Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #582663

Complaint Review: SLIM4Life d/b/a slimgenics - Internet Colorado

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Kountkelobo — Hopkins Minnesota USA
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • SLIM4Life d/b/a slimgenics 6568 South Racine Circle, Centennial Co Internet, Colorado United States of America

SLIM4Life ,slimgenics slimgenics Deceptive recruiting practice; false job title and responsibility describpion; false income potential claims Internet, Colorado

*Author of original report: Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development

*General Comment: Bitter

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

This company places recruitment ads for its weight loss clinics that present the title and responsibilties of the job in a way that do not accurately portray the job as it really is.  The job is in reality a weight loss groceries sales job, and the so-called 'weight loss counselor' is nothing more than a food diary record-recorder.


In addition, the company portrays itself as an Equal Employment Opportunity Company when in reality it wants primarily attractive young females who may or may not have credentials in nutrition.  It seems that many of the females actually have credentials or education related to fashion merchandising, retail sales, sociology, or some other non-specific education with no core of study related to nutrition or health.


Some of the so-called managers and weight loss specialists have never used the products to lose weight, and have actually had liposuction to remove body fat withouth any concommitant use of the companies weight loss products or methodology.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 03/18/2010 03:27 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/slim4life-dba-slimgenics/internet-colorado-80111/slim4life-slimgenics-slimgenics-deceptive-recruiting-practice-false-job-title-and-respon-582663. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
1Author
1Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#2 Author of original report

Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development

AUTHOR: Kountkelobo - (USA)

POSTED: Wednesday, July 07, 2010

The Department of Employment and Econcomic Development has a record of the testimony supporting the Unemployment Compensation claim, the rebuttal, and the decision affirming benefits payment.

The findings of the sworn testimony resulted in the benefits decision to uphold the original decision that benefits could be claimed.  Whatever the 'bitter' comment referred to should be considered slanderous.  No misconduct was shown. 

The prior comment is a defense of personal prejudice. 

An age and sex discrimination interview was made with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights.  The employer may not discharge an employee for beginning a complaint based on age or sex. 

The employee has not relinquished the right to continue the age and sex discrimination complaint with continuing investigation by a the Minnesota Department of Human Rights.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 General Comment

Bitter

AUTHOR: BITTER - (United States of America)

POSTED: Tuesday, April 20, 2010

The above comment seemed not to acknowledge the persons own shortcomings or take any responsibility for their own experiences/actions ,they choose to blame and label everyone but them self in this scenario that paints them as the victim without telling the whole story.   They honestly only know a fraction of the history of all  its employees.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now