- Report: #873273
Complaint Review: Optimal Owner Care Inc.
| Optimal Owner Care Inc. 1 City Boluevard W. Suite 600
Orange, California United States of America |
|
Optimal Owner Care Inc. They are really trying to make you upgrade your timeshare Orange, California
*Consumer Suggestion: Still Some Red Flags
*Author of original report: Update
Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 04/24/2012 05:24 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Optimal-Owner-Care-Inc/Orange-California-92868/Optimal-Owner-Care-Inc-They-are-really-trying-to-make-you-upgrade-your-timeshare-Orange-873273. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Optimal Owner Care Inc.
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
Search Tips#1 Consumer Suggestion
Still Some Red Flags
AUTHOR: John - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, May 29, 2012
The domain name was created only last November and has a private (cloaked) registration. Not a confidence booster.
Their previous name was Point Potential, Inc.
Successful businesses like to show their management team on their website. Scammers don't..........
#2 Author of original report
Update
AUTHOR: TM - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, May 29, 2012
He also pointed out that the BBB does reflect that they have been in business since 2008 and it is easy to get the BBB accreditation date confused with the business start date which is located at the bottom of the screen. I checked out the website again, and it does in fact show an older start date then I previously stated, so I do want to correct that. I am assuming this includes the time with the previous company, but I may be wrong. However, I still was not given the name of the previous company due to "legal, or business" reasons.

