Shame on you Olivia Turner & Cecillia Wang from the ACLU for defending illegal immigrants taking advantage of the United States allowing them to live in America illegally costing taxpayers and burdening our country to pay for them. Alabama's new HB 56 illegal immigration law helps Alabama's direction to stop illegal immigration costing taxpayers a huge burden and our economy from jobs taken away from businesses hiring cheap labor. You Olivia Turner & Cecillia Wang apparently want to support that movement of illegal immigrants to corrupt America allow them to live here.
Shame on you Olivia Turner & Cecillia Wang from ACLU. Our country is broke because you want to sue the State of Alabama to give illegal immigrants rights when they should not be in this country in the first place. They fill up our prisons, they cost our schools, they take businesses away from honest taxpayers, they send money made here to their own countries, cost our health care system with free health insurance and they double their families and cost us more and more money each year and more. [continued below]....
I support the new law that Alabama's governor Bentley signed June 9, 2011, its is wonderful law and we need it. It is as shame that democrats like Olivia Turner & Cecillia Wang want full use of social programs in this country to bankrupt America into the depression which non-sense thinking to help America grow, she wants to keep this country sinking into a ditch by supporting illegal immigrants to live in Alabama or allover to get full rights, what a shame.
Read here from the ACLU of Alabama:
ACLU To File Lawsuit Challenging Alabamas New Anti-Immigrant Law
June 9, 2011
The American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Alabama said today that they will file, in coalition with other civil rights groups, a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Alabama's draconian anti-immigrant law before it goes into effect Sept. 1. HB 56, even more restrictive than Arizona's SB1070 which it was inspired by, was signed into law this morning by Alabama Gov. Robert Bentley.
The laws key provisions sanction discriminatory and unconstitutional practices by police officers, landlords and employers by inviting racial profiling of Latinos and others based on how they look or talk, violating the First Amendment and interfering with federal law. Under the extreme law, Alabama public schools will require children to provide proof of citizenship when enrolling in kindergarten and grade school and require police to demand papers from people they stop whom they suspect are not authorized to be in the U.S.
The following can be attributed to:
Olivia Turner, executive director of the ACLU of Alabama
"By signing this bill into law, Gov. Bentley is willing to sacrifice the civil liberties of all Alabamans, eroding the rights of millions of people living and working in this state. This law undermines core American values of fairness and equality, subjecting both citizens and non-citizens alike to unlawful racial profiling, and does nothing to ensure the safety and economic security of Alabama.
Cecillia Wang, director of the ACLU Immigrants Rights Project
This law is an outrageous throw-back to the pre-Civil Rights era, going beyond the discriminatory and unconstitutional police practices that weve seen in other states. It blocks the schoolhouse doors to children, will result in people being turned away when they try to rent a home, and places burdens on people of color at the voting booth. By signing this bill into law, Gov. Bentley has codified official discrimination in the State of Alabama. We will take action to keep this law from going into effect to ensure that the civil rights and liberties of all Alabamans are protected.
Beware of the ACLU that are out to hurt our nation and feed it to the illegal immigrants on there hate organization to Americans taking to live by the laws in this country, the ACLU wants to distroy our country. Shame on the ACLU
ACLU Is Funded with Tax Payer Dollars!! You pay them to hurt our country>
Section 1988. Proceedings in vindication of civil rights
(a) Applicability of statutory and common law
The jurisdiction in civil and criminal matters conferred on the
district courts by the provisions of titles 13, 24, and 70 of the
Revised Statutes for the protection of all persons in the United
States in their civil rights, and for their vindication, shall be
exercised and enforced in conformity with the laws of the United
States, so far as such laws are suitable to carry the same into
effect; but in all cases where they are not adapted to the object,
or are deficient in the provisions necessary to furnish suitable
remedies and punish offenses against law, the common law, as
modified and changed by the constitution and statutes of the State
wherein the court having jurisdiction of such civil or criminal
cause is held, so far as the same is not inconsistent with the
Constitution and laws of the United States, shall be extended to
and govern the said courts in the trial and disposition of the
cause, and, if it is of a criminal nature, in the infliction of
punishment on the party found guilty.
(b) Attorney's fees
In any action or proceeding to enforce a provision of sections
1981, 1981a, 1982, 1983, 1985, and 1986 of this title, title IX of
Public Law 92-318 (20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.), the Religious Freedom
Restoration Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. 2000bb et seq.), the Religious
Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C.
2000cc et seq.), title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42
U.S.C. 2000d et seq.), or section 13981 of this title, the court,
in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party, other than the
United States, a reasonable attorney's fee as part of the costs,
except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an
act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity such
officer shall not be held liable for any costs, including
attorney's fees, unless such action was clearly in excess of such
(c) Expert fees
In awarding an attorney's fee under subsection (b) of this
section in any action or proceeding to enforce a provision of
section 1981 or 1981a of this title, the court, in its discretion,
may include expert fees as part of the attorney's fee.
What a shame!