- Report: #498627
Complaint Review: SIRIUS XM SATELLITE RADIO
| SIRIUS XM SATELLITE RADIO www.xmradio.com
Internet United States of America |
|
SIRIUS XM SATELLITE RADIO XM This company is going downhill fast! Internet
*Author of original report: The squeaky wheel
*Consumer Comment: Tim...you are right on the money...
*Author of original report: Excellent Points, Ronny
*UPDATE Employee: You should be informed...
Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
I first purchased an XM unit in 2005. I do alot of driving, so I LOVED having a wide variety of programming, with no commercials, for a fair $12 per month with no hidden, ridiculous extra fees.
I also enjoyed that the online service was free with my subscription, and that I could listen at work without an additional fee.
XM merged with SIRIUS a few months back. It was QUITE apparent to me that the goal was to rid themselves of each other's competition, deprive the consumer of the benefits of choice, and increase their fees.
Customer service has, of course, been outsourced. In 2005, I could call with any issue and get through to a knowledgeable person fairly quickly. Now, I have to go through multiple levels of automated hell before I get to a person.
When I do reach a person, I might as well be talking to my dog. Well, I guess it's a bit worse, because my dog usually understands what I'm trying to accomplish with the communication.
They have now instituted an "activation fee" for new or reactivating customers, and added in some strange "music use" fee of $2 per month. I understand that $2 per month isn't much, but if you're going to raise your fee, just raise your fee! Don't insult my intelligence!
After I recently made a surprisingly large payment to get my unit reactivated following a few months off, the CSR asks me which credit or debt card I would like to place on the account for future billing. I told him none. I don't use credit cards. And I never do recurrent billing plans, because I might as well be handing over checkbook full of blank, signed checks.
This was never a problem before. But the CSR says that now, without a credit or debit card, they don't have a way to bill me and therefore I can't have an account. I thought that's odd, you guys used to send me bills in the mail. In fact, I'm pretty sure I was notified of my past-due balance via this ingenious method.
So, after actually having to speak with his supervisor, he says the "last resort" (yes, he actually said that) would be to send me monthly invoices. Wow! Bills in the mail that take a conscious effort to pay! Am I the only one that remembers this concept?
So I'm all set to have the unit reactivated. This process requires that you leave your radio on for 20 minutes so that the antenna can receive the activation signal.
20 minutes goes by and I still only have the "preview" channel. I call customer service again and have another signal sent. 45 minutes goes by and still only the preview channel. I call again and ask for technical support. I explain my problem. I am told that there must be a problem with my antenna.
Well, common sense dictates that my antenna is working just fine if I'm receiving the preview channel. I try to explain this concept to the "technician" to no avail. I finally give up and ask her to just send the signal again so I can give it a third try. Then she actually had the gall to ask me if I would like to upgrade my programming package! Why would I want to pay extra for more of NOTHING!
After about a half hour I've got my channels. Mind you, I had to leave my car running for about two hours. But after a full afternoon of headaches, everything is finally working so I'm happy.
Until today, when I'm at my desk and want to listen online. Lo and behold, the part of the service that used to be free now costs $3 per month.
But wait! There's more! I guess that, since I won't sign on for recurrent billing, I'm not actually considered a "current subscriber," so I actually have to pay the full subscription fee to listen online!
Long story short (I guess it's actually kind of late for that): what cost $12 per month four years ago would now, if I were to pay it, cost me $29 per month. Plus, there are FAR more commercials than there used to be.
Remember when they advertised it as "commercial free," then changed that to "commercial free music" (which was a euphamism for "the talk channels are no longer commercial free"). Now the talk channels have just as many commercials as any regular radio station, and I think the music channels have some commercials too.
The funny thing is I only listen to one channel (XM 202, Sirius 197). The best thing about this channel, four years ago, was the complete lack of restriction by the FCC or XM management. They didn't even have to worry about offending advertisers. There's still no FCC restriction, but company management severely restricts creativity now that there are advertisers, and Oprah, to worry about.
If they didn't have Ron & Fez, I would trash my XM and go back to NPR. I used to tell people that my XM unit was my smartest purchase ever. My advice now: don't bother with sattelite radio unless you do a lot of driving or are looking for a particular channel/show.
I hope you all enjoyed my long-winded diatribe.
Best regards!
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 09/22/2009 08:54 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/SIRIUS-XM-SATELLITE-RADIO/internet/SIRIUS-XM-SATELLITE-RADIO-XM-This-company-is-going-downhill-fast-Internet-498627. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on SIRIUS XM SATELLITE RADIO
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
Search Tips#1 Author of original report
The squeaky wheel
AUTHOR: Tim - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, October 03, 2009
So, of course, I sent a copy of my report to Sirius/XM "Listener Care." I was, at the time, told that I could expect a response within 24 hours. The report was attached to a complaint that specifically addressed the issue with their charging for the online service.
About three days later, I did receive a response. It was apparent that the response was not auto-generated, and was written by a local (it didn't bear the linguistic hallmarks of having been written by an "outsourced" employee).
Originally, I had somewhat of an issue with the fact that I would have to pay for the online service at all, as this used to be a "perk." But my big issue was that, since I don't do auto-pay, I would have to pay the full subscription rate to receive the online service (basically, I would have been paying for one full subscription for the car, and one full subscription for the office).
In their reply email, I was given the ability to receive the lower fee for the online service without having to sign on to recurrent billing. A definite point in their favor, but I am still paying for something that used to be free.
Their excuse for now having to charge for the online service is a sham. They claim that they have upgraded the streaming system, and that the sound is now "cd quality."
I listened online for years and never had a problem with the sound quality. In fact, I was surprised at how good it sounded, especially compared to the sound quality of streaming terrestrial programs. So this whole "cd quality sound" thing seems like another cover story to charge more money.
Again, if you're going to charge me more, just charge me more and tell me that the rates increased. Stop blowing smoke up my ass.
Bottom line: I am, actually, pleased with the response that I received from Listener Care. I am still displeased, however, with the overall state of affairs down at Sirius/XM.
#2 Consumer Comment
Tim...you are right on the money...
AUTHOR: Ronny g - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Declining auto sales hurt their growth potential..and the problem is 2 -fold..because people are tightening up...they are less apt to spring for the extras in life like satellite radio.
However...if as you stated they can deliver what their customers want..and not resort to deception to gain revenue..and let the people who know what the listeners want work unfettered, the company has a chance for survival. If they act like the phone companies and banks to "sneak" in fees and make the plans misleading to "trap" customers...sure as the day is long..they will fail. And no tarp money is allocated for them, not a dime.
#3 Author of original report
Excellent Points, Ronny
AUTHOR: Tim - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, September 23, 2009
You're exactly right, both of these companies have been in financial trouble since day one. I wasn't aware of their current status, but I would have surmised that they were still tanking.
And yup, Sirius purchased XM. Not technically a merger, but still a transaction that, in my opinion, should have been scrutinized more closely by the SEC and the FTC. And now look - the shareholders are worse off, as are the consumers. Of course, much of that can be blamed on the economy.
But here's where I would go with those things in mind:
Both companies KNEW, from the get-go, that a given subscriber would have to be on board for about three years before that individual account became profitable. Now, I don't profess to be a radio guru or anything, but I can hypothesize that the primary factor in retaining a subscriber is quality programming.
For me, and for the others that listen to the same channel, quality programming means 1) management keeps their noses out of the day-to-day activities of the on-air talent, who were hired for their personal knowledge of how to entertain an audience; and 2) NO COMMERCIALS!
Back in the early days this is what we had. The infant XM was run by people who KNEW that the key to keeping listeners was recognizing when to defer to the knowledge of the on-air talent. Now Sirius/XM is run by awful business-people, each of which has a trail of failed terrestrial radio stations behind them.
So I guess I don't know what the answer is, and how this company can remain viable and still provide the level of programming and customer service I came to enjoy several years ago. But back then, the theory was "if we stick with this long enough, and keep giving people what they want, we will eventually become profitable."
Whether they would be tanking this bad if they had stuck with that philosophy, I don't know. But it's painfully evident that the "let's run this thing like it's Chrysler" way isn't working.
Giving a novelty, relic shock-jock a $.5B contract probably wasn't the best idea either. And from what I hear, the guy's only putting in about 10 hours of actual airtime per week. But, for some reason, his listeners like what he does, so let him do it! (Just make him do more of it).
By the way, kudos for pointing out that the "technical service" rep has probably never even seen a satellite radio.
#4 UPDATE Employee
You should be informed...
AUTHOR: Ronny g - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, September 23, 2009

