• Report: #1091021


  • Submitted: Thu, October 10, 2013
  • Updated: Thu, October 29, 2015

  • Reported By: Unhappy customer — waltmore Rhode Island
65 Larch St. Manchester, New Hampshire USA

OBELISK ENTERPRISES CHRIS SMITH MANCHESTER RIPOFF REPORT WARNS OF PERCEIVED QUESTIONABLE CONTENTNewHampshire  NH65 this one man Internet "marketing" company ripped us off. HE CLAIMED TO GET OUR WEBSITE ON PAGE ONE on google. Instead all we got was a bunch of BS! we also found out Chris Smith is a (((REDACTED))). He was converted. Be ware of this person. Manchester New Hampshire

*Consumer Comment: Misleading and potentially slanderous report.

What's this?
What's this?
What's this?
Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Ripoff Report
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™

SEO Reputation Management at its best!

Editor’s Note:  We thank our users for considering Ripoff Report as a source for information and providing warnings to the general public.  That being said, sometimes, after a review of the text, our team will determined that the content filed by an author appears to be serious in nature and is therefore perceived to be questionable and, as such, the Report Posting is placed on hold for further investigations prior to publishing OR is otherwise flagged after publication and is placed into a Review Bin.  If and when Report Postings are flagged for these types of issues, especially when there are specific serious criminal allegations, we may, as we did here, try to follow up with the Author of the Posting to obtain more information.  Our Terms of Service require that information posted be truthful and not defamatory and we are in no position to determine what information is true or false; the author affirms the truth of a posting prior to posting.  We understand that allegations made by an author may very well be true, and we respect an author’s right to Free Speech, but in order for the information to be published once it has been flagged, or for the information to be later (((REDACTED))) once flagged after prior publication, Ripoff Report may ask the author to provide some form of explanation or documentation to support their position.  Depending on the circumstances, if the author fails to respond or timely provide adequate notification, at the sole discretion of Ripoff Report, the Report may be considered “incomplete” and may not be approved or may be (((REDACTED))) to remove the serious allegations or otherwise perceived questionable content from the Report and any Postings thereto that mention such information – more for the purposes of making sure the author is standing behind their Report as we are not a judge and jury to determine the accuracy of evidence.  Redactions below may be due to the author’s failure to adhere to our Terms of Service and/or because the author failed to timely respond with an appropriate response to our inquiry.


CONSUMERS:  Proceed with Caution when reviewing and relying on the subject Report Posting(s) below as it MAY BE FALSE and/or MISLEADING.  It is highly encouraged that you conduct additional research, from credible sources, before making any determination on whether or not to do business with the named individual(s) or business(es).


PLEASED TO SEE SUCH EFFORTS?  YOU CAN HELP RIPOFF REPORT COMBAT THESE TYPES OF ISSUES:  Ripoff Report, as resources allow, is working towards combatting Cyberharassment, Cyberstalking, Cyberbullying and/or other problems such as what is generically called “revenge posts” that can be riddled with personal commentary and/or allegations that can be serious.   Ripoff Report would love to be able to timely address each and every review request we receive, however, this takes resources.  If you think this is a worth-while endeavor, we encourage you to make a donation so that we can expand the resources that we can devote to this project.  You can make a non-tax deductible donation by visiting our “Donate to our Efforts” page and clicking on the PayPal icon near the bottom of the page.  The more resources we have, the more resources we can devote to this project and other forward thinking and positive initiatives like it.


Thank you!


~ Ripoff Report Team




Chris Smith of Obelisk Enterprises Manchester NH is an (((REDACTED))) Be ware of this person. He was also(((REDACTED)))

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 10/10/2013 03:42 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/OBELISK-ENTERPRISES-CHRIS-SMITH-MANCHESTER-NH/Manchester-New-Hampshire-03102/OBELISK-ENTERPRISES-CHRIS-SMITH-MANCHESTER-RIPOFF-REPORT-WARNS-OF-PERCEIVED-QUESTIONABLE-C-1091021. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.

Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.

Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on OBELISK ENTERPRISES CHRIS SMITH MANCHESTER NH

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Search Tips
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
0Author 1Consumer 0Employee/Owner
Updates & Rebuttals

#1 Consumer Comment

Misleading and potentially slanderous report.

AUTHOR: gnice3d - (USA)

Disclaimer: I have never met Chris Smith or anyone associated with his company and have no relationship with Obelisk Enterprises, nor to my knowledge any of their clients.  

A random and personal circumstance led me to this report this morning and having a background in both the tech industry and private investigations, I quickly looked into the claim that Mr. Smith was (((REDACTED))).   The allegation is 100% false.

1) The Chris Smith who was (((REDACTED))) in the state of New Hampshire has a different DOB.
2) The Chris Smith who was (((REDACTED))).

I find it difficult to believe the filer of the above complaint did not make this obvious conclusion when he was Googling Mr. Smith... But yet, I find it hard to believe that the filer could not have noted the specific guideline to formatting his complaint which were wholly ignored.

Being a webdev myself, I see this complaint as a slanderous attack which likely stems from the client ignoring what the scope of services were. This complaint should be removed immediately so that the poor man's children are (((REDACTED)))

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?