- Report: #376396
Report - Rebuttal - Arbitrate
Complaint Review: Wayne County Friend Of Court Abuse Of Power And Biased
Wayne County Friend Of Court Abuse Of Power And Biased645 Griswold St Ste 150 Detroit, Michigan U.S.A.
Wayne County Friend Of Court abuse of power and biased Detroit, MI 48226 Detroit Michigan
My husband and his ex have a good relationship and three children. They agreed to a support between the two of them. When she gave my husband sole custody of their oldest son the judge told my husband I am entering a ruling that you will never be able to collect support from the mother. The oldest boy was two months old when this happened.
My husband and the mother of his three children had only one child at this time, they got together and made more children two girls followed. A total of three children. They started having kids young when they were in high school. As they grew up they knew they were not right together. They remain friends and help out with the kids.
My husband had a second son by a different woman. This woman slept with his brother and said it did not count as this brother was not biological and was only adopted from the foster care system. My husband could not deal with sitting at the table on X-mas or other family events when his brother and then wife present. He soon divorced her challenging her to stop drinking and doing drugs. She refused and he left due to her screaming and threatening to toss her self down the basment stairs.
My husband and I eventually married, he and his ex seperated in 2001 but could not afford the divorce till 2004. The court ordered child support and my husband thought he was to give it to her.
The FOC said any money he gives her is a gift. So FOC started taking money out of his check. In the mean time she got an exparte ppo on him. While this was on him he had no idea, and she kept coming to his job, and calling his job, begging him to come over, and come back. She even wrote letters saying she missed him, and he is the best thing ever, and their anniversary is coming up can he please come over, if he will not coome over can he please just call once she cannot understand how a man can just not contact her and cut her off like this.
Yet in the ppo she says he is stalking breaking in her home and she is scared for her safety. She called him to the house saying it was urgent to do with the kid when he arrived she was naked in the window with some other man from her job. The same man had been oer plenty of times in the past when they were married, and my he would come in from work to find them 'hanging out'
The FOC knows these things as they are all in letters and notes she has wrote we saved them all. She has come to my house high and keyed my car, broke in and sent drug dealers to the house to do things while her son was asleep in the car. The worse was his ex and her friend put on full disguise, wigs make up and even switched out cars, to stalk me on fathers day when they had my husband off with the kids. The ex's friend and the ex were inturupted with what ever they had planned for me when the friends 5 yr old was hit by a car and killed. If she had been home helping watch her son he may still be alive but instead she chose to leave him and help her friend stalk me.
The ex has left the son out at age 7 at 10:10 on a school night playing games with my husband. A police officer had to threaten her to get her to make any sense. We had the child the whole summer not one ounce of help from her.
She gets the child support up every 36 months and the FOC knows she dose drugs she even admitted it to referee Ross.
This child comes to our house and fills his pockets with food to take with him. The FOC refuses to count the first three children even with my husband having sole custody of one. The FOC said they do not recognize children that do not have a FOC order! I thought FOC was to help deal with dead beat dads? A dad who pays is not dead beat, and when dose a court get to butt in to the American right to raise your children in the way the parents of the child see fit? My husband has never abused his children in any form and dose not need the FOC causing trouble between him and the first childrens mother.
The second sons mom dose not even get her money on time from FOC.
The first mom dose not want to deal with FOC due to the abusive way they treated her parents growing up.
How can the FOC force a father who has worked out parenting in an agreement with the other parent to bring the other children and turn them into cases? The first mom is not on aid and the children are fine, never miss a meal.
I called the IRS and they advised me that I tell my husband to go to his job and fix his taxes they will help average out the taxes so no money is owed or maybe 100.00 is owed this will stop FOC from takiing his taxes every year as there will be none to take. He will see extra money on his check as that is where tax returns come from extra money taken from a pay check.
I am so angry my husband and I have belonged to Detroit Parent Network and we do good work in the community, his son is very attached to me he enjoys going to the YouthVille center where DPN is located. We go on vacation toether and do lots of positive things. The mother gets mad when ever and tries to stop him from all contact. She is very mean to the child, and tells him if he keeps saying he wants to live with his dad foster care will take him away and he will never see his family again. Once we convinced him this was a lie and he was safe, she told him she would hate him.
This poor kid never did anything like Carol Rhodes says Friend of Court Enemy of the Family, all they care about is the money they make off the sale of these kids to whatever parent they can get the most money out of. When they collect the money they take lots of time geting it to the parent.
In this case the courts know the mom is on drugs and alchol so my husband is actually paying 251.00 out of every pay check he makes 14.00 an hour and has 3 children previous. he now brings home about 1,000.00 a month and we were forced onto welfare, we now get 300.00 in food stamps. This is stupid I do not want to be on food stamps. I want to be able to support ourselves and not need this aid.
With the money this way why is the FOC (Forgets our children) alowed to abuse the children and who can regulate them into workiing in the best interest of the children?
I have started a group to join together people who want to work against he FOC and for fathers who want to be allowed to be dads not just a child support check.
How come when the mom is out of work there is tons of programs to help her and support her till she gets on her feet but a dad is called names like dead beat? My husband has never missed a payment even with them taking more then the judge ordered, they always say he is in arears!
CLICK here to see why Rip-off Report, as a matter of policy, deleted either a phone number, link or e-mail address from this Report.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 09/26/2008 08:51 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Wayne-County-Friend-Of-Court-Abuse-Of-Power-And-Biased/Detroit-Michigan-48226/Wayne-County-Friend-Of-Court-abuse-of-power-and-biased-Detroit-MI-48226-Detroit-Michigan-376396. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:Search Tips
In order to assure the best results in your search:
- Keep the name short & simple, and try different variations of the name.
- Do not include ".com", "S", "Inc.", "Corp", or "LLC" at the end of the Company name.
- Use only the first/main part of a name to get best results.
- Only search one name at a time if Company has many AKA's.
Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.
- Business's (11)
- Lawyers and Law Firms (5312)
- Administrative Law (11)
- Admiralty & Maritime Law (27)
- Agricultural Law (2)
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (10)
- Antitrust & Trade Regulation (1)
- Appellate Practice (72)
- Aviation & Aerospace (11)
- Banking Law (90)
- Bankruptcy (380)
- Business Law (232)
- Civil Rights (55)
- Class Actions (30)
- Commercial Law (13)
- Communications Law (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Construction Law (83)
- Contracts (7)
- Corporate Law (75)
- Criminal Law (668)
- Debtor & Creditor (51)
- Education Law (14)
- Elder Law (77)
- ElectionCampaign & Political (0)
- Eminent Domain (5)
- Employee Benefits (7)
- Energy (0)
- Entertainment & Sports (17)
- Environmental Law (43)
- Family Law (13)
- Finance (0)
- Government (14)
- Government Contracts (2)
- Health Care (1)
- Immigration (482)
- Indians & Native Populations (1)
- Insurance (90)
- Intellectual Property (526)
- International Law (33)
- International Trade (0)
- Internet Law (7)
- Investments (1)
- Labor & Employment (12)
- Legal Malpractice (92)
- Litigation (20)
- Media Law (1)
- Medical Malpractice (13)
- Mergers & Acquisitions (0)
- Military Law (5)
- Natural Resources (10)
- Occupational Safety & Health (0)
- Personal Injury (842)
- Products Liability (21)
- Professional Liability (0)
- Real Estate (361)
- Securities (169)
- Taxation (142)
- Technology & Science (0)
- Toxic Torts (0)
- Transportation (2)
- Trusts & Estates (368)
- White Collar Crime (1)
- Wills & Probate (7)
- Workers Compensation (242)
- Zoning, Planning & Land Use (10)
- Legal Services (32)
- Arbitrators/Mediators (7)
- Automotive Expert Witnesses (0)
- Bail Bonds (0)
- Court Reporters (1)
- Electronic Data Discovery (1)
- Expert Witnesses (1)
- Forensic Experts (1)
- Jury Selection (0)
- Legal Assistants (8)
- Legal Speakers (2)
- Litigation Support (2)
- Medical Expert Witnesses (1)
- Other (14)
- Paralegal (5)
- Private Investigators (6)
- Process Servers (7)
- Translators/Interpreters (0)
- Miscellaneous Business Services (19)