- Report: #237577
Complaint Review: The Results Group
Related Reports
Featured Ripoff Reports
Ripoff Reports
Ripoff Report on CBS 19
Ripoff Report on CBS 19 - Global Marketing Alliance
Ripoff Report on ABC 15 - Smart Shopper
Ripoff Report - Girls Gone Wild
Ripoff Report on Fox 11 - Car Repair
Special Features
-
Doctored Reviews is designed to help patients, doctors, and websites understand the problems created by Medical Justice, a company trying to restrict online patient reviews, and to offer some ways that let patients freely talk about their healthcare experiences. -
The government should serve voters, not corporate special interests. Public Citizen works to empower ordinary citizens, reduce the influence of big corporations on government, open the government to public scrutiny, and hold public officials accountable for their misdeeds. -
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE BBB: NOT a government agency as listed in your local phone book. Instead the BBB is a private non-profit / franchise operation. 20/20 exposes the BBB, Hamas Terror Group Gets 'A' Rating - BBB is running a "pay for play" scheme.
| The Results Group 3219 E. Camelback Road, #838
Phoenix, Arizona U.S.A. |
|
The Results Group, Ripped me off royally, even had a payback guarntee Phoenix Arizona
*Consumer Suggestion: Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C.,
*Consumer Suggestion: Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C.,
*Consumer Suggestion: Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C.,
*Consumer Suggestion: Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C.,
Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
I was told I had to wait 6 months if money wasn't coming in, there would be money back refund of a certainn percent. Zilch cant' call confienly there ios no phone number in service. I was scammed BAD. Remember when it sounds to good to be true, It usually is.
Linda
Caledonia, Michigan
U.S.A.
Linda
Caledonia, Michigan
U.S.A.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 03/01/2007 11:02 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/The-Results-Group/Phoenix-Arizona-85018/The-Results-Group-Ripped-me-off-royally-even-had-a-payback-guarntee-Phoenix-Arizona-237577. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on The Results Group
Search for additional reports
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
Search Tips#1 Consumer Suggestion
Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C.,
AUTHOR: Dennis - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, March 01, 2007
Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C., an Arizona Limited Liability Company, Edward R. Longoria, individually and as a manager of The Results Group, L.L.C., and Amber R. Halvorson, individually and as a manager of The Results Group, L.L.C., Defendants (United States District Court for the District of Arizona)
Civil No. CV 06 2843 PHX JAT, FTC File No. 062 3205
http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0623205/index.htm
December 12, 2006
Complaint for Injunctive and Other Relief
Temporary Restraining Order Freezing Assets and Providing Equitable Relief, and Order To Show Cause
Why A Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue
===============================
The FTC today announced nine new cases:
The Results Group Working out of a boiler room in Phoenix, the operation charged between $99 and $599 to build and host Web sites affiliated with the Web sites of Fortune 500 retail companies such as Amazon.com and Overstock.com. Consumers would make money when those retailers paid commissions for sales made through the consumers' Web sites. In fact, the large retailers were unaware of any such affiliation, and consumers made no money. The FTC charged that the operation falsely represented that purchasers would receive substantial income as well as substantial assistance from an expert staff, and used false and misleading statements to encourage consumers to buy the business opportunity.
Civil No. CV 06 2843 PHX JAT, FTC File No. 062 3205
http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0623205/index.htm
December 12, 2006
Complaint for Injunctive and Other Relief
Temporary Restraining Order Freezing Assets and Providing Equitable Relief, and Order To Show Cause
Why A Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue
===============================
The FTC today announced nine new cases:
The Results Group Working out of a boiler room in Phoenix, the operation charged between $99 and $599 to build and host Web sites affiliated with the Web sites of Fortune 500 retail companies such as Amazon.com and Overstock.com. Consumers would make money when those retailers paid commissions for sales made through the consumers' Web sites. In fact, the large retailers were unaware of any such affiliation, and consumers made no money. The FTC charged that the operation falsely represented that purchasers would receive substantial income as well as substantial assistance from an expert staff, and used false and misleading statements to encourage consumers to buy the business opportunity.
Respond to this report!
What's this? #2 Consumer Suggestion
Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C.,
AUTHOR: Dennis - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, March 01, 2007
Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C., an Arizona Limited Liability Company, Edward R. Longoria, individually and as a manager of The Results Group, L.L.C., and Amber R. Halvorson, individually and as a manager of The Results Group, L.L.C., Defendants (United States District Court for the District of Arizona)
Civil No. CV 06 2843 PHX JAT, FTC File No. 062 3205
http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0623205/index.htm
December 12, 2006
Complaint for Injunctive and Other Relief
Temporary Restraining Order Freezing Assets and Providing Equitable Relief, and Order To Show Cause
Why A Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue
===============================
The FTC today announced nine new cases:
The Results Group Working out of a boiler room in Phoenix, the operation charged between $99 and $599 to build and host Web sites affiliated with the Web sites of Fortune 500 retail companies such as Amazon.com and Overstock.com. Consumers would make money when those retailers paid commissions for sales made through the consumers' Web sites. In fact, the large retailers were unaware of any such affiliation, and consumers made no money. The FTC charged that the operation falsely represented that purchasers would receive substantial income as well as substantial assistance from an expert staff, and used false and misleading statements to encourage consumers to buy the business opportunity.
Civil No. CV 06 2843 PHX JAT, FTC File No. 062 3205
http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0623205/index.htm
December 12, 2006
Complaint for Injunctive and Other Relief
Temporary Restraining Order Freezing Assets and Providing Equitable Relief, and Order To Show Cause
Why A Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue
===============================
The FTC today announced nine new cases:
The Results Group Working out of a boiler room in Phoenix, the operation charged between $99 and $599 to build and host Web sites affiliated with the Web sites of Fortune 500 retail companies such as Amazon.com and Overstock.com. Consumers would make money when those retailers paid commissions for sales made through the consumers' Web sites. In fact, the large retailers were unaware of any such affiliation, and consumers made no money. The FTC charged that the operation falsely represented that purchasers would receive substantial income as well as substantial assistance from an expert staff, and used false and misleading statements to encourage consumers to buy the business opportunity.
Respond to this report!
What's this? #3 Consumer Suggestion
Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C.,
AUTHOR: Dennis - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, March 01, 2007
Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C., an Arizona Limited Liability Company, Edward R. Longoria, individually and as a manager of The Results Group, L.L.C., and Amber R. Halvorson, individually and as a manager of The Results Group, L.L.C., Defendants (United States District Court for the District of Arizona)
Civil No. CV 06 2843 PHX JAT, FTC File No. 062 3205
http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0623205/index.htm
December 12, 2006
Complaint for Injunctive and Other Relief
Temporary Restraining Order Freezing Assets and Providing Equitable Relief, and Order To Show Cause
Why A Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue
===============================
The FTC today announced nine new cases:
The Results Group Working out of a boiler room in Phoenix, the operation charged between $99 and $599 to build and host Web sites affiliated with the Web sites of Fortune 500 retail companies such as Amazon.com and Overstock.com. Consumers would make money when those retailers paid commissions for sales made through the consumers' Web sites. In fact, the large retailers were unaware of any such affiliation, and consumers made no money. The FTC charged that the operation falsely represented that purchasers would receive substantial income as well as substantial assistance from an expert staff, and used false and misleading statements to encourage consumers to buy the business opportunity.
Civil No. CV 06 2843 PHX JAT, FTC File No. 062 3205
http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0623205/index.htm
December 12, 2006
Complaint for Injunctive and Other Relief
Temporary Restraining Order Freezing Assets and Providing Equitable Relief, and Order To Show Cause
Why A Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue
===============================
The FTC today announced nine new cases:
The Results Group Working out of a boiler room in Phoenix, the operation charged between $99 and $599 to build and host Web sites affiliated with the Web sites of Fortune 500 retail companies such as Amazon.com and Overstock.com. Consumers would make money when those retailers paid commissions for sales made through the consumers' Web sites. In fact, the large retailers were unaware of any such affiliation, and consumers made no money. The FTC charged that the operation falsely represented that purchasers would receive substantial income as well as substantial assistance from an expert staff, and used false and misleading statements to encourage consumers to buy the business opportunity.
Respond to this report!
What's this? #4 Consumer Suggestion
Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C.,
AUTHOR: Dennis - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, March 01, 2007
Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C., an Arizona Limited Liability Company, Edward R. Longoria, individually and as a manager of The Results Group, L.L.C., and Amber R. Halvorson, individually and as a manager of The Results Group, L.L.C., Defendants (United States District Court for the District of Arizona)
Civil No. CV 06 2843 PHX JAT, FTC File No. 062 3205
http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0623205/index.htm
December 12, 2006
Complaint for Injunctive and Other Relief
Temporary Restraining Order Freezing Assets and Providing Equitable Relief, and Order To Show Cause
Why A Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue
===============================
The FTC today announced nine new cases:
The Results Group Working out of a boiler room in Phoenix, the operation charged between $99 and $599 to build and host Web sites affiliated with the Web sites of Fortune 500 retail companies such as Amazon.com and Overstock.com. Consumers would make money when those retailers paid commissions for sales made through the consumers' Web sites. In fact, the large retailers were unaware of any such affiliation, and consumers made no money. The FTC charged that the operation falsely represented that purchasers would receive substantial income as well as substantial assistance from an expert staff, and used false and misleading statements to encourage consumers to buy the business opportunity.
Civil No. CV 06 2843 PHX JAT, FTC File No. 062 3205
http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0623205/index.htm
December 12, 2006
Complaint for Injunctive and Other Relief
Temporary Restraining Order Freezing Assets and Providing Equitable Relief, and Order To Show Cause
Why A Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue
===============================
The FTC today announced nine new cases:
The Results Group Working out of a boiler room in Phoenix, the operation charged between $99 and $599 to build and host Web sites affiliated with the Web sites of Fortune 500 retail companies such as Amazon.com and Overstock.com. Consumers would make money when those retailers paid commissions for sales made through the consumers' Web sites. In fact, the large retailers were unaware of any such affiliation, and consumers made no money. The FTC charged that the operation falsely represented that purchasers would receive substantial income as well as substantial assistance from an expert staff, and used false and misleading statements to encourage consumers to buy the business opportunity.
Respond to this report!
What's this? 
