• Report: #1043744

Complaint Review: Trustpilot

Thank You

Read how Ripoff Report saves consumers millions.

  • Submitted: Tue, April 16, 2013
  • Updated: Mon, April 22, 2013

  • Reported By: Mjolnir — Copenhagen Internet
Trustpilot
Internet United States of America

Trustpilot Joakim Ditlev Trustpilot guilty of breaking consumers trust on Wikipedia, Internet

*REBUTTAL Individual responds: Answer to anonymous hater

What's this?
What's this?
What's this?
Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Ripoff Report
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™

SEO Reputation Management at its best!

Trustpilot a company that champions itself as the trusted name in consumer reviews seems guilty of editing their own wikipedia page. Joakim Ditlev, Trustpilot's specialist in PR and reputation management, has been painting a pretty rosy picture of Trustpilot on Wikipedia as user Jokked while removing any negative information about the company, whether it is true or not. So much for Trust, Trustpilot!

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 04/16/2013 02:19 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Trustpilot/internet/Trustpilot-Joakim-Ditlev-Trustpilot-guilty-of-breaking-consumers-trust-on-Wikipedia-Inter-1043744. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.

Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.

Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Trustpilot

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Search Tips
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author 0Consumer 1Employee/Owner
Updates & Rebuttals

#1 REBUTTAL Individual responds

Answer to anonymous hater

AUTHOR: Joakim - ()

Joakim here,

Thanks for your personal attack. I don't receive those very often, but unlike other people I'm not afraid to post things in my own name. That helps you address your hate, so I hope you appreciate my openness.  

I can only recognize one true thing in your claim. I did edit the Wikipedia page using that username. What I also did was removing a couple of biased sentences lacking cites and neutral language. Ive also been updating that page with cited facts a couple of times. Last time I checked these things are requirements for any Wikipedia article and that behavior is not breaking any rules.
If you think an article is biased, Wikipedia has some excellent ways to discuss that. For some reason neither you nor other haters use that functionality in this case.   

Your ability to hunt the man rather than the target is second to none. However, if you or other people have doubts about my trustworthiness, I do prefer to learn that from someone, whos not shouting out loud while hiding behind mummys skirts.

Ill be happy to discuss this further. You are welcome to contact me - jod(at)trustpilot(dot)com
/Joakim
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.



Ripoff Report Legal Directory