• Report: #1082360

Complaint Review: Theresa Cassiday

  • Submitted: Fri, September 06, 2013
  • Updated: Fri, September 06, 2013

  • Reported By: Victims Defense — New York New York
Theresa Cassiday
Bellevue, Nebraska USA

Theresa Cassiday Cantena Creations - Belllevue CYBERSTALKER - BEWARE - CYBERSTALKER - BEWARE Bellevue Nebraska

*Author of original report: Good Work Victims Defense

*Author of original report: THANK YOU ED AND RIPOFF REPORTS - J.PAUL OTTIS

*Author of original report: Globee Investors for Mr. J. Paul Ottis

*Author of original report: J. Paul Ottis AKA, Jay Ottis and Globee vs. Cyberstalkers - Internet Postings

What's this?
What's this?
What's this?
Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Ripoff Report
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™

SEO Reputation Management at its best!


Provided by Victims Defense, August 30, 2013

Complaint: A4519-3107-68 

Cyberstalking Crime Defined by Federal Law:

Cyberstalking:  The use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, a group of individuals, or an organization.  It is a criminal offense. 

False Accusations: Many cyberstalkers try to damage the reputation of their victim and turn other people against them. They post false information about them on websites. They may set up their own websites, blogs or user pages for this purpose. They post allegations about the victim to newsgroups, chat rooms, or other sites that allow public contributions.

Monitoring victim’s online activities:  Cyberstalkers attempt to trace their victim’s IP address to gather more information about their victims.

Encouraging others to harass the victim:  Cyberstalkers involve third parties in their harassment of their victims. They may claim the victim has harmed the stalker or their family in some way to encourage others to join the pursuit to cause the victim harm and or damage.

Attacks victims computer: Cyberstalkers try to damage the victim's computer by sending viruses.

  • The first U.S. cyberstalking law went into effect in 1999 in California.
  • Other states include prohibition against cyberstalking in their harassment or stalking legislation. In Florida, HB 479 was introduced in 2003 to ban cyberstalking. This was signed into law on October 2003.


This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 09/06/2013 03:20 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Theresa-Cassiday/Bellevue-Nebraska-68125/Theresa-Cassiday-Cantena-Creations-Belllevue-CYBERSTALKER-BEWARE-CYBERSTALKER-BE-1082360. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.

Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.

Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Theresa Cassiday

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Search Tips
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
4Author 0Consumer 0Employee/Owner
Updates & Rebuttals

#1 Author of original report

Good Work Victims Defense

AUTHOR: Victims Defense - ()

 As a long term friend to Mr. Ottis that knows him and his family very well, I am vibrant with joy to see the wheels of justice moving against the terroristic and damaging threats of Globee as an initial investor in 1999.

I have been very close to Mr. Ottis and Globee, experiencing the cowardly postings of individulas that have refused to post their indentity.  The only two identities I have seen is Theresa Cassiday and Darrell Purdue.

Theresa Cassiday - DBA - Cantena Creations is a shameful person for attacking an individual that she has never met and only gotten hate information from Darrell Purdue and cyberstalkers. 

Darrell Purdue, actually did Mr. Ottis a favor, in that Missiouri has laws against "Cyberstalkers", in dadition to darrell having posted life threats against Mr. Ottis which is an unquestionable crime. 

The bottom line is that globee has has a long list of prior contacts that go from Nebraska to washington DC that were cultivated and worked by Mr. Ottis.  Mr. Ottis has two letters from the White House commending his work which came from President Clinton and First Lady Hillory Clinton.

He and his associates have worked with NASA representatives in Iowa, Pasadena, Ca., Washington DC and have had a 36 year NASA consultant in the Globee project since 2005.

We also have a evidence that all of these opportunities were lost due to Mr. Ottis's questionable character and or ownership of Globee products.

The questions were all ligitimate by various third parties because, people tend to believe what they read on the Internet.

However, I and several people including family and friends in law enforcement, government capacities, non-profit organizations, media networks, publishers, toy producers and other major childrens product producers and distributors, love the product and the dedication of Mr. Ottis.

It is said that a tree can be judged by its fruit and a man can be judged by his labor.  Well, there is an entire line of Globee products and the creation and production has all been led by Mr. Ottis.

Thank you Ripoff Reports for this forum,

R. Ottis - for J.Paul Ottis and victims Defense - 9/7/13 

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Author of original report


AUTHOR: Victims Defense - ()






Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 Author of original report

Globee Investors for Mr. J. Paul Ottis

AUTHOR: Victims Defense - ()

 Its about time that the laws have changed and people like this woman can be brought to justice.  I am also hopeful that the guy that threatened Mr.Ottis' life gets prosecuted.

I know this guy called Globee's business lawyer and spewed out some pretty hateful words towards Mr. Ottis.  Not too smart to provide an expert wittness with facts that can cause you harm, especially when the someone is the lawyer representing the client that you are condeming and threatening.

I for one know the extent of Mr. Ottis's developed and produced Globee products.  It took a genius to create and put all them together as realted, yet independant of one another.

The products go deep into the physics of astronomy and life sciences on Planet Earth.  A great gift to young minds.

As for me, I have never known Mr. Ottis to be bent for glory to make millions on Globee, but to reach millions of children with wholesome knowledge.

It has always been my understanding that the earnings from Globee were going to impaired children and those in need of assistance in life.  From day one in 1999, Mr. Ottis began making live appearances with Globee and donating gifts and finaces to Nebraska organizations, hospitals and those in need of help.  Its all a matter of record, not hype like the cyberstalkers have used to attack Mr. Ottis.

If a man suffers ten (10) years of torment, defamation and threats from Cyberstalkers.  The same man suffers a heart attacke, undergoes five (5) bypasses, has three strokes and two cancer removals. Yet HE continues to get up everyday and work to the best of his ability to keep his dream alive, and protect his family, friends and investors. 

Which of you indignant cyberstalkers can stand as tall or walk in his shoes?

Mr. Ottis's integrity and dedication is at the highest level possible.

I stand alongside numerous friends and investor that go back to 1999 .  I have never known a man that has worked so hard, taken so much and expected so little in return for himself.

All of you cyberstalkers should ask for mercy from God for your hateful hearts.  You have target Mr. Ottis and we have stood by him, yet our finances and lives have suffered because of you!  Globee products have been held back because of you! 

Our only hope was our continued faith in Mr. Ottis.

My friends and I are all family to Mr. Ottis and we support his dream for children.

Provided to Victims Defense/ P.T. Billings - 9/13

CC. Mr. Ottis, his legal team, family and Globee Investors.

This posting will serve as evidence for investigators and prosecutors as necessary.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#4 Author of original report

J. Paul Ottis AKA, Jay Ottis and Globee vs. Cyberstalkers - Internet Postings

AUTHOR: Victims Defense - ()

PLAINTIFF:   J. Paul Ottis and Globee Verses Defendants:

Does 1-10 - The identity of the Defendants is withheld due to current civil and criminal prosecution procedures. 

Body of Complaint:

Whereas, the Plaintiff is seeking indictments against the Defendants as individuals and or collectively for alleged, intentional and malicious defamation of Plaintiff’s name and character, and for intentionally and maliciously sabotaging Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s business hereinafter “Globee” for a period of not less than ten(10) years and;  

Whereas, the Plaintiff alleges Defendants have intentionally and maliciously caused irrevocable damage to Plaintiffs family, friends and Globee investors and;

Whereas, the Defendants intentional and malicious damage to Plaintiff and Globee products, have impaired and restricted the production, marketing and revenue earning opportunities for Globee and;

Whereas, it is alleged that individuals providing Plaintiff with finances for the development, production, and marketing of Globee have suffered financial hardships due to the intentional and malicious acts of Defendants and;

Whereas, Plaintiffs rights to conduct business, market, sell and or license Globee products to third parties has been intentionally and maliciously impaired by Defendants adversarial acts and;

Therefore, the Plaintiff is hereby giving notice of seeking both civil and criminal charges against the Defendants individually, and or collectively.

EXHIBIT: Evidence of Revenue Loss.  Numerous excerpts from blog sites serve as evidence of intentional and malicious sabotage by Defendants including their boasting responsibility for the Plaintiffs loss of a $750,000.00 Globee contract and a $14 million dollar contract.  The Plaintiffs record of losses due to the illicit acts of the Defendants is not less than $ 45,000,000.00 (Forty five million dollars) to date.

EXHIBIT:  Testimony of a Globee Investor:  “I am the first Globee investor with the Plaintiff and Globie a.k.a. Globee.  I provided $100,000.00 to Plaintiff and Globee in 1999.  I have been directly involved in the personal life and business affairs of Plaintiff and Globee for the past seventeen (17) years.

Furthermore, I have become acquainted with many of the Plaintiffs family members, friends and investors over the past seventeen (17) years.  

I testify to the best of my knowledge, that every person involved in Globee is aware of the Defendants postings.  Furthermore, that they are aware of the numerous products that the Plaintiff has developed and produced under duress of being stalked, threatened and defamed by Defendants.

I can attest that the Defendants perpetuated “Hate Crimes and Terroristic Life Threats” against Plaintiff with intent to harm the Plaintiff and Globee.  One written quote reads: “He needs to be shot in the head”.   This threat was posted by an individual in Iowa, with a follow-on accessory posting by an individual in Nebraska. 

I am aware of the Plaintiff making numerous attempts to terminate the Defendants stalking and slanderous attacks in order to market Globee. 

The Plaintiff’ and the Plaintiff’s lawyer believe that Defendants are violating federal laws by “Hacking into Plaintiffs e-mail and Internet sites, obtaining unauthorized personal information.

I am aware of family and personal friends of Plaintiff including a former FBI Special Agent in Charge, a retired Secret Service Agent in Omaha, Ne., and a former Senator, a current Senator, a California County Sherriff, and a Las Vegas Police Officer, all being aware of Plaintiffs Globee business and the postings of cyberstalkers.   

Furthermore, I am familiar with lawyers and law firms in Nebraska, Minnesota, California and Nevada that have represented Plaintiff on matters of intellectual properties, business negotiations, contracts, litigation and general business operations over the past fifteen (15) years.  

In addition, I am familiar with one of Plaintiffs best friend and key financers. He is a graduate from UCLA and a retired CPA from Los Angeles, CA.   The man built and managed two medical centers and three pharmacies in Los Angeles.  He retired at fifty eight (58) years old and founded one of the world’s leading sportswear and accessory companies which sold ten years later for $160 million dollars.   

In conclusion, Globee associates and investors are law abiding citizens whose lives and careers are creditable.  Their being aware of the cyberstalkers allegations, have provided them and other law enforcement opportunity to take action against Mr. Ottis if the posted allegations were valid.   

EXHIBIT:  Demands for Cyberstalkers Identities: The Plaintiff has posted numerous requests over the years, asking/demanding the Defendants provide their true identity, to which none have complied.   

EXHIBIT: Plaintiff filed a Federal Suit.  On October 18, 2007, Plaintiff’s lawyer filed a suit in Nebraska Federal Court to force the cyberstalkers to court.  He took action to place himself and his case against the cyberstalkers before a Federal Judge.  This is not the action of a person that is hiding incriminating evidence.

Prior Federal Suit Filed by Plaintiff

Plaintiff: J. Paul Ottis

Defendants:  Internet Bloggers and Does 1-10                                                                     


Filed:  October 18, 2007

Court:  Nebraska District Court

Office:  4- Lincoln Office 

County: Douglas

Presiding Judge:  Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom

Referring Judge:  Magistrate Judge David L. Piester

Nature of Suit: Torts - Injury - Assault, Libel, and Slander

Cause: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Jurisdiction: Diversity

Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff


NOTE:  The Plaintiff dismissed the case due to the “Lack of Laws Governing Content on the Internet”.    The case cited that prompted the dismissal was the Megan Meier death of 2006.  “A thirteen year old school girl was stalked and manipulated with lies and acts of malice on the Internet by a 43 year old female neighbor. The adult neighbor pretended to be Megan’s boyfriend.   Megan killed herself due to the malicious attacks on the Internet.  The 43 year old woman could not be prosecuted for Megan’s death, for the lack of laws governing posters of Internet content”.

However laws are changing and doors are opening to prosecute the Defendants both civilly and criminally.   

EXHIBIT:  The Defendants prompted actions against Plaintiff by the State of Utah.

The Defendants prompted a civil action from the State of Utah against the Plaintiff.  The Utah prosecutor Wayne Klein resigned facing termination and prosecution for “False Prosecution and Abuse of Authority”.  

The case involved a Utah investor that worked for Plaintiff having discovered cyberstalkers postings and obtained a counter check without authorization to withdraw $67,000.00 from the Plaintiffs account. 

The Plaintiff’s attorney filed embezzlement charges against the bank and the individual.  Plaintiff withdrew the charges after being asked by one of the Plaintiff’s lawyers, a Mormon, to drop the case because the individual in Utah was also a Mormon.

The Plaintiff agreed and withdrew the embezzlement charges in lieu of paying a promissory note to the individual.  Two years later, the person filed civil actions against Plaintiff for the unpaid promissory note.

The Plaintiffs lawyer in Utah filed a response to the civil action, stating that the Utah Department of Securities Prosecutor Wayne Klein had abused his authority and falsely prosecuted the Plaintiff.  In addition, the Plaintiff’s lawyer claimed damages, attorney’s fees and court costs for their violation against the Plaintiff.

The Utah prosecutor Wayne Klein retaliated by escalating the case to criminal and threatened Plaintiff with forty (40) years in prison if he challenged Utah and lost.

Plaintiff’s Nebraska and Utah lawyers including a former Senator, in addition to a former FBI Special Agent advised Plaintiff to settle the case based on their discovery that Utah’s Judicial System was corrupt.  In conjunction to the Plaintiff’s defense team discovering the corruption, the New York Times headlined Utah as the 14th most corrupt state in America.

See: (((link redacted)))

During and after Plaintiffs settlement he provided his case to (R) Jim Bird and testified against Utah in the 2007, House of Representatives investigation of Utah’s Department of Securities and head prosecutor Wayne Klein.   

During the investigation, Wayne Klein, the prosecutor of the Plaintiff, resigned under pressure of being terminated and prosecuted for “False Prosecution and Abuse of Authority”. 

EXHIBIT:  Excerpt from Utah Newspaper 2007.

Former Financial Advisors Sue Utah for Civil Rights Violations

Two former independent advisors seek $357.6 million in damages, claiming that the Utah Division of Securities and others violated their civil rights.

They allege that the Utah Division of Securities, among others, violated their right to due process and conducted unreasonable search and seizure, malicious prosecution, and cruel and unusual punishment enforced by extortion, bribery and witness tampering.

“This lawsuit is about civil rights violations and Utah’s Division of Securities gone wild,” said JoAnn Secrist, former Utah assistant attorney general.

In 2007, Utah’s legislative Auditor General’s Office completed an audit of the Division of Securities, finding there were numerous instances where the division overstepped its bounds.   “The audit found that the division was running over people’s rights,” Secrist said.

During that audit, Wayne Klein, Utah’s “Top Cop” became a defendant.  He resigned from his post as director of the Utah Division of Securities facing termination and prosecution for “False Prosecution and Abuse of Authority”.

Conclusion:  The Defendants have intentionally and maliciously harassed and threatened the Plaintiff. 

The Defendants have intentionally and maliciously violated privacy acts obtaining and distributing unauthorized personal information on Plaintiff.

The Defendants have intentionally and maliciously impaired and deprived the Plaintiff and his investors of numerous opportunities to earn revenue benefits for their investments of time and money.

The Defendants have intentionally and maliciously impaired the personal life of Defendant through Terrorist Threats, Hate Crimes and cyberstalking.        

This document has been copied to: State and Federal Authorities, J. Paul Ottis, family, friends and Globee investors.

Victims Defense

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?