• Report: #798453

Complaint Review: law offices of Lajuan E Wood

Thank You

Read how Ripoff Report saves consumers millions.

  • Submitted: Tue, November 15, 2011
  • Updated: Tue, November 15, 2011

  • Reported By: hel_mut — pinion hills, California USA
law offices of Lajuan E Wood
1911 douglas blvd 85-435 roseville, California United States of America

law offices of Lajuan E Wood sacor financial ,national credit accptance desposition subpeana, demand of bank information from party without legal interst,collection ,roseville , California

What's this?
What's this?
What's this?
Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Ripoff Report
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™

SEO Reputation Management at its best!

The services of a deposition subpoena for collection of a judgment that is the act {arbitration award from NAF {Obtained with fraud }then confirming the fraud with fraud petition to  confirm  arbitration award in the superior court san Bernardino Civvs 800269  
 
The following parties and California cooperation for profit are one and the same
Michael sahlbach  national credit acceptance president {defendant in first bank vs nca }
Nca was shut down
 
Michael sahlbach shortly before nca was out of business created a new California cooperation for profit .wherefore this company for profit did what every one would like to do ,default and thereafter change names .consumers never be able to do such easy way out of being dishonest ,and or a carrier criminals that earning profit with abuse and or dishonesty is not a cured with legal action by one consumer ,because a new company be created .the state of California law must be respected by consumers and business equal .
The true fact is that only the consumer must obey the law because nca was shut down
And now sacor becomes a assignee to a judgment for nca
But sacor claimed to have all the title and records ,
 
That you have 30 days to dispute this debt ,a letter of dispute was served and it was based on 2 judgments for nca against the victim of unfair debt collection practice based on the facts was in the petitions filed page 1 of the prosecutions papers were the same lender and retailer used for the parties injured by breach of contract .that the default credit card accounts were purchased by Michael sahlbach .the arbitration proceeding have provide a lot of facts that this arbitrator naf  must pay bills like another business ,that the consumers being prosecuted in this forum do not pay the bills ,99 percent of the decision made by the nag  with a po box as address  favors you know who.
 
This herein report will try to give consumers a look on who is the wrong doer and why consumers never had and never will treated equally with out a mouth piece on their side ,and a attorney for does not promise the consumer a thing because we are the victims of a private clubs were the people are the issuers of licenses to practice law .like the naf the state bar is named in the California constitution but is not in any way associated with government, that is perhaps to deep to explore ,how ever who is paying for the operation cost of the state bar ,simple the member ship fee ,equal to the los Angeles athletic club .
 
More members more operation funds ,less member budget cuts ,that then comes the walker issue ,a third party investigates the misconduct of a member ,which then the state bar hides the member behind the supreme court being the only way to read the walker vs member document it is well known that politician ,vip presidents of large companies have one thing in common ,not to forget the ruling superiors in any court of state and federal jurisdiction s are off spring of the same mother lode. If the nest is unethical at core then the following fact
 
The year 2000 created a computer kick and or was not so much in the engineering of a BIOS ,and or the instruction for the boot up of a computer system and the majority of major system that use data to function stated brand new on 01.01.2000
 
That the trial chief council of the bar employees complaint annalists and has only the authorities to hear a complaint ,to analyze a complaint such employee requires an open mind ,naturally and to but the employee in the position of a consumer that has been the victim of a member bad faith action against a consumer preferred by the bar to consult in regards services of a member and legal issues being the cause .
 
So you go to the members office and he looks at your evidence and or case and without a single word dials the phone number of the opponent ,thereafter they planned to destroy my life because the other lawyer advised my former wife to rob me and get all the dirt so he can extort a signature to get a annulment for his client the criminal advise was prior to becoming the attorney of record and or was the dirt strong enough .that the advise with email confirming what I knew he was doing ,reasoning in to get a chance to talk to my wife was thru another attorney ,as a consumer no attorney will talk to a person without having a mouth piece himself .that is a true fact and sad to see ,that having the ability to ask a lawyer what his intentions are ,he can not advise you he claims
 
So here a subpoena was served calling a witness that has no legal interest in the case and is to release my routing and checking account number from chevron credit cards .so first question would be what are you gong to do with the information?  and then how did you get the address were to send the subpoena .this action is 3 years after a remittutur was issued in appeal .the advise to get an attorney is the same brush off for the last 8 years because the consultation by the attorney I ask to help and he then pushed me out of the petitioner chair and continued this divorce toll his favored judge came back.
Thereafter the real law in the Victorville court was practice.
Till this day let the records confirm the accusation and or allegations against a public entity .
Simple a lawyer will ask a judge to discharge his mandatory duty and becomes dumb deaf and maliciously ignorant even if he is a eye witness of his own bias act .
 
Short fact on 08.06.2008 the minute order claims the idiot and or defendant was in court that then 2 days later a proposed order was filed and never served claiming that the defendant idiot was not in court ,to make this issue even better a second petition based on the same fraud was served in div 9 of such house were the ruler is just a puppet and or the front  
The tru fact is that in one case of fraud I am not in court and then in the other case I was served in the place I was not .the total amount that nca sacor claims I owe is about 75.000.00 and none of the debt was made by me ,I did not get one cent of spending power but are the entrust worthy consumer. over 8 years  I have collected decision and responses from all state and federal agencies that have the authorities granted by the people to not only slap the fingers of Pugh and Ripley but based on such professional suicide. the administrative office of the court thru the office of the general council issued this following code 8 times  gov code 945.6  the judicial council advises an idiot to file a claim against the superior court in a state court. the court is major player in the conspiracy to sue the court I did 2 times our of eight .to seek an attorney right away
 
Easy said then done if the monthly fixed in come is 875.00 based on being an idiot that gets paid because I am mentally disabled .
 
To just think that an offer to sue the court is not your daily invitation not alone 8 times from that agency .if that lawyer would have consulted that day 8 years ago I would not have last not only material lost but the most important is the credit score which mine was prior to the robbery was 830 I could by a 500.000.00  without a down payment that took 30 years to come to such score which was destroyed in less then 10 minutes .
The bank allowed the attorney I consulted to penetrate my account ,and the source for the act came from evidence submitted upon this superior court named .
Further information published by this court is a nullity with childrens and cause for the divorce was me shooting blanks no sperm to initiate a child ,if that is not enough the county of san Bernardino is a beneficiary of a judicial lien for child support .
 
Now this attorney and I do not know out of what woods he came from that bears a license ,and rabbies first doing modification and now is the top dog of a another California cooperation that has permission to be criminal with the blessing  the former ag ,defended a case claming this idiot sued the wrong party .that the code 945.6 was the authorities bud the office of the genral employee mark brown is an active member of the bar .and if the judge is the defendant then who is the unintelligible ? the defense claimed my failure to file without first being rejected by another California agency that is waste of tax payer money ,the agency claims to aid victim of criminal acts ,how ever let the record be evidence the agency cares more about the wrong doing employee then the victim of such intentional ignorance practices .
 
The director is the governor and the legal advisor of this board is the district attorney of san Bernardino were corruption is standard practice the controller used tax money to buy speed ,and was buzzing all day long .the da was fined for election money .
That just 7 month ago the vcgcb issued is second invitation thru this favored gov code sec 945.6 and the warning claims 180 days to file a claim with the sacor made its move after 220 days if you get my drift  
a
 
it is pretty lonesome if know extra cash is le because a six pack could bring at least one soul to talked to .that to garnish ackeing account by using the credit bureaus to obtain any information to serve a subpoena ,with the people are the authorities used by this creature we do not know what part of the woods she came from and I gues her other happy was to cheat disadvandtes consumer by modification of loans .
 
first lawyers sue you get judicial liens when that runs short they do modification and if that is not profitable the do counseling of debt
 
this attorney ripley is honored as a pro tem ,and the records show that he is a judge in div 9 and 10 on the samne day and makes special appearance as judge for the plaintiff ,of court no record {ttranscript} taken cases our of submission and then rules a judgement in the case ,defendant never showed because the real law is in the service which the holidays when clerk being hsanded a card with checks from ripley for being the primary party in regards proof of service, and  defaults are 90 percent of the rulings even if that judges claims an argument was heard ,judgment for nca because he was in court but he is I am a idiot ..Ripley made a special appearance in that case and was a defendant for unfair debt collection practice and the court had  2 active cases against for civil rights  were Ripley filed the proposal the judge to lie and the defendant court then lied
 
now to get in to my checking account to garnish without any court order is one think that to garnish a account of a disabled that is exempt from such primitive misuse of the people of California  I am 60 years old and I seen Charlie and loved orange sun shine and whipping post once made me  shake my hair I like the 22 minute version at Fillmore
wherefore this live is not fair issue presents a major crisis for consumers being attacked by wishes dogs that carry a control number how ever the agency that issues such has for the last 2 generations created a bunch of disrespectful members that got this country in deep  shit and we will never recover
asking a judge to lie is permitted by employees of the state mark brown for Edmund brown  plaintiff is no more the old angry man lashing out on every one
child support for childrens manufactures 120.000.00 judgment for debt  I never spend a time .that it is time again to ramble  and the governor claimed I am idiot and then her advises me to sue the state and to serve upon the state
legal question to kamala Harris is under what authorities can 1 defendant ask the other defendant to allow a crime {Ripley and court were defended on 08.06.2008 the day the records show that I was in this house a clerk is the ruler .
 
it is simple if I would not be disabled  and have resources but I dont have a tree with 50 dollar bills to pick from where money talks and an idiot has to walk because life is not fair ,if this attorney succeed and take only 50.00 dollars out of the account then  I was correct 8 years ago predicting that  the people are being puked on  .that to protest must be the only way to present a message before it becomes primitive dog for dog ,we elected our own down fall .ty soon there be only government employees who sit behind a desk and play god  claiming to go by the book how ever when asking can I see this book  they become hostile that now waiting to find out the checking account was intruded ,that to close the account would crated a problem with the direct deposit because it would created a bigger problem .if this action does do what they have polanned .then action be heavy and complaints be send . but if they want to be ignorant they dont have to go far
it is sad  that this is reality ,unreal  but lifew is not fair ,update will follw

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 11/15/2011 08:16 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/law-offices-of-Lajuan-E-Wood/roseville-California-95661/law-offices-of-Lajuan-E-Wood-sacor-financial-national-credit-accptance-desposition-subp-798453. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.

Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.

Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on law offices of Lajuan E Wood

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Search Tips
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.



Ripoff Report Legal Directory