- Report: #922700
Report - Rebuttal - Arbitrate
Complaint Review: United Healthcare
United HealthcarePO Box 6082 Salt Lake City, Utah United States of America
United Healthcare AARP Medicare Complete United Healthcare sticks it to patients and doctors on screening colonoscopies Salt Lake City, Utah
*Author of original report: It's About UnitedHealthcare, not AARP or "Obamacare"
*Consumer Comment: comment
*Consumer Comment: NO ONE should join AARP
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
Click here now..
When I was billed a copay by both the surgical group and anesthesiology group, I first called them. I wanted to make sure they correctly coded and submitted their bill to United, noting it was a 5 year "screening colonoscopy," with no pathology found, no treatment required, and therefore no co-payment due from the patient. They did everything right, but when I called, they said: "This happens a lot."
I then called United. They said I could file an appeal, but they had 60 days from the date of receipt to make a decision. "If I pay my doctors on time, as I always do, and you decide you were wrong, will you refund my copayments?"
"No. Just don't pay them until you hear from us."
In the meantime, both medical groups were much more patient and consumer friendly. They said they would wait for the results of the appeal, and I did not have to make the payments until we all heard of the decision.
On the final week United had to reply to the appeal, it came through by mail.
"We decided to approve your appeal. We will make an exception for your situation, but we decided that our original decision about copayment is correct."
Seven bullet points were added, each denying they were wrong and trying to make sure that their decision was an "exception."
Indeed! Their exception--and payment--was made because a consumer cited federal law to them, filed an immediate appeal and included copies of their own policy regarding no copays for colonoscopy scrreening.
AARP should be ashamed--more responsible--- than just granting a naked license and taking money for the use of its name when insurers behave as United Health has.
Further, where is the federal government's monitoring of private compliance with Medicare Advance Plans and the Affordable Care Act, the latter of which made this preventive benefit possible?
My guess is fewer than 1 in 10 who face this same situation will appeal. Hopefully, this Ripoff Report will send a message to other patients, to the federal government, to United Healthcare and to AARP.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 08/05/2012 05:48 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/United-Healthcare/Salt-Lake-City-Utah-84131-0362/United-Healthcare-AARP-Medicare-Complete-United-Healthcare-sticks-it-to-patients-and-doct-922700. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:Search Tips
In order to assure the best results in your search:
- Keep the name short & simple, and try different variations of the name.
- Do not include ".com", "S", "Inc.", "Corp", or "LLC" at the end of the Company name.
- Use only the first/main part of a name to get best results.
- Only search one name at a time if Company has many AKA's.