• Report: #258929

Complaint Review: Orangemarlin

Thank You

Read how Ripoff Report saves consumers millions.

  • Submitted: Thu, July 05, 2007
  • Updated: Thu, January 24, 2008

  • Reported By:detrioit Michigan
5656 Horvar St. Provo, Utah U.S.A.
  • Phone:
  • Web:
  • Category: Liars

Orangemarlin Using Wikipedia to push A POV. Using unethcial technigues to control articles Provo Utah

*Consumer Suggestion: Have seen him do this

*Consumer Comment: Wikipedia

*Consumer Comment: you're ridiculous John...

*Consumer Comment: Liar

What's this?
What's this?
What's this?
Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Ripoff Report
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™

SEO Reputation Management at its best!

This unethical and vulgar editor has taken control of some articles on Wiki. He does this because he has some kind of mental disorder. He is an atheist and is anti Christian. He will not allow other to input the correct info into articles. He is a bully and is a coward.

detrioit, Michigan

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 07/05/2007 04:52 PM and is a permanent record located here: The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.

Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.

Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Orangemarlin

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Search Tips
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
0Author 4Consumer 0Employee/Owner
Updates & Rebuttals

#1 Consumer Suggestion

Have seen him do this

AUTHOR: Vwqm6c - (U.S.A.)

I've seen OrangeMarlin doing this. There is a group of wikipedia editors that want to push a very strong POV to run out anything they don't believe is scientific, e.g. creationism and paranormal topics. They've altered the articles to call these topics fake, rather than be neutral. Unfortunately, some are administrators, so they block people who object, change the articles their way, and lock them. The most active in this group are probably OrangeMarlin, ScienceApologist, and PouponOnToast, but there are about two dozen more. You'll see the same names on every vote page for neutrality checks, Admin Noticeboard, RfC, etc., always voting to get their group member out of trouble. In fact, post a complaint to one of their talk pages (be civil, of course). They have eachother's talk pages on watchlist; you'll get responses from half a dozen of them before the day is out (even though they're not the user who you left the message for).
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Consumer Comment


AUTHOR: Matthew - (U.S.A.)

There really is no point to editing anything on wikipedia anymore, it will be removed in a few weeks. I once had an article on my internet BBS site. A rather large one with over 2000 members. They removed it for being Non-notable, nevermind we referenced ourselves all over the place but that wasnt good enough as they said "Those are just people agreeing with your politics."
They have also removed popular youtube video creators and director's pages because they are 'non-notable'. That entire 'encyclopedia' is a waste of time to try and contribute anything to.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 Consumer Comment

you're ridiculous John...

AUTHOR: Jodi - (U.S.A.)

Orangemarlin is brilliant!!! Most intelligent people will totally get this guy! His views on politics, the world in general, and especially EVOLUTION are ingenious. I love him...sorry John , but you're wrong. To say the editor has a mental problem because he won't let you change what he wrote (thank you editor) makes you sound like a childish baby. Why do you call him an atheist and non christian? Is it because the proof of evolution completely contradicts the bible? Do you think scientist are all atheists?
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#4 Consumer Comment


AUTHOR: Kingshades - (U.S.A.)

Sounds more like you were banned for trolling. Just the way to make sure to mention that the editor is an atheist makes me think that you are either lying, mad for violating the rules by editing an article that your religion does not agree with (science, atheism, evolution, homosexuality etc.)

Even if this is true, it should be thrown out the window because you are showing prejudice by clearly stating that you don't like atheists and non-Christians.
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

Ripoff Report Legal Directory