• Report: #1068377

Complaint Review: ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER))

  • Submitted: Fri, July 19, 2013
  • Updated: Tue, February 02, 2016

  • Reported By: Annonimous68 — Dallas Texas
((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER))
Dallas, Texas USA

SPECIFIC INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT WAS FOUND TO BE FALSE/DEFAMATORY BY A COURT. OUT OF RESPECT FOR THE JUDICIAL PROCESS, THE SPECIFIC INFORMATION THAT WAS FOUND FALSE/DEFAMATORY BY THE COURT HAS BEEN ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)) | ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)) Texas

*REBUTTAL Individual responds: Girlfriend's Nuts

What's this?
What's this?
What's this?
Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Ripoff Report
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™

SEO Reputation Management at its best!

Editor’s Note: The law protects and encourages Ripoff Report to make appropriate edits to Reports posted by third parties. Ripoff Report may use that editorial power to post findings from a court of law about the subject matter of Reports. In some cases, a Court may find that specific statements made by the author of a Ripoff Report are false and defamatory. When both sides of a dispute appear and contest the facts of a situation in court it is believed that the findings of the court are generally reliable and fair. Out of respect for the courts and the judicial process, Ripoff Report, upon request, may post that kind of finding with special prominence, and in some cases, may even redact the information specifically identified by the court as false from the original Report. In this instance, the Court Order combined with additional formal court documents received by Ripoff Report was specific enough regarding the statements made, and as such, the offending language has been (((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER))) by Ripoff Report.NOTE:Statements that have not been redacted may not have been specifically outlined in the Court Order and/or may have been considered statements of opinion. It is highly encouraged that consumers conduct their own additional research, from credible sources such as regulating authorities, prior to making any decisions on whether or not to do business with any individual or entity named as the information contained herein, and any negative inference derived from such information, may very well be false and misleading.

NOW TO THE EDITORIALLY REDACTED REPORT:

 

((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)), Registered Principal, Prosper, Texas) submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent in which he was ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)). Without admitting or denying the findings, ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)) consented to the described sanction and to the entry of findings that he raised over $1.5 million from investors through offers and sales of limited partnership interests in a hedge fund, and made numerous misrepresentations in connection with the offers and sales that were inconsistent with the private placement memorandum (PPM). The findings stated that ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)) used over $1.3 million of the funds raised to invest in promissory notes issued by private companies in which he had a controlling interest, and made misrepresentations regarding the fund’s investment strategy, the concentration of investment funds in particular investments; the use of funds, and the amount of management fees and other expenses charged to the fund.

 

The findings also stated that ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)) omitted to timely disclose material facts including that he exercised sole discretion over the fund’s operations, and misused customer funds received in connection with the fund offering by obtaining debit cards linked to accounts and utilized the cards to pay for personal and non-business related expenses. The findings also included that ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)) caused funds from the various accounts to be transferred to his personal brokerage account and caused monthly payments for non-business related expenses to be drafted from one of the accounts. ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)), through his member firm, conducted an unregistered offering of the securities of an entity for which there was no available exemption due primarily to the offering being conducted pursuant to a general solicitation, and failed to timely disclose to investors that the firm was under common control with the issuer, in that he owned both entities. ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)) also found that ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)) failed to properly supervise the activities of a registered representative for whom he had supervisory responsibility, and failed to review the representative’s email correspondence. (((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)))

 


This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 07/19/2013 09:36 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/REDACTED-BASED-ON-FINDINGS-VIA-COURT-ORDER/Dallas-Texas/SPECIFIC-INFORMATION-CONTAINED-IN-THIS-REPORT-WAS-FOUND-TO-BE-FALSEDEFAMATORY-BY-A-COURT-1068377. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.

Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.

Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER))

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Search Tips
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author 0Consumer 1Employee/Owner
Updates & Rebuttals

#1 REBUTTAL Individual responds

Girlfriend's Nuts

AUTHOR: Charles - ()

While I did sign a consent and waiver form with FINRA when the market crashed and hiring counsel during exams and audits was not "in my budget" at the time, I was not ever charged, convicted or found guilty of any wrong doing in relation to the former securities firm and hedge fund I ran.  I certainly had some bad judgement and poor management at the time, but nothing which entails fraud etc. as suggested in the title of this report.  The girl behind this has done this type of disparaging activity a number of times.  She seemingly has nothing better to do with her time.  Sad thing is that a company like "ripoff" does not care.  They have policy that states there is freedom of speech and they can't control what she or anyone who wants to damage someone miliciously does on their site.  Just like the prostution sites that say "they are not involved, only publishing."  I guess the pen is mightier than the sword.  Sad that a person can be so mean.  If you have any questions about the validity of this report, feel free to call me.  ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER))

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
X