- Report: #177218
Complaint Review: Schwan's
| Schwan's schwans.com
Romeoville, Illinois U.S.A. |
|
Schwan's ripoff a home delivery food service, now charges the customer $1.00 fuel surcharge! Romeoville Illinois
*Consumer Comment: It's now $1.75 delivery fee
*UPDATE Employee: Fuel Surcharge
*UPDATE Employee: Grief and Displeasure
*UPDATE Employee: Fuel Surcharge is now Delivery Charge
*Consumer Comment: I 2nd that
*UPDATE EX-employee responds: Schwans is crooked
*UPDATE Employee: It's not unreasonable
*UPDATE Employee: I hate it, but I do it.
*UPDATE Employee: How to avoid $1.00 fuel charge & our pay
*Consumer Comment: An extremely happy customer
*UPDATE Employee: Husband works for Schwan's.......
*UPDATE EX-employee responds: Not worth the money !!!
*Consumer Comment: What about the food itself?
*UPDATE EX-employee responds: If we knew what corporate moguls know we'd all hang-m
*UPDATE EX-employee responds: Eugene Kicks Butt, Peter Butt, lmbo !!!!!!!
*Consumer Comment: Thank you Quinn
*Consumer Comment: No, Eugene, you are wrong!
*UPDATE EX-employee responds: We can only gain from the truth.
*UPDATE EX-employee responds: We can only gain from the truth.
*UPDATE EX-employee responds: We can only gain from the truth.
*UPDATE EX-employee responds: We can only gain from the truth.
*Consumer Comment: My wife used to work for ATT
*Consumer Comment: My wife used to work for ATT
*Consumer Comment: My wife used to work for ATT
*Consumer Comment: My wife used to work for ATT
*Consumer Comment: It is clearly about the dollar as you refuse to do the proper math
*Consumer Comment: An exellent suggestion
*Consumer Comment: I agree!
*Consumer Comment: ALL OF THIS DRAMA OVER A DOLLAR?
*Consumer Comment: ALL OF THIS DRAMA OVER A DOLLAR?
*Consumer Comment: ALL OF THIS DRAMA OVER A DOLLAR?
*Consumer Comment: ALL OF THIS DRAMA OVER A DOLLAR?
*UPDATE EX-employee responds: uh, wrong and wrong, lmbo !!!
*Consumer Comment: If Schwann's can do it, so can I
*Consumer Comment: Quinn, ever hear of discrimination?
*UPDATE EX-employee responds: Carl, I dislike Schwan for larger, moral reasons.
*Consumer Comment: I dont take delivery from them anymore
*Consumer Suggestion: Variable costs.
*Consumer Comment: My 2 cents
*Consumer Comment: Read Quinn's original comment again....
*UPDATE EX-employee responds: Both Chantel & Lori make excellent points.
*Consumer Comment: They chose to deliver!
*Consumer Comment: Cyd, think you need new batteries in that calculator!
*UPDATE EX-employee responds: $1 Wont Break The Camels Back
*Consumer Comment: Fuel
*UPDATE EX-employee responds: Go Away
*Consumer Comment: visit 3 millions homes/wk, but sell to 150 millions?????
*Consumer Comment: visit 3 millions homes/wk, but sell to 150 millions?????
*Consumer Comment: visit 3 millions homes/wk, but sell to 150 millions?????
*Consumer Comment: visit 3 millions homes/wk, but sell to 150 millions?????
*Consumer Suggestion: Surcharge is the norm
*UPDATE EX-employee responds: You don't say !!!
*Consumer Comment: Get Real...
*UPDATE EX-employee responds: Suggestion
*Consumer Comment: The surcharge does seem silly.
*Consumer Comment: Increased prices
*Consumer Comment: I can see her point...
*Consumer Comment: You're absurd
*Consumer Comment: Gene or Chantel...whoever is doing the complaining
*Consumer Comment: The dollar is not the issue
*Consumer Comment: It's also clearly posted on the website in no less than 2 places
*Consumer Comment: Ripoff?
*Consumer Comment: Ripoff?
*Consumer Comment: Ripoff?
*Consumer Comment: Ripoff?
Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
Gene
Downers Grove, Illinois
U.S.A.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 02/20/2006 05:30 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Schwans/Romeoville-Illinois/Schwans-ripoff-a-home-delivery-food-service-now-charges-the-customer-100-fuel-surcharg-177218. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Schwan's
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
Search Tips#1 Consumer Comment
It's now $1.75 delivery fee
AUTHOR: lwos - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, June 28, 2011
#2 UPDATE Employee
Fuel Surcharge
AUTHOR: MidMo - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, February 12, 2011
Oh please. Get a grip. Get a life. Do you realize that UPS and FedEx charge an even HIGHER fuel surcharge? Get an Omaha Steak and have it brought to your door for a saturday party. It may get there faster, but you WILL pay much more for an equivalent product from Schwans. You are getting a steak on wednesday for $20 more a better deal when you get it on friday for $20 less and it is just as good, if not, better? Hell, UPS Next Day Air shipments for LETTERS are easily over $20 in addition to the original product. FedEx? Try about $50+ for smaller packages next day, like a 4x4x4 box.
Me, personally, I'd go for something a little less costly but there in time, and cheaper too. $1 is hardly enough to cry, bitch and moan about. Order pizzas daily and THEN see how much that delivery charge adds up, even over just a few days from a local pizza place.
I work as a CSM for Schwans and have been for the last three months. Since the posting of most of these complaints and rebuttals, Schwans has changed a few things to include the way its' CSM's are paid. We are now paid a salary but have to work our tails off to get any type of commission. Is this fair? Not for me it isn't. I was given a failing route where I barely make my weekly checkpoint if I even make it at all. I will soon have a choice to make in the next couple of weeks and I'm not sure whether I want to sign on as the CSM for this route. Why should I? there is no chance for myself or anyone else that takes this route to make any kind of commission for several years, especially with the current financial problems this country is facing. Many of my customers have told me that they can't buy from me anymore due to either the husband or wife being laid off. I live in Oklahoma and the area I live in the last several months have seen a dramatic reduction in oil and gas wells being drilled which has caused many people to be laid off indefinitely.
I will thou have to agree with some of you concerning working for Schwans. If you can help it.. don't work for them. I work like a slave and yes the pay checks are nice... but when I break it down.. for the same amount of money and hours I put in.. I could easily make just as much at McDonalds. I do miss my life and really miss my weekends off.. But on the other hand.. I do have job applications turned in at other places.. Just waiting on the phone calls.
#4 UPDATE Employee
Fuel Surcharge is now Delivery Charge
AUTHOR: Pokerqueent - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, January 11, 2009
And the prices have gone up and some have gone down. That's how businesses make money to stay in business and keep their employees working so they don't have to lay them off.
Some districts/regions are old school & know how Marvin started & are growing today.
Other districts/regions are filled w/ greed, incompetency, ignorance & overall idiocy.
Case in point, how long are the "Now Hiring" signs going to be displayed on the rear of the trucks? 5, 10 years? Maybe they'll be taken off when replaced w/ "Going Out of Business."
Some of Schwan's is crooked.
#6 UPDATE EX-employee responds
Schwans is crooked
AUTHOR: Steve - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Friday, August 24, 2007
they cheat their employees.
don't buy from them and do not work for them.
..As to multiple customers on a street, there's no realistic way to equally distribute the cost of fuel for a trip down that street between all of the buying customers. Likewise, the average route day has between 50 and 100 customers on it. We visit every one, but on average less than half actually make a purchase on any given day. With routes that run as much as 150 miles a day, you can see how it's unreasonable to not recoup our costs at each opportunity.
#8 UPDATE Employee
I hate it, but I do it.
AUTHOR: Joe - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, February 07, 2007
First of all, for all of you who responded and said they were not told of the fuel surcharge, that is utter bullcrap. I know for a fact that every single person who was a customer of Schwan's home service at the time when the surcharge was implemented was mailed a letter describing the new surcharge and how it applied. If you didn't get this letter that means that your address was incorrect in the handheld which was probably not your fault, but the fact remains that these letter WERE sent. Aside from have huge 72 point print on the fron over every catalog talking about the surcharge, what else would you have them do?
Second: As far as the actual surcharge is concerned I can't believe how many people are upset about it. Do you make a huge fuss when Pizza Hut or pretty much any other company delivers pizza to your door, because guess what? They charge you a delivery charge too. Now they might include it in the price of their pizza or they might have it seperate on the check like Pizza Hut does. The point is it is there, you just don't know because you don't look. You cell phone bill has vast amounts of surcharges on it and you aren't calling up your provider whining about them?
The fact is I myself hate the surcharge because I am the one who has to explain it to my customers, but after I explain it them usually tell me that $1 or $2 a month is a small price to pay for having delicious food delivered to their door.
Lastly:
Let me explain why Schwan's has the prices that they do and the surcharge. First this business of %50 buying rate is crazy, I only wish %50 if my customers would buy every time I came buy. The actual rate is much closer to %35 percent. That means 35 out of 100 customers buy on any given date. When you factor in that you are driving to all 100 of these a day which could be substantial miles and only getting $35 worth of fuel you can quickly see why this came about.
And the prices well lets think about this.
Level 1 - Farmers/Fisherman and their workers have to either raise the livestock or plant the vegtables. They take their cut when selling the raw product.
Level 2 - Transporation of raw product to suppliers, the trucking company takes their cut.
Level 3 - Supplies of finished or raw supply have to pay workers to work on the product.
Level 4 - Schwan's buys raw product from Supplier ( For example they used to buy raw chicken from Tyson meat company )
Level 5 - Transportation to Schwan's manufacturing plant from Supplier, truckers take another cut.
Level 6 - Schwan's plant workers have to be paid for their time. This includes management and so on.
Level 7 - Trucking from the Schwan's manufacturing plant to the individual depots, again another cut for the truckers.
Level 8 - Depot warehouse guys have to be paid to load the trucks everynight.
Level 9 - Maintenance cost for warehouses, depots, trucks. Insurance copays, fuel for the trucks, etc.
Level 10 - The CSM of the route is the last one to actually get paid.
Now this is an overly simplified version of the actual costs of delivering food products to someones door but I think you get the picture. Every step in the above plan adds that much more cost onto a product. Now with a retail store that process stops around level 8. These extra two levels that Schwan's has to deal with is where a good portion of the final costs comes from.
In conclusion, you can expect the costs of ALL food products to go up, retail or otherwise. Its a little thing economists like to call ... inflation. If you don't want to pay a lousy $1 every other week for some of the best tasting food you can get outside of a restaurant, then I would say fine have fun at Wal-Mart.
#9 UPDATE Employee
How to avoid $1.00 fuel charge & our pay
AUTHOR: Eric - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, February 03, 2007
Even better, ask your CSM to call up a non-tax business & then your final bill is even cheaper. We don't make money on the fuel surcharge or taxes. However, if your guy says he won't do it, then tell him it can be done and he just lost a sale.
As far as how much does a driver get paid? In the first couple of months, we are guaranteed $600 a week or $120 per day [some places pay $720] but then that soon disappears after you are sent to Schwan's School [3 1/2 days on how to be a better salesperson - they pay for you travel, food & motel bill] & then your pay is based only on commission of your daily sales.
For example, you sell $700 worth of food in one day & your pay is 9.0% which comes to $63 gross. However, you may work 13 hours that day [time includes pre-tripping your truck, boring sales meetings and at night with filling out paper work and making nightly bank deposits] so that comes to $4.85 an hour [$63/13]. This 9% is for the first $1000 because after that it goes to 11% and jumps about % every $1000.
$0 - 999 9 %
1001 - 1100 11 %
1101 1200 11.5%
1201 1300 12 %
1301 1400 12.5%
1401 1500 13 %
1501 1600 13.5%
1601 1700 14 %
1701 1900 15 %
1901 2200 15.5%
2201 2500 16 %
2501 3000 16.5%
3001 9999 17 %
However, unless your on a route that has customers buying a lot from you, your not going to make that much. That is why you will see a lot of turn over after the guarantee runs out. Yeah, there are maybe 3 or 4 route guys at each depot location that makes between $50000 - $65000 but they are the exception and not the rule.
#10 Consumer Comment
An extremely happy customer
AUTHOR: Clifford - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Monday, January 29, 2007
I do not care if they add $1.00 to my order if it means it will help keep them in business so we can enjoy their food and door to door service.
I still miss having a Milk Man and would be willing to a pay a premium to anyone who wanted to provide that service again as well.
Don't know anything about conditions of employment except that most people are not happy in their jobs but if their employers provide what I consider a good service at a fair price I'll just worry about myself and let other folks worry about themselves.
Good job Schwann and I hope you can stick around.
#11 UPDATE Employee
Husband works for Schwan's.......
AUTHOR: Kathy - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Monday, January 29, 2007
About the comment about arbitrarily refusing service....
HE HAD A GUN PULLED ON HIM! Did Schwan's do anything?! NO!
DRUG DEALER (it was all laying out, ready for sale)paid him with drug money.
Some *&*& up family that had 10 kids, 14 near death looking dogs and feces everywhere. The Mama made sure the kids swarmed the truck to see if they could get in an unlocked door. My husband always locks them, but geez!
It's just not working out.
The resume is ready...
and yes.... The $1 is ridiculous
#12 UPDATE EX-employee responds
Not worth the money !!!
AUTHOR: Quinn - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, November 08, 2006
I have reasons to dislike Mavin Schwan's company with a passion. My friends and family will never do business with them ever again. Please do not buy from them or work for them. It's all a heartache. I cannot say much more than that here.
All the best,
#13 Consumer Comment
What about the food itself?
AUTHOR: Giselle - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, November 07, 2006
#14 UPDATE EX-employee responds
If we knew what corporate moguls know we'd all hang-m
AUTHOR: Quinn - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Monday, November 06, 2006
In 1998, Schwan Enterprises was listed as 42nd from the top of the wealthiest privately owned companies in America. By 2003, Schwan rose 10 place points to 32nd. I haven't been following it but they're headed for the top #1 spot with only 8 billion dollars annual revenue. When a Schwan exec spits on the road, that spittle is worth more than any dollar, not that they ever see the road.
One last point. If you purchase from a Schwan truck away from your home. They can't charge the dollar surcharge. Against the law = )
All the best,
#15 UPDATE EX-employee responds
Eugene Kicks Butt, Peter Butt, lmbo !!!!!!!
AUTHOR: Quinn - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Monday, November 06, 2006
Peter, your the one with the hyper rebuts so stop with this irate nonsense. This is America boy, or haven't you noticed. Go crawl back under your Schwan rock and leave consumer complaints to the professionals. Honestly, you're not helping anything or anyone other than your own pitiful ego.
As far as paying a dollar for "all your groceries" that's bunk. Many people will buy just a half gallon of ice cream for $6 and have to pay an extra dollar for the pleasure. You can pay $200 on Schwan products and still not have nearly enough to last all week long. Service charges has always been built into Schwan's product prices. Surcharges are just a brainchild to line exec's pockets and Eugene just might not want to contribute to that less than lofty pursuit. Go get-m Eugene, I'm with ya man !!!!!!!
All the best,
You seem to know a lot more about Schwann's than I do, so I defer to your expertise. I guess my main question is since gas prices have dropped to a nationwide average of $2.18 a gallon, will Schwann's be dropping the surcharge or will they figure "Ah, hell, everybody's used to it, some people don't even know about it, let's keep it." Also, I gather Schwann's implemented the surcharge because of rising gas prices. Do you happen to know what the price of gas was when they added the tax? (Was it above or below $2.18?) In my opinion their food prices were over-inflated to begin with, and I felt this in itself reflected gas and truck maintenance.
Just curious. At this point I could care less, as I am done dealing with Schwann's. Thank you.
#17 Consumer Comment
No, Eugene, you are wrong!
AUTHOR: Peter - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Monday, November 06, 2006
IT IS STILL ONLY A DOLLAR TO YOU, THOUGH! So get over it, find something new to philosophize about, and don't do business with Schwann's if that is what it is going to take for you to prove your point. I'm sure the next time you're lugging your grocery cart through the pouring rain from the store to your car, you'll think differently about that $1 charge for convenient home delivery.
#18 UPDATE EX-employee responds
We can only gain from the truth.
AUTHOR: Quinn - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Monday, November 06, 2006
The deep pockets of Schwan Enterprises can throw all the cutthroat lawyers they wish at me, accusing me of defamation. Problem is, falsehood must be proven and there's just too many truthful route managers for that to be accomplished.
Besides, the real assault against Schwan is through customer enlightenment. That is something that cannot be undone. My 15 websites are being replicated by many route managers who thought they had no recourse. I just happen to be the right man at the right time for the job to shine a light on what Marvin Schwan's ice cream company has become. The Internet of which Schwan's so eagerly embraced to lesson their dependency on the route manager is the very thing that will undo them.
All the best,
#19 UPDATE EX-employee responds
We can only gain from the truth.
AUTHOR: Quinn - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Monday, November 06, 2006
The deep pockets of Schwan Enterprises can throw all the cutthroat lawyers they wish at me, accusing me of defamation. Problem is, falsehood must be proven and there's just too many truthful route managers for that to be accomplished.
Besides, the real assault against Schwan is through customer enlightenment. That is something that cannot be undone. My 15 websites are being replicated by many route managers who thought they had no recourse. I just happen to be the right man at the right time for the job to shine a light on what Marvin Schwan's ice cream company has become. The Internet of which Schwan's so eagerly embraced to lesson their dependency on the route manager is the very thing that will undo them.
All the best,
#20 UPDATE EX-employee responds
We can only gain from the truth.
AUTHOR: Quinn - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Monday, November 06, 2006
The deep pockets of Schwan Enterprises can throw all the cutthroat lawyers they wish at me, accusing me of defamation. Problem is, falsehood must be proven and there's just too many truthful route managers for that to be accomplished.
Besides, the real assault against Schwan is through customer enlightenment. That is something that cannot be undone. My 15 websites are being replicated by many route managers who thought they had no recourse. I just happen to be the right man at the right time for the job to shine a light on what Marvin Schwan's ice cream company has become. The Internet of which Schwan's so eagerly embraced to lesson their dependency on the route manager is the very thing that will undo them.
All the best,
#21 UPDATE EX-employee responds
We can only gain from the truth.
AUTHOR: Quinn - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Monday, November 06, 2006
The deep pockets of Schwan Enterprises can throw all the cutthroat lawyers they wish at me, accusing me of defamation. Problem is, falsehood must be proven and there's just too many truthful route managers for that to be accomplished.
Besides, the real assault against Schwan is through customer enlightenment. That is something that cannot be undone. My 15 websites are being replicated by many route managers who thought they had no recourse. I just happen to be the right man at the right time for the job to shine a light on what Marvin Schwan's ice cream company has become. The Internet of which Schwan's so eagerly embraced to lesson their dependency on the route manager is the very thing that will undo them.
All the best,
#22 Consumer Comment
My wife used to work for ATT
AUTHOR: Robert - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Monday, November 06, 2006
These people here are complaining about paying $1(ONE dollar) to have their groceries delivered. Amazing.
I don't worry about ANYTHING less than $100. Is $1, or less, REALLY going to upset you this much?
Good grief.
#23 Consumer Comment
My wife used to work for ATT
AUTHOR: Robert - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Monday, November 06, 2006
These people here are complaining about paying $1(ONE dollar) to have their groceries delivered. Amazing.
I don't worry about ANYTHING less than $100. Is $1, or less, REALLY going to upset you this much?
Good grief.
#24 Consumer Comment
My wife used to work for ATT
AUTHOR: Robert - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Monday, November 06, 2006
These people here are complaining about paying $1(ONE dollar) to have their groceries delivered. Amazing.
I don't worry about ANYTHING less than $100. Is $1, or less, REALLY going to upset you this much?
Good grief.
#25 Consumer Comment
My wife used to work for ATT
AUTHOR: Robert - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Monday, November 06, 2006
These people here are complaining about paying $1(ONE dollar) to have their groceries delivered. Amazing.
I don't worry about ANYTHING less than $100. Is $1, or less, REALLY going to upset you this much?
Good grief.
#26 Consumer Comment
It is clearly about the dollar as you refuse to do the proper math
AUTHOR: John - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, November 05, 2006
"But I know for a fact that on my road alone they deliver to at least a dozen customers. I cannot see how they can justify charging twelve dollars extra for gas to cover a delivery route that is less than half a mile long."
So how far away from Schwan's depot are you? It takes fuel to get to the area where these 12 houses are located. IT IS NOT JUST ABOUT DRIVING ON THE ROAD WHERE THESE 12 HOUSES ARE. Should people who live immediately down the street from the depot pay less? You'd have a real fit then. Should people who live farther away from you pay more? They'd have a fit. No one is going to be happy but you all will still order from them. The math has been done above. Again, if you don't want to pay, then don't order from them and go get it yourself.
The market will dictate whether the dollar surcharge is justified or not. No matter what, it's not a rip off.
#27 Consumer Comment
An exellent suggestion
AUTHOR: Eugene - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, November 05, 2006
You are (as usual) AGAIN wrong. I don't know why I bother responding to you anyway. Everyone knows you are here to push people's buttons. (sigh) All right, once more, and this time pay attention.
As I clearly stated, the dollar is not the issue. I probably lose more change in my couch cushion every day. It is the way Schwan's chooses to do business that is wrong. If they had clearly told everyone up front that they were implementing this surcharge, then most everyone would have said no big deal and that would have been it. The fact that they didn't seems to call their integrity into question.
To tell you the truth, if I lived in a rural area and Schwan's had to make a special trip just for me, I could see paying a gas surcharge. But I know for a fact that on my road alone they deliver to at least a dozen customers. I cannot see how they can justify charging twelve dollars extra for gas to cover a delivery route that is less than half a mile long.
We have been dealing with Schwan's for five years now. They stop by every two weeks and we usually buy about thirty dollars worth of food. But I have to ask, where is loyalty. If their answer to being fair and even-handed is to charge everyone the extra dollar, then I have to question their ethics. If this is but one hidden charge, maybe there are others I'm not aware of. Maybe I'm being nickeled and dimed to death and I don't even know it.
Anyway, your suggestion was a good one. If I don't like the way Schwan's does business, don't deal with them. An exellent idea! Schwan's has seen the last of me.
It is pretty clear that if you do not like the $1 delivery fee, then you should simply cease all business with the company. But you don't seem satisfied with that. It sounds like you want to continue doing business with them FOR FREE (aka, without having to pay the delivery fee like all the other customers).
#29 Consumer Comment
ALL OF THIS DRAMA OVER A DOLLAR?
AUTHOR: Sherri - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, November 05, 2006
#30 Consumer Comment
ALL OF THIS DRAMA OVER A DOLLAR?
AUTHOR: Sherri - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, November 05, 2006
#31 Consumer Comment
ALL OF THIS DRAMA OVER A DOLLAR?
AUTHOR: Sherri - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, November 05, 2006
#32 Consumer Comment
ALL OF THIS DRAMA OVER A DOLLAR?
AUTHOR: Sherri - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, November 05, 2006
#33 UPDATE EX-employee responds
uh, wrong and wrong, lmbo !!!
AUTHOR: Quinn - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, November 05, 2006
Now for Peter. Peter says:"What you are saying is highly inappropriate". Don't lie to these good people Peter. And stop lying to yourself. And if you want to be dogmatic with me, do it to my face if you have what it takes(I wouldn't suggest it). Schwan hurt my family severely after years of sacrifice and dedication and I know how to make them pay for having done that(for every $10 taken from me, they lose a cool million). HOW DARE YOU TRY TO TELL ME WHAT MY JOB IS !!! *clears throat* Peter says:"It is YOUR JOB to deliver food and manage your accounts. It is NOT your job to make judgements". Are you talking about good judgement or bad judgement? Oh, I see, you think that managers shouldn't have the facility to judge. You want "Schwan Delivery BOYS", not managers(less expensive, less training). RM's work off 11% commission from what they can sell. That makes up 100% of there wages minus some bonus money. They don't work for tips like a delivery boy. So it's crucial for the RM to provide the best service he can to protect his wages. There's something we call "firing a customer off your route". There are criminals out there who also may want Schwan's service or even psychos, or haven't you heard that they exist? You could be one for all I know. If you were my customer and insisted in being abusive in an unacceptable manner, you would receive a verbal and written explanation for why you lost your privilege for being a Schwan customer. A copy of the letter would be posted at the depot with discussion among my associates. The point is, you would be off my route for good.
Peter says: "Do you realize that you were engaging in discrimination? Schwann's does not need discriminatory individuals working for them" *shakes head* I can tell you work for Schwan, duh. Here again, there are two types of discrimination, one bad and one good. The bad type is when you discriminate to harm unjustly yet the good type of discrimination is key to survival. Peter, it's when a decision should be made for the good of everyone. Am I talking to a 10 year old? Seems like it. I warned I shouldn't be pushed.
But let's not forget, you still work for Schwan. Your mindless babble sounds like something out of Amway !!! Leave Schwan's Home Service and get-A-life Peter. That's my message, not just to you but the world. It's Schwan's immoral treatment of its employees that is the real scam and rip-off. Stay in Pony Peter.
#34 Consumer Comment
If Schwann's can do it, so can I
AUTHOR: Eugene - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, November 04, 2006
Anyway, if Schwann can get away with this, so can I. The next time I go out to a restaurant I will intentionally shortchange the waiter on the tip. My reason: Hey, it cost me gas to drive out here, and I ought to be recompensed.
#35 Consumer Comment
Quinn, ever hear of discrimination?
AUTHOR: Peter - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, November 04, 2006
#36 UPDATE EX-employee responds
Carl, I dislike Schwan for larger, moral reasons.
AUTHOR: Quinn - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Friday, November 03, 2006
Back when I was a route manager I would discontinue service to most customers who didn't respect me as a manager. Often, people make the mistake in thinking of Schwan Route Managers as mere delivery boys. Not the case. Like myself, many Route Managers build their routs from scratch. They are highly trained managers who deserve your respect. It's unfortunate that the customer isn't made aware of all the responsibilities of these hard working men and women. I made it clear to every Route Manager I trained that they should be humble yet firm in their responsibility to manage individual accounts for the good of the entire route system. I myself had a very low tolerance for customers who misbehaved. There are people you know who don't deserve Schwan's level of service and thinking they were born with that right which is an unfortunate problem for them.
Often I felt like warning the more abusive ones that their community at large would flog them if I made it known how they treated me. I could take as much abuse as most until they wanted to go over my head and complain to the home office in Marshall MN. That for me was always the last straw and so I would summarily drop their service. Mind you, this action was reserved for only the most abusive of my customers who had no respect for humanity in general. I've had wonderful customers drop me for reasons out of my control.
Schwan's customers are reassured that they purchase from Schwan under no contract. That maybe The best thing about them. But realize this, where as the customer can drop out at anytime just by saying, "no thanks", in turn, the customer may be dropped by the route manager as well. He/She(RM), must maintain their sense of dignity and remember their loved ones would not have them tolerate certain behavior from any of their customers. For the most part, they are highly ethical individuals with huge responsibilities working like slaves, who service on average, 1,000 customers every two weeks.
There's no need for these people to have heart murmurs just because they have to driving up to the house of an unruly customer. Drop-m! But when Route Managers find themselves's intimidated by such customers, they should find a different line of work. 2% out of a 1,000 customer base is a reasonable cull rate.
So do have a little respect. Their ice cream is the best, now that's the last good thing I'll say about Schwan's Home Service.
All the best,
#37 Consumer Comment
I dont take delivery from them anymore
AUTHOR: Carl - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Friday, November 03, 2006
the above statement is not entirely true. I get my
pizza at little ceasars for 5.00 take out compared to other pizza parlors that charge way more. They have not raised their price in years. And in case you are wondering about extra gasoline, not. I schedule my trips accordingly. So I actually save money that way.
Schwans screwed up my order one time and I complained at like most large corporate companies never responded back either over the phone or email and I told the driver I am sorry but since they did not respond I am no longer interested in your product.
I would spend about a 100.00 per week. Go add that up and tell me how much they lost from me?
#38 Consumer Suggestion
Variable costs.
AUTHOR: Ashley - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, November 02, 2006
You should always ask for the total price to confirm what you will have to pay.If the total is not what you expect,ask for an itemized list of charges.
It is just as much your responsibility to understand as it is their responsibility to explain.
Don't make such a big deal about a dollar.
Now that you know,you can make an informed choice about whether you want to use their service in the future or not.And,you can always request a receipt.This is not a ripoff.
The reason they raised food prices was because their food costs went up. Anyone who compares grocery prices from a year ago to today will see that your food costs have gone up too.
The reason they charge a fuel surcharge is to cover the cost of fuel. Should it be a dollar? Maybe not. Maybe fifty cents would suffice.
As for the cable company, the taxis, the utility companies, the phone companies, ect, they DO charge you extra now to cover the costs of their fuel. They just do not call it a fuel surcharge, they simply raise their rates (on items they sell that have not had their prices upped by the market...wow that is a complicated sentence, sorry).
Now, I am not saying it is right, but it is the way of the world If you don't like it, don't buy. Problem solved!
#40 Consumer Comment
Read Quinn's original comment again....
AUTHOR: Cyd - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, November 02, 2006
"Schwan's 7,000 trucks services 3 million homes every week, out of which, some 150 million make a purchase. Now that's 150 Million dollars extra from that measly one dollar bill."
Half of 3 million is 1.5 million, not 150 million.
My math skills are just fine thank you. You might want to check your reading skills before you make a comment.
Quinn did provide the correct figure in a later comment.
#41 UPDATE EX-employee responds
Both Chantel & Lori make excellent points.
AUTHOR: Quinn - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, November 02, 2006
God bless you all,
P.S. I use Quenn as a pin-name. They know who I am.
#42 Consumer Comment
They chose to deliver!
AUTHOR: Chantel - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, November 02, 2006
#43 Consumer Comment
Cyd, think you need new batteries in that calculator!
AUTHOR: Lori - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, November 02, 2006
I'm one of the few 'large order' customers, with purchases between $120-$275 per trip. I object to the surcharge because they DID raise the prices of the food at about the same time. Now, I'm paying more for the food, PLUS the surcharge. If they had raised every food item price by a nickel, then at least the cost was spread more evenly across the board. Why didn't they do that? Because THERE WAS NO PROFIT IN IT! I purchase an average of 12-15 items, the average sale is 2-3 items. Do the math on that one LOL
I'll continue to buy from Schwans, at least for now. If the prices continue to climb, I'll continue to cut back, until I decide to pick everything up at the store. Just like every bad habit, it's hard to give up cold turkey.
#44 UPDATE EX-employee responds
$1 Wont Break The Camels Back
AUTHOR: Quinn - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, November 01, 2006
I will mention, I've been in the past, not only an LGM over the largest customer base in the company but a preferred customer for over 15 years. I have trained dozens of route managers with close working associations of some 2 dozen other LGM's in several states.
The Achilles heel for Schwan Enterprises is the paranoia of its law department due to its heady liability from doing business both on and inside private property. No matter how you slice it, Schwan's Home Service is a dinosaur whose day of extinction is close at hand while its international frozen food operations is well entrenched. You can count on Schwan to sacrifice its slave like workforce and ditch its original mission. Remember, it's privately owned. They're forced to disclose nothing.
All the best,
That surcharge barely covers the cost of their fuel. Just imagine how much more you would pay to go to them, or to the store. Even if your order is $32, and extra dollar should not hurt you. If it does, you should not be ordering food from Schwans (its 3% by the way).
Best of luck to you!
#46 UPDATE EX-employee responds
Go Away
AUTHOR: Quinn - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, November 01, 2006
At 90 customers per day ~ times 5 days per week ~ times 7,000 trucks = 3,150,000 ~ divided by 2(expected purchase rate)= 1,575,000 ~ times $1, here again = $1,575,000.00 weekly fuel surcharge.
I'll layout Schwan seven-ways-to-Sunday if you push me. You have no idea !!!
It's proposed that Schwan Enterprises will soon dissolve its home service division given the negative liability environment. As the largest brand name, frozen food producer in America, it has no qualms doing just that.
Sorry, the going advice is for all route managers find other employment, fast. In short, Schwan's Home Service no longer intends any job security for its employees.
All the best,
#47 Consumer Comment
visit 3 millions homes/wk, but sell to 150 millions?????
AUTHOR: Cyd - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, October 31, 2006
If they have 7000 trucks as you state, then each truck would have to sell to 3571+ homes/per day (based on a 6 day work week). Even at 3 million homes per week, they would have to visit 71+ homes/per day. That does not include the homes that do not purchase that week. Add to all those homes the drive time and time to process the order and collect payment and I have to say, NO WAY!!!!.
Your position on whether the surcharge is fair or not does not get taken seriously when you exaggerate your numbers to make it look good.
I personally averaged around $50 per order when I ordered from them (its been a few years. I think that based on the increased fuel prices a dollar per order is really fair. Many companies have added a fuel surcharge to the cost of deliveries to offset the cost of fuel. FedEx charges a fuel surcharge to deliver and because I have an account with them, I usually do not have the specific amount until I receive the bill. I don't complain, because the cost is minimal and I don't expect them or any other company to lose money due to increases in the cost of doing business. All increases are passed on the the consumer one way or another...
Complain about the oil companies who have obviously increased prices far beyond any increased costs they have incurred. This is evident as most are posting record earnings lately.
CYd
#48 Consumer Comment
visit 3 millions homes/wk, but sell to 150 millions?????
AUTHOR: Cyd - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, October 31, 2006
If they have 7000 trucks as you state, then each truck would have to sell to 3571+ homes/per day (based on a 6 day work week). Even at 3 million homes per week, they would have to visit 71+ homes/per day. That does not include the homes that do not purchase that week. Add to all those homes the drive time and time to process the order and collect payment and I have to say, NO WAY!!!!.
Your position on whether the surcharge is fair or not does not get taken seriously when you exaggerate your numbers to make it look good.
I personally averaged around $50 per order when I ordered from them (its been a few years. I think that based on the increased fuel prices a dollar per order is really fair. Many companies have added a fuel surcharge to the cost of deliveries to offset the cost of fuel. FedEx charges a fuel surcharge to deliver and because I have an account with them, I usually do not have the specific amount until I receive the bill. I don't complain, because the cost is minimal and I don't expect them or any other company to lose money due to increases in the cost of doing business. All increases are passed on the the consumer one way or another...
Complain about the oil companies who have obviously increased prices far beyond any increased costs they have incurred. This is evident as most are posting record earnings lately.
CYd
#49 Consumer Comment
visit 3 millions homes/wk, but sell to 150 millions?????
AUTHOR: Cyd - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, October 31, 2006
If they have 7000 trucks as you state, then each truck would have to sell to 3571+ homes/per day (based on a 6 day work week). Even at 3 million homes per week, they would have to visit 71+ homes/per day. That does not include the homes that do not purchase that week. Add to all those homes the drive time and time to process the order and collect payment and I have to say, NO WAY!!!!.
Your position on whether the surcharge is fair or not does not get taken seriously when you exaggerate your numbers to make it look good.
I personally averaged around $50 per order when I ordered from them (its been a few years. I think that based on the increased fuel prices a dollar per order is really fair. Many companies have added a fuel surcharge to the cost of deliveries to offset the cost of fuel. FedEx charges a fuel surcharge to deliver and because I have an account with them, I usually do not have the specific amount until I receive the bill. I don't complain, because the cost is minimal and I don't expect them or any other company to lose money due to increases in the cost of doing business. All increases are passed on the the consumer one way or another...
Complain about the oil companies who have obviously increased prices far beyond any increased costs they have incurred. This is evident as most are posting record earnings lately.
CYd
#50 Consumer Comment
visit 3 millions homes/wk, but sell to 150 millions?????
AUTHOR: Cyd - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, October 31, 2006
If they have 7000 trucks as you state, then each truck would have to sell to 3571+ homes/per day (based on a 6 day work week). Even at 3 million homes per week, they would have to visit 71+ homes/per day. That does not include the homes that do not purchase that week. Add to all those homes the drive time and time to process the order and collect payment and I have to say, NO WAY!!!!.
Your position on whether the surcharge is fair or not does not get taken seriously when you exaggerate your numbers to make it look good.
I personally averaged around $50 per order when I ordered from them (its been a few years. I think that based on the increased fuel prices a dollar per order is really fair. Many companies have added a fuel surcharge to the cost of deliveries to offset the cost of fuel. FedEx charges a fuel surcharge to deliver and because I have an account with them, I usually do not have the specific amount until I receive the bill. I don't complain, because the cost is minimal and I don't expect them or any other company to lose money due to increases in the cost of doing business. All increases are passed on the the consumer one way or another...
Complain about the oil companies who have obviously increased prices far beyond any increased costs they have incurred. This is evident as most are posting record earnings lately.
CYd
#51 Consumer Suggestion
Surcharge is the norm
AUTHOR: Christine - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, October 31, 2006
#52 UPDATE EX-employee responds
You don't say !!!
AUTHOR: Quinn - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, October 31, 2006
Earlier it was said that the additional dollar shouldn't be noticed due to the cost and time of grocery store shopping. Ha! Weight it against Schwan's premium prices. Also, Schwan's 7,000 trucks services 3 million homes every week, out of which, some 150 million make a purchase. Now that's 150 Million dollars extra from that measly one dollar bill.
I used to bristle when anyone would say, "I'd never buy off a truck". Guess what??? Me neither!!!
#54 UPDATE EX-employee responds
Suggestion
AUTHOR: Dawn - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, May 18, 2006
My suggestion is to get with your neighbors and enter only 1 order. The route manager gets paid on the total dollars he sells, not how many customers purchase. This way each person could take a turn paying the surcharge.
As far as getting items less expensive, yes, there are many other places to get pork chops at a lower cost but, is the QUALITY the same for the less expensive items? Even though I no longer work for Schwan's and I no longer receive the employee perks, I still purchase the same products I always have.
#55 Consumer Comment
The surcharge does seem silly.
AUTHOR: Marc - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, February 23, 2006
#56 Consumer Comment
Increased prices
AUTHOR: Giselle - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, February 23, 2006
The $1 food delivery charge is most likely for fuel costs. ITS NOT UNREASONABLE!!!
#57 Consumer Comment
I can see her point...
AUTHOR: Lori - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, February 22, 2006
Schwans day is tomorrow, and it's looking like this week we aren't needing anything.
L
Trader Joe's does have great food at better prices, however, THEY DON'T SHIP OR DELIVER. So why compare Schwans against an establishment that does not deliver. For example, I just got a shipment from Omaha Steaks. They charge $19.99 to ship via UPS on dry ice. I think that's pretty reasonable. A buck to have food brought to your door is outstanding.
Why don't you go back to Wal-Mart. You'll be much more comfortable there.
#59 Consumer Comment
Gene or Chantel...whoever is doing the complaining
AUTHOR: Pete - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, February 21, 2006
#60 Consumer Comment
The dollar is not the issue
AUTHOR: Chantel - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, February 21, 2006
#61 Consumer Comment
It's also clearly posted on the website in no less than 2 places
AUTHOR: R - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Monday, February 20, 2006
And once at the bottom:
Although we have been pleased to offer you free delivery in the past, in an effort to offset rising energy costs without major price increases while continuing to provide you with the same level of service, the company has implemented a $1 fuel surcharge on most orders which will be added at the time of delivery.
So what's your problem?
Also, I can't see a Schwans order being any less than $150 so this represents abot 6/10ths of 1% of the cost of the order.
Do you find this to be unreasonable?
Also, I can't see a Schwans order being any less than $150 so this represents abot 6/10ths of 1% of the cost of the order.
Do you find this to be unreasonable?
Also, I can't see a Schwans order being any less than $150 so this represents abot 6/10ths of 1% of the cost of the order.
Do you find this to be unreasonable?
Also, I can't see a Schwans order being any less than $150 so this represents abot 6/10ths of 1% of the cost of the order.
Do you find this to be unreasonable?

