• Report: #597894

Complaint Review: Dr Martin Diner phd

  • Submitted: Wed, April 28, 2010
  • Updated: Sun, March 20, 2011

  • Reported By: saveourkids — USA or KGB New York United States of America
Dr Martin Diner phd
Sag Harbor Sag harbor, New York United States of America

Dr Martin Diner phd Con Artist Childrens psychologist who violats ethics by taking children shopping and to his home instead of helping ! Sag harbor, New York

*Author of original report: Mental mothers demented in laws ex wifes Corrupt system, people involed abusing and killing our children

*Author of original report: Martin Diner phD a CHILD ABUSER LIER

What's this?
What's this?
What's this?
Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Ripoff Report
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™

SEO Reputation Management at its best!

How is it possible that a childrens psychologist that the mother found and is going out and screwing him is not a conflict as to childrens best interest!

This SOB child abuser had told me him self that instead of using his therapy sessions to help my children he takes them shopping and takes them to his home to go swimming in his pool and has my children change in to their swim suites in his office while he's there. My children had told me number of time how Dr Diner comes over their mothers house for diner and takes their mother out on dates , from first day when the mother brought the children to him she and her mental old bat her maternal mother coached my children to lie to the Dr., my children hate Dr Diner he tells them lies about me (this SOB never met me he only know what the mother told him more lies) he even had try to file papers with the court on the mothers advise to help her keep me from seeing my children , well that did NOT work the Supreme Court Judge saw right through it that the mother was trying to use the Dr as a hired gun  the Court dismissed it!  And still nothing is being done to stop the mother and her Dr friend from abusing our children.

You tell me whats wrong with this picture, how is this Dr helping the children!

The ONLY thing he's helping is he's bank account and busting his nut with this two timing mother. The forensic psychologist did found that the mother has multiple mental disorders.

The misconduct by this so called Dr (what a joke) is beyond any ethics he's only helping the mother ALIENATE and ABUSE my two little children!

I guess when its to late after something happens thats when the court will wake up and see the whole clear picture!


This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 04/28/2010 02:14 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Dr-Martin-Diner-phd/Sag-harbor-New-York-11963/Dr-Martin-Diner-phd-Con-Artist-Childrens-psychologist-who-violats-ethics-by-taking-childre-597894. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.

Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.

Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Dr Martin Diner phd

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Search Tips
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
2Author 0Consumer 0Employee/Owner
Updates & Rebuttals

#1 Author of original report

Mental mothers demented in laws ex wifes Corrupt system, people involed abusing and killing our children

AUTHOR: saveourkids - (United States of America)

Mothers are the real child abusers killers with help of this corrupt system that they pay of bribe favor to cover up their false allegations.

Originally posted 2006 10 20 at Fathers for Life:
Sins of the mother
Barbara Kay, National Post
Published: Wednesday, October 11, 2006

We have heard the story before. The names change, the province changes, the particulars of the custody case change, the age of the dead child changes, but some things stay the same when a mother kills her own children: Any objective observer can see the tragedy coming a mile away, the children are not removed from her toxic embrace before it happens, and the mother is not only insufficiently punished (if at all) for the crime, but receives public sympathy on the assumption she was driven to it by forces beyond her control.

Last week, Frances Elaine Campione, 31, locked in a year-long custody battle with her estranged husband Leonardo, was charged with the murder of their two baby daughters, one-year-old Sophia, and three-year-old Serena. Whatever the truth turns out to be in this case, warning signs had abounded: The Children’s Aid Society of Simcoe County, Ont. had kept an open file on this family for some time; former neighbours portrayed the mother as unstable and possibly suicidal; some described bizarre and frightening public behaviour; she had been hospitalized for treatment on several occasions.

In the past five years, there have been several comparable tragedies….(Full story) Update 2010 09 15: Jury selection began on Monday for a murder trial that will explore the death of two Barrie toddlers who died almost four years ago….(Full Story)
Update 2010 10 08: Crown wraps it’s case against mom. Barrie woman charged with murdering her two young daughters….(Full Story)
Update 2010 10 23:  Voir dire in Campione trial….

Crown attorney Enno Meijers asked for the voir dire [a trial within a trial]. Since the jury was absent, there is a publication ban on any of the discussion inside the courtroom….(Full Story)
The harsh reality of serious and fatal child abuse is that just about exactly 70 percent of it is committed by biological mothers and only about 9 percent or less by the natural fathers of children in families. (See also Child Abuse and Mortality, by Senator Anne C. Cools (1995), and Predominantly women, not men, kill children, by Walter Schneider (2002))

This entry was posted on October 23, 2010 at 12:20 pm and is filed under Maternal Rights, Judiciary, Child Murder, Feminist Jurisprudence, Women's Violence. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site.
| Print
9 Responses to “Sins of the mother…”

Walter Schneider says:
October 31, 2010 at 12:01 pm
BARRIE - Elaine Campione tried to “snow” psychiatrists by saying she doesn’t remember killing her kids to try to get out of a murder rap, a Crown attorney charged yesterday….(Full Story)
Walter Schneider says:
November 5, 2010 at 11:13 pm
CTV Toronto
Murderous mom knew she did wrong, Crown argues
Updated: Fri Nov. 05 2010 5:45:14 PM
The Canadian Press
BARRIE, Ont. — Mental illness did not prevent a mother who drowned her two young daughters from knowing it was wrong as she held their heads under water in the bathtub, court heard Friday….(Full Story and photo)
Walter Schneider says:
November 6, 2010 at 11:11 pm
Barrie Examiner
November 7, 2010
Crown refutes illness: Campione case wrapping up
There was no mistaking the tone of “pure, vindictive hatred,” in the voice of Elaine Campione as she sits in front of a video camera to tell her estranged husband their children are dead, a Crown attorney told a jury, Friday.
“She would rather kill her girls than let him have them,” said Crown Enno Meijers.
In his closing argument that kept a jury spell-bound for several hours, Meijers worked to convince the jury Campione was not suffering from a severe mental illness when she drowned her toddlers, Serena, 3, and Sopia, 1, in the bathtub October 2, 2006….(Full Story)
Walter Schneider says:
November 8, 2010 at 10:25 pm
# Nov 08, 2010 - 11:08 AM
Jury deciding fate of murdering mom

BARRIE - In her closing remarks Thursday, defence lawyer Mary Cremer painted Elaine Campione as a mother who, despite her history of mental illness, always cared about her kids. Campione is charged with two counts of first-degree murder in the death of her daughters Serena, three, and Sophia, one, after drowning them in the bathtub of her Coulter Street apartment….
But Crown attorney Enno Meijers argued Friday that Campione is self-absorbed, needy and manipulative. She stopped socializing with a girlfriend in the summer of 2006 after she no longer had a car; she blamed her own mother for being poor growing up because she didn’t “get off her fat a*s” and get a job; and she gave away a girls’ size 6X coat and twin-bed sheets to another friend because “the girls will never grow into those,” Meijers said….
The jury is deliberating a verdict in the case. (Full Story)
Walter Schneider says:
November 13, 2010 at 8:26 pm
National Post
Judge defines ‘moral’ for jurors in Campione case
Elspeth Lodge November 12, 2010 – 11:21 pm
BARRIE — The jury deliberating the fate of a Barrie woman who drowned her two young daughters will continue their deliberations for a fifth day today….
Yesterday, the jury asked for a definition of ‘‘morally wrong,” a phrase Justice Alfred Stong had used in his instructions before their deliberations. He read them the Canadian Oxford Dictionary definition of “moral.” The jury also asked for a definition and review of ‘‘balance of probabilities,’’ another phrase from his instructions. He repeated what he had told them earlier, that the defence needs to prove Ms. Campione was not criminally responsible on a simple “balance of probabilities,” rather than “beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Read more
I think that the end is visible. This is a murder trial, but the jury appears to have been instructed to judge the guilt of the accused on the standard that is commonly applied in civil trials “a simple “balance of probabilities,” rather than the standard of “beyond a reasonable doubt,” a standard that normally applies in criminal trials.

It seems to me that at the very least, regardless of what the verdict will be, there will probably be an appeal because of the confusion of standards that are being applied. Moreover, why did the jury ask about the definition of “moral”? Why did the judge bring “moral” into the picture, when the law, “Thou shalt not murder,” should be the only determining factor? Is the determination not whether or not she murdered her daughters? Has murder now become a fuzzy concept, depending on what degree of morally wrong applies?
Walter Schneider says:
November 14, 2010 at 10:01 pm
Toronto SUN
The gentler side of killer mom’s estranged husband
By TRACY McLAUGHLIN, Special to Toronto Sun
Last Updated: November 14, 2010 8:37pm
BARRIE — “Daddy, daddy!” cried little Serena Campione, her chubby little arms raised in the air, running with glee when she spotted her father….
And it was the last time he would see them alive. Two weeks later they would be dead, drowned by their mother, Elaine Campione….(Full Story
Walter Schneider says:
November 16, 2010 at 11:39 am
Mother who drowned daughters guilty of first-degree murder
Globe and Mail
Last updated Tuesday, Nov. 16, 2010 7:27AM EST

Minutes after a jury convicted Elaine Campione of two counts of first-degree murder in the drowning deaths of her little daughters, the trial judge suggested she belonged to a class of “weaker and more vulnerable” citizens who as “victim/offenders” sometimes “act out of the expected norm.”….(Full Story)

That is an interesting comment by a judge, although that sort of comment makes people wonder what it is all about. The jury in the Campione murder case had not been instructed so narrowly that they would have been prevented from finding Elaine Campione guilty of first-degree murder. That would have been unwise, politically, and political such murder trials are.
As Christie Blatchford describes in her article, Ontario Superior Court Judge Alfred Stong did his best to make Elaine Campione appear to be the “true” victim, even opining on evidence that little or perhaps nothing was heard of in the hearing, without ever even having heard any testimony by the father of the children.

Still, now Judge Stong must prepare the ground of political acceptance for the sentence he will hand down. That sentence will without a doubt be based on reasoning that argues that poor Elaine Campione does not deserve to rot in jail, because, with just the right amount and quality of psychological counselling, she will be enabled to recover from the harm that years of abuse at the hands of the “real” villain in the case, her ex-husband and father of her children. Whereby she will then soon demonstrate that she is not truly a heinous murderess but a valid member of society.

That will be according to the pattern that is played out time and again in such cases. There always is an excuse. If it was not her husband or any other man who made her do it, then the next in line are the devil or her inner demons. If everything else fails, the poor murdering mama can always claim nothing more than that she just could not help herself and just had to do it.
It will be interesting to see how the Campione murder trial will end and what the sentence will have been after it has had been served. The outcome perhaps proves that something went terribly wrong in the case, because in many other such cases the murdering mama got away with murder because she either went free or had to serve only a minimal sentence. (e. g.: Mom pleads insanity in bathtub drownings –Cleveland; Two Brands of Compassion, Outrage and Justice –Canada)
Walter Schneider says:
December 9, 2010 at 3:03 am
The B.C. Catholic
Faith on the bench - Deacon Alf Stong answers critics after
Wednesday, 08 December 2010 17:20 Michael Swan
Alf Strong, Ontario superior Court judge and decon, is not bothered by scolding from Toronto Star
By Michael Swan
The Catholic Register
Orillia, ON–Ontario Superior Court Judge Alf Stong is not particularly bothered by the front-page scolding he got from a Toronto Star columnist at the end of the Elaine Campione murder trial last month….
Though the law stipulated Campione had to be sentenced to life in prison with no possibility of parole for 25 years, Stong seemed to want to soften the sentence by reminding the prison system of its obligation to provide “necessary psychiatric treatment and medical care while in their custody.” “Stong extended to this vengefully embittered woman moral cover that all but made a mockery of the jury’s verdict,” said DiManno….(Full Story)
Elaine Campione supposedly will serve the mandatory prison sentence of 25 years without parole. It remains to be seen whether Judge Stong’s admonition to the prison system will have the desired effect and cause her to be treated as the victim he thinks she is.
Walter Schneider says:
December 10, 2010 at 10:10 pm
Of course, the Campione case is far from over:

Mother convicted in drowning deaths will appeal
Toronto Star
A jury found Elaine Campione, who drowned her two young daughters, guilty of two counts of first-degree murder. The 35-year-old woman convicted of …(Full Story)
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

1&1 Blog - powered by WordPress

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Author of original report

Martin Diner phD a CHILD ABUSER LIER

AUTHOR: saveourkids - (United States of America)

This crrok who has been screwing these childrens mother lying to two little children violating every ethical law as a psychologist ,  abusing children bribes them by buying toys in place of offering help even Supreme Court judge had saw that he was nothing but a hired gun by the mother who has been lying to the court.
This SOB should not be around children God only knows how many other children Martin Diner has abused lied to alienated from their loving perant.

Seems Sag Harbor is an area for child abusers to live in hide from the public  and abuse local children.

What normal psychologist takes the childrens mother out on dates screws her teaches children to lie and to make false statements takes other people children to his home
 to swim who knows what abuse goes on there!

Save Our Children from these Abusers!
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?