- Report: #456578
Complaint Review: Telecheck
| Telecheck 5251 Wetheimer Rd
Houston, Texas U.S.A. |
|
Telecheck Determined to ruin my check-writing priviledge for no apparent reason, Telecheck should be stopped for knowingly ruining people,s good name and reputation, Houston Texas
*Consumer Suggestion: Contact First Data, who owns TeleCheck
*Consumer Comment: Similar
Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
Recently I wrote three checks to firms that I have done business with for at least ten years. All three were denied by telecheck, even though they weren't denied the last time I presented checks at these same firms. Although I was told that they had no negative information on me when I phoned them. I was told that it could be that it was because of the number of the check, (1849) The unusual amount of the check ($55.95)or I had no prior dealings with telecheck and would have to let time proove my check-writing habits.
First of all, the check number shows only that I have had this account for some time as the number is so high. Second, an amount of $55.95 is a very normal amount. Not a lot, and could be for gas, groceries, or any number of daily expenses. And third, My credit is not theirs to question as I am not asking for a a loan or anything else.
How is it possible that they can ruin a persons good name with their defaming reports? It doesn't take long for word to get round town that one was denied check writing priviledges. What if this were an emergency and I needed money for say--- medicine, out of town and had no cash, no credit cards and no-one to borrow from? What then. In this day and age of stolen identities, this could be a real problem and conceivably could land a person in jail because of their actions. Something needs to be done.
Lana
Pueblo, Colorado
U.S.A.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 05/29/2009 11:41 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Telecheck/Houston-Texas-77056/Telecheck-Determined-to-ruin-my-check-writing-priviledge-for-no-apparent-reason-Telecheck-456578. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Telecheck
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
Search Tips#1 Consumer Suggestion
Contact First Data, who owns TeleCheck
AUTHOR: Mark - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Monday, August 03, 2009
POSTED: Monday, August 03, 2009I have been working on my situation for nearly two months, and got sick of getting no where and getting lied to with their customer service personnel. Did a little research and found that First Data owns TeleCheck, and Kohlberg Kravis Roberts and Co owns First Data.
I called KKR, and was given the following contact information for consumer feedback / complaints:
It is a company called Kekst & Co (1-212-521-4800) - ask for Ruth E. Pachman
In calling them, they seemed to have no interest in dealing with me, but were also nice enough to promise to have someone return my call, or have someone at First Data respond to me. This was on Friday July 31, 2009. Today, Aug 03, 2009 I received a call from First Data with a promise that they would make the necessary calls to have my dispute handled as soon as possible. It was originally filed on June 15, 2009.
The person at First Data who called me is:
Dana (First Data) and her number is: 1-303-967-7549
I recommend that anyone who has issues with Telecheck use these numbers, and start pushing back on these crooks who seemingly have no one to answer to when determining how to deal with consumers.
The more these people have to waste their time answering to consumers who are unfairly treated, the faster they will put means in place to correct this.
Mark
Vgolfmaster@hotmail.com
#2 Consumer Comment
Similar
AUTHOR: Renee - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, June 30, 2009
POSTED: Tuesday, June 30, 2009

