Alvin Donovan and Equity Partners Fund Alvin Donovan Equity Partners brought me public but failed to fund fraudulent scam Internet

"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain and most fools do." 
Benjamin Franklin 

"You have complaints? Good. That means youve stood up for something, sometime in your life."
Winston Churchill 

Having read the rebuttals here on the one hand they do make sense and on the other hand further show the original report for the utter and total nonsense it is.

Firstly, thanks for stating the real facts here and for pointing out just some of the many obvious factual mistakes the tabloid made. 

Secondly, a quick check on google shows that at least one company named Worldlink Plc DID get actual funding from 
this investor. google "worldlink update on funding" This company and many others also had very good things
to say about the MD of the investor.

Furthermore, those companies went on to say that the investor also arrranged for other investors and acquisitions as well.

Lastly, this provides reliable independent proof this investor is for real and that the tabloid sensationalist story is in reality a lie.

This is an example of the just one of a long line of shoddy mistakes made by either ignoring or not even bothering to check out the real facts in the case.

They would not let the truth get in the way of a good story.

Obviously when the companies do what they are supposed to do according to their contract with the investor and proceed in an honest and ethical manner then the investor does what they are supposed to do with respect to the contract.

In this case, this investor is for real as they have invested in at least one company who did the right thing and shows that Blandin and Brackens story just do not hold water.

This post here on ripoff report has been reposted over and over again, apparently by the same person. I would like to add the results of my own investigation and research. There are several reasons why this article is complete rubbish. I have contacted and spoken to a few people involved in this case and here are the facts.  Luke Bracken or Bracken International Mining, Kim Cox of AWTN and Jacques Blandin of Firmware and Visi Inc Plc. played that poor unsuspecting tabloid journalist at the Enquirer like a banjo and here is how they did it:

1. This company in the report is an equity line funder. This kind of investor obviously wants companies to drawdown so they make money when a company draws down. So if a company puts in a drawdown notice obviously they would fill it, there is no reason not to.

2. In all cases the company signs a legal contract which they must have their lawyer review before signing and the terms are in simple plain English. Nowhere in the article by this tabloid journalist does the journalist refer to the contract or having had any discussions with Brackens or Blandin lawyer. I can only assume there was no discussions with their lawyers .

3. Their website clearly states that the companies pay a third party non- affiliated law firm for legal document preparation.

4. It also clearly states they are not an underwriter and do not provide liquidity, IR or PR.

5. In all cases the company signs a term sheet which is made in simple English any 12 year old can understand.

This type of funding has been around for over 10 years and there are over a dozen firms worldwide offering this type of structure worldwide.

Luke Bracken claims the investor did 100s of deals. Okay but only two companies in Australia seemed to have had a problem. Maybe in Australia they sign term sheets without reading them? And they sign legally binding agreements without reading them?

Jacques Blandin CEO Firmware or VisiInc PLC made an announcement after they signed with the investor, probably used that announcement to entice investors and the investor never heard from them again after the announcement and they never put in a drawdown

But dont believe me- Google the term Jacques Blandin ASIC and you will see that Jacques Blandin of Firmware VisiInc Plc. was banned by the Australian SEC for:
Mr. Blandin, of Dianella, Western Australia, was a proper authority holder with Australian Financial Securities Pty Ltd during the period 19 November 1998 to 27 January 2000.

The undertaking was offered following an investigation into the activities of Mr. Blandin, which found that Mr. Blandin had made recommendations to his client that ****she invest $135,000 in companies with which he was associated or had an interest, without properly disclosing that association or interest to the client, in contravention of the Corporations Law.****

ASIC also found that Mr. Blandin did not have a reasonable basis for making those recommendations, and knew that his client would rely upon them.

The conduct of Mr. Blandin ultimately caused his client to sustain a loss of approximately $120,000 due to the insolvency of the company with which Mr. Blandin was associated or had an interest.
My guess is Jacque Blandin Firmware Visi Inc used the announcement of his signing with the investor as a way to entice investors into his sham company and had no intention of ever getting funding from the investor.

One other point that makes no sense whatsoever:  Jacques Blandin of Firmware Visiinc Plc. claims that the investor is just giving you your own money. Yet he claims that the investor did not fulfill the drawdown. If the investor was just giving him his own money then obviously they would have fulfilled the drawdown.

My sources reveal that once Jacques Blandin of Firmware Visi Inc made the announcement, then he fled to the USA to get away from the Australian authorities and never contacted the investor again.
Further proof is that Visiinc plc. that they have been kicked off of the German stock exchange- why?

Now lets focus on Luke Bracken of Bracken International Mining-
His company Bracken International Mining appears to have a $500 million dollar market cap as of this posting but it does not have any trading volume? How many companies with that size market cap have no trading volume like this?

Also if you research them further you will see they are trying to raise $500 million dollars. How can a company worth $500 million raise $500 million?

Maybe he just cannot do the math like they just cannot read term sheets and contracts?
Furthermore Google Luke Bracken Ripoff Report  to see his background.  Luke Bracken of Bracken International Mining seems even worse than Jacques Blandin of Firmware Visi Inc Plc.

Once again, Luke Bracken of Bracken International Mining announced the deal with the investor and then most likely used it to get other investors into his company.

We also have it on reliable sources that Luke Bracken of Bracken International Mining was close to roping in Gerry Harvey of Harvey Norman fame into investing but he tried to circumvent the introducer and Norman ran away from Luke Bracken of Bracken International Mining as fast as he could. Not to mention that he works out a bedroom in the house of his mother. How is it that the CEO of a 500 million euro market cap does not have the ability to even live in his own apartment- something smells very fishy there.

It looks like both Luke Bracken of Bracken International Mining and Jacques Blandin of Firmware Visi Inc pulled one of the oldest tricks in the book- they burn an investor then try to throw dirt on the victim to bury their mis deeds.

I have read this tabloid journalist with great  interest and it is an interesting  alert about just some of the many of Luke Bracken  Bracken International Mining, Kim Cox AWTN and  Jacques Blandin Firmware Visi Inc. latest in a  long line of questionable debacles.  

If you Google the term Jacques Blandin ASIC you  will get an idea of his character. ASIC reported  in part as follows The undertaking was offered  following an investigation into the activities of  Mr Blandin, which found that Mr Blandin had made 
recommendations to his client that she invest $135,000  in companies with which he was associated or had an 
interest, without properly disclosing that association  or interest to the client, in contravention of the  Corporations Law.

ASIC also found that Mr Blandin did not have a reasonable  basis for making those recommendations, and knew that his 
client would rely upon them.

The conduct of Mr Blandin ultimately caused his client to  sustain a loss of approximately $120,000 due to the insolvency 
of the company with which Mr Blandin was associated or had an  interest. 

Birds of a feather flock together. It is important for other  potential investment firms or private investors to conduct 
thorough due diligence on them and their past transactions  and know that Luke Bracken of Bracken International Mining, 
Kim Cox of AWTN and Jacques Blandin or Firmware/Visiinc and  their conduct should there be any difficulties arising from 
their dealings with them.

Let this ripoff report serve as a warning to anyone looking  at doing business with Kim Cox AWTN, Jacques Blandin Firmware 
Visi Inc or Luke Bracken of Bracken International Mining that  if they sound too good to be true it probably is and the 
possible trouble they will cause you if you do business with them.