- Report: #835533
Complaint Review: Petco
| Petco 8404 B Eager Road
Brentwood, Missouri United States of America |
|
Petco dog harnesses Brentwood, Missouri
*Author of original report: Adolp-Homosassa
*Consumer Comment: Is this a rhetorical question?
*Consumer Comment: The OP should have quit while he was (a little) ahead..
*Author of original report: Adolph--Homosassa
*Consumer Comment: Hey you!
*Author of original report: Defective?
*Author of original report: Truth Socrates?
*Author of original report: To Read?
*Consumer Comment: ....once in awhile.........
*Consumer Comment: question
*Consumer Comment: Are you kidding?
Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 02/07/2012 03:56 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Petco/Brentwood-Missouri-/Petco-dog-harnesses-Brentwood-Missouri-835533. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Petco
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
Search Tips#1 Author of original report
Adolp-Homosassa
AUTHOR: concernedcitizen - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, February 08, 2012
"How many reasons do you want? (That is another rhetorical question)."
.
"But thanks for lending credence to my last post"
OK Adolph from Homos assa.
#2 Consumer Comment
Is this a rhetorical question?
AUTHOR: Adolph - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, February 08, 2012
.
How many reasons do you want? (That is another rhetorical question).
.
But thanks for lending credence to my last post, anyway.
#3 Consumer Comment
The OP should have quit while he was (a little) ahead..
AUTHOR: Ken - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, February 08, 2012
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, February 08, 2012POSTED: Wednesday, February 08, 2012
"Adolph--Homo"
Instead of attacking me in your post why don't you find someone else to go bully for the rest of evening. just simply quit reading the post instead of trying to rape someone else's opinion."
You just confirmed Adolph's Post.
You are shooting yourself in the...er foot.
#4 Author of original report
Adolph--Homosassa
AUTHOR: concernedcitizen - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, February 08, 2012
Instead of attacking me in your post why don't you find someone else to go bully for the rest of evening. just simply quit reading the post instead of trying to rape someone else's opinion.
making less sense with each sucessive entry. You've sort of made your
invalid point in your earlier posts. They're becoming less lucid as you
progress. Go tie your beloved dog up with a rope and take your meds.
#6 Author of original report
Defective?
AUTHOR: concernedcitizen - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, February 07, 2012
#7 Author of original report
Truth Socrates?
AUTHOR: concernedcitizen - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, February 07, 2012
That's a conundrum of statements, especially if you do not understand epistemology. That's actually what makes a person too stupid to own an animal, but what is worse is not to understand that a mammal is an animal. Unless you believe that you are a God which is not human which is a mammal which is an animal. So are all animals stupid. I suspect not but some mammals that are human who bark one or two word statements like an animal such as a dog might be.
#8 Author of original report
To Read?
AUTHOR: concernedcitizen - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, February 07, 2012
#9 Consumer Comment
....once in awhile.........
AUTHOR: Adolph - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, February 07, 2012
.a portion of an entry is as truthfully accurate as it is humorous. This is a perfect example:
What they should have done is contact Animal Control and file a complaint on you for being too dumb to own an animal.
.
Bravo! So funny. So true.
#11 Consumer Comment
Are you kidding?
AUTHOR: Robert - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, February 07, 2012
should only be used when walking the dog and not to be used if using a tether to a dog stake in the ground.
- In several jurisdictions it is actually ILLEGAL to tether a dog to a stationary object(which could include a post in the ground). You think that is perhaps why they don't mention it?
I guess if you wanted to use the harness as a slingshot you would make the same claim of it being defective just because they don't tell you it can't be used as a slingshot. What they should have done is contact Animal Control and file a complaint on you for being too dumb to own an animal.

