- Report: #123005
Report - Rebuttal - Arbitrate
Complaint Review: Vector Security
Vector Security9800 Patuxent Woods Dr. Columbia, MD, Maryland U.S.A.
Vector Security Unreliable Alarm Sensor! Rip-off! Columbia Maryland
*Consumer Suggestion: Some advice...
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
Click here now..
In response a service technician conducted a check of our in home system on 21 Sep 04. The technician's initial attempt to demonstrate the reliability of the sensors was a sham! He demonstrated questionable knowledge of the sensors as he tapped on the sensor and wall attempting to activate them. These sensors only activate to noise with the frequency of breaking glass, not physical vibrations.
I had the technician contact his boss, Mike Bell, and demanded he have someone come out with the proper testing device that duplicates the frequency of breaking glass. After contacting Mr. Bell on his cell phone, the technician had to excuse him self to go outside to complete his conversation. After completing the conversation the technician advised me that he did have the proper testing device for a Glass Breakage Listing sensor. However, as he attempted to set up the test, it was evident he was uncertain of the procedure. Being familiar with the devices, I assisted him.
The key fault with the test is that the sensors have to be placed in a test mode before testing them. If the sensor activates, then only the electrical circuits of the sensor's test mode have been verified as operational. This does not verify that the sensor will activate in its normal active listing mode. Our sample sensors did activate in the test mode.
It is obvious that The Association of Central Monitoring Stations would not test, evaluate and comment on the reliability of a sensor in its test mode. Therefore, the issue of sensor reliability, in a real world situation, remains unanswered! I pointed this out to Mr. Bell, and his supervisor Mr. Tom McLaughlin. Neither was able, or apparently willing to work a satisfactory solution to the problem.
On 28 Sep 04, I contacted Ms. Connie Schultz, VP Vector Security in Virginia, 800-688-0150 x4037. I informed her of my negative experiences and provided her copies of the Washington Consumers Checkbook article. She advised that Vector Security was a member of The Association of Central Monitoring Stations and passed me off to Mr. Chris Adamcik, 800-0150 x4305.
I contacted Mr. Adamcik, again provided him a copy of the article and the web sites for Consumers Checkbook and The Association of Central Monitoring Stations. I then conducted follow-ups checks with him and Schultz through the month of October 2004. Their reaction to date has been evasive/non responsive to the issue of sensor reliability.
Based on my experiences with Vector Security over the last few months, as a customer I can only question their honesty and integrity in responding to a basic question, based on published information. Simply, will the sensors that we have paid for, work when we need them to? Only after getting a honest/believable response to this question, will we know our options.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 12/15/2004 12:35 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Vector-Security/Columbia-MD-Maryland-21046/Vector-Security-Unreliable-Alarm-Sensor-Rip-off-Columbia-Maryland-123005. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:Search Tips
In order to assure the best results in your search:
- Keep the name short & simple, and try different variations of the name.
- Do not include ".com", "S", "Inc.", "Corp", or "LLC" at the end of the Company name.
- Use only the first/main part of a name to get best results.
- Only search one name at a time if Company has many AKA's.
Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.