- Report: #32169
Complaint Review: Stephen A. Walker, D.D.S., P.C.
Related Reports
Featured Ripoff Reports
Ripoff Reports
Ripoff Report on CBS 19
Ripoff Report on CBS 19 - Global Marketing Alliance
Ripoff Report on ABC 15 - Smart Shopper
Ripoff Report - Girls Gone Wild
Ripoff Report on Fox 11 - Car Repair
Special Features
-
Doctored Reviews is designed to help patients, doctors, and websites understand the problems created by Medical Justice, a company trying to restrict online patient reviews, and to offer some ways that let patients freely talk about their healthcare experiences. -
The government should serve voters, not corporate special interests. Public Citizen works to empower ordinary citizens, reduce the influence of big corporations on government, open the government to public scrutiny, and hold public officials accountable for their misdeeds. -
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE BBB: NOT a government agency as listed in your local phone book. Instead the BBB is a private non-profit / franchise operation. 20/20 exposes the BBB, Hamas Terror Group Gets 'A' Rating - BBB is running a "pay for play" scheme.
| Stephen A. Walker, D.D.S., P.C. 870 East 9400 South
Sandy, Utah U.S.A. |
|
Stephen A. Walker, D.D.S., P.C. charged for services not performed and avoided my phone calls to charge late fees. ripoff Sandy Utah
*Consumer Comment: REPORT THIS INCIDENT TO THE INSURANCE
*Consumer Comment: REPORT THIS INCIDENT TO THE INSURANCE
*Consumer Comment: REPORT THIS INCIDENT TO THE INSURANCE
*Consumer Comment: REPORT THIS INCIDENT TO THE INSURANCE
*Author of original report: Dentist Loses Law Suit
Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
On 2/04/2002 I went to the dentist and after they claimed that work was done that was not. I have been disputing this since febuary and they avoid my calls and are charging late fees. They have over billed the insurance and me. they refuse to resolve this matter.
they charged for a "full mouth Debridement" when the insurance would not pay for that they changed it to "periodontal scaling" neither of which did they perform .
Desired Settlement: Other (requires explanation)
Settlement Explanation:
I will pay $89.40 out of the $322.87. The 89.40 is the total amount due minus the made-up charges and late fees
Tina
West Valley City, Utah
they charged for a "full mouth Debridement" when the insurance would not pay for that they changed it to "periodontal scaling" neither of which did they perform .
Desired Settlement: Other (requires explanation)
Settlement Explanation:
I will pay $89.40 out of the $322.87. The 89.40 is the total amount due minus the made-up charges and late fees
Tina
West Valley City, Utah
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 10/09/2002 04:40 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Stephen-A-Walker-DDS-PC/Sandy-Utah-84094/Stephen-A-Walker-DDS-PC-charged-for-services-not-performed-and-avoided-my-phone-ca-32169. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Stephen A. Walker, D.D.S., P.C.
Search for additional reports
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
Search Tips#1 Consumer Comment
REPORT THIS INCIDENT TO THE INSURANCE
AUTHOR: ERIKA - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, June 18, 2003
AS AN OFFICE DENTAL OFFICE MANAGER OF 18 YEARS. I HAVE CAN TELL YOU THAT THE INS. COM. USUALLY ASKS FOR X-RAYS BEFORE THEY APPROVE ANY PERIO TREATMEN SINCE THIS PROCEDURE USUALLY HAS A MAX. YOU CAN CALL YOUR INSURANCE COM. AND ASK TO SPEAK TO A PROVIDER SPECIALIST THEY WILL IN RETURN LOOK INTO THE CLAIM AND THE SUDDEN CHANGE ON CODE PROCEDURE, ALSO MAKE THEM AWARE THAT THIS PROCEDURE NEVER TOOK PLACE. AN INVESTIGATION WILL FOLLOW AS TO WHERE THE DOCTOR WILL NEED TO SUBMIT PERIO EVALUATION W/ POCKET DEPTHS EXAMINATION, A COMPLETE FULL MOUTH SERIES WHICH IS ALWAYS REQUIRED IN A PERIO CASE. AND BELIEVE YOU ME...HE WILL HAVE TO REFUND THE ENTIRE MONIES BACK TO YOUR INSURANCE COM. HE WILL ALSO BE FLAGGED WITH ALL HIS INCOMING DENTAL CLAIMS. IF THEY FIND HIM AT FAULT KNOWINLY, HE MAY ALSO LOSE HIS PROVIDER CREDENTIALS WITH THIS INS. CO.
FINANCE SPECIALIST/OFFICE MANAGER-GOOD LUCK
FINANCE SPECIALIST/OFFICE MANAGER-GOOD LUCK
Respond to this report!
What's this? #2 Consumer Comment
REPORT THIS INCIDENT TO THE INSURANCE
AUTHOR: ERIKA - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, June 18, 2003
AS AN OFFICE DENTAL OFFICE MANAGER OF 18 YEARS. I HAVE CAN TELL YOU THAT THE INS. COM. USUALLY ASKS FOR X-RAYS BEFORE THEY APPROVE ANY PERIO TREATMEN SINCE THIS PROCEDURE USUALLY HAS A MAX. YOU CAN CALL YOUR INSURANCE COM. AND ASK TO SPEAK TO A PROVIDER SPECIALIST THEY WILL IN RETURN LOOK INTO THE CLAIM AND THE SUDDEN CHANGE ON CODE PROCEDURE, ALSO MAKE THEM AWARE THAT THIS PROCEDURE NEVER TOOK PLACE. AN INVESTIGATION WILL FOLLOW AS TO WHERE THE DOCTOR WILL NEED TO SUBMIT PERIO EVALUATION W/ POCKET DEPTHS EXAMINATION, A COMPLETE FULL MOUTH SERIES WHICH IS ALWAYS REQUIRED IN A PERIO CASE. AND BELIEVE YOU ME...HE WILL HAVE TO REFUND THE ENTIRE MONIES BACK TO YOUR INSURANCE COM. HE WILL ALSO BE FLAGGED WITH ALL HIS INCOMING DENTAL CLAIMS. IF THEY FIND HIM AT FAULT KNOWINLY, HE MAY ALSO LOSE HIS PROVIDER CREDENTIALS WITH THIS INS. CO.
FINANCE SPECIALIST/OFFICE MANAGER-GOOD LUCK
FINANCE SPECIALIST/OFFICE MANAGER-GOOD LUCK
Respond to this report!
What's this? #3 Consumer Comment
REPORT THIS INCIDENT TO THE INSURANCE
AUTHOR: ERIKA - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, June 18, 2003
AS AN OFFICE DENTAL OFFICE MANAGER OF 18 YEARS. I HAVE CAN TELL YOU THAT THE INS. COM. USUALLY ASKS FOR X-RAYS BEFORE THEY APPROVE ANY PERIO TREATMEN SINCE THIS PROCEDURE USUALLY HAS A MAX. YOU CAN CALL YOUR INSURANCE COM. AND ASK TO SPEAK TO A PROVIDER SPECIALIST THEY WILL IN RETURN LOOK INTO THE CLAIM AND THE SUDDEN CHANGE ON CODE PROCEDURE, ALSO MAKE THEM AWARE THAT THIS PROCEDURE NEVER TOOK PLACE. AN INVESTIGATION WILL FOLLOW AS TO WHERE THE DOCTOR WILL NEED TO SUBMIT PERIO EVALUATION W/ POCKET DEPTHS EXAMINATION, A COMPLETE FULL MOUTH SERIES WHICH IS ALWAYS REQUIRED IN A PERIO CASE. AND BELIEVE YOU ME...HE WILL HAVE TO REFUND THE ENTIRE MONIES BACK TO YOUR INSURANCE COM. HE WILL ALSO BE FLAGGED WITH ALL HIS INCOMING DENTAL CLAIMS. IF THEY FIND HIM AT FAULT KNOWINLY, HE MAY ALSO LOSE HIS PROVIDER CREDENTIALS WITH THIS INS. CO.
FINANCE SPECIALIST/OFFICE MANAGER-GOOD LUCK
FINANCE SPECIALIST/OFFICE MANAGER-GOOD LUCK
Respond to this report!
What's this? #4 Consumer Comment
REPORT THIS INCIDENT TO THE INSURANCE
AUTHOR: ERIKA - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, June 18, 2003
AS AN OFFICE DENTAL OFFICE MANAGER OF 18 YEARS. I HAVE CAN TELL YOU THAT THE INS. COM. USUALLY ASKS FOR X-RAYS BEFORE THEY APPROVE ANY PERIO TREATMEN SINCE THIS PROCEDURE USUALLY HAS A MAX. YOU CAN CALL YOUR INSURANCE COM. AND ASK TO SPEAK TO A PROVIDER SPECIALIST THEY WILL IN RETURN LOOK INTO THE CLAIM AND THE SUDDEN CHANGE ON CODE PROCEDURE, ALSO MAKE THEM AWARE THAT THIS PROCEDURE NEVER TOOK PLACE. AN INVESTIGATION WILL FOLLOW AS TO WHERE THE DOCTOR WILL NEED TO SUBMIT PERIO EVALUATION W/ POCKET DEPTHS EXAMINATION, A COMPLETE FULL MOUTH SERIES WHICH IS ALWAYS REQUIRED IN A PERIO CASE. AND BELIEVE YOU ME...HE WILL HAVE TO REFUND THE ENTIRE MONIES BACK TO YOUR INSURANCE COM. HE WILL ALSO BE FLAGGED WITH ALL HIS INCOMING DENTAL CLAIMS. IF THEY FIND HIM AT FAULT KNOWINLY, HE MAY ALSO LOSE HIS PROVIDER CREDENTIALS WITH THIS INS. CO.
FINANCE SPECIALIST/OFFICE MANAGER-GOOD LUCK
FINANCE SPECIALIST/OFFICE MANAGER-GOOD LUCK
Respond to this report!
What's this? #5 Author of original report
Dentist Loses Law Suit
AUTHOR: Tina - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, May 31, 2003
Stephen A. Walker took me to small claims court in February to try to claim the money he was trying to get from me but he didn't even show up for court himself he sent his Acounts recievable clerk that I had never even met instead.
She could not prove that I owed the money, and the case was dismissed. They had 10 days to appeal and I have not yet heard anything more from them so I assume they decided it was cheaper to not have me pay the money I did not owe than try to sue me again for it.
She could not prove that I owed the money, and the case was dismissed. They had 10 days to appeal and I have not yet heard anything more from them so I assume they decided it was cheaper to not have me pay the money I did not owe than try to sue me again for it.
Respond to this report!
What's this? 
