- Report: #253310
Complaint Review: Steadfast Networks
Related Reports
Featured Ripoff Reports
Ripoff Reports
Ripoff Report on CBS 19
Ripoff Report on CBS 19 - Global Marketing Alliance
Ripoff Report on ABC 15 - Smart Shopper
Ripoff Report - Girls Gone Wild
Ripoff Report on Fox 11 - Car Repair
Special Features
-
Doctored Reviews is designed to help patients, doctors, and websites understand the problems created by Medical Justice, a company trying to restrict online patient reviews, and to offer some ways that let patients freely talk about their healthcare experiences. -
The government should serve voters, not corporate special interests. Public Citizen works to empower ordinary citizens, reduce the influence of big corporations on government, open the government to public scrutiny, and hold public officials accountable for their misdeeds. -
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE BBB: NOT a government agency as listed in your local phone book. Instead the BBB is a private non-profit / franchise operation. 20/20 exposes the BBB, Hamas Terror Group Gets 'A' Rating - BBB is running a "pay for play" scheme.
| Steadfast Networks 227 Taft St
Fond Du Lac, Wisconsin U.S.A. |
|
Steadfast Networks ripoff consumer fraud Fond Du Lac Wisconsin
*Author of original report: and a few years later.....
*REBUTTAL Owner of company: Incomplete Information
Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
Our client purchased a dedicated server from SteadFast Networks. Everything seemed fine with them and our client purchased another server from Steadfast Networks. The second server was defective and Steadfast Networks failed to properly address the issue. The technical support department did a good job with what they could and it was discovered that the server was simply provided defective. Canceled the server with the company only a few days after it was ordered.
Company canceled the server and refuses to give refund, no refund, no service, sounds like FRAUD TO ME. My client also had another server with this company, he alerted them that he would also be terminating business on that server at the end of the pre-paid date. Company decided to revoke access to the server, no refund, no service, sounds like FRAUD TO ME. Charges will be brought about said company on Monday for two counts of consumer fraud. Watch out for these guys
Daniel
Las Vegas, Nevada
U.S.A.
Company canceled the server and refuses to give refund, no refund, no service, sounds like FRAUD TO ME. My client also had another server with this company, he alerted them that he would also be terminating business on that server at the end of the pre-paid date. Company decided to revoke access to the server, no refund, no service, sounds like FRAUD TO ME. Charges will be brought about said company on Monday for two counts of consumer fraud. Watch out for these guys
Daniel
Las Vegas, Nevada
U.S.A.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 06/08/2007 10:40 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Steadfast-Networks/Fond-Du-Lac-Wisconsin-54935/Steadfast-Networks-ripoff-consumer-fraud-Fond-Du-Lac-Wisconsin-253310. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Steadfast Networks
Search for additional reports
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
Search Tips#1 Author of original report
and a few years later.....
AUTHOR: Daniel - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, June 09, 2012
That took long enough to dispute now didn't it? The chargeback was a valid request; otherwise the bank wouldn't of honored it.
You are aware that mastercard and visa both acknowledge that non-tangible goods place any doubt back on the provider of service.
You had an unhappy customer and instead of washing your hands with them and giving them a refund you opted to "stand behind your terms of service" and keep the money.
How'd that work out for ya?
Respond to this report!
What's this? #2 REBUTTAL Owner of company
Incomplete Information
AUTHOR: steadfastkarl - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, June 09, 2012
The customer in question brought a drive error to our attention, to which we responded within 15 minutes. We needed access to his server to check the BIOS settings and run some tests, but this access was denied by the customer. The next day, there was a catastrophic drive failure. While the server was relatively new, drive failures can and do happen at any time, which is why we recommend RAID configurations for any high availability needs. The reason action was not taken was because the customer refused to allow us to take action, we cannot replace a drive without customer approval, and the server was not provided as defective, as the server had been up for over a week without a single disk error until this incident. After the incident, we were able to copy the customer data to a new, fully functional drive, with little to no data loss.
The customer used service, which was delivered as expected, and prompt support service was issued. A service credit was offered, but refused. The customer then filed a chargeback within 20 minutes of their refund request, while the issue was still being actively discussed. Once the chargeback was issued, they were in violation of the terms of service and all service was suspended.
Our service is clearly not fraud, we have thousands of happy customers, and we worked with this customer on resolving their issues, offered an account credit, and were working with them on a solution when they just filed a chargeback. We do not take chargebacks lightly, and when the customer elects to take such action, there is little we can do from that point. To note, no charges were ever filed.
The customer used service, which was delivered as expected, and prompt support service was issued. A service credit was offered, but refused. The customer then filed a chargeback within 20 minutes of their refund request, while the issue was still being actively discussed. Once the chargeback was issued, they were in violation of the terms of service and all service was suspended.
Our service is clearly not fraud, we have thousands of happy customers, and we worked with this customer on resolving their issues, offered an account credit, and were working with them on a solution when they just filed a chargeback. We do not take chargebacks lightly, and when the customer elects to take such action, there is little we can do from that point. To note, no charges were ever filed.
Respond to this report!
What's this? 
