• Report: #922840

Complaint Review: Paul J. Lagassey

Thank You

Read how Ripoff Report saves consumers millions.

  • Submitted: Sun, August 05, 2012
  • Updated: Fri, August 10, 2012

  • Reported By: Philippe — Montreal Quebec United States of America
Paul J. Lagassey
611 Date Palm Rd, Vero-Beach, Florida United States of America

Paul J. Lagassey Ametrine Investments, LLC A theft story, using the barrier of cost in civil litigation to steal assets Vero-Beach, Florida

*Author of original report: Latest events: no good-faith negotiation and more intimidation

*Author of original report: Statement scope clarification

*Author of original report: Paul J. Lagassey and Ametrine Investments, LLC; a theft story

What's this?
What's this?
What's this?
Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Ripoff Report
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™

SEO Reputation Management at its best!

In the present report, events leading to a perpetrated fraud, grand-theft, threatening and extortion are spelled-out from two members of a LLC that used the proceeds resulting from a company asset for their own personal use against the LLC itself and two other members that did not benefit from 10 years of effort into building value into the company.

Events originated from the sale of Conceptual Speech, LLC main intellectual property assets for an amount of $415,000.00 to Intellectual Ventures while Mr. Paul J. Lagassey was the Manager of Conceptual Speech, LLC and he secretly maintained a bank account in the name of Conceptual Speech, LLC and directed the proceeds from such sale into that bank account. This resulted in making the proceeds from the sale unreachable to Conceptual Speech, LLC and its other partners and was used entirely at the discretion of Mr. Lagassey without regard to contractual agreements signed when he finally emptied the account to leave a balance of $21. [continued below]....
.....00 within the following months.

Mr. Frederick Hallas also participated in the theft by illegally receiving $38,162.41 that he did not contractually have the rights to, while Mr. Lagassey's participation was more significant by diverting $129,087.36 from Conceptual Speech, LLC to his own personal use. Other partners that were defrauded are Mr. Philippe Roy, the inventor of sold Intellectual Property, that did not receive any money from the sale and had contractual rights (through distributions) to $148,034.76 and right to debts that had to be repaid, and Mr. ********* that had contractual rights (through distributions) to $19,215.02 and also did not receive any proceeds resulting from the sale.

Furthermore, victims of the perpetrated fraud were denied access to key legal documentation that prevented them from monetizing remaining assets into the LLC, and some communications originating from Mr. Lagassey convey elements that can support extortion claims based on the fact that cooperation is offered based only on the signature from other partners of a release for an amount that is a fraction of what is contractually owed. Threats were also made by Mr. Lagaseey against Mr. Roy to convince him not to pursue legal actions and further argument to sign a release. Lastly, bank statements obtained confirm the fact that money still not under the control of Conceptual Speech, LLC from the sale of its main intellectual property portfolio is no longer into a Conceptual Speech, LLC owed account. This re-scopes the accusations from a fraud case to a theft case.

To summarize, it is believed that Mr. Paul Lagassey could be charged with the followings:
Fraud
Extortion
Theft
Threats
And, Mr. Frederick Hallas, with:
Theft

e-mail samples through time:

"An agreement was signed between Conceptual Speech, LLC and Mr. Frederick Hallas where he invested $15 000 as a loan, if requested a payment back within 1 year, or an automatic transformation into a 1% ownership otherwise. No other documentation from Mr. Hallas was submitted, hence a 1% ownership transformation is resulting."

"Attached is a spread sheet with a worse case scenario on a sale at $400k, and a resolution authorizing the sale of Conceptual IP in two portfolios (Conceptual Assets and SpeechVibe Assets), at $400k each." ... "Philippe's Share - 62.3% $127,834 Paul's Share - 28.2% $49,167 Jean's Share - 8.5% $19,667"

"Trying to get us top dollar - we've reachd the threshold and things are on track for a sale to IV - other potential buyers aren't excited, so I think we shoulld take the money and run. I am ready to sign the contract with IV but haven't been able to reach Steve for the past two days. I just need his rubber stamp on the contract."

"My personal instinct is that I've done the best I can to maximize our return. I advise we take the offer too. If not, we could end up with nothing, and have substantial costs going forward, which neither you or I want to pay. Also note we are getting grantback licenses, so we can continue to practice the art if we so desire."

"I'd agree to close the deal with IV for $415K. I appreciate the fact it is for Conceptual's portfolio exclusively. For my other PPA, I will wait for it to issue to put it for sale once again if IV cannot put at least 50K on the table for it right now."

"We'd all appreciate an update on the sale of the patent portfolio. Also, please include some details on how payment/distributions will be made including amounts. Thank you"

"The closing has happened, and there are several problems that we have to resolve." ... "Roy
$56,215 Ametrine $142,204 Champoux $9,263" ... "If you agree, then I will send you general
releases and assignment documents, and as soon as I get back signed copies Ill initiate a wire
transfer to you. Meanwhile I will proceed to negotiate with Steve and Fred."

"Further, you are put on notice that if you try to do anything that I perceive as potentially harmful to the minority members, I will use your resolution to go to court and seek an injunction to stop you. Of course this will be expensive and will further deplete the assets of the company. I would consider an attempt to remove me as manager to be such an act, as would an proposed action that would impact the right of a minority member without their consent.. And finally, you may think that if you'd handled the transfer of the money differently that the outcome would have been different. But let me assure you after your resolution opened my eyes, had you tried to do that I would have done whatever was necessary to stop you or stop the sale."

"Please be advised that Paul Lagassey was removed as the Manager of Conceptual Speech, LLC, effective as of 1:43 AM on 12/23/2011. The official communication sent to him this morning is attached to this e-mail."

"You are no longer the Manager of Conceptual Speech, LLC and do not have the authority to make any decision or bank transfers. Fred was made aware of that fact, and moving ahead with this is unlawful on your end as well as on Fred's end."

"I will force the dissolution option if that is necessary. There is no question that I am going to get
my capital out of this deal and get out."

"There is no dissolution nor splitting entities considered. There is only one consideration to be made, it is to respect the contractual agreements that have always been in place all along. There is no 'settlement negotiation'. The negotiations were done over time and every decision was logged. You had put some capital in return of ownership, and that is what you're gonna have. You cannot, and will not have it both ways. In the meantime, as far as I can tell, no-one has access to money and if you touch any Conceptual Speech, LLC money, you're gonna burn your fingers.

I have sent you a key communication that was prepared by you in July as a reminder of your commitments and distributions in the event of a $400K sale which is pretty close to the actual scenario. As far as I can tell, the negotiation is just a matter of plugging the right numbers with minor adjustments that a high-school student could do. I do not care and will not deal with the psychological drama and distortion of reality that you are subject to."

"Ametrine and I are judgement proof."

"If you don't want to settle, that's fine too. It means more money for Ametrine. Ametrine islegitimately entitled to more money than what it has received. If we don't settle this today it means Ametrine will get the rest of its money. I would almost prefer that scenario."

"I am certain that my actions will withstand the scrutiny of a judge and/or an arbitration panel. I made sure of this before taking a position. The same goes for the payment to Fred."

"The only benefit of doing this is to get this over with. If Ametrine doesn't get that benefit today, it is going to keep its money."

"I really don't care that you want a second bite at the apple. I am only interested in Ametrine getting its money back and getting a return on its investment."

"If you want $50k by Friday and to take your best shot at getting a second bite at the apple, then you can choose to do that today. If you want both entities, then you can have them, but it will cost you. If you don't accept one of these options today, then the $50k is off the table and a judge will settle the matter sometime down the road. But it will not end in criminal action as you think. And it will not end with $50k in your pocket and potential to make another deal down the road."

"But allegations that you misappropriated conceptual technology to nuance and a court order to seize your computer are within the realm of probability in a civil action - ask Gary Crain. Some ivr systems out there now act suspiciously like conceptual - keep messing with me & one day you may come to work & find a pink slip in place of your computer."

"If you really think I'm stupid enough to take a position that won't withstand the scrutiny of a Judge, then go ahead and try me. But after today you're never going to see $50,000 from this deal again, nor a chance for a second bite at the apple. Is your lawyer and whomever else is advising you going to pay you $50k when you find out I'm right? In two years you'll look back on today and realize what a stupid mistake you made. I've said all I can say on the subject - I guess our discussions are over."

"So be on notice that any threats against my person or unwelcome entry into my home or office will be met with a call to 911 (if time and circumstances allow) and the appropriate force needed (including deadly force if necessary) to deter the attack pending the arrival of the sheriff or the police."

Modus operandi of Paul J. Lagassey:

1) Enter into a partnership with someone that knows its trade.
2) Invest a little at the beginning.
3) Run huge bills and force the other party to settle for a fraction of the amount.
4) Let other partners work to build some value into the partnership.
5) At the right time, when the value has reached its maximum value, sell assets.
6) He will potentially use his Manager title to secretly open a bank account in the name of the partnership.
7) Sell the assets and have the secretly opened bank account receive the funds.
8) He will then point to any small disagreement to gather the entire amount to its own personal use.
9) He will invite you to sue him and use the partnership money for his own personal use.
10) At some point, he may offer you to settle for a fraction of the amount in exchange of a release document (clear extortion).

Note: If you have experienced similar dealing with Paul J. Laggassey or any LLC he controls or he is a member of, report it to the FBI. They are building a case against him and as he reproduces the same pattern, he is working his way towards a threshold they need in the amount of stollen amount of money in order to prosecute him.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 08/05/2012 02:48 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Paul-J-Lagassey/Vero-Beach-Florida-32963/Paul-J-Lagassey-Ametrine-Investments-LLC-A-theft-story-using-the-barrier-of-cost-in-ci-922840. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.

Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.

Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Paul J. Lagassey

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Search Tips
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
3Author 0Consumer 0Employee/Owner
Updates & Rebuttals

#1 Author of original report

Latest events: no good-faith negotiation and more intimidation

AUTHOR: Philippe Roy - (Canada)

This correspondence is in furtherance of settlement negotiations and shall not be used as evidence in any legal proceeding in accordance with FRE 408 and corresponding state law. The content of this communication relates to Philippe Roy's personal opinion, acting as Manager of Conceptual Speech, LLC and not in his personal name.


In light of the events and provided the fact that Conceptual Speech, LLC's related sale amount of $415,000.00 was routed to a bank account that had been secretly opened by Paul J. Lagassey and all the proceeds from the sale (with the exception of $21.00) transferred out of this account to other accounts that are not related to the LLC, one would think that Mr. Lagassey would have been nervous about his actions and exposition to the Law. Instead, the following sequence of events occurred:


1) Mr. Lagassey filed a lawsuit, through CoolSoft, LLC against Philippe Roy and served that lawsuit at Philippe Roy's employment location at Nuance Communications in Montreal. Although Mr. Lagassey was officially communicated Philippe Roy's address in many legally binding documents, and although Mr. Lagassey even visited Philippe Roy's domicile in many occasions, he went out of his way to investigate on the whereabouts of Philippe Roy's employment and had him served the lawsuit to him at that location.


2) HR Manager of Nuance Communications called Philippe Roy to gather explanations about the filing of that lawsuit in November 2012.


3) On January 8th 2013, Philippe Roy was fired from Nuance Communications.


4) The CoolSoft, LLC lawsuit was a joke. Per Mr. Lagassey's allegations, Philippe Roy entered into a contract with CoolSoft, LLC in September 2008 to perform programming work. Instead, Philippe Roy had denied that he wanted anything to do with the programming work and had referred another engineer that he thought was a good fit to perform the work. In various e-mail communications, Mr. Lagassey agreed the work was done by that other engineer (even paying that person). Such work was to be performed within 6 months from the start date. Upon delivery of its first drop to be tested by Mr. Lagassey, Mr. Lagassey took 3 months to perform such testing, and then the other engineer was busy on other things. The entire contract was for about $1500 and Mr. Lagassey kept changing the scope of the project and kept provinding unclear delivery milestones. This had become an unmanageable project due to Mr. Lagassey's actions. That being said, the worst is the fact that CoolSoft, LLC was dissolved since July 2008. Hence it did not have the legal rights to enter into a contract that is not related to the winding-up of affairs. On that basis, we notified the legal representative of Mr. Lagassey that we would ask for a dismissal and also on the basis the other engineer was not apart of the lawsuit. Since then, the lawsuit had no movement, and should Mr. Lagassey decide to further move it through the Justice system, he is sure to lose on it (plus Attorneys fees from his end and mine).


5) Another of Mr. Lagassey's lawyer got in touch with Philippe Roy's lawyer in order to communicate 3 other counts that were considered to be filed against Philippe Roy and offer a settlement attempt. One of such counts is most probably related to the present Ripoff Report for libel. Mr. Roy's lawyer advised Mr. Roy that negotiating settlement is recommended at this point. If such settlement negotiation is performed now, once the civil trial will initiate, there will not be a need anymore to go through that phase once again. The last offer that Mr. Lagassey made to Philippe Roy to return $0 of the $415,000.00 to Conceptual Speech, LLC, so, if he is to continue in that direction, it is easy to predict for the negotiation settlement to fail, nevertheless, Mr. Roy agreed to such a course of action.


6) Mr. Philippe Roy, in the last year since the theft occurred, saved enough of his personal money in order to get to trial and not run out of money before obtaining its sentence against both Mr. Lagassey and Mr. Hallas. The lawsuit is also ready to be filed and the outcome somewhat predictable.


7) From Mr. Hallas's side, the same strategy of no communication was used. Such a strategy shall not protect him against his Unjust Enrichment lawsuit once the time is right and the sentence once again is somewhat predictable.


Here are a couple of legal reminders when dealing with people such as Mr. Lagassey and Mr. Hallas:


- If this gets to court, a discovery phase will call for a subpoena on Nuance Communication to disclose all communications related to Philippe Roy's dismissal. Upon investigating material, if there was any relationship between the dismissal and Mr. Lagassey's lawsuit that was filed at Mr. Roy's employment, Mr. Lagassey will have to respond to a libel and defamation case that had generated significant loss on Mr. Roy's side.
- Once found guilty of theft in Florida, one is automatically fined threefold the amount that was stolen. For the present situation, this will sum up to $1.2M since at no point the $415,000.00 amount was really under the control of Conceptual Speech, LLC (instead it was under the control of Paul J. Lagassey into a bank account that was registered under the LLC name but for which it was kept secret).
- Once found guilty of theft in Florida, a bankruptcy does not release from the debt ($1.2M in this case).
- Most to all LLC's under Mr. Lagassey's name are dissolved administratively since at most July 2008. When an officer performs any action or representation that is unrelated to the winding-up of affairs when a corporation is dissolved, he does so in its personal name and is liable personally for the action or representation. The letter of the law may be different, but the essence of it is pretty much as stated. Even Ametrine Investments, LLC, the member of Conceptual Speech, LLC was dissolved administratively since 2008. Mr. Lagassey did not even have any corporation shell protecting him under any angle even though he stated after the facts he acted as a Ametrine Investments, LLC employee (contrary to official papers filed on each bi-annual reports and his own representations prior to the theft). This mounts to many wishful thinking elements on his end and a really weak defense when the time will come to respond from the lawsuit that is coming his way.
- Once found guilty of Unjust Enrichment in Florida, a bankruptcy would release Mr. Hallas from the debt ($40K in this case), but Conceptual Speech, LLC would have priority during the liquidation of assets (almost sure to get its $40K back). In the processing of a bankruptcy, any sentencing related to an Unjust Enrichment has priority since that money is viewed as not really being part of the bankrupt's asset, hence giving priority to the awarded party in the Unjust Enrichment sentence.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Author of original report

Statement scope clarification

AUTHOR: Philippe Roy - (Canada)

When originally it was written "They are building a case against him and as he reproduces the same pattern, he
is working his way towards a threshold they need in the amount of stollen amount of money in order to prosecute him", it could instead have been better stated "The FBI could build a case against anyone that reproduces offenses and likelyhood increases if the same pattern is used, it is also a general understanding that a threshold is needed in the amount of
stolen money to prosecute any theft case, and the more is being reported, the most likely are perpetrators of theft offenses to be prosecuted"

I do not work for the FBI and am not in the secret to know what they prosecute or not and am just communicating general knowledge that may or may not be related to Mr. Paul J. Lagassey.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 Author of original report

Paul J. Lagassey and Ametrine Investments, LLC; a theft story

AUTHOR: Philippe - (United States of America)

In the present report, events leading to a perpetrated fraud, grand-theft, threatening and extortion are spelled-out from two members of a LLC that used the proceeds resulting from a company asset for their own personal use against the LLC itself and two other members that did not benefit from 10 years of effort into building value into the company.

Events originated from the sale of Conceptual Speech, LLC main intellectual property assets for an amount of $415,000.00 to Intellectual Ventures while Mr. Paul J. Lagassey was the Manager of Conceptual Speech, LLC and he secretly maintained a bank account in the name of Conceptual Speech, LLC and directed the proceeds from such sale into that bank account. This resulted in making the proceeds from the sale unreachable to Conceptual Speech, LLC and its other partners and was used entirely at the discretion of Mr. Lagassey without regard to contractual agreements signed when he finally emptied the account to leave a balance of $21.00 within the following months.

Mr. Frederick Hallas also participated in the theft by illegally receiving $38,162.41 that he did not contractually have the rights to, while Mr. Lagassey's participation was more significant by diverting $129,087.36 from Conceptual Speech, LLC to his own personal use. Other partners that were defrauded are Mr. Philippe Roy, the inventor of sold Intellectual Property, that did not receive any money from the sale and had contractual rights (through distributions) to $148,034.76 and right to debts that had to be repaid, and Mr. ********* that had contractual rights (through distributions) to $19,215.02 and also did not receive any proceeds resulting from the sale.

Furthermore, victims of the perpetrated fraud were denied access to key legal documentation that prevented them from monetizing remaining assets into the LLC, and some communications originating from Mr. Lagassey convey elements that can support extortion claims based on the fact that cooperation is offered based only on the signature from other partners of a release for an amount that is a fraction of what is contractually owed. Threats were also made by Mr. Lagaseey against Mr. Roy to convince him not to pursue legal actions and further argument to sign a release. Lastly, bank statements obtained confirm the fact that money still not under the control of Conceptual Speech, LLC from the sale of its main intellectual property portfolio is no longer into a Conceptual Speech, LLC owed account. This re-scopes the accusations from a fraud case to a theft case.

To summarize, it is believed that Mr. Paul Lagassey could be charged with the followings:
  Fraud
Extortion
Theft
Threats

And, Mr. Frederick Hallas, with:
  Theft

e-mail samples through time:

Philippe Roy wrote:
 "An agreement was signed between Conceptual Speech, LLC and Mr. Frederick Hallas where he invested $15 000 as a loan, if requested a payment back within 1 year, or an automatic transformation into a 1% ownership otherwise. No other documentation from Mr. Hallas was submitted, hence a 1% ownership transformation is resulting."

Paul J. Lagassey wrote:
"Attached is a spread sheet with a worse case scenario on a sale at $400k, and a resolution authorizing the sale of Conceptual IP in two portfolios (Conceptual Assets and SpeechVibe Assets), at $400k each." ... "Philippe's Share - 62.3% $127,834 Paul's Share - 28.2% $49,167 Jean's Share - 8.5% $19,667"

Paul J. Lagassey wrote:
 "Trying to get us top dollar - we've reachd the threshold and things are on track for a sale to IV - other potential buyers aren't excited, so I think we shoulld take the money and run. I am ready to sign the contract with IV but haven't been able to reach Steve for the past two days. I just need his rubber stamp on the contract."

Paul J. Lagassey wrote:
"My personal instinct is that I've done the best I can to maximize our return. I advise we take the offer too. If not, we could end up with nothing, and have substantial costs going forward, which neither you or I want to pay. Also note we are getting grantback licenses, so we can continue to practice the art if we so desire."

Philippe Roy wrote:
"I'd agree to close the deal with IV for $415K. I appreciate the fact it is for Conceptual's portfolio exclusively. For my other PPA, I will wait for it to issue to put it for sale once again if IV cannot put at least 50K on the table for it right now."

Philippe Roy wrote:
"We'd all appreciate an update on the sale of the patent portfolio. Also, please include some details on how payment/distributions will be made including amounts. Thank you"

Paul J. Lagassey wrote:
 "The closing has happened, and there are several problems that we have to resolve." ... "Roy $56,215 Ametrine $142,204 Champoux $9,263" ... "If you agree, then I will send you general releases and assignment documents, and as soon as I get back signed copies Ill initiate a wire transfer to you. Meanwhile I will proceed to negotiate with Steve and Fred."

Paul J. Lagassey wrote:
 "Further, you are put on notice that if you try to do anything that I perceive as potentially harmful to the minority members, I will use your resolution to go to court and seek an injunction to stop you. Of course this will be expensive and will further deplete the assets of the company. I would consider an attempt to remove me as manager to be such an act, as would an proposed action that would impact the right of a minority member without their consent.. And finally, you may think that if you'd handled the transfer of the money differently that the outcome would have been different. But let me assure you after your resolution opened my eyes, had you tried to do that I would have done whatever was necessary to stop you or stop the sale."

Philippe Roy wrote:
 "Please be advised that Paul Lagassey was removed as the Manager of Conceptual Speech, LLC, effective as of 1:43 AM on 12/23/2011. The official communication sent to him this morning is attached to this e-mail."

Philippe Roy wrote:
 "You are no longer the Manager of Conceptual Speech, LLC and do not have the authority to make any decision or bank transfers. Fred was made aware of that fact, and moving ahead with this is unlawful on your end as well as on Fred's end."

Paul J. Lagassey wrote:
"I will force the dissolution option if that is necessary. There is no question that I am going to get my capital out of this deal and get out."

Philippe Roy wrote:
"There is no dissolution nor splitting entities considered. There is only one consideration to be made, it is to respect the contractual agreements that have always been in place all along. There is no 'settlement negotiation'. The negotiations were done over time and every decision was logged. You had put some capital in return of ownership, and that is what you're gonna have. You cannot, and will not have it both ways. In the meantime, as far as I can tell, no-one has access to money and if you touch any Conceptual Speech, LLC money, you're gonna burn your fingers.

I have sent you a key communication that was prepared by you in July as a reminder of your commitments and distributions in the event of a $400K sale which is pretty close to the actual scenario. As far as I can tell, the negotiation is just a matter of plugging the right numbers with minor adjustments that a high-school student could do. I do not care and will not deal with the psychological drama and distortion of reality that you are subject to."

Paul J. Lagassey wrote:
 "Ametrine and I are judgement proof."

"If you don't want to settle, that's fine too. It means more money for Ametrine. Ametrine islegitimately entitled to more money than what it has received. If we don't settle this today it means Ametrine will get the rest of its money. I would almost prefer that scenario."

"I am certain that my actions will withstand the scrutiny of a judge and/or an arbitration panel. I made sure of this before taking a position. The same goes for the payment to Fred."

"The only benefit of doing this is to get this over with. If Ametrine doesn't get that benefit today, it is going to keep its money."

"I really don't care that you want a second bite at the apple. I am only interested in Ametrine getting its money back and getting a return on its investment."

"If you want $50k by Friday and to take your best shot at getting a second bite at the apple, then you can choose to do that today. If you want both entities, then you can have them, but it will cost you. If you don't accept one of these options today, then the $50k is off the table and a judge will settle the matter sometime down the road. But it will not end in criminal action as you think. And it will not end with $50k in your pocket and potential to make another deal down the road."

"But allegations that you misappropriated conceptual technology to nuance and a court order to seize your computer are within the realm of probability in a civil action - ask Gary Crain. Some ivr systems out there now act suspiciously like conceptual - keep messing with me & one day you may come to work & find a pink slip in place of your computer."

"If you really think I'm stupid enough to take a position that won't withstand the scrutiny of a Judge, then go ahead and try me. But after today you're never going to see $50,000 from this deal again, nor a chance for a second bite at the apple. Is your lawyer and whomever else is advising you going to pay you $50k when you find out I'm right? In two years you'll look back on today and realize what a stupid mistake you made. I've said all I can say on the subject - I guess our discussions are over."

"So be on notice that any threats against my person or unwelcome entry into my home or office will be met with a call to 911 (if time and circumstances allow) and the appropriate force needed (including deadly force if necessary) to deter the attack pending the arrival of the sheriff or the police."

Modus operandi of Paul J. Lagassey:
 1) Enter into a partnership with someone that knows its trade.
2) Invest a little at the beginning.
3) Run huge bills and force the other party to settle for a fraction of the amount.
4) Let other partners work to build some value into the partnership.
5) At the right time, when the value has reached its maximum value, sell assets.
6) He will potentially use his Manager title to secretly open a bank account in the name of the partnership.
7) Sell the assets and have the secretly opened bank account receive the funds.
8) He will then point to any small disagreement to gather the entire amount to its own personal use.
9) He will invite you to sue him and use the partnership money for his own personal use.
10) At some point, he may offer you to settle for a fraction of the amount in exchange of a release document (clear extortion).

Note: If you have experienced similar dealing with Paul J. Laggassey or any LLC he controls or he is a member of, report it to the FBI. They are building a case against him and as he reproduces the same pattern, he is working his way towards a threshold they need in the amount of stollen money in order to prosecute him. Please report him to the FBI for any past or future events so Mr. Lagassey is charged and does not further harm legitimate people that wants to build value into partnerships while respecting the rules.
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.



Ripoff Report Legal Directory