ED Magedson – Founder
Sports Trading ClubSydney Singapore and UK Internet Australia
Complaint Review: Sports Trading Club | Notice: Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration Decision: A neutral and independent Arbitrator has determined that the following Report contained one or more false statements of facts. The false statements have been redacted as ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)) | Sports Trading Club, Leigh Johnson, ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). Sydney Australia Internet
RIPOFF REPORT VIP ARBITRATION
SUMMARY OF ARBITRATOR’S DECISION
Sports Trading Club Partnership, Complainant
Author of Report #1055151
Complainant Sports Trading Club Partnership (the “Complainant”) has challenged the truthfulness of certain specific statements (each, a “Statement”) posted by Author “sleuth-Sydney” (the “Author”) on the Ripoff Report website at www.ripoffreport.com as Ripoff Report #1055151 (the “Report”). The Author accused the Complainant of being involved in online betting schemes . The Complainant denied all such allegations. The Author did not submit a response to the Complainant or any contact information. [continued below]....
In accordance with the Rules, the Arbitrator was asked to decide whether the challenged Statements were an opinion or a fact. If, and only if, the Statement was determined to be a statement of fact, the Arbitrator was asked to further decided if, by a preponderance of the evidence, to determine if the Statement was true or false. If the statement identified by the Complainant is determined to be an opinion, no determination will be made as to that particular Statement because an opinion cannot be determined to be true nor false.
In this case, the Arbitrator had only the evidence submitted by the Complainant to consider. The evidence submitted included Ripoff Report #1055151, Complainant’s Arbitration Statement, Complainant’s Witness Statements (4), and supporting records and letters.
Each Statement challenged by the Complainant has been considered, together with any Witness Statements and Documents provided by the Complainant for determination of the truth or falsity of the Statement. The Author did not provide a response to the Complaint.
The Arbitrator determined that the certain statements challenged in the Report were false. Therefore, according to the VIP Arbitration Rules, those statements have been redacted.
Decided November 20, 2013
Sandra J. Franklin, Arbitrator
* A copy of the full Arbitrator’s Decision is available upon request. Please e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org with the name of the Complainant and Report number.
((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/2078820
((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)).
((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration))
((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)).
((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). But don’t take my word for it. Do your own proper research before investing anything with these rogues!
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 05/30/2013 04:52 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Sports-Trading-Club/internet/Complaint-Review-Sports-Trading-Club-Notice-Ripoff-Report-VIP-Arbitration-Decision-A-1055151. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:Search Tips
In order to assure the best results in your search:
Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.