• Report: #1046659

Complaint Review: Andrew J. Spinnell - Internet Fraud

  • Submitted: Sat, April 27, 2013
  • Updated: Fri, May 10, 2013

  • Reported By: anonymous — New York New York
Andrew J. Spinnell - Internet Fraud
295 Madison Avenue - 10th Floor New York, New York United States of America

Andrew J. Spinnell - Internet Fraud Andrew Spinnell - INTERNET FRAUD New York, New York

*Consumer Comment: Search Andrew Spinnell for more RipOffReports on this site

*Consumer Comment: ANDREW J. SPINNELL - MORE DECEPTION

*REBUTTAL Individual responds: NO INTERNET FRAUD

What's this?
What's this?
What's this?
Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Ripoff Report
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™

SEO Reputation Management at its best!

Andrew J. Spinnell has a history of deceit and deception in his practice of law and this is clearly evidenced in his Internet website where he displays a photograph of his face taken when he was in his early forties or so giving his potential clients the impression that they would be dealing with a handsome, dashing, debonair young attorney when in actual fact Andrew is 67 years old and quite ugly. His face is puffy, flabby, extremely unattractive and in dire need of the services of a plastic surgeon. No wonder that he is embarrassed to display his actual current photograph on his website when other attorneys his age show the handsome visages of a distinguished older barrister.
 
This kind of fraudulent misrepresentation what you get when you deal with Andrew J. Spinnell. Would you want to deal with an attorney who is so embarrassed with his looks that he has to defraud you into believing that he is years younger than he actually is? Is this the kind of attorney who you would want to deal with? Would you believe anything he has to tell you about the progress of your case? Would he be truthful in dealing with you when he seeks to deceive you with his fraudulent photograph?
 
I would not want to deal with the likes of Andrew J. Spinnell. Nor should you.


 
 

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 04/27/2013 10:29 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Andrew-J-Spinnell-Internet-Fraud/New-York-New-York-/Andrew-J-Spinnell-Internet-Fraud-Andrew-Spinnell-INTERNET-FRAUD-New-York-New-York-1046659. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.

Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.

Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Andrew J. Spinnell - Internet Fraud

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Search Tips
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author 2Consumer 1Employee/Owner
Updates & Rebuttals

#1 Consumer Comment

Search Andrew Spinnell for more RipOffReports on this site

AUTHOR: Anonymous - ()

 Search this site for more RipOffReports on Andrew J. Spinnell - already posted or to come

Deception

Malpractice

Liar

Discipline Complaint

 

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Consumer Comment

ANDREW J. SPINNELL - MORE DECEPTION

AUTHOR: Anonymous - ()

 Andrew wrote that he does not engage in deceit and deception and that he is not a dishonest lawyer yet it has been two weeks since he was exposed here on RipOffReport as deceiving the Internet community with a twenty-five year old or so photograph of himself in his forties which hardly resembles him when he is 67 years old and is quite unattractive and he has not replaced this deceptive photograph with his actual photo. He persists in this deception - if this is not deception then what is? It's been two weeks since the posting titled Andrew J. Spinnell - Internet Fraud and the photo remains.

Andrew cites his distinguished rating in Martindale Hubbell as demonstrating that he is an honest attorney. This rating is a peer review from other attorneys. Would these attorneys give him this rating if they knew that he was disciplined and was sued three times for legal malpractice and was not insured for at least two of the cases and the he  was recently asked in writing if he had legal malpractice insurance and failed to answer?

How many lawyers have been sued for legal malpractice three times?

And would they have voted for him if they knew that Andrew J. Spinnell was reprimanded by the State of Connecticut for unethical conduct?

And would they have voted for him if they knew that Andrew J. Spinnell was sued for fully documented deceit and deception but the court found him not liable pursuant to Judiciary Law 487 because he was pro se.

And would they have voted for him if they knew that he was sanctioned in the amount of $5,000 by Judge Martin for frivolous motion practice in Federal Court?

And would they have voted for him if they knew that he was sanctioned in New York State Supreme Court?

And would they have voted for him if they knew that he was found by the Appellate Court to have not paid his employee's unemployment insurance taxes?

The point is that Andrew J. Spinnell persists in his deception in displaying a photograph of himself on his website www.andrewjspinnell.com that does not resemble what he looks like now. It is a photograph of him years ago when he was good looking and not like he looks like now at 67 yeas old when he is ugly and in dire need of a cosmetic surgeon.

Andrew J. Spinnell is a very bad man.

I wouldn't use him as my attorney. Nor should you.

 

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 REBUTTAL Individual responds

NO INTERNET FRAUD

AUTHOR: Honestlawyer - ()

This Report of "Internet Fraud" was written by a disgruntled former client of mine Philip Seldon whom I sued for defamation for his publishing a faxed memorandum to multiple attorneys in NYC claiming that I was a dishonest lawyer, just as he is now alleging. A jury did not believe him and rendered a punitive damages award against him of $400,000 and a total judgment of $500,000. In revenge he sued me on four different ocassions and lost each time. He never stops so he will be sued again for defaming me again by alleging that I have "a history of deceit and deception in his practice of law", which is absolutely false as evidenced by my distinguished rating with Martindale-Hubbell and lawyers.com and  my superior rating on AVVO.

Mr. Seldon is the object of scorn of many consumers on the internet as a Google search will attest. Disregard his report as it is another example of his revenge for being beaten again and again.

Andrew

New York, NY

 

 

 

 

 

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
X