- Report: #187688
Complaint Review: Snelling Personnel Services
| Snelling Personnel Services 26 W 7th Street
Anderson, Indiana U.S.A. |
|
Snelling Personnel Services Misleading claims Anderson Indiana
*UPDATE EX-employee responds: Snelling is Shady
*UPDATE EX-employee responds: Rude, Unprofessional
*UPDATE EX-employee responds: Never Work For Them
*Consumer Comment: PETER IN PONY.....................
*UPDATE EX-employee responds: San Antonio Office Misrepresent Jobs, Too
*Consumer Suggestion: SNELLING IS A JOKE PERIOD
*Author of original report: To restate and clarify my position
*Consumer Comment: Huh??
*UPDATE Employee: NO FEE FOR PLACEMENT NOW! - NEVER MISLED - Candidate needs help
Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
David
Indianapolis, Indiana
U.S.A.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 04/20/2006 11:37 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Snelling-Personnel-Services/Anderson-Indiana-46016/Snelling-Personnel-Services-Misleading-claims-Anderson-Indiana-187688. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Snelling Personnel Services
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
Search Tips#1 UPDATE EX-employee responds
Snelling is Shady
AUTHOR: Sheri - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, July 22, 2012
#2 UPDATE EX-employee responds
Rude, Unprofessional
AUTHOR: Tmd - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, July 21, 2010
#3 UPDATE EX-employee responds
Never Work For Them
AUTHOR: Ralph - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Monday, November 17, 2008
#4 Consumer Comment
PETER IN PONY.....................
AUTHOR: Margaret - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, October 14, 2008
#5 UPDATE EX-employee responds
San Antonio Office Misrepresent Jobs, Too
AUTHOR: Ralph - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Monday, October 13, 2008
My friend continued to call Snelling with her status almost very week however Bob kept telling her that he didn't have any new assignments for her. After a couple of months, she stopped calling and found a permanent job through another staffing agency.
#6 Consumer Suggestion
SNELLING IS A JOKE PERIOD
AUTHOR: Margaret - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, May 22, 2007
Duh, I ran an office for 15 years and have a variety of excellent skills. Since the company I had left due to downsizing did not use Excel or Powerpoint I was not exactly proficient in those two programs however I am computer literate which means if I start using them daily I will become proficient. The little witch wanted to place me in a 9.00 an hour job after making 17.00 an hour for sometime.
I don't think so.
I would not recommend Snelling in Houston Texas to anyone.
With the help of a small agency on the far Northwest side of town I was placed with an excellent company and guess what? I still don't have to use Excel and I will be back to my former pay scale as soon as I make permanent in the next 2 months.
#7 Author of original report
To restate and clarify my position
AUTHOR: David - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Friday, June 02, 2006
Teresa, I do not need any help. Rather, I feel that you need help with basic reading comprehension. I do not mind paying for a genuine service when a service is truly provided. However, I do mind paying for a service when I am lied to and misled by the provider of the service.
I never questioned whether or not Snelling placed me with American General Finance (AGF). They placed me. That is not the issue here. The issue I have, Teresa, is the way that Snelling went about obtaining my placement agreement. At the time that I first went to Snelling, I was obviously in search of employment. I generally liked what they told me about AGF and indicated that I would like to continue discussing employment opportunities.
I was then informed by Sue ((FULL NAME REDACTED)) of Snelling in Anderson, IN that they charged a $4,000 (four thousand dollar) placement fee for placement with AGF. Of course being unemployed at the time, I balked a bit at the idea of paying that sum of money in order to obtain employment.
However, Sue made light of the fee, saying that I could obtain financing through a local bank Snelling had arrangements with and that payments could me made monthly on the total sum for one year, with a balloon payment due in full during the 13th month. At that point, I was still a bit hesitant at the thought of paying such a fee to obtain employment.
Sue then informed me that the fee was really no big deal, and in fact she stated that, "Most employees pay off the fee within a year with a PORTION of their quarterly bonuses." Taking her at her word, this made the fee seem much less of a burden, and I then proceeded to continue the placement process. I obtained the financing through a local bank and all seemed fine. However, once I began work at AGF, I became aware of the harsh reality of the situation.
When I would discuss the $4,000 fee with other employees at AGF, they would tell me how they remember having to take out a credit card in order to pay it, and were in fact still paying on it years later. When I asked why they didn't just use their bonus checks to pay the loan, as Sue had informed me that most do, my question was met with looks of utter disbelief and even laughter. "Oh, they got you with that one too?" they would ask me. It quickly became apparent that other people had been misled, just as I had been, by unrealistic earnings claims.
I find it extremely tough to believe that Sue, as a placement representative for AGF, could be so far off-base about the amount of bonus money that employees received. I based my decision largely on her claims of the amount of income I could expect to make. I believe that I was intentionally given inaccurate information in order to obtain my agreement for job placement. That is my opinion and you cannot change that.
Peter, you need to refer to the above posts in order to understand the situation on which you are commenting. I was not "telling falsified stories" as you claim, rather I was recounting my experience with the company in question. Perhaps I should charge you with libel against me for claiming that I told "falsified stories".
As I told Teresa, I feel that I was intentionally given inaccurate information and you cannot change my opinion. At the time I was placed through Snelling, they charged a fee, as indicated by Teresa in her rebuttal. Apparently now they don't. I do not make the company's policies, nor do I keep abreast of their annual updates. Please do not attempt to portray me in a negative or malicious manner due to changes the company has made since the time I was placed with them.
Thank you.
It is very common for employers to require potential employees to begin through a staffing agency, for several reasons. Most importantly, it allows the employer to kind of "try out" a new person to see if they are a good fit for the company. If they are not, they can easily get rid of them with no notice and get someone new. Also going through staffing agencies saves employers a great deal of work screening and interviewing candidates. And, the obvious, the employer saves a ton of money because agency workers do NOT receive company benefits, vacation time, etc.
If you do not like a particular staffing agency, that is fine - but that does not give you the right to tell falsified stories about them in an attempt to slander them! I hope Snelling Personnel presses charges against you for libel!
#9 UPDATE Employee
NO FEE FOR PLACEMENT NOW! - NEVER MISLED - Candidate needs help
AUTHOR: Teresa - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, June 01, 2006
a National Search Firm. There are fees only paid to the branch in Anderson when an
acceptance on both parties is complete. It is also noted that currently whenever a
candidate is placed with AGF as an FR (Mgr. Tr.), the company takes on the service
charge. FURTHER NOTE: The Snelling Personnel office in Anderson, IN will only
accept search assignments where the company pays the fee - so come on in:)! We have
not charged an applicant a fee since 4/05.
The individual with complaint is obviously someone placed a while back and the reason
for their employment termination or status of is private and confidential. There were
many many years where Snelling successfully assisted in the placement of applicants in
hundreds of different positions with different companies and candidates paid a placement
fee for this service. When an individual accepted employment in those circumstances
they were given an acceptance agreement in writing with the position's annual salary,
location, etc.

