- Report: #226625
Complaint Review: The Results Group
| The Results Group theresultsgrp.com
Phoenix, Arizona U.S.A. |
|
The Results Group promised success with their program, now their gone and no way to reach them. Ripoff Phoenix Arizona
*UPDATE EX-employee responds: contact rebecca
*Consumer Suggestion: FTC & Arizona AG have filed actions against TRG
Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
Dale
Grass Valley, California
U.S.A.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 12/21/2006 11:10 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/The-Results-Group/Phoenix-Arizona/The-Results-Group-promised-success-with-their-program-now-their-gone-and-no-way-to-reach-226625. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on The Results Group
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
Search Tips#1 UPDATE EX-employee responds
contact rebecca
AUTHOR: Ken - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, December 27, 2006
#2 Consumer Suggestion
FTC & Arizona AG have filed actions against TRG
AUTHOR: Armando - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, December 21, 2006
http://www.azag.gov/press_releases/
dec/2006/TheResultsGroup.pdf
"Attorney General Terry Goddard today announced that his office has filed suit against The Results Group (TRG) and its managers, Edward
Longoria and Amber Halvorson, alleging that their work-at-home business opportunity
scheme violated the Arizona Consumer Fraud Act."
http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2006/12/falsehopes.htm
The Results Group Working out of a boiler room in Phoenix, the operation charged between $99 and $599 to build and host Web sites affiliated with the Web sites of Fortune 500 retail companies such as Amazon.com and Overstock.com. Consumers would make money when those retailers paid commissions for sales made through the consumers' Web sites.
In fact, the large retailers were unaware of any such affiliation, and consumers made no money. The FTC charged that the operation falsely represented that purchasers would receive substantial income as well as substantial assistance from an expert staff, and used false and misleading statements to encourage consumers to buy the business opportunity.

