BABY PAUL BPZY new jersey , new york , and beverly hills THIS COMPANY STOLD MY MONEY . NEW JERSEY AND NEW YORK Nationwide

My name is Keith Moss I have records and am a witness that everything this Baby Paul says is a lie . Lisa Trindade has several witnesses to this company and its abuse . Did he fail to bmention not only did he steal 15,000 dollars from this client . He then turns around and lies about doing it . Can he explain thew bank records and text messages that stated what this client was  investing in . Can he explain why his company got Lisa Trindade to New York and the entire business invite her to dinner to do a dine and dash oin her leaving her with a 100 plus dollar dinner bill . Can he explain the reasobn Lisa Trindade was asked to pay 400.00 to service his car when all it needed was power steering fluid but he claimed she couldnt make it too the studio  because his truck was broke . Can you explain if Lisa Trindade only paid 3,500 to you . Why is the a bank payment for 3,500 plus 4,500 plus 1,200, plus 1000. The list goes on and on . I cant believe what this person did to this poor women . More witnesses would love to speak on this as well . I will have them leave comments . This is a professional scam artist that provided nothing lisa asked for and paid for . everything lisa trindade was paying for was being used for other things and this business did more to her but im gonna let her friendstell u the other incident that is worse than 15,000 stolen . 

I am a partner of the company in which this report was falsely filed against.

This report was filed by a disgruntled and misinformed client named Lisa Trindade, a resident of Merced California who has limited knowledge of the music industry and standard business practices.

As a client the individual invested in a music production deal for the amount of $3,500.00.

This amount was a fee for the exclusive rights to use music production for an independent album project.

The client Lisa Trindade was informed that lyric songwriting and arranging was not included in the fee for the music production deal therefore must be paid separately.

Upon learning this the client became disgruntled at the additional expense to complete the songs written and arranged for her by a separate individual and blames the individual in which she paid for the music production.

In addition, the client became personally involved with the provider of the music production within a period of time whereas funds were exchanged for personal matters that did not pertain to the music business.

Therefore as the personal involvement dissipated, the client decided she was dissatisfied with the services provided by the music producer and chose to seek retribution from her initial investment.