Southwest Shooting Authority Coke Reynolds, Owner Exercise Your Right to Vote and Lose Your Right to Bear Arms Pinetop, Arizona

The author of the rebuttal to the initial report must be a lawyer because either he can't read or chooses to mis-characterize what he's read.  Nothing was said about the company's actions being unconstitutional.  The original author finds the action of the gun shop owner objectionable.  But according to the rebuutal, it's just foot stomping if you don't present a legal brief complete with citations to express it.  Wow, I didn't know that was what is reuired when you want to write about a narrow minded gun shop owner. This rebutter apparently has an even more narrow mind.  He thinks you have to be a lawyer to make a point.  Hint:  You don't.  And I too find it objectionable that this gun shop owner should dictate our right to bear arms based upon one's political views.

Surely you jest and are fishing for an inflammatory response.  So, you equate a business with refusing service as a sudden.. " Apparently, if you exorcized your Constitutional right to vote, and you
used that freedom to choose Obama, you MUST now lose your Constitutional
right to bear arms."  I read nothing anti-Constitutional in his refusal to provide his service and goods for stating his opinion to refuse to serve those of a different political view.  Nothing about "You don't even need a felony conviction at this store, just show you're NOT a mindless idiot and you're disqualified from owning a gun."  Where is this unconstitutional?  Justify your views in the constitution (with the Constitution, and Bill Of Rights cited).  Noticed no responses, could it be censoring that don't agree with your political views....hmmm.  Justify, coherently, your foot stomping.