Sandra Colleen Richmond
DOB: 1/16/1961

Charge 1: False Reports To Law Enforcement Authorities Guilty plea to a lesser charge

Charge 2: Disorderly conduct No Lo Contendere

County/State: Lancaster, PA

Offense Dates: 4/13/96 to 5/17/96

Date Filed: 6/21/96

Court: Court of Common Pleas

Issuing Auth.: Lancaster Police Department

Filed by: Peter Anders

Lower Court Docket: CR00326-96

Criminal ID: CR00326-96

Legacy Docket: 44511

Legacy Docket: 2538CR1996

Disposition: 1) Guilty plea to a lesser charge.
2) Nolo Contendere plea

Reports: Sandra Colleen Richmond, 415 W Marion St., Lancaster PA. #96-15202; Sec 4904 of PA Crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904)

Reports:
 
Apr 13, 1996 (1710 hrs): Richmond made a false report of a robbery to Officers Hall and Will Genetti. Richmond alleged that on or near the 300 block of S. Ann St. she was robbed by a Hispanic female. Richmond claimed she asked the woman for directions to Chester St., and the woman assaulted her, robbed her of a change purse containing $20 from her vehicle. The change purse was allegedly inside a larger purse from the back seat of her car. Richmond also claimed that the woman smashed her vehicles rear windows to get the purse, and the woman and another individual vandalized her vehicle, causing $2000 in property damage. Richmond responded that she didnt see any street signs. Richmond stated she was in the area to give $20 she had owed to one Esther (no last name). She later changed her story stating she was in the area to see one Maude Burke. Richmond later stated she had not asked anyone for directions but was simply attacked and robbed at a stop sign. Officer Genetti noticed that Richmonds vehicle had no rear doors or windows, and obviously her rear windows had not been smashed. Officer Genetti gave Richmond a chance to change her story, while warning her that it was a crime to issue a false police report. Officer Genetti suspected this may have been a drug deal gone bad.

Apr 14, 1996 (1015 hrs): Richmond called Sgt. Anderson. Anderson found Richmond to be evasive, stating she would not answer questions and would not come to the police station to look at suspect photos.

Apr 14, 1996 (1050 hrs): Officer Genetti went to Richmonds home and spoke with her boyfriend, Darryl Moyer, Jr. Moyer said Richmond was in the vicinity of the alleged scene to look for a dress. This is the 3rd version of the story of why Richmond was in the vicinity of the scene.

May 15, 1996: Richmond called Capt. Arnold. She stated she wanted to meet to discuss the incident and report an additional incident. Richmond met with Capt. Arnold and Officer Anders. Richmond stated that a Hispanic female, 16-17 years of age, approached her, acted sweet and got into her car. Richmond stated that she and the female started fighting, then two African American males showed up and smashed in her windows and sunroof. Richmond stated Boy, someone must have been training someone down there. Im trying to figure out why my car wasnt moving. Someone trained them, they must have pressed my emergency brake.

Officer Anders filed charges against Sandra Richmond.
Convicted of a DUI in Lancaster on July 30th,1996.

Case No. 1134-1996

Name: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania vs. Sandra Colleen Richmond

DOB: 1/16/1961

Charge: Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol or Controlled Substance;

PA Vehicle Code 75.3731 (a)(1) County/State: Lancaster, PA

Offense Date: 2/15/96 (2143 hrs)

Date Filed: 7/30/96 Court: Court of Common Pleas District: Magisterial District

02-2-02 Police Report: 96-6915

Issuing Auth.: Lancaster Bureau of Police

Filed by: Officer Bradley R. Shenk

Sentence: Accelerate Rehabilitative Disposition (ARD: an Alternative sentencing program) per conditions of order. License suspended 8 mos. (or 2 yrs/8 mos.) Attend ID to be paid 50 hours of community service.

Reports:

PFA Order (Protection From Abuse Order) 5/5/95: 1974-95 - Mary Richmond vs. Sandra Richmond Mary Richmond, Sandras mother, filed a PFA (Protection From Abuse) Order against Sandra, alleging repeated physical beatings, death threat, stolen property, attempted to steal drugs, threatened to call Marys work to smear her to her employer.

2/6/96: 1134-1996 (Police Report 96-6915) Commonwealth of Pennsylvania vs. Sandra C. Richmond DUI,

Offense: 2/15/96,

Filed: 2/16/96.

On 2/15/96 at 2143 hrs. Sandra Colleen Richmond was passed out in her gray Dodge sedan, PALP# AXW9619 in front of 136 N. Mulberry St., Lancaster, PA. Officer found Richmond stopped with the engine running and transmission in drive. Richmond was passed out and slumped over to the right with her head on the passenger seat. Her vehicle was partially blocking the roadway. Richmond had a plastic cup containing wine or champagne between her legs. Officer found a blue wax paper baggie commonly used to package heroin on the passenger seat, and a needle cap was found on the drivers seat. Richmond failed preliminary tests at the scene and later refused to have her blood drawn at the station. Richmond had a moderate odor of alcohol on her breath. ARD - The Commonwealth charged Richmond with I Count of DUI, sentencing her to a suspended license of 8 months, 2 yrs. Attend ID to be paid within 2 months. Perform 50 hours of community service.

4/7/97: 2538 1996 Police Report 96-15202 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania vs. Sandra C. Richmond

Offense: 3/7/97,

Filed: 4/7/97.

Richmond pleaded down from False Reports to Authorities to Disorderly Conduct.

No Trespass Order

February 4, 2000 No Trespass Order as Respondent Following a pattern of harassing and libelous behavior by Richmond at Stephen Hogans office, Hogans attorney files a No Trespass Order, which Richmond then violates by coming to his office. She is cited for trespassing by the authorities.

Newport Beach Police Department 12/12/2006 -
Police Report: Dr No. 06-12735
Threatening Phone Call Report: Sandra Richmond called a resident in Newport Coast CA and made threats to him and his family.

Newport Beach Police Department 12/23/2006 - Police Report: Dr No. 06-13098
Domestic Battery Report: PC 234(e)(1) Sandra Richmond physical beating on her husband.

Newport Beach Police Department 01/26/2006 - Police Report: Dr No. 07-00987
Threatening Phone Call Report: Sandra Richmond constantly calls a family in Ladera Ranch CA with threats of harm to them, their children and extortion.

CIVIL RECORDS NEWPORT BEACH, CA
Case No. 07HL00034 Case Name: Thomas Knaup vs. Sandra Cho, AKA Sandra Richmond
Type: Civil Judgment / Unlawful Detainer
Reports: Judgment against Sandra C. Richmond, orders Sandra C. Richmond to leave property.

CIVIL RECORDS LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA
Case No. 4601158 Name: Sandra Moyer Cross Party Name: Lee County Tax Collector Record Date: 7/25/2005 County/State: Lee / Florida Type: Order Book Type: O Book: 4812 Page: 1084 Comments: CS04-CA-003086, 1998-2003, INTANGIBLE TAX WARRANTS Instrument #: 6908804 Note: The original document is necessary to verify the ID.

CIVIL LITIGATION - PENNSYLVANIA
Case No. CI-07-08382 Case Name: Dell & Homsher, LLC vs. Sandra Moyer, AKA Sandra Richmond, AKA Sandra Shutt Type: Civil Judgment Amount: Pending County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 8/22/07 Date Updated: Pending Disposition: Open Reports : Reports that Richmond owes their law firm approximately $48,202.

Case No. CI-02-02667 Case Name: Sandra Moyer vs. Eric J. Hoffman and Mary Beth Hoffman Type: Civil Amount: Pending County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 3/27/02 Date Updated: Pending Reports: Dell & Homsher from the above-listed case represented Sandra Moyer in that case.

Case No. CI-01-07750 Case Name: Robert N. Lepore, J. Stephen Hogan, Alma M. Hogan, DBA Hogan Development Company vs. Sandra Moyer Type: Civil Judgment / Unlawful Detainer Amount: Pending County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 8/1/01 Date Updated: 2/13/04 Reports: Suit involving J. Stephen Hogan re: rents at 350 Buch Ave., Mannheim Township, Lancaster County, PA 17601. On 9/13/02 the judge ruled to recover 350 Buch Ave. from Richmond. On 2/13/04 settlement reached, Richmonds counterclaim settled, costs paid, and the matter concluded.

Case No. CI-01-00278 Case Name: Sandra C. Moyer as Administrator of the Estate of Michael J. Sabo vs. Mary A. Richmond Type: Civil Judgment Amount: Pending County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 1/5/01 Date Updated: Pending Reports: Sandra C. Moyer sues her mother, Mary A. Richmond over the estate of her deceased brother, Michael J. Sabo. Threats of Violence and Act of Violence by Sandra: Mary Richmond files a Protective Order against Sandra Richmond citing death threats, physical abuse, burglary, attempted theft or Mary Richmonds pharmaceuticals and alleged drug abuse. Mother passed away.

Case No. CI-98-05268 Case Name: Sandra Moyer vs. Darryl L. Moyer, Jr. Type: Family court, Divorce Amount: Pending County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 5/7/98 Date Updated: Pending Reports: Threats of Violence: Richmond (Sandra Moyer) threatened to pay someone to have his legs broken.

Case No. CI-98-05406 Case Name: National City Mortgage vs. Sandra C. Richmond Type: Mortgage Foreclosure Amount: $62,770.83 with interest from 10/20/98 Plaintiff Counsel: Frank Federman, Esq. Property: 415 W. Marion St., Lancaster, PA 17601 Mailing Address: PO Box 11231, Lancaster, PA 17605 Date Filed: 5/13/98 Date Updated: Pending Reports: Sandra C. Richmond skips on a $62,770.83 mortgage, leaving 415 W. Marion St. Lancaster residence vacant for months. Neighbor reported Richmond had moved out months prior and the property was vacant. Post Office had no forwarding address for Richmond. Property returned to the bank, recorded 4/6/99. Costs awarded to plaintiff counsel, $2301.92.

Case No. JC3211199536 Case Name: Sears Roebuck and Co. vs. Richmond Type: Civil Judgment Amount: $3574 County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 11/3/95 Date Updated: Pending

Case No. CJ-1994-8083 Case Name: Bank of Lancaster County vs. Richmond Type: Civil Judgment Amount: $1197 County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 12/9/94 Date Updated: Pending Reports: Bank of Lancaster is awarded $1108 against Sandra C. Richmond.

Case No. CI-1993-0449 Case Name: Richmond vs. Hershey Farm Company Type: Civil Demand Amount: $10,000 Plaintiff Counsel: Patrick Zimmerman, Esq. Property: Hershey Village Apartments, 350 Sun Valley Dr., Leola, PA 17540 Date Filed: 1/28/93 Date Updated: 1/3/97 Reports: Complaints served 2/2/93 on Richard P. Nuffort (Atty), 22 South Duke St., Lancaster, PA 17602; also on John F. Cottone, 1330 Wabank Rd., also on James R. Haines, 1173 Elm Ave. and also on J. Freeland Hatfield, 603 South West End Ave., all in Lancaster, PA 17603. On 7/30/96 Richmond was awarded $10,000 following settlement agreement, paid $1000 by Def. Michael L. Yingst, $1000 by Def. Hatfield, and $8000 by Def. Hershey Farm Company. Insurance Company for Hershey Farm, State Farm Insurance paid an additional $800 and Def. Hatfield paid an additional $200. Richmond assigned her action ($1000) against Yingst to Hershey Farm Company and Def. Hatfield. Threats of Violence An attorney reports that Richmond made threats against John F. Cottone of Hershey Farms Company.

Case No. CI-1992-0969 Case Name: Hershey Farm Company vs. Richmond Type: Civil / Unlawful Detainer Amount: Pending Property: Hershey Heritage Apartments, 1330 Wabank Rd., Unit 1, Lancaster, PA 17603 Date Filed: 3/2/92 Date Updated: 10/11/95 Reports: Terminated on 10/11/95 per Local Rule 350.

Case No. CI-1992-1248 Case Name: Woerner vs. Fishel (Co-Def. of Sandra Richmond) Type: Appeal From District Justice Amount: Unknown County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 3/18/92 Date Updated: 10/11/95 Reports: Notice of Appeal filed by Patrick Zimmerman, Richmonds attorney. Larry Woerner vs. Keith Fishel and Sandra Richmond, 637 Wyncroft Lane, Unit 1, Lancaster, PA 17601. Andrew Hooker Appel, Esq. filed against Fishel for $3482.83 plus costs. Judgment entered against Defendant. On 10/11/95 case terminated per Local Rule 350.

Case No. CI-1990-3563 Case Name: Martin & Virginia Maerz vs. Ted & Sandra Savicky (AKA Sandra Richmond) Type: Civil Judgment Defense Counsel: Patrick Zimmerman, Esq. Amount: $3205.49 County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 6/18/90 Preliminary objections by Defendants Date Filed: 8/24/90 Judgment awarded to Plaintiffs Date Updated: 6/17/92 Reports: Martin & Virginia Maerz are awarded $3205.49 against Sandra Savicky, AKA Richmond in an action filed on June 18, 1990.

Case No. CI-1990-1268 Case Name: Sandra Colleen Richmond vs. Theodore Anthony Savicky Type: Divorce Amount: Unknown County/State: Lancaster, PA Date File: 3/28/90 Date Updated: 5/17/91 Reports: Threats of Violence: Sandra threatened Richard Savicky to slit his throat and get the mafia after him. His wife Charlotte also reports that Sandra threatened her life and that Sandra also threatened the life of their son and Sandras ex-husband, Ted Savicky.

CIVIL LITIGATION - TEXAS

Case No. 521369. Case Name: N. Gopal Swamy vs. Sandra Richmond (ex-wife, Nalini Swamy) Type: Civil Judgment Amount: Pending Court/County/State: Houston Court, Harris County, TX Date Filed: 2/18/88 (Film 871710005) Date Filed: 8/29/88 (Film 881691721) Date Filed: 11/10/89 (Film 805002314) Reports: Richmonds address in this suit: 1926 Rainy River Dr., Houston, TX 77088. See Witness Interviews for a summary on this case.

Case No. Reports: Reports that Sandra Richmond was sued by her employer, Allied Capital Mortgage, in Houston, Texas. Richmonds boss of that time is Don Strauss, Investigation ongoing.
February 18, 1988 Sandra Richmond is sued by N. Gopal Swamy in Houston, Texas. Mr. Swamy had sold a house to Richmond in Houston. Richmond stopped making payments. Swamy prevailed in court and has a judgment against her.

BANKRUPTCIES, LIENS, JUDGMENTS AND DEFAULTS
 
Case No. 9725057 Case Name: Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Sandra E. Richmond Type: Chapter 7 Bankruptcy - Discharged County/State: Delaware, PA Date Filed: 11/10/97 Date Updated: 8/9/03 Reports: Richmonds SSN: 208-52-4170. Her address at the time was 415 W. Marion St., and possibly 232 W. Orange St., in Lancaster.

Case No. CV000051094 Case Name: Pet Emergency Treatment Service vs. Sandra Richmond Type: Civil Judgment Amount: $171 County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 12/16/94 Date Updated: 6/5/07 Reports: Richmonds address at the time was 415 W. Marion St., Lancaster, PA 17603. Pet Emergency Treatment Service is awarded $171 in action vs. Sandra Richmond.
 
Case No. CV000024895 Case Name: Sears Roebuck and Co. vs. Sandra C. Richmond Type: Civil Judgment Amount: $3514 County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 9/22/95 Date Updated: 6/5/07 Reports: Richmonds address at the time was 415 W. Marion St., Lancaster, PA 17603. Sears Roebuck and Co. is awarded $3514 against Sandra C. Richmond.

Case No. JC3083199436 Case Name: Bank of Lancaster vs. Sandra C. Richmond Type: Civil Judgment Amount: $1197 County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 12/9/94 Date Updated: 6/5/07 Reports: Richmonds address at the time was 350 Sun Valley Dr., Leola, PA 17540. The Bank of Lancaster is awarded $1197 against Sandra Richmond.

Case No. CV000046494 Case Name: Bank of Lancaster vs. Sandra C. Richmond Type: Civil Judgment Amount: $1108 County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 10/21/94 Date Updated: 6/5/07 Reports: Richmonds address at the time was 350 Sun Valley Dr., Leola, PA 17540. Bank of Lancaster is awarded $1108 against Sandra C. Richmond.

Case No. JC3211199536 Case Name: Sears Roebuck and Co. vs. Sandra C. Richmond Type: Civil Judgment Amount: $3574 County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 11/3/95 Date Updated: 6/5/07 Reports: Richmonds address at the time was 415 W. Marion St., Lancaster, PA 17603. Sears Roebuck and Co. is awarded $3574 against Sandra C. Richmond.

Possible Identity Theft Authority is looking into it, Richmond appears to have been using the identity of Deborah Susan Reckling, using SSN: 218-52-4710, DOB: 7/24/1951. Richmonds most probably accurate SSN is 208-52-4170 (DOB: 1/16/1961, DOB: 9/1/1960), which appears on her Bankruptcy record in Delaware County. Typographical errors can inadvertently occur where an individual transposes one of the numbers, for example, a 3 becomes an 8, or a 7 becomes a 9. In this case, there was a sequential change of the second number in the SSN, from a 0 to a 1. This is unlikely in that the numbers are not similar, and also because Richmond shows 5 addresses listed. These addresses were collectively reported to the credit bureaus 23 times, so it would appear that the appearance of these addresses are not random typographical errors.

Richmond used the name Nikki Sabo for an undisclosed purpose. As you know, Richmonds deceased brother was Michael Sabo, Richmond sued her mother, Mary Richmond over the estate. Unfortunately, Mary Richmond is now deceased, however the probate records are available.

There are many other threats and harassments with many other individuals and companies as discovery continue, Use the internet to put false derogatory information on individuals or companies for extortion. Threats of violence. Commit perjury and lied under oath. Professional debtor Rent a home, not pay rent until being evicted. Dating Scam - Move in with lovers, when the relationship doesnt workout, made up false allegation to filed Protection From Abuse (PFA) orders to keep them from go to their own home and wouldnt move out until eviction. Forgery - forge documents Make up bogus charges of abuse or sexually harassment against employers, ex-lovers, married men to extort money. Make up bogus charges of sexually harassment conducts against attorneys in an effort to extort them to forgive the legal fees or to continue representing on her case. File false complaint against Police Officers for retaliation.

At last hopefully, when Ms. Richmond make untrue statements which you can use these infomation to impeach her in court and the forthcoming evidence.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 REBUTTAL Owner of company

These are fraudulent complaints used as extortion

AUTHOR: Tim - (U.S.A.)

These are fraudulent complaints are from one person posted to look like from many individuals. All of these complaints are used in an effort to extort money from me and my companies. The individual responsible for generating all these complaints is a professional scam artist and extortionist. We have found out this individual has 2 criminal convictions and involved with at least 25 civil cases, she has used this method to extort other companies and individuals for money as well.

Below are her information: Sandra Richmond, Alias: Sandra C. Richmond, Sandra E. Richmond, Sandra Colleen Moyer, Sandra Savicky, Sandra Schutt, Nikki Sabo, Sandra Cho, Deborah Susan Reckling, Kendra ,

CRIMINAL RECORDS LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Case No. CP-36-CR-0002538-1996 Name: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania vs. Sandra Colleen Richmond DOB: 1/16/1961 Charge 1: False Reports To Law Enforcement Authorities Guilty plea to a lesser charge Charge 2: Disorderly conduct No Lo Contendere County/State: Lancaster, PA Offense Dates: 4/13/96 to 5/17/96 Date Filed: 6/21/96 Court: Court of Common Pleas Issuing Auth.: Lancaster Police Department Filed by: Peter Anders Lower Court Docket: CR00326-96 Criminal ID: CR00326-96 Legacy Docket: 44511 Legacy Docket: 2538CR1996 Disposition: 1) Guilty plea to a lesser charge. 2) Nolo Contendere plea Reports: Sandra Colleen Richmond, 415 W Marion St., Lancaster PA. #96-15202; Sec 4904 of PA Crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904)

Reports:

Apr 13, 1996 (1710 hrs): Richmond made a false report of a robbery to Officers Hall and Will Genetti. Richmond alleged that on or near the 300 block of S. Ann St. she was robbed by a Hispanic female. Richmond claimed she asked the woman for directions to Chester St., and the woman assaulted her, robbed her of a change purse containing $20 from her vehicle. The change purse was allegedly inside a larger purse from the back seat of her car. Richmond also claimed that the woman smashed her vehicles rear windows to get the purse, and the woman and another individual vandalized her vehicle, causing $2000 in property damage. Richmond responded that she didnt see any street signs. Richmond stated she was in the area to give $20 she had owed to one Esther (no last name). She later changed her story stating she was in the area to see one Maude Burke. Richmond later stated she had not asked anyone for directions but was simply attacked and robbed at a stop sign. Officer Genetti noticed that Richmonds vehicle had no rear doors or windows, and obviously her rear windows had not been smashed. Officer Genetti gave Richmond a chance to change her story, while warning her that it was a crime to issue a false police report. Officer Genetti suspected this may have been a drug deal gone bad.

Apr 14, 1996 (1015 hrs): Richmond called Sgt. Anderson. Anderson found Richmond to be evasive, stating she would not answer questions and would not come to the police station to look at suspect photos.

Apr 14, 1996 (1050 hrs): Officer Genetti went to Richmonds home and spoke with her boyfriend, Darryl Moyer, Jr. Moyer said Richmond was in the vicinity of the alleged scene to look for a dress. This is the 3rd version of the story of why Richmond was in the vicinity of the scene.

May 15, 1996: Richmond called Capt. Arnold. She stated she wanted to meet to discuss the incident and report an additional incident. Richmond met with Capt. Arnold and Officer Anders. Richmond stated that a Hispanic female, 16-17 years of age, approached her, acted sweet and got into her car. Richmond stated that she and the female started fighting, then two African American males showed up and smashed in her windows and sunroof. Richmond stated Boy, someone must have been training someone down there. Im trying to figure out why my car wasnt moving. Someone trained them, they must have pressed my emergency brake.

Officer Anders filed charges against Richmond.

Convicted of a DUI in Lancaster on July 30th,1996.

Case No. 1134-1996 Name: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania vs. Sandra Colleen Richmond DOB: 1/16/1961 Charge: Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol or Controlled Substance; PA Vehicle Code 75.3731 (a)(1) County/State: Lancaster, PA Offense Date: 2/15/96 (2143 hrs) Date Filed: 7/30/96 Court: Court of Common Pleas District: Magisterial District 02-2-02 Police Report: 96-6915 Issuing Auth.: Lancaster Bureau of Police Filed by: Officer Bradley R. Shenk Sentence: Accelerate Rehabilitative Disposition (ARD: an Alternative sentencing program) per conditions of order. License suspended 8 mos. (or 2 yrs/8 mos.) Attend ID to be paid 50 hours of community service.

Reports

PFA Order (Protection From Abuse Order) 5/5/95: 1974-95 - Mary Richmond vs. Sandra Richmond Mary Richmond, Sandras mother, filed a PFA (Protection From Abuse) Order against Sandra, alleging repeated physical beatings, death threat, stolen property, attempted to steal drugs, threatened to call Marys work to smear her to her employer.

2/6/96: 1134-1996 (Police Report 96-6915) Commonwealth of Pennsylvania vs. Sandra C. Richmond DUI, Offense: 2/15/96, Filed: 2/16/96. On 2/15/96 at 2143 hrs. Sandra Colleen Richmond was passed out in her gray Dodge sedan, PALP# AXW9619 in front of 136 N. Mulberry St., Lancaster, PA. Officer found Richmond stopped with the engine running and transmission in drive. Richmond was passed out and slumped over to the right with her head on the passenger seat. Her vehicle was partially blocking the roadway. Richmond had a plastic cup containing wine or champagne between her legs. Officer found a blue wax paper baggie commonly used to package heroin on the passenger seat, and a needle cap was found on the drivers seat. Richmond failed preliminary tests at the scene and later refused to have her blood drawn at the station. Richmond had a moderate odor of alcohol on her breath. ARD - The Commonwealth charged Richmond with I Count of DUI, sentencing her to a suspended license of 8 months, 2 yrs. Attend ID to be paid within 2 months. Perform 50 hours of community service.

4/7/97: 2538 1996 Police Report 96-15202 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania vs. Sandra C. Richmond Offense: 3/7/97, Filed: 4/7/97. Richmond pleaded down from False Reports to Authorities to Disorderly Conduct.

No Trespass Order

February 4, 2000 No Trespass Order as Respondent Following a pattern of harassing and libelous behavior by Richmond at Stephen Hogans office, Hogans attorney files a No Trespass Order, which Richmond then violates by coming to his office. She is cited for trespassing by the authorities.

Newport Beach Police Department 12/12/2006 - Police Report: Dr No. 06-12735 Threatening Phone Call Report: Sandra Richmond called a resident in Newport Coast CA and made threats to him and his family.

Newport Beach Police Department 12/23/2006 - Police Report: Dr No. 06-13098 Domestic Battery Report: PC 234(e)(1) Sandra Richmond physical beating on her husband. Newport Beach Police Department 01/26/2006 - Police Report: Dr No. 07-00987 Threatening Phone Call Report: Sandra Richmond constantly calls a family in Ladera Ranch CA with threats of harm to them, their children and extortion.

CIVIL RECORDS NEWPORT BEACH, CA

Case No. 07HL00034 Case Name: Thomas Knaup vs. Sandra Cho, AKA Sandra Richmond Type: Civil Judgment / Unlawful Detainer Amount: Pending County/State: Newport Beach, CA Date Filed: 1/19/07 Date Updated: Pending Disposition: Open Reports: Judgment against Sandra C. Richmond, orders Sandra C. Richmond to leave property.

CIVIL RECORDS LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case No. 4601158 Name: Sandra Moyer Cross Party Name: Lee County Tax Collector Record Date: 7/25/2005 County/State: Lee / Florida Type: Order Book Type: O Book: 4812 Page: 1084 Comments: CS04-CA-003086, 1998-2003, INTANGIBLE TAX WARRANTS Instrument #: 6908804 Note: The original document is necessary to verify the ID.

CIVIL LITIGATION - PENNSYLVANIA

Case No. CI-07-08382 Case Name: Dell & Homsher, LLC vs. Sandra Moyer, AKA Sandra Richmond, AKA Sandra Shutt Type: Civil Judgment Amount: Pending County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 8/22/07 Date Updated: Pending Disposition: Open Reports : Reports that Richmond owes their law firm approximately $48,202.

Case No. CI-02-02667 Case Name: Sandra Moyer vs. Eric J. Hoffman and Mary Beth Hoffman Type: Civil Amount: Pending County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 3/27/02 Date Updated: Pending Reports: Dell & Homsher from the above-listed case represented Sandra Moyer in that case.

Case No. CI-01-07750 Case Name: Robert N. Lepore, J. Stephen Hogan, Alma M. Hogan, DBA Hogan Development Company vs. Sandra Moyer Type: Civil Judgment / Unlawful Detainer Amount: Pending County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 8/1/01 Date Updated: 2/13/04 Reports: Suit involving J. Stephen Hogan re: rents at 350 Buch Ave., Mannheim Township, Lancaster County, PA 17601. On 9/13/02 the judge ruled to recover 350 Buch Ave. from Richmond. On 2/13/04 settlement reached, Richmonds counterclaim settled, costs paid, and the matter concluded.

Case No. CI-01-00278 Case Name: Sandra C. Moyer as Administrator of the Estate of Michael J. Sabo vs. Mary A. Richmond Type: Civil Judgment Amount: Pending County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 1/5/01 Date Updated: Pending Reports: Sandra C. Moyer sues her mother, Mary A. Richmond over the estate of her deceased brother, Michael J. Sabo. Threats of Violence and Act of Violence by Sandra: Mary Richmond files a Protective Order against Sandra Richmond citing death threats, physical abuse, burglary, attempted theft or Mary Richmonds pharmaceuticals and alleged drug abuse. Mother passed away.

Case No. CI-98-05268 Case Name: Sandra Moyer vs. Darryl L. Moyer, Jr. Type: Family court, Divorce Amount: Pending County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 5/7/98 Date Updated: Pending Reports: Threats of Violence: Richmond (Sandra Moyer) threatened to pay someone to have his legs broken.

Case No. CI-98-05406 Case Name: National City Mortgage vs. Sandra C. Richmond Type: Mortgage Foreclosure Amount: $62,770.83 with interest from 10/20/98 Plaintiff Counsel: Frank Federman, Esq. Property: 415 W. Marion St., Lancaster, PA 17601 Mailing Address: PO Box 11231, Lancaster, PA 17605 Date Filed: 5/13/98 Date Updated: Pending Reports: Sandra C. Richmond skips on a $62,770.83 mortgage, leaving 415 W. Marion St. Lancaster residence vacant for months. Neighbor reported Richmond had moved out months prior and the property was vacant. Post Office had no forwarding address for Richmond. Property returned to the bank, recorded 4/6/99. Costs awarded to plaintiff counsel, $2301.92.

Case No. JC3211199536 Case Name: Sears Roebuck and Co. vs. Richmond Type: Civil Judgment Amount: $3574 County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 11/3/95 Date Updated: Pending

Case No. CJ-1994-8083 Case Name: Bank of Lancaster County vs. Richmond Type: Civil Judgment Amount: $1197 County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 12/9/94 Date Updated: Pending Reports: Bank of Lancaster is awarded $1108 against Sandra C. Richmond.

Case No. CI-1993-0449 Case Name: Richmond vs. Hershey Farm Company Type: Civil Demand Amount: $10,000 Plaintiff Counsel: Patrick Zimmerman, Esq. Property: Hershey Village Apartments, 350 Sun Valley Dr., Leola, PA 17540 Date Filed: 1/28/93 Date Updated: 1/3/97 Reports: Complaints served 2/2/93 on Richard P. Nuffort (Atty), 22 South Duke St., Lancaster, PA 17602; also on John F. Cottone, 1330 Wabank Rd., also on James R. Haines, 1173 Elm Ave. and also on J. Freeland Hatfield, 603 South West End Ave., all in Lancaster, PA 17603. On 7/30/96 Richmond was awarded $10,000 following settlement agreement, paid $1000 by Def. Michael L. Yingst, $1000 by Def. Hatfield, and $8000 by Def. Hershey Farm Company. Insurance Company for Hershey Farm, State Farm Insurance paid an additional $800 and Def. Hatfield paid an additional $200. Richmond assigned her action ($1000) against Yingst to Hershey Farm Company and Def. Hatfield. Threats of Violence An attorney reports that Richmond made threats against John F. Cottone of Hershey Farms Company.

Case No. CI-1992-0969 Case Name: Hershey Farm Company vs. Richmond Type: Civil / Unlawful Detainer Amount: Pending Property: Hershey Heritage Apartments, 1330 Wabank Rd., Unit 1, Lancaster, PA 17603 Date Filed: 3/2/92 Date Updated: 10/11/95 Reports: Terminated on 10/11/95 per Local Rule 350.

Case No. CI-1992-1248 Case Name: Woerner vs. Fishel (Co-Def. of Sandra Richmond) Type: Appeal From District Justice Amount: Unknown County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 3/18/92 Date Updated: 10/11/95 Reports: Notice of Appeal filed by Patrick Zimmerman, Richmonds attorney. Larry Woerner vs. Keith Fishel and Sandra Richmond, 637 Wyncroft Lane, Unit 1, Lancaster, PA 17601. Andrew Hooker Appel, Esq. filed against Fishel for $3482.83 plus costs. Judgment entered against Defendant. On 10/11/95 case terminated per Local Rule 350.

Case No. CI-1990-3563 Case Name: Martin & Virginia Maerz vs. Ted & Sandra Savicky (AKA Sandra Richmond) Type: Civil Judgment Defense Counsel: Patrick Zimmerman, Esq. Amount: $3205.49 County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 6/18/90 Preliminary objections by Defendants Date Filed: 8/24/90 Judgment awarded to Plaintiffs Date Updated: 6/17/92 Reports: Martin & Virginia Maerz are awarded $3205.49 against Sandra Savicky, AKA Richmond in an action filed on June 18, 1990.

Case No. CI-1990-1268 Case Name: Sandra Colleen Richmond vs. Theodore Anthony Savicky Type: Divorce Amount: Unknown County/State: Lancaster, PA Date File: 3/28/90 Date Updated: 5/17/91 Reports: Threats of Violence: Sandra threatened Richard Savicky to slit his throat and get the mafia after him. His wife Charlotte also reports that Sandra threatened her life and that Sandra also threatened the life of their son and Sandras ex-husband, Ted Savicky.

CIVIL LITIGATION - TEXAS

Case No. 521369. Case Name: N. Gopal Swamy vs. Sandra Richmond (ex-wife, Nalini Swamy) Type: Civil Judgment Amount: Pending Court/County/State: Houston Court, Harris County, TX Date Filed: 2/18/88 (Film 871710005) Date Filed: 8/29/88 (Film 881691721) Date Filed: 11/10/89 (Film 805002314) Reports: Richmonds address in this suit: 1926 Rainy River Dr., Houston, TX 77088. See Witness Interviews for a summary on this case.

Case No. Reports: Reports that Sandra Richmond was sued by her employer, Allied Capital Mortgage, in Houston, Texas. Richmonds boss of that time is Don Strauss, Investigation ongoing.

February 18, 1988 Sandra Richmond is sued by N. Gopal Swamy in Houston, Texas. Mr. Swamy had sold a house to Richmond in Houston. Richmond stopped making payments. Swamy prevailed in court and has a judgment against her.

BANKRUPTCIES, LIENS, JUDGMENTS AND DEFAULTS

Case No. 9725057 Case Name: Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Sandra E. Richmond Type: Chapter 7 Bankruptcy - Discharged County/State: Delaware, PA Date Filed: 11/10/97 Date Updated: 8/9/03 Reports: Richmonds SSN: 208-52-4170. Her address at the time was 415 W. Marion St., and possibly 232 W. Orange St., in Lancaster.

Case No. CV000051094 Case Name: Pet Emergency Treatment Service vs. Sandra Richmond Type: Civil Judgment Amount: $171 County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 12/16/94 Date Updated: 6/5/07 Reports: Richmonds address at the time was 415 W. Marion St., Lancaster, PA 17603. Pet Emergency Treatment Service is awarded $171 in action vs. Sandra Richmond.

Case No. CV000024895 Case Name: Sears Roebuck and Co. vs. Sandra C. Richmond Type: Civil Judgment Amount: $3514 County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 9/22/95 Date Updated: 6/5/07 Reports: Richmonds address at the time was 415 W. Marion St., Lancaster, PA 17603. Sears Roebuck and Co. is awarded $3514 against Sandra C. Richmond.

Case No. JC3083199436 Case Name: Bank of Lancaster vs. Sandra C. Richmond Type: Civil Judgment Amount: $1197 County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 12/9/94 Date Updated: 6/5/07 Reports: Richmonds address at the time was 350 Sun Valley Dr., Leola, PA 17540. The Bank of Lancaster is awarded $1197 against Sandra Richmond.

Case No. CV000046494 Case Name: Bank of Lancaster vs. Sandra C. Richmond Type: Civil Judgment Amount: $1108 County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 10/21/94 Date Updated: 6/5/07 Reports: Richmonds address at the time was 350 Sun Valley Dr., Leola, PA 17540. Bank of Lancaster is awarded $1108 against Sandra C. Richmond.

Case No. JC3211199536 Case Name: Sears Roebuck and Co. vs. Sandra C. Richmond Type: Civil Judgment Amount: $3574 County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 11/3/95 Date Updated: 6/5/07 Reports: Richmonds address at the time was 415 W. Marion St., Lancaster, PA 17603. Sears Roebuck and Co. is awarded $3574 against Sandra C. Richmond.

Possible Identity Theft Authority is looking into it, Richmond appears to have been using the identity of Deborah Susan Reckling, using SSN: 218-52-4710, DOB: 7/24/1951. Richmonds most probably accurate SSN is 208-52-4170 (DOB: 1/16/1961, DOB: 9/1/1960), which appears on her Bankruptcy record in Delaware County. Typographical errors can inadvertently occur where an individual transposes one of the numbers, for example, a 3 becomes an 8, or a 7 becomes a 9. In this case, there was a sequential change of the second number in the SSN, from a 0 to a 1. This is unlikely in that the numbers are not similar, and also because Richmond shows 5 addresses listed. These addresses were collectively reported to the credit bureaus 23 times, so it would appear that the appearance of these addresses are not random typographical errors.

Richmond used the name Nikki Sabo for an undisclosed purpose. As you know, Richmonds deceased brother was Michael Sabo, Richmond sued her mother, Mary Richmond over the estate. Unfortunately, Mary Richmond is now deceased, however the probate records are available.

There are many other threats and harassments with many other individuals and companies as discovery continue, Use the internet to put false derogatory information on individuals or companies for extortion. Threats of violence. Commit perjury and lied under oath. Professional debtor Rent a home, not pay rent until being evicted. Dating Scam - Move in with lovers, when the relationship doesnt workout, made up false allegation to filed Protection From Abuse (PFA) orders to keep them from go to their own home and wouldnt move out until eviction. Forgery - forge documents Make up bogus charges of abuse or sexually harassment against employers, ex-lovers, married men to extort money. Make up bogus charges of sexually harassment conducts against attorneys in an effort to extort them to forgive the legal fees or to continue representing on her case. File false complaint against Police Officers for retaliation. At last hopefully, when Ms. Richmond continue to make untrue statements under oath which you can impeach in court by presenting this and the forthcoming evidence.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 REBUTTAL Owner of company

These are fraudulent complaints used as a extortion tactic

AUTHOR: Tim - (U.S.A.)

These are fraudulent complaints are from one person posted to look like from many individuals. All of these complaints are used in an effort to extort money from me and my companies. The individual responsible for generating all these complaints is a professional scam artist and extortionist. We have found out this individual has 2 criminal convictions and involved with at least 25 civil cases, she has used this method to extort other companies and individuals for money as well. Below are her information: Sandra Richmond, Alias: Sandra C. Richmond, Sandra E. Richmond, Sandra Colleen Moyer, Sandra Savicky, Sandra Schutt, Nikki Sabo, Sandra Cho, Deborah Susan Reckling,, CRIMINAL RECORDS LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Case No. CP-36-CR-0002538-1996 Name: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania vs. Sandra Colleen Richmond DOB: 1/16/1961 Charge 1: False Reports To Law Enforcement Authorities Guilty plea to a lesser charge Charge 2: Disorderly conduct No Lo Contendere County/State: Lancaster, PA Offense Dates: 4/13/96 to 5/17/96 Date Filed: 6/21/96 Court: Court of Common Pleas Issuing Auth.: Lancaster Police Department Filed by: Peter Anders Lower Court Docket: CR00326-96 Criminal ID: CR00326-96 Legacy Docket: 44511 Legacy Docket: 2538CR1996 Disposition: 1) Guilty plea to a lesser charge. 2) Nolo Contendere plea Reports: Sandra Colleen Richmond, 415 W Marion St., Lancaster PA. #96-15202; Sec 4904 of PA Crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904) Reports: Apr 13, 1996 (1710 hrs): Richmond made a false report of a robbery to Officers Hall and Will Genetti. Richmond alleged that on or near the 300 block of S. Ann St. she was robbed by a Hispanic female. Richmond claimed she asked the woman for directions to Chester St., and the woman assaulted her, robbed her of a change purse containing $20 from her vehicle. The change purse was allegedly inside a larger purse from the back seat of her car. Richmond also claimed that the woman smashed her vehicles rear windows to get the purse, and the woman and another individual vandalized her vehicle, causing $2000 in property damage. Richmond responded that she didnt see any street signs. Richmond stated she was in the area to give $20 she had owed to one Esther (no last name). She later changed her story stating she was in the area to see one Maude Burke. Richmond later stated she had not asked anyone for directions but was simply attacked and robbed at a stop sign. Officer Genetti noticed that Richmonds vehicle had no rear doors or windows, and obviously her rear windows had not been smashed. Officer Genetti gave Richmond a chance to change her story, while warning her that it was a crime to issue a false police report. Officer Genetti suspected this may have been a drug deal gone bad. Apr 14, 1996 (1015 hrs): Richmond called Sgt. Anderson. Anderson found Richmond to be evasive, stating she would not answer questions and would not come to the police station to look at suspect photos. Apr 14, 1996 (1050 hrs): Officer Genetti went to Richmonds home and spoke with her boyfriend, Darryl Moyer, Jr. Moyer said Richmond was in the vicinity of the alleged scene to look for a dress. This is the 3rd version of the story of why Richmond was in the vicinity of the scene. May 15, 1996: Richmond called Capt. Arnold. She stated she wanted to meet to discuss the incident and report an additional incident. Richmond met with Capt. Arnold and Officer Anders. Richmond stated that a Hispanic female, 16-17 years of age, approached her, acted sweet and got into her car. Richmond stated that she and the female started fighting, then two African American males showed up and smashed in her windows and sunroof. Richmond stated Boy, someone must have been training someone down there. Im trying to figure out why my car wasnt moving. Someone trained them, they must have pressed my emergency brake. Officer Anders filed charges against Richmond. Convicted of a DUI in Lancaster on July 30th,1996. Case No. 1134-1996 Name: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania vs. Sandra Colleen Richmond DOB: 1/16/1961 Charge: Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol or Controlled Substance; PA Vehicle Code 75.3731 (a)(1) County/State: Lancaster, PA Offense Date: 2/15/96 (2143 hrs) Date Filed: 7/30/96 Court: Court of Common Pleas District: Magisterial District 02-2-02 Police Report: 96-6915 Issuing Auth.: Lancaster Bureau of Police Filed by: Officer Bradley R. Shenk Sentence: Accelerate Rehabilitative Disposition (ARD: an Alternative sentencing program) per conditions of order. License suspended 8 mos. (or 2 yrs/8 mos.) Attend ID to be paid 50 hours of community service. Reports PFA Order (Protection From Abuse Order) 5/5/95: 1974-95 - Mary Richmond vs. Sandra Richmond Mary Richmond, Sandras mother, filed a PFA (Protection From Abuse) Order against Sandra, alleging repeated physical beatings, death threat, stolen property, attempted to steal drugs, threatened to call Marys work to smear her to her employer. 2/6/96: 1134-1996 (Police Report 96-6915) Commonwealth of Pennsylvania vs. Sandra C. Richmond DUI, Offense: 2/15/96, Filed: 2/16/96. On 2/15/96 at 2143 hrs. Sandra Colleen Richmond was passed out in her gray Dodge sedan, PALP# AXW9619 in front of 136 N. Mulberry St., Lancaster, PA. Officer found Richmond stopped with the engine running and transmission in drive. Richmond was passed out and slumped over to the right with her head on the passenger seat. Her vehicle was partially blocking the roadway. Richmond had a plastic cup containing wine or champagne between her legs. Officer found a blue wax paper baggie commonly used to package heroin on the passenger seat, and a needle cap was found on the drivers seat. Richmond failed preliminary tests at the scene and later refused to have her blood drawn at the station. Richmond had a moderate odor of alcohol on her breath. ARD - The Commonwealth charged Richmond with I Count of DUI, sentencing her to a suspended license of 8 months, 2 yrs. Attend ID to be paid within 2 months. Perform 50 hours of community service. 4/7/97: 2538 1996 Police Report 96-15202 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania vs. Sandra C. Richmond Offense: 3/7/97, Filed: 4/7/97. Richmond pleaded down from False Reports to Authorities to Disorderly Conduct. No Trespass Order February 4, 2000 No Trespass Order as Respondent Following a pattern of harassing and libelous behavior by Richmond at Stephen Hogans office, Hogans attorney files a No Trespass Order, which Richmond then violates by coming to his office. She is cited for trespassing by the authorities. Newport Beach Police Department 12/12/2006 - Police Report: Dr No. 06-12735 Threatening Phone Call Report: Sandra Richmond called a resident in Newport Coast CA and made threats to him and his family. Newport Beach Police Department 12/23/2006 - Police Report: Dr No. 06-13098 Domestic Battery Report: PC 234(e)(1) Sandra Richmond physical beating on her husband. Newport Beach Police Department 01/26/2006 - Police Report: Dr No. 07-00987 Threatening Phone Call Report: Sandra Richmond constantly calls a family in Ladera Ranch CA with threats of harm to them, their children and extortion. CIVIL RECORDS NEWPORT BEACH, CA Case No. 07HL00034 Case Name: Thomas Knaup vs. Sandra Cho, AKA Sandra Richmond Type: Civil Judgment / Unlawful Detainer Amount: Pending County/State: Newport Beach, CA Date Filed: 1/19/07 Date Updated: Pending Disposition: Open Reports: Judgment against Sandra C. Richmond, orders Sandra C. Richmond to leave property. CIVIL RECORDS LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 4601158 Name: Sandra Moyer Cross Party Name: Lee County Tax Collector Record Date: 7/25/2005 County/State: Lee / Florida Type: Order Book Type: O Book: 4812 Page: 1084 Comments: CS04-CA-003086, 1998-2003, INTANGIBLE TAX WARRANTS Instrument #: 6908804 Note: The original document is necessary to verify the ID. CIVIL LITIGATION - PENNSYLVANIA Case No. CI-07-08382 Case Name: Dell & Homsher, LLC vs. Sandra Moyer, AKA Sandra Richmond, AKA Sandra Shutt Type: Civil Judgment Amount: Pending County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 8/22/07 Date Updated: Pending Disposition: Open Reports : Reports that Richmond owes their law firm approximately $48,202. Case No. CI-02-02667 Case Name: Sandra Moyer vs. Eric J. Hoffman and Mary Beth Hoffman Type: Civil Amount: Pending County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 3/27/02 Date Updated: Pending Reports: Dell & Homsher from the above-listed case represented Sandra Moyer in that case. Case No. CI-01-07750 Case Name: Robert N. Lepore, J. Stephen Hogan, Alma M. Hogan, DBA Hogan Development Company vs. Sandra Moyer Type: Civil Judgment / Unlawful Detainer Amount: Pending County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 8/1/01 Date Updated: 2/13/04 Reports: Suit involving J. Stephen Hogan re: rents at 350 Buch Ave., Mannheim Township, Lancaster County, PA 17601. On 9/13/02 the judge ruled to recover 350 Buch Ave. from Richmond. On 2/13/04 settlement reached, Richmonds counterclaim settled, costs paid, and the matter concluded. Case No. CI-01-00278 Case Name: Sandra C. Moyer as Administrator of the Estate of Michael J. Sabo vs. Mary A. Richmond Type: Civil Judgment Amount: Pending County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 1/5/01 Date Updated: Pending Reports: Sandra C. Moyer sues her mother, Mary A. Richmond over the estate of her deceased brother, Michael J. Sabo. Threats of Violence and Act of Violence by Sandra: Mary Richmond files a Protective Order against Sandra Richmond citing death threats, physical abuse, burglary, attempted theft or Mary Richmonds pharmaceuticals and alleged drug abuse. Mother passed away. Case No. CI-98-05268 Case Name: Sandra Moyer vs. Darryl L. Moyer, Jr. Type: Family court, Divorce Amount: Pending County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 5/7/98 Date Updated: Pending Reports: Threats of Violence: Richmond (Sandra Moyer) threatened to pay someone to have his legs broken. Case No. CI-98-05406 Case Name: National City Mortgage vs. Sandra C. Richmond Type: Mortgage Foreclosure Amount: $62,770.83 with interest from 10/20/98 Plaintiff Counsel: Frank Federman, Esq. Property: 415 W. Marion St., Lancaster, PA 17601 Mailing Address: PO Box 11231, Lancaster, PA 17605 Date Filed: 5/13/98 Date Updated: Pending Reports: Sandra C. Richmond skips on a $62,770.83 mortgage, leaving 415 W. Marion St. Lancaster residence vacant for months. Neighbor reported Richmond had moved out months prior and the property was vacant. Post Office had no forwarding address for Richmond. Property returned to the bank, recorded 4/6/99. Costs awarded to plaintiff counsel, $2301.92. Case No. JC3211199536 Case Name: Sears Roebuck and Co. vs. Richmond Type: Civil Judgment Amount: $3574 County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 11/3/95 Date Updated: Pending Case No. CJ-1994-8083 Case Name: Bank of Lancaster County vs. Richmond Type: Civil Judgment Amount: $1197 County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 12/9/94 Date Updated: Pending Reports: Bank of Lancaster is awarded $1108 against Sandra C. Richmond. Case No. CI-1993-0449 Case Name: Richmond vs. Hershey Farm Company Type: Civil Demand Amount: $10,000 Plaintiff Counsel: Patrick Zimmerman, Esq. Property: Hershey Village Apartments, 350 Sun Valley Dr., Leola, PA 17540 Date Filed: 1/28/93 Date Updated: 1/3/97 Reports: Complaints served 2/2/93 on Richard P. Nuffort (Atty), 22 South Duke St., Lancaster, PA 17602; also on John F. Cottone, 1330 Wabank Rd., also on James R. Haines, 1173 Elm Ave. and also on J. Freeland Hatfield, 603 South West End Ave., all in Lancaster, PA 17603. On 7/30/96 Richmond was awarded $10,000 following settlement agreement, paid $1000 by Def. Michael L. Yingst, $1000 by Def. Hatfield, and $8000 by Def. Hershey Farm Company. Insurance Company for Hershey Farm, State Farm Insurance paid an additional $800 and Def. Hatfield paid an additional $200. Richmond assigned her action ($1000) against Yingst to Hershey Farm Company and Def. Hatfield. Threats of Violence An attorney reports that Richmond made threats against John F. Cottone of Hershey Farms Company. Case No. CI-1992-0969 Case Name: Hershey Farm Company vs. Richmond Type: Civil / Unlawful Detainer Amount: Pending Property: Hershey Heritage Apartments, 1330 Wabank Rd., Unit 1, Lancaster, PA 17603 Date Filed: 3/2/92 Date Updated: 10/11/95 Reports: Terminated on 10/11/95 per Local Rule 350. Case No. CI-1992-1248 Case Name: Woerner vs. Fishel (Co-Def. of Sandra Richmond) Type: Appeal From District Justice Amount: Unknown County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 3/18/92 Date Updated: 10/11/95 Reports: Notice of Appeal filed by Patrick Zimmerman, Richmonds attorney. Larry Woerner vs. Keith Fishel and Sandra Richmond, 637 Wyncroft Lane, Unit 1, Lancaster, PA 17601. Andrew Hooker Appel, Esq. filed against Fishel for $3482.83 plus costs. Judgment entered against Defendant. On 10/11/95 case terminated per Local Rule 350. Case No. CI-1990-3563 Case Name: Martin & Virginia Maerz vs. Ted & Sandra Savicky (AKA Sandra Richmond) Type: Civil Judgment Defense Counsel: Patrick Zimmerman, Esq. Amount: $3205.49 County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 6/18/90 Preliminary objections by Defendants Date Filed: 8/24/90 Judgment awarded to Plaintiffs Date Updated: 6/17/92 Reports: Martin & Virginia Maerz are awarded $3205.49 against Sandra Savicky, AKA Richmond in an action filed on June 18, 1990. Case No. CI-1990-1268 Case Name: Sandra Colleen Richmond vs. Theodore Anthony Savicky Type: Divorce Amount: Unknown County/State: Lancaster, PA Date File: 3/28/90 Date Updated: 5/17/91 Reports: Threats of Violence: Sandra threatened Richard Savicky to slit his throat and get the mafia after him. His wife Charlotte also reports that Sandra threatened her life and that Sandra also threatened the life of their son and Sandras ex-husband, Ted Savicky. CIVIL LITIGATION - TEXAS Case No. 521369. Case Name: N. Gopal Swamy vs. Sandra Richmond (ex-wife, Nalini Swamy) Type: Civil Judgment Amount: Pending Court/County/State: Houston Court, Harris County, TX Date Filed: 2/18/88 (Film 871710005) Date Filed: 8/29/88 (Film 881691721) Date Filed: 11/10/89 (Film 805002314) Reports: Richmonds address in this suit: 1926 Rainy River Dr., Houston, TX 77088. See Witness Interviews for a summary on this case. Case No. Reports: Reports that Sandra Richmond was sued by her employer, Allied Capital Mortgage, in Houston, Texas. Richmonds boss of that time is Don Strauss, Investigation ongoing. February 18, 1988 Sandra Richmond is sued by N. Gopal Swamy in Houston, Texas. Mr. Swamy had sold a house to Richmond in Houston. Richmond stopped making payments. Swamy prevailed in court and has a judgment against her. BANKRUPTCIES, LIENS, JUDGMENTS AND DEFAULTS Case No. 9725057 Case Name: Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Sandra E. Richmond Type: Chapter 7 Bankruptcy - Discharged County/State: Delaware, PA Date Filed: 11/10/97 Date Updated: 8/9/03 Reports: Richmonds SSN: 208-52-4170. Her address at the time was 415 W. Marion St., and possibly 232 W. Orange St., in Lancaster. Case No. CV000051094 Case Name: Pet Emergency Treatment Service vs. Sandra Richmond Type: Civil Judgment Amount: $171 County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 12/16/94 Date Updated: 6/5/07 Reports: Richmonds address at the time was 415 W. Marion St., Lancaster, PA 17603. Pet Emergency Treatment Service is awarded $171 in action vs. Sandra Richmond. Case No. CV000024895 Case Name: Sears Roebuck and Co. vs. Sandra C. Richmond Type: Civil Judgment Amount: $3514 County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 9/22/95 Date Updated: 6/5/07 Reports: Richmonds address at the time was 415 W. Marion St., Lancaster, PA 17603. Sears Roebuck and Co. is awarded $3514 against Sandra C. Richmond. Case No. JC3083199436 Case Name: Bank of Lancaster vs. Sandra C. Richmond Type: Civil Judgment Amount: $1197 County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 12/9/94 Date Updated: 6/5/07 Reports: Richmonds address at the time was 350 Sun Valley Dr., Leola, PA 17540. The Bank of Lancaster is awarded $1197 against Sandra Richmond. Case No. CV000046494 Case Name: Bank of Lancaster vs. Sandra C. Richmond Type: Civil Judgment Amount: $1108 County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 10/21/94 Date Updated: 6/5/07 Reports: Richmonds address at the time was 350 Sun Valley Dr., Leola, PA 17540. Bank of Lancaster is awarded $1108 against Sandra C. Richmond. Case No. JC3211199536 Case Name: Sears Roebuck and Co. vs. Sandra C. Richmond Type: Civil Judgment Amount: $3574 County/State: Lancaster, PA Date Filed: 11/3/95 Date Updated: 6/5/07 Reports: Richmonds address at the time was 415 W. Marion St., Lancaster, PA 17603. Sears Roebuck and Co. is awarded $3574 against Sandra C. Richmond. Possible Identity Theft Authority is looking into it, Richmond appears to have been using the identity of Deborah Susan Reckling, using SSN: 218-52-4710, DOB: 7/24/1951. Richmonds most probably accurate SSN is 208-52-4170 (DOB: 1/16/1961, DOB: 9/1/1960), which appears on her Bankruptcy record in Delaware County. Typographical errors can inadvertently occur where an individual transposes one of the numbers, for example, a 3 becomes an 8, or a 7 becomes a 9. In this case, there was a sequential change of the second number in the SSN, from a 0 to a 1. This is unlikely in that the numbers are not similar, and also because Richmond shows 5 addresses listed. These addresses were collectively reported to the credit bureaus 23 times, so it would appear that the appearance of these addresses are not random typographical errors. Richmond used the name Nikki Sabo for an undisclosed purpose. As you know, Richmonds deceased brother was Michael Sabo, Richmond sued her mother, Mary Richmond over the estate. Unfortunately, Mary Richmond is now deceased, however the probate records are available. *There are many other threats and harassments with many other individuals and companies as discovery continue, Use the internet to put false derogatory information on individuals or companies for extortion. Threats of violence Commit perjury and lied under oath. Professional debtor Rent a home, not pay rent until being evicted. Dating Scam - Move in with lovers, when the relationship doesnt workout, made up false allegation to filed Protection From Abuse (PFA) orders to keep them from go to their own home and wouldnt move out until eviction. Forgery - forge documents Make up bogus charges of abuse or sexually harassment against employers, ex-lovers, married men to extort money. Make up bogus charges of sexually harassment conducts against attorneys in an effort to extort them to forgive the legal fees or to continue representing on her case. File false complaint against Police Officers for retaliation. At last hopefully, when Ms. Richmond continue to make untrue statements under oath which you can impeach in court by presenting this and the forthcoming evidence.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#4 REBUTTAL Owner of company

These are fraudulent complaints from one person

AUTHOR: Tim - (U.S.A.)

These are fraudulent complaints from one person All of these complaints came from one individual in an effort to extort money from me and my companies. The individual responsible for generating all these complaints is a professional scam artist and extortionist. We have found out this individual has 2 criminal convictions and involved with at least 25 civil cases, she has used this method to extort us as well as other companies and individuals for money. She forged an investment contract in her own hand writing and claims that we owe her money. The contract was examined by a forensic handwriting expert and found to be fraudulent. We have also successfully obtained a restraining order from the court against her. Our companies have one of the best reputations in the industry and are well respected in the financial community. These reputations are demonstrated by satisfied clients.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#5 Author of original report

Newport coast entertainment

AUTHOR: Frauded - (U.S.A.)

Update. Tim Chos rebuttal is hilarious. All his companies are closed down under cease and desist. He is so busy hiding every dime he has, because everyone is coming after him. He hides from getting served. And now alliance group entertainment has filed a legal action against him. He turned on Alliances Karkeh in a legal forum, so looks again like Cho sticks to his MO. Which is when his lips are moving, he is lying.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#6 UPDATE EX-employee responds

WHAT OFFICE/WHAT PHONE NUMBER?

AUTHOR: Anonymous - (U.S.A.)

It is really funny how TimCho turns the hot seat to people any people other than himself who is always the guilty person. What has to be said is the nerve of this shrimp. He has a record a mile long of being a scammer, a thief, a liar, a con man, and he writes on a public domain lies about an innocent person he beat up and robbed when he should be in jail at this very moment so he cant hurt anyone ever again. The shame and embarrassment he is going to have when he is in jail will be worth waiting for. No nobody gets the picture here. Nobody believes a word he says. He is a pyscopath. If a person wants to contact you as you say at the addresses and phone numbers, wont that be a problem since you are shut down? A little fact you left out? And that you have no customer relations department because you have no company. You sit or lay in your bed all day every day typing away on the internet ripping people off, and talking on the phone stating lies to people you tlak to. Kobe Bryant is your investor?

Wonder if he knows that? You are dangerous you are not a professional business person. And who wrote that for you because you cannot spell, or type, or even speak properly. You are a fraud all the way. You are chinese but you call chinese people chinks, and you call vietnamese people really bad names. Didnt you say your partners wife is vietnamese? How does a little fella like yourself muster up the gall to put this crap on the net when you are shut down and accused of all the things you are accused of? AND found GUILTY of. You are a fraud and you dont know when to quit. Your company consists of nothing. Your ex wife is on all your recordings she makes from her telephone at home, and you have an office that you never go to. It is a shell.

For show, like your whole life.
The fraud carries into your personal life. When you say "we" you really mean you. The games are over with your torturing these victims. You are in way over your head with all the perjury all the lies your viscious gossip. You are not well respected personally or professionally. You never do clean business it always has to be corrupt. You cant go get a license to be legal, you have to beat the system. You are not smart enough to past a test admit it. You say it is because you dont want to have to let investigators and regulators in your files, but, it is more than that. You are still subject to the laws of the state and every state you solicit. And you are kicked out of several of them. You actually believe that anyone is listening to your claim of how great of a business man you are? You really believe yourself. It is obvious that you do not compute what is in front of you. Instead of continuing to make a mockery of your self and a complete fool, get some help.

Your legal stategies are not serving you are they. No legal plan with a foundation of complete lies and fraud will ever help you. No one in any state will give you any credibility. You have none. Until you become a law abiding citizen, do not keep talking. You will spend until you are bankrupt and still lose. Then you will have to hide. Because you are a very sore loser. You expect to win when you are completely lying and commiting fraud and theft. That doesnt work.


You are found out in this state and in this country. Face it CHO you cant get away with all this criminal activity. You see victory where no victory is. You know what you did. The times of you skating by are over. Too many people are on to you and your lies will never hold up in court. Only a nutcase would believe they could get away with what you are trying to do. Give it up. Is your so called handwriting expert as good as the attorney you had with four suspensions against him who is now being sued again? Sure the "expert" said fraudulent? If so, did you inform he or she that it was you that created that situation? You are as dumb as you look. And that is pretty dumb. And you do realize that you will have to prove everything you lied about. Who is the companies being extorted? You have yourself and your life in between the accusations of an innocent person who by the way will come out of this where she belongs, in the seat of justice and you will be punished for what you did and how long you did it. You need to never be allowed to be in any business unless you are watched like a hawk and have nothing to do with anyones money. Because you cannot help yourself. You are a thief and a liar. There are ways to make a living honestly without thinking of how to steal peoples money from them.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#7 UPDATE EX-employee responds

WHAT OFFICE/WHAT PHONE NUMBER?

AUTHOR: Anonymous - (U.S.A.)

It is really funny how TimCho turns the hot seat to people any people other than himself who is always the guilty person. What has to be said is the nerve of this shrimp. He has a record a mile long of being a scammer, a thief, a liar, a con man, and he writes on a public domain lies about an innocent person he beat up and robbed when he should be in jail at this very moment so he cant hurt anyone ever again. The shame and embarrassment he is going to have when he is in jail will be worth waiting for. No nobody gets the picture here. Nobody believes a word he says. He is a pyscopath. If a person wants to contact you as you say at the addresses and phone numbers, wont that be a problem since you are shut down? A little fact you left out? And that you have no customer relations department because you have no company. You sit or lay in your bed all day every day typing away on the internet ripping people off, and talking on the phone stating lies to people you tlak to. Kobe Bryant is your investor?

Wonder if he knows that? You are dangerous you are not a professional business person. And who wrote that for you because you cannot spell, or type, or even speak properly. You are a fraud all the way. You are chinese but you call chinese people chinks, and you call vietnamese people really bad names. Didnt you say your partners wife is vietnamese? How does a little fella like yourself muster up the gall to put this crap on the net when you are shut down and accused of all the things you are accused of? AND found GUILTY of. You are a fraud and you dont know when to quit. Your company consists of nothing. Your ex wife is on all your recordings she makes from her telephone at home, and you have an office that you never go to. It is a shell.

For show, like your whole life.
The fraud carries into your personal life. When you say "we" you really mean you. The games are over with your torturing these victims. You are in way over your head with all the perjury all the lies your viscious gossip. You are not well respected personally or professionally. You never do clean business it always has to be corrupt. You cant go get a license to be legal, you have to beat the system. You are not smart enough to past a test admit it. You say it is because you dont want to have to let investigators and regulators in your files, but, it is more than that. You are still subject to the laws of the state and every state you solicit. And you are kicked out of several of them. You actually believe that anyone is listening to your claim of how great of a business man you are? You really believe yourself. It is obvious that you do not compute what is in front of you. Instead of continuing to make a mockery of your self and a complete fool, get some help.

Your legal stategies are not serving you are they. No legal plan with a foundation of complete lies and fraud will ever help you. No one in any state will give you any credibility. You have none. Until you become a law abiding citizen, do not keep talking. You will spend until you are bankrupt and still lose. Then you will have to hide. Because you are a very sore loser. You expect to win when you are completely lying and commiting fraud and theft. That doesnt work.


You are found out in this state and in this country. Face it CHO you cant get away with all this criminal activity. You see victory where no victory is. You know what you did. The times of you skating by are over. Too many people are on to you and your lies will never hold up in court. Only a nutcase would believe they could get away with what you are trying to do. Give it up. Is your so called handwriting expert as good as the attorney you had with four suspensions against him who is now being sued again? Sure the "expert" said fraudulent? If so, did you inform he or she that it was you that created that situation? You are as dumb as you look. And that is pretty dumb. And you do realize that you will have to prove everything you lied about. Who is the companies being extorted? You have yourself and your life in between the accusations of an innocent person who by the way will come out of this where she belongs, in the seat of justice and you will be punished for what you did and how long you did it. You need to never be allowed to be in any business unless you are watched like a hawk and have nothing to do with anyones money. Because you cannot help yourself. You are a thief and a liar. There are ways to make a living honestly without thinking of how to steal peoples money from them.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#8 UPDATE EX-employee responds

WHAT OFFICE/WHAT PHONE NUMBER?

AUTHOR: Anonymous - (U.S.A.)

It is really funny how TimCho turns the hot seat to people any people other than himself who is always the guilty person. What has to be said is the nerve of this shrimp. He has a record a mile long of being a scammer, a thief, a liar, a con man, and he writes on a public domain lies about an innocent person he beat up and robbed when he should be in jail at this very moment so he cant hurt anyone ever again. The shame and embarrassment he is going to have when he is in jail will be worth waiting for. No nobody gets the picture here. Nobody believes a word he says. He is a pyscopath. If a person wants to contact you as you say at the addresses and phone numbers, wont that be a problem since you are shut down? A little fact you left out? And that you have no customer relations department because you have no company. You sit or lay in your bed all day every day typing away on the internet ripping people off, and talking on the phone stating lies to people you tlak to. Kobe Bryant is your investor?

Wonder if he knows that? You are dangerous you are not a professional business person. And who wrote that for you because you cannot spell, or type, or even speak properly. You are a fraud all the way. You are chinese but you call chinese people chinks, and you call vietnamese people really bad names. Didnt you say your partners wife is vietnamese? How does a little fella like yourself muster up the gall to put this crap on the net when you are shut down and accused of all the things you are accused of? AND found GUILTY of. You are a fraud and you dont know when to quit. Your company consists of nothing. Your ex wife is on all your recordings she makes from her telephone at home, and you have an office that you never go to. It is a shell.

For show, like your whole life.
The fraud carries into your personal life. When you say "we" you really mean you. The games are over with your torturing these victims. You are in way over your head with all the perjury all the lies your viscious gossip. You are not well respected personally or professionally. You never do clean business it always has to be corrupt. You cant go get a license to be legal, you have to beat the system. You are not smart enough to past a test admit it. You say it is because you dont want to have to let investigators and regulators in your files, but, it is more than that. You are still subject to the laws of the state and every state you solicit. And you are kicked out of several of them. You actually believe that anyone is listening to your claim of how great of a business man you are? You really believe yourself. It is obvious that you do not compute what is in front of you. Instead of continuing to make a mockery of your self and a complete fool, get some help.

Your legal stategies are not serving you are they. No legal plan with a foundation of complete lies and fraud will ever help you. No one in any state will give you any credibility. You have none. Until you become a law abiding citizen, do not keep talking. You will spend until you are bankrupt and still lose. Then you will have to hide. Because you are a very sore loser. You expect to win when you are completely lying and commiting fraud and theft. That doesnt work.


You are found out in this state and in this country. Face it CHO you cant get away with all this criminal activity. You see victory where no victory is. You know what you did. The times of you skating by are over. Too many people are on to you and your lies will never hold up in court. Only a nutcase would believe they could get away with what you are trying to do. Give it up. Is your so called handwriting expert as good as the attorney you had with four suspensions against him who is now being sued again? Sure the "expert" said fraudulent? If so, did you inform he or she that it was you that created that situation? You are as dumb as you look. And that is pretty dumb. And you do realize that you will have to prove everything you lied about. Who is the companies being extorted? You have yourself and your life in between the accusations of an innocent person who by the way will come out of this where she belongs, in the seat of justice and you will be punished for what you did and how long you did it. You need to never be allowed to be in any business unless you are watched like a hawk and have nothing to do with anyones money. Because you cannot help yourself. You are a thief and a liar. There are ways to make a living honestly without thinking of how to steal peoples money from them.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#9 Author of original report

THE TRUTH

AUTHOR: Fraudedbycho - (U.S.A.)

Although I have been accused in this posting, I am in the midst of several causes of action with this individual and I know that posting indepth information about this person/persons would be wrong at this time. but since I was informed that my name was put on here, I will give a very limited response.

You must exercise extreme caution in reading, or listening to and believing anything this person says. I believe in the justice system even though it is taking too long. The judges are wise people, they can see what is going on, as does everyone. There is a reason that so many individuals and enforcement agencies have come down on this person. Honestly when I read what he writes I just cannot believe anyone would be that reckless that they put themselves in such jeopardy. With a courtdate only 7 days away, and a month coming of ALL court proceedings, it is unbelievable that he did this, but so is everything he does. He needs help. How does it go? Lord help him for he knows not what he does?

I would like to save everyone from even a fraction of the pain I have suffered in my life from knowing this person, but at this time, I can only urge you to sit back and watch. My life has suffered in everyway possible and now it is on display because of this person. Do not let it happen to you. If you do, you will have regrets. If anyone, had been able to warn me before instead of after, I wouldnt be in hell right now.

What I want to get across is just use common sense. Look at the person claiming to be so pure. And then read reality. Make calls, do whatever you have to. Why would all of these things be there if there wasnt something to it? There is no regret, no remorse, not a thing on his part but to fight a battle that he is the originator of. I worked my whole life to have had what I did have, and it was taken from me not unlike a robbery. Unfortunately I have to go through a civil process to get to the criminal process and it is not a great way to live a life that is too short to begin with.

I will say that many things are in the works and justice will be served. I will confirm that there are no false contracts anywhere. They are viable contracts. I was standing there when they were signed and I wrote a check to a corporation and it was cashed and in the memo section it also states what it was for. I cannot address what I know is going on with it until later, but it is not was is stated above. Without getting into detail, there are a whole host of documents including signed statements by these people that they actually had and took the money for themselves. This should have been handled criminally, but when the civil court is done, that will follow. Why would anyone have to create or alter documents when they have so much proof that they had that amount of an investment? It is what it is. So please do your homework, you wouldnt like being where so many of us have been with an involvement with these people. past and present. The punishment was not severe enough but they will get it right this time. There is a reason the verbage from the legal documents state that much harm will come to the public if they are allowed to stay in business. That is why we have agencies that look out for us. And I am grateful for their work and encourage them to keep up the good work and will help in any way possible to be of help to anyone.
They really try to protect people from fraud and losing their assets, when you can find out before it is too late.

And for all of the people who are behind me and supporting me, my new and old friends, and all the prayer groups from around the world, I thank you all from the bottom of my heart. You all are the reason I am getting stronger, and making it through this ordeal. God Bless you all.

As a footnote I will say that I am grateful to tim cho for so boldly placing these things on the internet, because people told me he said it, but, that would have been denied by him. it is being presented to the judges so they may assess it for what it is, as it is not accurate, and extremely premature. And it even contradicts his sworn statement under penalty of perjury. That is not the first or tenth time that has happened. If you read the legal documents against him on the internet, you will see that for a long time he has been accused of, and found liable for, using the internet, and his advertising, for his own gain and to cause harm and damage. Maybe it would be a good idea if he stayed away from the internet and got a real viable job. the computer doesnt seem to be a really big asset in his life as it keeps causing him more harm than any gain he gets. And it is really harming all of us until he is put to a stop.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#10 UPDATE EX-employee responds

READ FTC COMPLAINT/ALSO READ FINAL ORDER

AUTHOR: Anonymous - (U.S.A.)


FTC Sues Day Trading Seminar Promoter Over Deceptive Ad Claims
In its seventh case challenging deceptive advertising claims made by "day trading" investment advisors, the Federal Trade Commission has filed suit in U.S. District Court against Timothy Cho and Tim Cho Investment Corporation ("TCI"), alleging that the defendants made false and deceptive advertising claims for TCI's training seminar on day trading. The agency seeks a court order directing Cho and TCI to stop making false and deceptive claims and provide consumer redress or give up their ill-gotten gains. TCI is located in Irvine, California, and has affiliate offices throughout the country.

In May 2000, the FTC, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and Securities and Exchange Commission announced a coordinated crackdown on deceptive trading promotions, and halted the claims of 14 online firms that promised to share the secrets of making easy money with little risk, using their trading strategies. This lawsuit represents a continuation of the FTC's enforcement efforts against these deceptive practices.

The FTC complaint states that, since 1998, Cho and TCI have used the Internet, newspapers and bulk e-mail to advertise a $6,000 two-day training seminar on day trading and other techniques for trading stocks, currencies and Standard & Poor's (S&P) futures contracts. The FTC alleges the defendants have claimed that, by using the techniques taught in the training seminar, investors can reasonably expect:

to achieve substantial profits (for example, 18 percent per trade);

that 12 out of every 13 trades will be profitable;

to earn six to seven figures annually (or more than $1,000,000);

to have made $179,070 in 179 trades in 1998 and 1999;

to have made $305,900 in 393 winning trades in the first nine months of 2000;

to earn a guaranteed 1000 percent return in trading S&P futures contracts within one year.

The FTC alleges that the defendants lacked substantiation for these claims, and that they were deceptive.

The ads also conveyed that investors can expect to trade profitably with little financial risk, the FTC alleged. In fact, the FTC complaint says, investors cannot reasonably expect to trade with little financial risk, and the claim is therefore false. The relief sought by the FTC includes an order halting the false and unsubstantiated claims and providing for redress to consumers or disgorgement of ill-gotten gains.

The Commission vote to file the complaint was 5-0. It was filed in the U. S. District Court for the Central District of California, Southern Division, in Santa Ana, March 15.

This case was brought with the invaluable assistance of the Securities Division of the Office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

NOTE: The Commission files a complaint when it has "reason to believe" that the law has been or is being violated, and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. A complaint is not a finding or ruling that the defendants have actually violated the law. The case will be decided by the court.

Copies of the complaint are available from the FTC's web site at http://www.ftc.gov and also from the FTC's Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580. The FTC works for the consumer to prevent fraudulent, deceptive and unfair business practices in the marketplace and to provide information to help consumers spot, stop and avoid them. To file a complaint, or to get free information on any of 150 consumer topics, call toll-free, 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters Internet, telemarketing and other fraud-related complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to hundreds of civil and criminal law enforcement agencies worldwide.

Media Contact:
Claudia Bourne Farrell,
Office of Public Affairs
202-326-2181
Staff Contact:
Kenneth Abbe or Amy Brothers,
Western Regional Office in Los Angeles
310-824-4343 or 310-824-4365

(FTC File No. 002 3023)
(Civil Action No. SACV01-331DOC(EEx))
E-mail this News Release
If you send this link to someone else, the FTC will not collect any personal information about you or the recipient.

Related Documents:FTC v. Tim Cho Investment Corp., et al. (Cent. Dist. of Calif.)

Complaint For Injunctive and Other Equitable Relief [PDF 31K]

About Us Contact Us Jobs No FEAR Act Data FOIA Site Map
Website Policies Accessibility Privacy Policy Browser Plug-ins Related Sites USA.gov Last Modified: Monday, 25-Jun-2007 16:12:00 EDT
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#11 UPDATE EX-employee responds

More documentation

AUTHOR: Anonymous - (U.S.A.)

www.corp.ca.gov/enf/info/dr/07pdf/newport.pdf

http://www.corp.ca.gov/enf/info/dr/07pdf/newport.pdf

Please follow these links for validation of the true claims on the site.
There are also issues under investigation regarding Taxes, IRS issues, vehicle insurance issues, theft of federal property, false statements on documents and claims of income, false public disclosures using mail and media of personal and professional gain. And more which cannot be given away just at this point.

Beware of this person. Guard your life around this person. The law is catching up but that takes a little while. Meanwhile he continues to dig a hole for himself so he can fall in it. Just beware and do not lose your money. Justice is surely coming.

He always said to just say what you have to to make the deal. He is a master of BS. A few more employees will also have to appear and make truthful statements as to the business he conducted and how he dodged the rules and laws repeatedly
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#12 UPDATE EX-employee responds

FTC Sues Day Trading Seminar Promoter Over Deceptive Ad Claims

AUTHOR: Anonymous - (U.S.A.)

In its seventh case challenging deceptive advertising claims made by "day trading" investment advisors, the Federal Trade Commission has filed suit in U.S. District Court against Timothy Cho and Tim Cho Investment Corporation ("TCI"), alleging that the defendants made false and deceptive advertising claims for TCI's training seminar on day trading. The agency seeks a court order directing Cho and TCI to stop making false and deceptive claims and provide consumer redress or give up their ill-gotten gains. TCI is located in Irvine, California, and has affiliate offices throughout the country.

In May 2000, the FTC, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and Securities and Exchange Commission announced a coordinated crackdown on deceptive trading promotions, and halted the claims of 14 online firms that promised to share the secrets of making easy money with little risk, using their trading strategies. This lawsuit represents a continuation of the FTC's enforcement efforts against these deceptive practices.

The FTC complaint states that, since 1998, Cho and TCI have used the Internet, newspapers and bulk e-mail to advertise a $6,000 two-day training seminar on day trading and other techniques for trading stocks, currencies and Standard & Poor's (S&P) futures contracts. The FTC alleges the defendants have claimed that, by using the techniques taught in the training seminar, investors can reasonably expect:

to achieve substantial profits (for example, 18 percent per trade);

that 12 out of every 13 trades will be profitable;

to earn six to seven figures annually (or more than $1,000,000);

to have made $179,070 in 179 trades in 1998 and 1999;

to have made $305,900 in 393 winning trades in the first nine months of 2000;

to earn a guaranteed 1000 percent return in trading S&P futures contracts within one year.

The FTC alleges that the defendants lacked substantiation for these claims, and that they were deceptive.

The ads also conveyed that investors can expect to trade profitably with little financial risk, the FTC alleged. In fact, the FTC complaint says, investors cannot reasonably expect to trade with little financial risk, and the claim is therefore false. The relief sought by the FTC includes an order halting the false and unsubstantiated claims and providing for redress to consumers or disgorgement of ill-gotten gains.

The Commission vote to file the complaint was 5-0. It was filed in the U. S. District Court for the Central District of California, Southern Division, in Santa Ana, March 15.

This case was brought with the invaluable assistance of the Securities Division of the Office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

NOTE: The Commission files a complaint when it has "reason to believe" that the law has been or is being violated, and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. A complaint is not a finding or ruling that the defendants have actually violated the law. The case will be decided by the court.

Copies of the complaint are available from the FTC's web site at http://www.ftc.gov and also from the FTC's Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580. The FTC works for the consumer to prevent fraudulent, deceptive and unfair business practices in the marketplace and to provide information to help consumers spot, stop and avoid them. To file a complaint, or to get free information on any of 150 consumer topics, call toll-free, 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters Internet, telemarketing and other fraud-related complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to hundreds of civil and criminal law enforcement agencies worldwide.

Media Contact:
Claudia Bourne Farrell,
Office of Public Affairs
202-326-2181
Staff Contact:
Kenneth Abbe or Amy Brothers,
Western Regional Office in Los Angeles
310-824-4343 or 310-824-4365

(FTC File No. 002 3023)
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#13 UPDATE EX-employee responds

other accusations

AUTHOR: Anonymous - (U.S.A.)

Many other things not mentioned here for legal reasons as much court actions are ongoing. However. There are bad real estate deals Cho orchestrated which resulted in massive losses for many clients. He blamed it all on his then partner, who got stuck with it.

The class action suit is involved with the Bureau of Consumer Affairs, and after thorough investigation it appears that Cho alone was the guilty party, and through manipulation had removed his name from the property and the transaction to stick others with it. He also tried to get poor unsuspecting people to invest in a property in Florida as his vacation home which he wanted the payments made on and he keep it for his use.

Kind of like he confiscated money and co mingled funds through all his businesses to pay for his leased home he claimed to own. His flashy sports cars, etc. a lifestyle he never could afford.
Contact Consumer Affairs office for more detailed information.

He still has a working website even though he did this to his customers and was the cause of their loss. He never mentions all the customers he has lost.

And as far as listing all the company names on the site. Those companies are to be out of commission. Cease and Desist ordered. He just continues on like he does not have to conform to the law, but he is in for some surprises.

If you have anything to do with this ultra con man, you will wish you never did.
And you and your family will suffer losses.
Contact legal agencies for information.
The Irs has also been informed of faulty untruthful reporting.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#14 UPDATE EX-employee responds

Beware everyone

AUTHOR: Anonymous - (U.S.A.)

tim cho has only a self proclaimed great reputation. All public records prove otherwise. he posts more fraudulent information and will be dealt with by law enforcement as well as even more civil and criminal charges. The FTC did find him guilty of their claims with a hefty fine, which he claimed he couldnt pay because he had no assets. He is banned from Mass and Pa. He is under cease and assist by all three company names listed on this site by the Calif. Dept. of Corporations.

A VERY IMPORTANT FACT CHO LEAVES OUT, IS ONE OF HIS VICTIMS HE IS REFERRING TO IS HIS OWN WIFE WHO HE ABUSED MENTALLY, FINANCIALLY, AND HE physically assaulted his wife and threatened to kill her and all her animals. He violated that order on several occasions including death threats after the order was in force. HE has a Domestic violence order against HIM to stay away from her, her home and not to make any statements about her.

His past girlfriend publicly accused him of child molestation to an attorney, and cho's wife and her friends, while he posessed child asian pornography in his home. court testimony addresses this. More to come.

He has made lengthy statements written and verbal under penalty of perjury that he did in fact steal hundreds of thousands of dollars of his customers money. This check, and all the documents are public record. The same claims have been made against him since 1998 by various authorities for illegal and untruthful business practices.

For the best interest of the public which is exactly the wording of all of the actions past and present against him from authorities and governing bodies, he has orders to cease and desist since 5/21/07. He is under criminal investigation by the Dept. of Justice as well.

No judge at any time ruled that any contracts were fraudulent. Only claims made by two criminals that have no way out of their crimes. They are legitimate contracts signed by these defendants. He will be unable to prove every statement he made to further victimize the innocent parties. The perjury which will be addressed and enforced will be on Cho and his partner in several actions, which will result in enforceable criminal actions. He never discloses the facts. He twists and turns them until they are totally false and making him the hero, but only in his own mind..

Lying about who his customers are. Claiming famous celebrities, wealthy citizens, and athletes were his customers knowing he could claim confidentiality that it couldnt be proven as untrue as it was. He did not and does not posess a securities license for the business he conducts. See cease and desist order dated 5/21/07.

In addition, Cho did in fact steal with no regard for the law or any ethics, hundreds of thousands of personal funds which were not his. Even though he knows this is true, he makes claims that it was his money when a paper trail clearly shows none of it was his money. Cho and his partner have several names each. Cho's being, Hin-Kong Cho, Tim Cho, Timothy Cho. His statements along with the rest of his very troubled life with the attack on this person, will be just another one of his huge mistakes he continues to make to his very detriment. He speaks of himself in the first and third person. To brag and lead the public again to believe in his lies and fraudulent behavior.

This man has constantly been accused of the same thing for almost 10 years. Good reputation? A leader in the financial world? Then why is he ordered to stop business again? Look at all public records, including lawsuits. The only thief and fraud is this man. The truth will all shortly be available and since he violated court orders by making more FALSE, defamatory claims against the very victims, he has more legal trouble coming to him immediately. When a man takes on the FTC in top position on search engines when they found him liable, that is a very challenged person. They have been informed of his actions as well.

There are so many more things to come out which cannot be addressed at this point, but will be due to the respect of the law proceeds.

He has stolen mail, a felony. He has harrassed and threatened his wife after being told to stay away. He stole office furniture and equipment he still uses and never paid for which totalled almost $200K and he claims that was not a valid contract either. Neither was the judgement the judge awarded against him. He had to be legally removed from his former offices with the help of the legal system.

Always his claims when he wants out of something is to manipulate or formulate an invented plan to circumvent the truth. .

Please refer to the Dept. of Corporations Legal Counsel, The Dept. of Justice criminal enforcement division, and the FTC for information to verify the standing of these individuals and their current status of doing business.

Please do protect your money and your beliefs at all costs. If you are careless, you could suffer a loss which could ruin your life.
Just as in Cho's magnificent claims about his day trading courses, which were found untruthful and deceptive by the Federal Trade Commission, that is an example of everything he states regarding himself, personally and professionally. No personal attacks will be made on him until all the public records are available out of a respect of the process of the legal system, unless other public members choose to do so which they may.

THIS IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF THE POT CALLING THE KETTLE BLACK.

What seriously guilty people do.
There will be a long line if Cho wants to threaten people who expose his corrupt nature. Including many agencies, and the public at large. He is a laughing stock in California. He is known as a crook, a liar and a flashy con man just as this person wrote. He has NO good name to destroy either personally or professionally. The desperation is showing now. He has attacked a person who did not even write this report on this site, and that has a violence order of protection against him. Within the next few days and weeks, all hell will break loose concerning this man and his partner in crime.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#15 UPDATE EX-employee responds

Beware everyone

AUTHOR: Anonymous - (U.S.A.)

tim cho has only a self proclaimed great reputation. All public records prove otherwise. he posts more fraudulent information and will be dealt with by law enforcement as well as even more civil and criminal charges. The FTC did find him guilty of their claims with a hefty fine, which he claimed he couldnt pay because he had no assets. He is banned from Mass and Pa. He is under cease and assist by all three company names listed on this site by the Calif. Dept. of Corporations.

A VERY IMPORTANT FACT CHO LEAVES OUT, IS ONE OF HIS VICTIMS HE IS REFERRING TO IS HIS OWN WIFE WHO HE ABUSED MENTALLY, FINANCIALLY, AND HE physically assaulted his wife and threatened to kill her and all her animals. He violated that order on several occasions including death threats after the order was in force. HE has a Domestic violence order against HIM to stay away from her, her home and not to make any statements about her.

His past girlfriend publicly accused him of child molestation to an attorney, and cho's wife and her friends, while he posessed child asian pornography in his home. court testimony addresses this. More to come.

He has made lengthy statements written and verbal under penalty of perjury that he did in fact steal hundreds of thousands of dollars of his customers money. This check, and all the documents are public record. The same claims have been made against him since 1998 by various authorities for illegal and untruthful business practices.

For the best interest of the public which is exactly the wording of all of the actions past and present against him from authorities and governing bodies, he has orders to cease and desist since 5/21/07. He is under criminal investigation by the Dept. of Justice as well.

No judge at any time ruled that any contracts were fraudulent. Only claims made by two criminals that have no way out of their crimes. They are legitimate contracts signed by these defendants. He will be unable to prove every statement he made to further victimize the innocent parties. The perjury which will be addressed and enforced will be on Cho and his partner in several actions, which will result in enforceable criminal actions. He never discloses the facts. He twists and turns them until they are totally false and making him the hero, but only in his own mind..

Lying about who his customers are. Claiming famous celebrities, wealthy citizens, and athletes were his customers knowing he could claim confidentiality that it couldnt be proven as untrue as it was. He did not and does not posess a securities license for the business he conducts. See cease and desist order dated 5/21/07.

In addition, Cho did in fact steal with no regard for the law or any ethics, hundreds of thousands of personal funds which were not his. Even though he knows this is true, he makes claims that it was his money when a paper trail clearly shows none of it was his money. Cho and his partner have several names each. Cho's being, Hin-Kong Cho, Tim Cho, Timothy Cho. His statements along with the rest of his very troubled life with the attack on this person, will be just another one of his huge mistakes he continues to make to his very detriment. He speaks of himself in the first and third person. To brag and lead the public again to believe in his lies and fraudulent behavior.

This man has constantly been accused of the same thing for almost 10 years. Good reputation? A leader in the financial world? Then why is he ordered to stop business again? Look at all public records, including lawsuits. The only thief and fraud is this man. The truth will all shortly be available and since he violated court orders by making more FALSE, defamatory claims against the very victims, he has more legal trouble coming to him immediately. When a man takes on the FTC in top position on search engines when they found him liable, that is a very challenged person. They have been informed of his actions as well.

There are so many more things to come out which cannot be addressed at this point, but will be due to the respect of the law proceeds.

He has stolen mail, a felony. He has harrassed and threatened his wife after being told to stay away. He stole office furniture and equipment he still uses and never paid for which totalled almost $200K and he claims that was not a valid contract either. Neither was the judgement the judge awarded against him. He had to be legally removed from his former offices with the help of the legal system.

Always his claims when he wants out of something is to manipulate or formulate an invented plan to circumvent the truth. .

Please refer to the Dept. of Corporations Legal Counsel, The Dept. of Justice criminal enforcement division, and the FTC for information to verify the standing of these individuals and their current status of doing business.

Please do protect your money and your beliefs at all costs. If you are careless, you could suffer a loss which could ruin your life.
Just as in Cho's magnificent claims about his day trading courses, which were found untruthful and deceptive by the Federal Trade Commission, that is an example of everything he states regarding himself, personally and professionally. No personal attacks will be made on him until all the public records are available out of a respect of the process of the legal system, unless other public members choose to do so which they may.

THIS IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF THE POT CALLING THE KETTLE BLACK.

What seriously guilty people do.
There will be a long line if Cho wants to threaten people who expose his corrupt nature. Including many agencies, and the public at large. He is a laughing stock in California. He is known as a crook, a liar and a flashy con man just as this person wrote. He has NO good name to destroy either personally or professionally. The desperation is showing now. He has attacked a person who did not even write this report on this site, and that has a violence order of protection against him. Within the next few days and weeks, all hell will break loose concerning this man and his partner in crime.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#16 REBUTTAL Owner of company

These are fraudulent complaints from one person

AUTHOR: Tim - (U.S.A.)

I cannot emphasize enough that these complaints are fraudulent. These complaints came from one individual in an effort to extort money from me, my companies and to damage my reputation both personally and professionally.
The first names that come to mind for any individual responsible for generating these types of complaints is scam artist and extortionist. This is further reinforced by the fact we have uncovered numerous aliases she has been associated with using. Her name is Sandra Richmond aka Sandra Moyer aka Kendra aka Sammi so on and so forth, I'm sure the picture of what is going on here is getting clearer by the minute.

We have found out she has used the Internet with different alias to extort us as well as other companies and individuals for money. She also forged an investment contract in her own hand writing. She tried to use the contract to attach both my business and personal funds. The contract was examined by a forensic handwriting expert and found to be fraudulent. The judge in this matter has already denied the attachment. I have also successfully obtained a temporary restraining order from the court against her. We are also asking the judge to prosecute her for perjury as well.

All of our companies and Tim Cho personally have one of the best names and reputations in the industry and are well respected in the financial community. These reputations are demonstrated by satisfied clients.

We strive to provide each of our customers with the utmost in customer care and professionalism and are eager to address any issue or concern that you feel has not been appropriately addressed, please contact us at:

Mailing Address: Newport Coast Capital Corporation
620 Newport Center Drive, Suite 1100
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Attention: Customer relations
E-mail Address: info@nccptl.com
Phone #: 949-612-6340

Mailing Address: Newport Coast Entertainment Corporation
620 Newport Center Drive, Suite 1100
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Attention: Customer relations
E-mail Address: info@nceus.com
Phone #: 949-612-6340

Mailing Address: Alliance Group Entertainment
801 Main Street
Burbank, CA 91506
Attention: Customer relations
E-mail Address: info@alliancefilm.com
Phone #: 323-488-8220
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#17 Author of original report

Theft Amounts

AUTHOR: Sandra - (U.S.A.)

The original amount of $300K is only from one person, this amount may be in the millions before all the information is accounted for. Tim Cho is a certified thief. He lies to all his customers about the validity of his abilities and the amount of business he has done and does. Well, everything out of his mouth is not truth.
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
X