- Report: #871535
Complaint Review: Wells-fargo Bank
| Wells-fargo Bank 21 east Garden Street
pensacola, Florida United States of America |
|
Wells-fargo Bank Wells fargo scam pending transactions over draft fees pensacola, Florida
*Consumer Comment: Team Rebutt is all over this post
*Consumer Comment: Josey
*Consumer Comment: Toast you are burnt
*Consumer Comment: Of course you are...you have been taken to the woodshed multiple times in this thread...
*General Comment: Check expiration date...
*Consumer Comment: ***NATIONWIDE ALERT FOR ALL WELLS FARGO BANK EMPLOYEES: WELLS FARGO HAS TAKEN OUT $17 BILLION IN SECRET LIFE INSURANCE POLICIES ON ITS EMPLOYEES.......
*Consumer Comment: Chech Expire
*General Comment: it was fun til someone "yawned"
*General Comment: Reminds me of a commercial...
*Author of original report: stretch and yawn
*Consumer Comment: Cough...
*Author of original report: yawn
*Consumer Comment: Just a comment
*General Comment: Your lawsuit...
*Author of original report: YAWN
*Consumer Comment: Yeah, finally
*Consumer Comment: I called it!
*Consumer Comment: Thank-you appledroplarry
*Author of original report: Help is coming
*Consumer Comment: Amazing
*Consumer Comment: Don't hold your breath Striderq
*General Comment: does not vs will not...
*Consumer Comment: OOH. I'm so scared.
*Consumer Comment: To all my fellow bank employees....
*Consumer Comment: 2nd Ammendment Rights???
*Author of original report: Coast
*Consumer Comment: Penalty fees is not stolen money
*Author of original report: Listen Jim martin
*Author of original report: Striderq
*Consumer Comment: Wow!
*General Comment: Again...
*Author of original report: I did you math
*Author of original report: You are correct.
*Author of original report: I'm guessing
*Author of original report: I have also worked for a bank & credit union
*Author of original report: You are missing the point.
*Consumer Comment: NATIONWIDE BANK ALERT: PLEASE FEEL FREE TO SEND COPIES OF YOUR RIPOFF REPORTS TO.....
*Consumer Comment: You are the one who made the claim...
*Consumer Comment: Ridiculous
*Consumer Comment: WOW
*Consumer Comment: I have to agree with Coast in this case...
*General Comment: A couple of reasons...
*Author of original report: Outstanding
*Author of original report: Thank you for your feedback
*Author of original report: The reason for my complaint
*Consumer Comment: simple math
*Consumer Comment: Seriously Larry....
*Consumer Comment: You missed the point
*Author of original report: Of course you disagree.
*Consumer Comment: I disagree
Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
Now there will usually be a few days in between the time when the pending charges are dropped and removed from your register & the funds are added back into your account from when they are instantly posted to your account. Most people would have spent the money thinking they were correct to do so. This will create overdraft fees. This is not illegal but it is a VERY poor way to treat your customers. This policy is designed to catch people with fees. It is in place for NO OTHER REASON! Wells-fargo is a bad bank. You will be better off banking with your local credit union. Wells-fargo does not care about you! Their only concern is getting as much money out of your wallet and into their vaults. They posted record profits in 2011 and 47% of those profits were from fees!!! LOOK it up. I have provided two sources for you below.
I have worked for banks and credit unions. I would never work for a bank that practices this policy.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/19/wells-fargo-debit-fee-que_n_1020464.html
http://www.mybanktracker.com/bank-news/2011/01/04/wells-fargo-checking-fees-2011-checking-account-review/
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 04/20/2012 06:31 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Wells-fargo-Bank/pensacola-Florida-32503/Wells-fargo-Bank-Wells-fargo-scam-pending-transactions-over-draft-fees-pensacola-Flor-871535. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Wells-fargo Bank
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
Search Tips#1 Consumer Comment
Team Rebutt is all over this post
AUTHOR: The Outlaw Josey Wales - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, June 13, 2012
#3 Consumer Comment
Toast you are burnt
AUTHOR: The Outlaw Josey Wales - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, June 13, 2012
#4 Consumer Comment
Of course you are...you have been taken to the woodshed multiple times in this thread...
AUTHOR: Truth Detector - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, May 13, 2012
This all because you refuse to exercise 2nd grade math skills and keep a check register.
Keep digging in moron...it's fools like you who keep accounts and goodies free for the responsible adults in this country.
#5 General Comment
Check expiration date...
AUTHOR: Striderq - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, May 09, 2012
#6 Consumer Comment
***NATIONWIDE ALERT FOR ALL WELLS FARGO BANK EMPLOYEES: WELLS FARGO HAS TAKEN OUT $17 BILLION IN SECRET LIFE INSURANCE POLICIES ON ITS EMPLOYEES.......
AUTHOR: Karl - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, May 09, 2012
Anyone can 'Google' this- BANK EXECUTIVES PROFITING ON THE DEATH OF EMPLOYEES, and read the related articles on the web for proof.
Then type in 411913 at this site and read Ripoff Report #411913 for additional information about these 'secret life insurance policies' that Wells Fargo has taken out on its current and former employees, and spread it throughout the entire Wells Fargo banking system in the USA and at sites like Twitter and Facebook!
Thank You
***NATIONWIDE OIL ALERT: Feel free to type in the following at this site and read the Ripoff Reports for important information-
OPEC
EXXON
OIL
MANIPULATION
MOBIL
BP
CHEVRON
WALL STREET
You can ask check printer to have check expire date. Ask for 90 days void check. That way, the check receiver has to deposit within 90 of date sign on check or the lose the money.
I had this problem before by one check receiver that hold almost a year. I request them to deposit and no answer. I check with the bank and the bank told me the check can be good up to one year of check date.
#8 General Comment
it was fun til someone "yawned"
AUTHOR: Righteous1 - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, April 24, 2012
The OP clearly is on meds that is making them drowsy, They should hook up with the Lady who is filing suit against Walgreens for them asking her name when she wanted to pick up a presecription!
They deserve each other.
On a side note- I so needed this laugh from the lunacy of the OP's claims. Sorry that I do not work for Wells Fargo but I played a customer for them on Tv! :) (just kidding!)
#9 General Comment
Reminds me of a commercial...
AUTHOR: Striderq - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, April 24, 2012
#10 Author of original report
stretch and yawn
AUTHOR: appledroplarry - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, April 24, 2012
- Since this is a matter for the courts, that must mean that a suit has been filed.
So can you please give us the docket number and court information. Or is this just one more "fact" you are not going to provide any proof for?
#12 Author of original report
yawn
AUTHOR: appledroplarry - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, April 24, 2012
Yep. Did you notice that prices are starting to go back down a little? Where I live, it was $4.05/gallon just last week. When I stopped this morning, it was $3.65/gallon.
So, back to the topic at hand. Your lawsuit will probably get settled out of court just like the many others filed against just about every bank in existence. You might get back a minute amount, but it will be nothing compared to the amount of money not keeping an accurate check register has cost you.
Would you care to elaborate on exactly which points you suddenly feel have some merit to them? Also, how many of your attorneys told you exactly what we have told you?
By the way, everyone has noticed that you refuse to answer questions and refuse to back up the "facts" that you've made up, er quoted. And nice try at diversion by saying you've moved on to the terrible gas price situation. That can be summed up in two words: President Obama.
#15 Author of original report
YAWN
AUTHOR: appledroplarry - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Monday, April 23, 2012
#16 Consumer Comment
Yeah, finally
AUTHOR: MochaG - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Monday, April 23, 2012
I am seeing the poor get poorer because they swallow their pride instead of food. >:)
Notice he did not mention the website or facebook profile, nor did he address his error in mentioning the wrong amendment.
And, no, I do not work for Wells Fargo or any company is being paid by Wells Fargo.
Either you are bluffing about having an attorney, or your attorney has no idea what he is talking about.
Why don't you post their contact info here?
#18 Consumer Comment
Thank-you appledroplarry
AUTHOR: coast - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Monday, April 23, 2012
#19 Author of original report
Help is coming
AUTHOR: appledroplarry - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Monday, April 23, 2012
You can then proceed with all the silly lawsuits you like, but in the meantime you would not be paying them any additional fees.
If you can't understand that, you should not have any accounts at all, you're not qualified.
Then you can explain how your right to bear arms has been abridged here.
Also, if you think people here work for banks, why in the world would they be telling you how to easily avoid paying fees. That doesn't make any sense either.
You're making a fool of yourself.
#21 Consumer Comment
Don't hold your breath Striderq
AUTHOR: Robert - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Monday, April 23, 2012
So don't hold your breath because I doubt we will ever see this list of banks that have this 15 day hold expiration.
#22 General Comment
does not vs will not...
AUTHOR: Striderq - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Monday, April 23, 2012
You however, have proven by your posts to be an exceptional person. You feel the rules apply to everyone EXCEPT you. So go ahead keep that feeling of entitlement, just let us know how much it costs you in OD fees. I know this is probably futile since you haven't answered a question with a straight answer but I'll try again: You say you know of banks/credit unions that allow pending card transactions to be on hold for 15 days before the hold expires. Can you name these financial institutions, since a lot of posters here I'm sure would flock to them to avoid OD fees?
#23 Consumer Comment
OOH. I'm so scared.
AUTHOR: Jim Martin - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Monday, April 23, 2012
Second Amendment-A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Please point out the statement where I or anyone else infringed upon your right to bear arms.
I believe this is one you want: First Amendment-Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
The problem here is all I did is make a request that WHEN you get overdraft fees at your new bank, you don't come back and complain about that bank too. Which is entirely within my constitutional right of freedom of speech. And I better clear this up before I get accused of infringing on your rights again-this is just a suggestion, I am not in any way telling you what you can and can't say, I am just trying to help you not make an a** out of yourself, again. You can do with this SUGGESTION what you will.
If you are going to accuse someone of infringing on your constitutional rights, you might want to make sure you get the correct amendment, otherwise you just look like an idiot.
I have moved my business to a Credit Union and if it ever does pull the crap that Wells-fargo pulls I will drop them also.
That's nice. So we can expect to see you back within the next 6 months complaining about their fees.
You are a corporate sell out and you definitely get paid to troll the internet and disparage complaints about Wells-fargo and I have already reported you and your friends to ROR management.
Then, where's my paycheck and why do I keep working at a factory? Ouch, I'm hurt that you would report me to ROR management! lol
I've never heard the line about how someone who disagrees with the OP must work for the company. Oh, wait, maybe I should look around on this site. I'll let you know when I find an OP who DOESN'T use that line.
I am working on a facebook page and a web page tonight about Wells-Fargo and You in particular Jim Martin. Look for them.
I looked and couldn't find it. Not that any one would be able to know for sure that it was about me any way. Do you know how many Jim Martin's(not my real, legal name anyway) there are in my state. I grew up in a very small town of about 500 people and there were 3 of us in just my elementary school. Oh, and to post derogatory comments about someone with the intent of defamation of character is SLANDER. I can sue you for that.
Who enjoys having money stolen from them by Wells-Fargo?
Well, I would have to say those people complain about getting OD fees because they don't keep an accurate check register, then continue to not keep an accurate check register.
You are transparent and soulless.
I feel like there was intent of defamation of character there. Should I set up a web site and facebook page about larry? What do you think guys, since supposedly we are such good friends.
You have only inspired me to fight harder against Wells-Fargo.
Well, good for you. I am waiting anxiously for the claims of a class action lawsuit and the claims of numerous lawyers contacting you in your next post.
#24 Consumer Comment
To all my fellow bank employees....
AUTHOR: Ken - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, April 22, 2012
Uh-oh, I think I just treaded on his 2nd amendment rights...does that mean I have to go to jail without even passing go.
I see a long future of disappointment for this fool.
Guess we should just give up and let him do it his way...look how well its been working for him
We'll just wait to see how "bad" the credit union treats him....soon.
#25 Consumer Comment
2nd Ammendment Rights???
AUTHOR: Robert - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, April 22, 2012
Really? Are you sure? Seems to me you should download a copy of our Constitution and READ IT!!!
Perhaps that is your difficulty - reading comprehension?
Good luck with your lawsuit. Do let us know when you file your class action lawsuit concerning the hold policies for pending transaction! Don't forget to post the correct name of the court that will hear your case and the docket/case number.
I will play "psychic Brother Bob" and predict that your lawsuit, if you can find an attorney naive enough to file it, will go nowhere.
#26 Author of original report
Coast
AUTHOR: appledroplarry - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, April 22, 2012
#27 Consumer Comment
Penalty fees is not stolen money
AUTHOR: coast - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, April 22, 2012
Penalty fees is not stolen money.
"Are you saying that there are NO banks that create policy that makes balancing a check book more difficult then other banks?"
The process of balancing a checkbook is exactly the same for all banks. Striderq's statement, "Balancing a register has NOTHING to do with a bank's policies" is 100% correct.
You gambled that the merchant did not process the transaction and you lost that gamble. A debit or check that has not been presented for payment is known as an outstanding transaction. The online bank balance does not include outstanding transactions but a correctly maintained check register does.
#28 Author of original report
Listen Jim martin
AUTHOR: appledroplarry - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, April 22, 2012
I have moved my business to a Credit Union and if it ever does pull the crap that Wells-fargo pulls I will drop them also. You are transparent and soulless. You are a corporate sell out and you definitely get paid to troll the internet and disparage complaints about Wells-fargo and I have already reported you and your friends to ROR management. You have only inspired me to fight harder against Wells-Fargo. I am working on a facebook page and a web page tonight about Wells-Fargo and You in particular Jim Martin. Look for them.
#29 Author of original report
Striderq
AUTHOR: appledroplarry - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, April 22, 2012
Well, I'm sure Wells-Fargo won't object to you using one of the "better" banks. Just do us all a favor, when you get an overdraft fee at your new bank, don't come back here and b*%@! about it because I can guarantee you will get the same responses you have gotten this time.
If no one ever made any mistakes then the Wells-Fargo policy would not make any difference.
Or, if every one would just spend the extra minute to WRITE THE PURCHASE down in their register, the Wells-Fargo policy, or any banks policy for that matter, would not make any difference.
Why does Wells-Fargo allow for a charge to pend for two days when many comparable institutions allow for over 15 days in many cases?
Because that is the policy they put out. If you don't agree with it, then find a different bank. I'm sure that either that policy was in place when you opened the account or they sent you a letter stating the change of policy. Since you are here complaining about the policy and how that policy is the reason you now have OD fees, my guess is you probably didn't read it.
A $35.00 fee is unacceptable to me to charge for a small error
Just one question here: What do you consider to be a "small error"? How far would you want them to let you overdraft your account before they start adding fees? $5? $10? Do you see the problem here? It may start out "small" but then you start arguing "well last time it was $10 and now it's only $11, they should just let it slide this time." Eventually, that $10 you think they should allow ends up being $200.
Wells-fargo is no worse than Bank Of America which just got sued for similar policies
Actually, Bank of America was sued for the order they were processing the debits in. The lawsuit had nothing to do with how long they allowed debits to pend.
http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/bank-of-america-settles-overdraft-fee-lawsuit/
The merchant cancelled the charge.
This one really made me laugh. Why would the merchant cancel the charge after the product or service was rendered? The only reason for the merchant to cancel the charge is if you made a purchase online and the item was no longer available. But even in this scenario, you would have know about it, either by email or phone call, BEFORE the bank did.
I expect a bank to leave the items as pending for 15 days or until the merchant closes their batch. This is pretty standard as Ebay, Paypal, Regions bank, Beach Community Bank, & all Credit Unions that I am aware of practice that policy. Wells-Fargo does not do that.
Umm...NO. Ebay and PayPal do not follow that policy. The 15 days only applies to a new seller until they have established a good track record. They hold the funds from the seller until the buyer has received the item and verified that it is as described. They do this so that if the buyer has a problem, they are covered.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/19/wells-fargo-debit-fee-que_n_1020464.html
Is an article about their newest fee. A $7 fee for debit card accounts. This has absolutely nothing to do with your complaint.
http://www.mybanktracker.com/bank-news/2011/01/04/wells-fargo-checking-fees-2011-checking-account-review/
Is an article about how Wells-Fargo is getting rid of their "free" checking account. Again, has absolutely nothing to do with your complaint.
Most people would have spent the money thinking they were correct to do so. This will create overdraft fees.
I, for one, wouldn't have spent the money. Until I receive a WRITTEN notice from the merchant that I don't owe them that money, it stays in my account. Of course, spending it is going to result in overdraft fees. You agreed to the policy when you opened the account and the bank has every right to collect.
there will usually be a few days in between the time when the pending charges are dropped and removed from your register & the funds are added back into your account from when they are instantly posted to your account
It wouldn't matter if it was 2 minutes or 2 years if you were to keep an accurate check register of your own. I'll admit that I don't put them in immediately either. I make sure I keep the receipts and put them all in every couple of days. I am also very adamant about NOT using checks/debit cards for everyday purchases, I use cash for those. I also have a credit card that I use for ALL of my bills, then I just write a check to the credit card company. Only writing 1 check per month and visiting the atm maybe once every 2 weeks really cuts back on the # of transactions that go through my checking account. 3 transactions per month=max of 3 OD fees per month. Do you see my point?
I have worked for banks and credit unions. I would never work for a bank that practices this policy.
Completely irrelevant.
To these people I can only say, I hope you enjoy the fees you caused yourself.
#32 Author of original report
I did you math
AUTHOR: appledroplarry - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, April 22, 2012
#33 Author of original report
You are correct.
AUTHOR: appledroplarry - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, April 22, 2012
#34 Author of original report
I'm guessing
AUTHOR: appledroplarry - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, April 22, 2012
#35 Author of original report
I have also worked for a bank & credit union
AUTHOR: appledroplarry - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, April 22, 2012
#36 Author of original report
You are missing the point.
AUTHOR: appledroplarry - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, April 22, 2012
You are correct that in a perfect world there would be no murder, no crime, and everyone would meticulously balance their check book. But since we do not live in a perfect world we should deal with the actual issues that arise. All I have been saying is that some banks are better than others in terms of member support and I believe that Wells-Fargo is one of the bad ones. I will say it again. Wells-Fargo's policies are different than other banks because they want to charge their members with more fees. It is their right to do so. I believe that the majority of Wells-Fargo members would be better off banking with a local credit union.
#37 Consumer Comment
NATIONWIDE BANK ALERT: PLEASE FEEL FREE TO SEND COPIES OF YOUR RIPOFF REPORTS TO.....
AUTHOR: Karl - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, April 22, 2012
Anyone can 'Google' this- WHO CONTROLS THE UNITED STATES ECONOMY BY MAJORITY 2010, and watch that video on the web in order to see who some of the CEOS are. (The Wells Fargo CEO appears towards the end of that 4 minute video.)
Then 'Google' the bank name and go to the Wikipedia site in order to find out who the other CEOS are, that do not appear in the above video, and mail copies of your Ripoff Reports to them immediately so they know what is happening.
Example: Anyone can 'Google' this- JPMORGAN CHASE WIKIPEDIA, and go to that site and see that the CEO'S name is Jamie Dimon.
Thank You
***NATIONWIDE MORTGAGE ALERT: Make sure to type in 481508 at this site and read St. Clair's Ripoff Report for valuable information if you have a mortgage in the USA and spread it all over the web at sites like Twitter and Facebook.
#38 Consumer Comment
You are the one who made the claim...
AUTHOR: Robert - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, April 22, 2012
- And if I expect a bank to give me 80% interest on my Savings Account if they don't I guess that is a RipOff also. Get the point?
This is pretty standard as Ebay, Paypal, Regions bank, Beach Community Bank, & all Credit Unions that I am aware of practice that policy. Wells-Fargo does not do that. Wells-Fargo lets them pend for two days.
- Funny how you mention a couple of banks and ALL credit unions in your list. Because you can see many RoR's on other banks AND credit unions about overdraft fees. But they all come down to people not taking responsibility over their own account.
It is my opinion that they have created this policy to force more overdraft fees.
- There is is the primary reason your opinions FAIL. The bank does not force any overdraft fees. They do not force anyone to make a purchase when they don't have funds. All someone has to do is keep their own WRITTEN register and they can not overdraft. All of your "reasons" or beliefs can not get past this point.
Please provide a reason whey they only allow them to pend for two days when other comparable institutions allow for much longer.
- Okay how about a company that you attempted to make a purchase, they put the amount on hold but you never completed the purchase. Your money is now "locked up" for 2 days instead of 15. How about a company that doesn't post the final transaction for 16 days. You are in the same exact situation if you don't keep your register. So as I said before(a bit tongue and cheek) would you prefer them to just keep them pending for 1 year?
It is not my responsibility to educate you. Do the math yourself. You can easily find their revenue, gross & net interest margins, losses, deposits and loans online
- Umm..you were the one who made the claim that 47% of their profit came from fees(and with your claims you inferred that they were from overdraft fees). You attempted to show this by your two examples. Obviously you were hoping no one would "call" you on them because the first link showed their fee schedule, and the other was talking about unrelated fees and even about other banks.
So I will ask again. Since you brought this up, show us one place where 47% of their profit came from overdraft fees, and more specifically because Wells Fargo decides to release holds after 2 days. Oh and...."I understand if you can not or will not provide an answer to my question".
You said: I do not want to spend my life staring at a check book register. I think it takes me less than a minute to make an entry in my register. Hardly a life consuming task - Ridiculous.
As long as you refuse to properly manage you accounts by keeping records, you are destined for a life of paying overdraft fees. That's your choice and you're free to do that, it helps keep checking accounts free for those of us who choose to keep a simple register.
As far as your excuses for stating the reason you will not provide sources for your statistics. You clearly don't have any, you made those numbers up or you would be happy to prove the people here wrong. You can't.
Accusing responders of being employees or something simply makes you appear stupid.
Follow the advice here and never pay OD fees again or follow your procedure and pay fees for life while whining about it, the choice is yours.
None of this is any defense for some of the bank's procedures and policies but it is a simple way to keep from paying fees until or unless those policies change. Whining and paying your hard earned money when there is a simple solution is indeed just plain dumb. Think about it.
#40 Consumer Comment
WOW
AUTHOR: Resty - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, April 22, 2012
Maybe you guys can explain to me what the hell is going on with these fools? I seriously dont get it. HOW can you pay something you owe and NOT put it in your check register?? How do you ever keep track of it? Ive had some companies hit my account almost literally within minutes of swiping the card and others dont for a couple 3 days. I reconcile my register every couple weeks. NO one can magically remember every charge and automatically KNOW whats in the account...however... I always seem to know within a few bucks what's in there even without balancing against the statement itself. WHY is this? First off it's because I keep the freakin thing balanced..every week or two, a month at the longest. Second I know what I owe and I what Im using and withdraw it from the register each time I use a check (archaic as it is) or swipe the debit card.
EVERY
SINGLE
TIME
.and I dont double spend that dollar amount just because it APPEARS to not have been withdrawn from the account ONLINE when I check. I dont care if it takes them a month or more to remove it.
Ironically LAST summer, July and August, I ordered some things delivered to my home from an Organic farmers market.>>Im somewhat disabled<< I paid this weekly by check unfortunately. This went on for about 6 weeks, maybe 8. EACH time I wrote a check out for this place. I removed that amount from MY REGISTER. NEVER thought any more about it. Those checks never appeared at the bank, never got subtracted. I never paid much attention because as far as I was concerned it was gone from me the day I wrote the check out. HOWEVER. the vendor never submitted the checks to my financial institution until I sent them an email and asked them about it, in MARCH 2012 !!
Had I followed the pattern of the complainants here. Id have re-spent that money.
..and before you ask. NO I dont work for any financial institution and you'd be surprised who I do work for.
Soooooo Strider, Robert, Coas, .keep up the good work. your names and advice are solid and strong here on ROR and well known. I venture to say y'all have somewhat of a fan club here.
#41 Consumer Comment
I have to agree with Coast in this case...
AUTHOR: Ronny g - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, April 22, 2012
But what Coast posted in his first reply is the reality. There are current laws and regulations already in place that prevent the bank form charging any fees for transactions that did have the funds at the "time" of purchase, but that only applies to the debit card. If you paid any bills with that account and did not have sufficient funds to cover it at the time..you are most likely getting a fee or fees whether they covered it or not. Hope that they did since if they did not..you can and most likely will get additional fees from the payee..and possible interest rate increases. You have to be really careful these days...it is not like the days of yore when any bank or business allows "grace periods" for free..not anymore. They would rather see you dragged under a bus and as well lose you as a customer since if they can not profit from you from fees or otherwise..why do they need you?
#42 General Comment
A couple of reasons...
AUTHOR: Striderq - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, April 21, 2012
The correct way is to subtract purchases from your register as soon as you make them. Add deposits after they become available in your account. If you want to know if you have enough money to buy something, look at your register. The inline banking is to show what has posted, allowing you to make sure it posted for the correct amount and to watch for fraudulent transactions. Having worked customer service for a bank I have a very difficult time believing that any bank or credit union has holds of 15 days. The business standard is 3 business days.
#43 Author of original report
Outstanding
AUTHOR: appledroplarry - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, April 21, 2012
I believe that reason is simply that Wells-Fargo is a business for most and it will maximize its profits any way it can while believing a invisible hand will somehow balance the GDP. It will maximize its profit at the expense of its customers in favor of short term profits. That is until a law suit is filed or too many people leave. Which ever comes first.
#44 Author of original report
Thank you for your feedback
AUTHOR: appledroplarry - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, April 21, 2012
1. The merchant cancelled the charge.
2. The charge finally posted and the correct amount was completely and finally deducted from the balance. Not taken away then added again to create fees for people who do not obsess over their written register. That should not be too much to ask of a lending / banking institution. Many other banks and all credit unions that I am aware of let charges pend for 15 days if need be. They do this so the customer will not be caught with unnecessary fees if they make a mistake. How do I know this? We will leave that at, "I own certain properties."
You are correct. It is Wells-Fargo privilege to charge their customers fees when they break one of their ever changing policies. A $35.00 fee is unacceptable to me to charge for a small error made by someone who could have been easily avoided it had they been able to get their correct balance from their phone or computer. It is not illegal but it is a greedy policy and it is not customer friendly. I recommend to everyone to bank with their local Credit Union. Wells-fargo is no worse than Bank Of America which just got sued for similar policies (and bank Of America lost). I look forward to the pending law suit against Wells-Fargo. I bet it pends for longer than two days. :)
#45 Author of original report
The reason for my complaint
AUTHOR: appledroplarry - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, April 21, 2012
1. I expect a bank to leave the items as pending for 15 days or until the merchant closes their batch. This is pretty standard as Ebay, Paypal, Regions bank, Beach Community Bank, & all Credit Unions that I am aware of practice that policy. Wells-Fargo does not do that. Wells-Fargo lets them pend for two days. Please provide a reason whey they only allow them to pend for two days when other comparable institutions allow for much longer. I understand if you can not or will not provide an answer to my question. It is my opinion that they have created this policy to force more overdraft fees. If you look at other complaint sites around the web about Wells-Fargo you will quickly see that my opinion is shared by many people.
2. It is not my responsibility to educate you. Do the math yourself. You can easily find their revenue, gross & net interest margins, losses, deposits and loans online. I do not mean to be rude but your previous rebuttal seemed somewhat pedantic. A bank only makes money in two ways, interest and fees.
Yes I am. If you were to read other comments on this web site you would see that I work for several financial institutions, auto dealers, retail stores, wholesale outlets, two shipping companies and one security service in at least twenty states.
"I am reminding you that it is best to be honest and not treat the consuming public like they are idiots. They are not."
You are correct; most people are not stupid. They have the sense to properly maintain a check register. I have been a Wells Fargo customer for fifteen years and have never had an overdraft. Simple mathematics.
#47 Consumer Comment
Seriously Larry....
AUTHOR: Jim S - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, April 21, 2012
Having your transaction online is no excuse for not keeping a written register - otherwise you can't ever reconcile your bank statement. I would guess though that you don't reconcile your statement either. The comment exemplifying the problem is your statement:
"Most people would have spent the money thinking they were correct to do so."
Maybe you can explain how would any person, other than a criminal, come to this conclusion? In other words, your saying that once you see the transaction disappearing from pending transactions.... you then decide the money you spent using your debit card... is money you're somehow not liable for to the merchant?? Is this what you're really claiming is your ripoff?? Are you saying that if the merchant somehow doesn't verify your transaction within 48 hours....then the merchant is giving your money back to you?? That isn't simply mismanagement... that is pure greed.
"They posted record profits in 2011 and 47% of those profits were from fees!!!"
Banks collect fees from people who fail to keep a register, and I personally don't have a problem with any company collecting fees in association with the normal operation of their business. Banks collect their fees from people who use their debit card at the exact point when they should NEVER use it, and from people who fail to opt-out of overdraft protection. Being a former employee of a bank or credit union is meaningless and lands you no more credibility than anyone else who incurs an overdraft fee; in fact it gives you less credibility. What you need to do is go into your bank and opt out of overdraft protection and keep a written register. You may get your debit card declined....and that's what should happen. Now it won't necessarily stop overdrafts, but it will stop cascading overdrafts.
Oh, and I'm not an employee or consultant for this bank or any other bank, now or in the past.
#48 Consumer Comment
You missed the point
AUTHOR: Robert - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, April 21, 2012
Concerning your comment that most people would basically keep an accurate register; I have to say that I disagree. My disagreement is based on the fact that 47% of wells-fargo profits were made from fees.
- Where do you get the 47% from? I looked at your two "sources", one listed the fees of Wells Fargo if you opened an account, the other talked about profit about Wells Fargo and other banks. But no where in either "source" did it mention that 47% of the fees were from people overdrafting their account. In fact I couldn't find anything about how many people get overdraft fees in the first place. So where did you get these numbers? Do those fees include things such as the Monthly Maintenance Fees? What percentage of the customers overdraft? Please do tell us where we can find this information. Because I can just about guarantee you that a vast majority of people do get how to manage their account and either use a register to make sure they don't overdraft.
The fact beyond this is that you missed the entire point. First of all when you talk about the "register" you are talking about the On-Line statement. This was NEVER meant to be the sole or even primary method to manage your account. It is used as verification and a tool(one of many).
TOTALLY!!! Then when the business finally closes their batch (whenever they do this) The charges are pulled directly from your account instantly. NO PENDING TIME!! I know of no other bank that does this.
- Actually just about EVERY bank I am aware of does this. Why would they not? What do you expect to happen? Do you expect the bank to just put it on as pending for another 2-3 days so you can "catch up"? How about them just keeping every pending transaction on the list for a year?
So the only difference with the banks is the amount of time they keep "pending" charges. If your complaint is that Wells Fargo has gone to 2 days while other banks are longer..okay I will give you that "complaint". But I will counter that it DOES NOT matter, if you keep your own WRITTEN Register. You see nothing short of an eraser can remove anything from YOUR register. So it doesn't matter if it takes a merchant 1 hour or 1 month to actually post the transaction, you have already accounted for it. As long as you can do simple 3rd grade math and never even attempt to spend more than you have available, the chances of you over drafting are about zero. And if you can't do 3rd grade math..you shouldn't have an account in the first place. This is not even including if a person is "opted-out" of the Standard Debit Card Overdraft protection where if there is not enough currently available the transaction is declined to avoid getting overdraft fees.
So what is your REAL reason for posting this report?
#49 Author of original report
Of course you disagree.
AUTHOR: appledroplarry - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, April 21, 2012
Concerning your comment that most people would basically keep an accurate register; I have to say that I disagree. My disagreement is based on the fact that 47% of wells-fargo profits were made from fees. Those numbers don't add up to, "most people keeping a updated register" as you stated as your opinion. I am reminding you that it is best to be honest and not treat the consuming public like they are idiots. They are not.
The last part of that sentence makes no sense.
"Most people would have spent the money thinking they were correct to do so."
I disagree. Most people would have entered the transaction into their check register and therefore would not have attempted to spend the funds.

