MANTHISSITESUCKS.com singsnapsucks2.com This website called me out by my first and last name in a derogatory manner. When I asked for my name to be removed, I was IP banned. I was kept informed that the site continued to use my name and i Hemet, California

I WAS A MEMBER OF SINGSNAP FOR 6 YEARS AND WAS SO d**n FAITHFUL I BLED SINGSNAP ATE SLEPT , WENT DAY IN AND DAY OUT NON-STOP SINGSNAP MY FAMILY FOR AWHILE THERE THOUGHT I HAD COMPUTERITICE BECAUSE OF SINGSNAP , I WAS ON THE COMPUTER 24 HOURS A DAY AND THE ONLY THING I WAS ON WAS SINGSNAP , EVERYTHING I DID IN MY LIFE WAS BECAUSE OF SINGSNAP ,  DID EVERYTHING FOR SINGSNAP , WAS PAYING FOR BLUE MEMBERS TO BE GOLD SO THEY COULD SING ON SINGSNAP THAT'S HOW MUCH SINGSNAP MEANT TO ME ,.UNTIL 2 YEARS AGO WHEN THEY DID WHAT THEY DID , WENT ON YOUTUBE AND HAD THE ADMINS LET THEM INTO MY YOUTUBE ACCOUNT AND TOOK EVERY SINGLE VIDEO OFF MY CHANNEL INCLUDING 3 THAT DID NOT BELONG TO SINGSNAP BUT TO KSOLO AND SINGSHOT AND BIX OF WHOM WAS NOT ON THE INTERNET ANY MORE AND I COULDN'T GET THOSE VIDEOS BACK GRANTED I SHOULD OF RECORDED THEM BECAUSE THEY WERE OF MY 5 YEAR OLD NEPHEW WHO IS LIKE A SON TO ME , BUT AT THE TIME I DIDN'T THINK MY CHANNEL WAS GOING ANY WHERE , DIDN'T KNOW THE STAFF OF SINGSNAP WAS GONNA GO INTO MY CHANNEL AND TAKE EVERY SINGLE VIDEO FROM ME AND GET THE ADMINS TO DELETE MY CHANNEL .THEY TRIED TO HAVE ME SUSPENDED ALSO BUT THE STAFF AND OWNER OF YOUTUBE WOULDN'T ALLOW THAT , LET ME PUT UP A NEW CHANNEL AND START ALL OVER AGAIN AND RECOMMENDED ANOTHER SITE TO USE INSTEAD OF SINGSNAP CALLING SINGSNAP A BUNCH OF P*SSY A** BULLIES WHO PICK FAVORITISM ALL THE TIME AND I BELIEVE IT BECAUSE SOME OF THESE HAVE BEEN THERE SINCE YOUTUBE WAS ON , http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=SINGSNAP&page=4

THOSE ARE VIDEOS OF SINGSNAP MEMBERS WHO ARE EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THEM ARE FAVORITES OF THE STAFF AND ADMINS AND OWNER OF SINGSNAP.

I SAW ONE LAST YEAR AND I SAID TO THEM BETTER NOT LET SINGSNAP STAFF FIND YOUR VIDEOS OR THEY WILL TAKE YOUR WHOLE VIDEOS AWAY AND HAVE THE ADMINS DELETE YOUR CHANNEL , THEY SAID THE STAFF MEMBERS SAID FOR US TO PUT THESE VIDEOS ON HERE , SO FAVORITISM IS ALIVE AND WELL IN LIVING LIKE A PLAGUE ON SINGSNAP THROUGH THE STAFF AND AMINS AND OWNER OF SINGSNAP.

AND I WAS SUSPENDED FROM SINGSNAP BECAUSE I WROTE ON MY PAGE OF HOW MEMBERS WHO ARE STAFF FAVORITES TELLS ON THE MESSAGE BOARD ABOUT NOT TO LISTEN TO THIS PERSON BECAUSE THEY CANNOT SING WORTH SH*T WHEN IN REAL LIFE WHICH A** KISSERS OF SINGSNAP TOTALLY ARE NOT OF , THE MEMBERS THEY SAY CANNOT SING ARE ACTUALLY BEAUTIFUL SINGERS WHO THEIR OWNLY CRIME ON SINGSNAP WITH THESE A** KISSING MEMBERS ARE THEY DO NOT SING THE SONG LIKE THE ORIGINAL ARTIST AND TOO MANY MEMBERS OF SINGSNAP HAVE A BAD THING WHEN IT COMES TO SINGING LIKE THE ORIGINAL ARTIST IF YOU DO NOT SING THE SONG LIKE THEY ORIGINAL ARTIST DID WHEN THEY FIRST CAME OUT THE A** KISSING MEMBERS OF THE STAFF SAYS YOU CANNOT SING IF YOU DO NOT SING LIKE THE ORIGINAL SINGER AND THAT'S A CROCK OF SH*T BUT THAT IS HOW THEY DO IT ON SINGSNAP AND ANYBODY THAT SAYS OTHERWISE IS DOWNED A TROUBLE MAKER AND THE STAFF FIND ALL KINDS OF WAYS TO GET RID OF YOUR A** ON SINGSNAP , 
SO DON'T COME ON HERE ACTING LIKE THERE ARE VIRGINS AND SAINTS ON SINGSNAP BECAUSE THERE ISN'T ANY OF THAT ON SINGSNAP , NOT EVEN GOD WOULD SET FOOT ON SINGSNAP MAYBE THE DEVIL BECAUSE THERE IS HIS KIND OF PEOPLE ON SINGSNAP , HYPOCRITICAL A**HOLES ON SINGSNAP THAT THINK IT'S HEAVEN ON EARTH AND ANYB0DY DISAGREES IS NO GOOD AND A TROUBLE MAKER .

YOU KEEP COMING AROUND ON THESE SITES B*TCHING AT THE SUSPENDED MEMBERS BECAUSE THEY TELL THEIR SIDE OF THE STORY OF WHY THEY GOT SUSPENDED THINKING THEY ARE TOTAL LIARS AND GOD IS GONNA WIPE THEM OFF THE PLANET 

WELL SEEING HOW I CAN STILL SING WHEN A** KISSING MEMBERS OF SINGSNAP SAID AND THOUGHT THAT THE STAFF STOPPED ME FROM SINGING AND SEEING HOW I GOT PEOPLE OF MY NEW SITES COMMENTING EVERY DAY ON EVERY VIDEO AND MP3 SONG TRACKS I PUT UP , THAT MUST BE A d**n LIE BECAUSE LIFE HAS BEEN GOOD FOR ME. SINCE I AM NO LONGER ON SINGSNAP ACTUALLY THINGS HAVE BEEN SO d**n GOOD .I GOT JOB OFFERS FOR MY SINGING FROM COUNTY FAIRS AND NOW THIS SUMMER RODEOS , AND SINGSNAP STAFF AND THE A** KISSERS SAID I WOULDN'T AMOUNT TO NOTHING SAID ON FACEBOOK THAT I CANNOT SING ANYWAYS THAT NOBODY ELSE WOULD PUT UP WITH ME , WELL GOD MADE A LIAR OUT OF THEM DIDN'T HE .

SINGSNAP THINKS THAT IF A MEMBER LEAVE SINGSNAP THEY WON'T SING ANY KARAOKE ANY MORE ON SINGSNAP  , IF THEY DO NOT HAVE SINGSNAP STAFF AND OWNER BACKING THEM UP AND THAT IS JUST NOT SO.
I'M LIVING PROOF OF THAT , AND SO IS OTHER MEMBERS THAT LEFT SINGSNAP THE ORIGINAL MEMBERS WHO HELP START SINGSNAP , ON FACEBOOK 3 OF THE ORIGINAL MEMBERS TOLD ME THAT SINGSNAP ISN'T THE SAME ANY MORE , ITS MORE RULES AND REGULATIONS INSTEAD OF JUST PLAIN FUN LIKE IT WAS WHEN WE FIRST STARTED SINGSNAP WHEN IT WAS INVITE ONLY , THEY LET THE MONEY MAKE THEIR HEADS TO d**n BIG STOPPED CARRYING ABOUT PEOPLE AND STARTED CARRYING MORE ABOUT MONEY 

IT SAYS THIS ON MY PAGE ON SINGSNAP
LADYMATIKA'S PROFILELadyMatika is located in Pennsylvania / USA and has been a SingSnap member since October 30, 2006. Currently, she hasn't made any recordings.This account has been closed by SingSnap Staff.

AND FRANKLY MY DEAR I DON'T GIVE A d**n !!!!!!

EVERYBODY ON YOUTUBE IS ASKING ME WHY I WAS SUSPENDED FROM SINGSNAP AND I TELL THEM THE TRUTH THE WHOLE UGLY TRUTH OF THE MATTER NOT THAT I MADE THEM MAD AND GOT THEM ANGRY AT ME BUT THE WHOLE UGLY TRUTH OF YOUTUBE AND EVERYTHING .

SINGSNAP STAFF THINKS THEY GOT ONE UP ON ME FOR SUSPENDED ME WHEN ACTUALLY THEY SET ME FREE THE CHAINS ARE GONE SINGSNAP STAFF AND ADMINS AND OWNER DON'T OWN MY A** ANY MORE 
ACTUALLY THEY NEVER DID THAT'S THE PROBLEM SINGSNAP NEVER COULD CONTROL ME 
AND NOW THAT THEY SUSPENDED ME THEY NEVER EVER WILL 

Yes, it's curious that someone involved in a lawsuit would post such comments without first consulting his attorney - who would tell him to zip his lip until the case is over. Every word posted can be used against him. There's proof all over about all of the fake nics the OP has used in the past to harass and bully others, especially in regard to SingSnap. And, according to Pacer, the plaintiff has requested he be severed from the suit in PA and the case against him be transferred to his jurisdiction in WA. It will be interesting to see how much of his puffed up pontification we'll see then!

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYVANIA

DIANE PATCHEN, et.al., Plaintiff,
vs. TREVOR McGUIRE, et.al., Defendant.
District Court Case No: 11-5388
MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS

STATEMENT OF FACTS
On October 27, 2011, Defendant Trevor McGuire filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint against him. On November 2, 2011, Defendant Catherine Loudon filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint against her. Defendant Laurence Dickerson incorporates by reference of the facts and arguments of Mr. McGuire and Ms. Loudon and moves to dismiss.

In addition to the facts alleged in Mr. McGuires motion and Ms. Loudons motion, Mr. Dickerson notes that he is a resident of the state of Washington. He has no ties to the state of Pennsylvania and there is nothing in the complaint that alleges he has ever been to Pennsylvania, has any ties to that state, or directed any of the complained of behavior at that state.

ARGUMENT
1.   The Court does not have personal jurisdiction over Mr. Dickerson.
In order to have personal jurisdiction over Mr. Dickerson, the Court must satisfy itself that Mr. Dickerson has sufficient ties to Pennsylvania to extend its longarm statute to include him. Mr.Dickerson is a resident of the state of Washington and there is nothing in the complaint that alleges he has ever been to Pennsylvania, has any ties to that state, or directed any of the complained of behavior at that state. The Court does not have personal jurisdiction over him and the Complaint must be dismissed. Remick v. Manfredy, 238 F.3d 248 (3rd Cir. 2001); Calder v. Jones, 465 U.S. 783 (1984); CR 12(b)(2).



Remick v. Manfredy defense?

Really??



http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/238/238.F3d.248.99-1422.html

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
PERSONAL JURISDICTION OVER INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
Remick does not deny that individual defendants Manfredy, John Manfredy, Brown, and Klaus are not residents of Pennsylvania. Manfredy is an Indiana resident, and the other defendants are residents of Illinois. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e), a district court may assert personal jurisdiction "over non-resident defendants to the extent permissible under the law of the state where the district court sits." Pennzoil Prod. Co. v. Colelli & Assocs., Inc., 149 F.3d 197, 200 (3d Cir. 1998) (citation omitted). Pennsylvania's long-arm statute, 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. S 5322(b), authorizes Pennsylvania courts "to exercise personal jurisdiction over nonresident defendants to the constitutional limits of the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment." Mellon Bank (East) PSFS, Nat'l a*s'n v. Farino, 960 F.2d 1217, 1221 (3d Cir. 1992).

Due process requires that the defendant have "minimum contacts" in the forum state, and that the exercise of jurisdiction comport with "traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice." International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 316 (1945) (quotations omitted). The Supreme Court has stated that "minimum contacts must have a basis in `some act by which the defendant purposefully avails itself of the privilege of conducting activities within the forum State, thus invoking the benefits and protections of its laws.' " Asahi Metal Indus. Co., Ltd. v. Superior Court of California, 480 U.S. 102, 109 (1987) (quoting Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462, 475 (1985)).
Personal jurisdiction may be exercised under two distinct theories, a defendant's general or claim-specific contacts with the forum. General jurisdiction is based upon the defendant's "continuous and systematic" contacts with the forum and exists even if the plaintiff's cause of action arises from the defendant's non-forum related activities. See Vetrotex CertainTeed Corp. v. Consol. Fiber Glass Prod. Co., 75 F.3d 147, 151 n.3 (3d Cir. 1996) (citations omitted). In contrast, specific jurisdiction is present only if the plaintiff's cause of action arises out of a defendant's forum-related activities, such that the defendant" `should reasonably anticipate being haled into court' " in that forum. Id. at 151 (quoting World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286, 297 (1980)).



http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/238/238.F3d.248.99-1422.html

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
In a situation similar to that before us, in which a Virginia law firm sued a California attorney in Virginia to collect fees after the attorney had retained the law firm as co-counsel to assist him in a California case, the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit stated:

[The defendant] initiated the relationship with [the plaintiff], knowing that [the plaintiff] was a Virginia lawyer who likely would do the requested work in Virginia. [The defendant] contracted with [the plaintiff] in Virginia, first by telephone and later in a writing that [the plaintiff], as the last party to sign, executed in Virginia. [The plaintiff] performed all of his duties under the contract in Virginia. Finally, the parties exchanged numerous telephone calls and written communications. Few examples of transacting business are more classic than [the defendant's] decision to associate a Virginia lawfirm on a case and his subsequent dealings with that firm. Because [the defendant] transacted business in Virginia, and because [the plaintiff's] cause of action arose directly from those activities, the Virginia long-arm statute is satisfied.

English & Smith v. Metzger, 901 F.2d 36, 39 (4th Cir. 1990) (footnote omitted). Significantly, Virginia's long-arm statute has been interpreted, like Pennsylvania's, "to extend jurisdiction to the extent permissible under the due process clause." Id. at 38.



Lawrence A Dickerson said January 2 2012 "Multiple IDs serve no purpose other than to further allow people to rant,rave and accuse without having to own their words.I use my full name except when not allowed by a particular web site and I have only been sued once and that lawsuit is being dismissed as we speak."



http://www.amazon.com/forum/history?_encoding=UTF8&cdForum=Fx33HXI3XVZDC8G&cdPage=53&cdThread=Tx1TE0RJ2R9IS3Z
Lawrence A. Dickerson says:
Posted on Nov 13, 2011 5:50:46 PM PST
Last edited by the author on Nov 13, 2011 5:51:00 PM PST

I am impressed tha you would find me so interesting that you spend time looking for my skeletons.I have none thus the reason why UI use my real name unlike you who adopts a fictional character from a TV program.

You can't make up stuff like this.



Curious.



Visit Lawrence A Dickerson, "use my real name" troubadore9, at
http://singsnapsucksand2sucks.blogspot.com/

Civil Action No. 11cv5388
Order
AND NOW, this 8th day of December 2011, after a status conference with counsel, and by agreement of counsel, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Counsel for the Plaintiff shall prepare and forward to all counsel and the unrepresented Defendants a draft settlement agreement. Defendants shall each file a response thereto as promptly as possible. Counsel for the Plaintiffs and counsel for Trevor McGuire shall report to the Court within 30 days of the date hereof as to the status of the settlement negotiations. 
2. All discovery in this action is stayed pending the results of the settlement negotiations.
3. No Motions to Dismiss shall be filed during the pendency of the settlement negotiations. Defendants are permitted to file Motions to Dismiss on jurisdictional or other grounds in the event that the settlement negotiations are not successfuL

United States District Court
Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:11-cv-05388-WY

PATCHEN et al v. MCGUIRE et al
Assigned to: HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR
Cause: 28:1338 Copyright Infringement

Date Filed: 08/25/2011
Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Nature of Suit: 320 Assault Libel & Slander
Jurisdiction: Federal Question

COMPLAINT against LAWRENCE DICKERSON, JOHN DOE NUMBER 1, JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, CATHERINE LOUDON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX, TREVOR MCGUIRE ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 048674.), filed by DIANE PATCHEN, ROBERT J. SMIK.(mima, ) (Entered: 08/26/2011)

Summons Issued as to LAWRENCE DICKERSON, CATHERINE LOUDON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX, TREVOR MCGUIRE. Four Forwarded To: Counsel on August 26, 2011 (mima, ) (Entered: 08/26/2011)

DEMAND for Trial by Jury by DIANE PATCHEN, ROBERT J. SMIK. (mima, ) (Entered: 08/26/2011)

Copy of Form to Register of Copyrights. (mima, ) (Entered: 08/26/2011)

STIPULATION (Joint Stipulation And Order Regarding Acceptance of Service and Extending Time To Respond To Complaint) by TREVOR MCGUIRE. (BAUGHMAN, MICHAEL) (FILED IN ERROR BY ATTORNEY ; COPY FORWARDED TO CLERK/JUDGE FOR APPROVAL) Modified on 9/20/2011 (nd, ). (Entered: 09/19/2011)

STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT THE TIME FOR DEFT MCGUIRE TO MOVE, PLEAD, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLFF'S COMPLAINT IS EXTENDED UNTIL 11/1/11. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 9/20/11. ) 9/20/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(gn, ) (Entered: 09/20/2011) Letter dated 9/22/11 from Francis X. Taney, Jr. requesting that the summons and complaint be srved by registered mil upon deft Catherine Loudon in accordance with FRCP 4(f)(C)(ii). (gn, ) Modified on 9/23/2011 (gn, ). (Entered: 09/23/2011)

AFFIDAVIT re served summons and complaint upon deft Catherine Loudon by registered mail on 9/23/11. (gn, ) (Entered: 09/23/2011)

APPLICATION BY DEFT LAWRENCE DICKERSON FOR PRO HAC VICE OF THOMAS E. WEAVER, JR., ESQ., SERVICE OF SERVICE. (gn, ) (Entered: 10/04/2011)

ORDER THAT THE APPLICATION OF THOMAS E. WEAVERE, JR., ESQ. TO PRACTICE IN THIS COURT IS GRANTED. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 10/5/11. ) 10/5/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND TO UNREPS, E-MAILED.(gn, ) (Entered: 10/05/2011)

MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by TREVOR MCGUIRE. Memorandum of Law in Support and Certificate of Service. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B) (BAUGHMAN, MICHAEL) (Entered: 10/27/2011)

MOTION TO DISMISS PLFFS' COMPLAINT, FILED BY DEFT CATHERINE LOUDON, MEMORANDUM, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.(gn, ) (Entered: 11/02/2011)

ANSWER to 1 Complaint by LAWRENCE DICKERSON.(WEAVER, THOMAS) (Entered: 11/02/2011)

MOTION to Dismiss filed by LAWRENCE DICKERSON. Certificate of Service. (WEAVER, THOMAS) (Entered: 11/02/2011)

Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss re 12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by LAWRENCE DICKERSON. (WEAVER, THOMAS) (Entered: 11/02/2011)

Request for Default , Affidavit in Support of Request for Entry of Default with Exhibit A, Affidavit of Service with Exhibit 1 ROBERT J. SMIK, DIANE PATCHEN against SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX. (TANEY, FRANCIS) (Entered: 11/16/2011)

DEFAULT BY SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR, PLEAD OR OTHERWISE DEFEND. (gn, ) Modified on 1/5/2012 (afm, ).(VACATED PER ORDER #24) (Entered: 11/22/2011)

Default Entered (gn, ) Modified on 1/5/2012 (afm, ).(VACATED PER ORDER #24) (Entered: 11/22/2011)

Amended Complaint against LAWRENCE DICKERSON, JOHN DOE NUMBER 1, JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, CATHERINE LOUDON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX, TREVOR MCGUIRE and EATSLEEPMUSIC CORP. filed by ROBERT J. SMIK and DIANE PATCHEN, Certificate of Service.(mbh, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/21/2011: # 1 Exh A-H) (gn, ). (Entered: 11/18/2011)

MOTION to Dismiss PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT. filed by SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX.MEMORANDUM, CERTIFICA TE OF SERVICE, PROPOSED ORDER. (Attachments: # 1 MEMORANDUM, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(amas) (Entered: 11/18/2011)

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 15 Amended Complaint, filed by TREVOR MCGUIRE. Memorandum,Certificate of Service.(BAUGHMAN, MICHAEL) (Entered: 11/22/2011)

ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS PLFF'S COMPALINT (DOC #16) IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 11/21/11. ) 11/22/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREPS, E- MAILED.(gn, ) (Entered: 11/22/2011)

ORDER THAT DEFT TREVOR MCGUIRE'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC #9), DEFT CATHERINE LOUDON'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC #10) AND DEFT LAWRENCE DICKERSON'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC #12) ARE DISMISSED AS MOOT. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 11/28/11. ) 11/29/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND UNREPS, E-MAILED.(gn, ) (Entered: 11/29/2011)

ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED AND THAT DEFT TREVOR MCGUIRE SHALL HAVE UNTIL 12/19/11, TO FILE AN ANSWER OR OTHER RESPOND THE THE AMENDED COMPLAINT. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 11/28/11. ) 11/29/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND UNREPS, E-MAILED.(gn, ) (Entered: 11/29/2011)

ORDERED THAT COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFF SHALL PREPARE AND FORWARD TO ALL COUNSEL AND THE UNREPRESENTED DEFENDANTS A DRAFT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 12/8/2011. 12/12/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREPS AND PRO SES AND E-MAILED.(sg, ) (Entered: 12/12/2011)

MOTION to Set Aside Default filed by SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX.MEMORANDUM, AFFIDA VIT, CERTIFICA TE OF SERVICE, PROPOSED ORDER.(kp, ) (Entered: 12/16/2011)

ANSWER to Amended Complaint, by SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX. Certificate of Service. (kp, ) (Entered: 12/16/2011)

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE ENTRY OF DEFAULT IS GRANTED IN ALL RESPECTS. THE DEFAULT ENTRY ON 11/22/11 SHALL BE VACATED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 12/12/11. 1/4/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND UNREPS AND E-MAILED.(mbh, ). (Entered: 01/04/2012)

Forward Observer aka Lawrence A Dickerson
alias menyon
alias troubadore9
alias Froggy Doggu
alias Bremerton
alias Lawrence A
alias frisky_dog_too
defendant in PATCHEN et al v. MCGUIRE et al, said case over :

http://blog.auctionbytes.com/cgi-bin/blog/blog.pl?/comments/2011/12/1325255404.html/3/40#comments
by: Lawrence A Dickerson
Mon Jan 2 14:46:36 2012
The internet has provided a forum where etiquette has flown the coop with the chickens.My own personal preference is to have every person who utilizes the web to use their own name.I know that is impossible but at least it forces people to own their words rather than talk smack clandestinely.

I agree with the poster that stated that comments are redundant now with the same individuals day in and day out spouting the same rhetoric and name calling.

I wonder if  calling people and corporations silly names makes the writer feel superior and special because they use a few buzz words.If people were to  use the web as they would in a personal conversation,the need for moderating and supervision would largely be eliminated.

Multiple IDs serve no purpose other than to further allow people to rant,rave and accuse without having to own their words.I use my full name except when not allowed by a particular web site and I have only been sued once and that lawsuit is being dismissed as we speak.The long arm of the law can determine who anybody is on the web if the need arises and is warranted so to think that mirrors and proxies are a safeguard is a misguided effort and advice to pass out to less knowledgeable users.


Ironically Forward Observer aka Lawrence A Dickerson a defendent with Trevor McGuire, filed a complaint about Sing Snap and Trevor McGuire :
http://www.ripoffreport.com/internet-fraud/sing-snap/sing-snap-eatsleepmusic-corpor-7ddf6.htm
Sing Snap Eatsleepmusic Corporation Sing Snap Steals Your Money Nepean, Ontario
* Submitted: Monday, July 26, 2010
* Reported By: forward observer Bremerton Washington USA
Sing Snap Eatsleepmusic Corporation Sing Snap Steals Your Money Nepean, Ontario
I became a member of Sing Snap,an on-line karaoke company.I paid $129 for a one year membership.Part of their benefits are a message board where members can discuss almost any subject.I prefer the Belief Boards where we discuss religion. I always back read the threads to be able to add my own impressions.I was admonished by a volunteer moderator to not back read as the subject matter normally had no bearing on the current discussion.I asked literally,"Where in the Hell did you come up with this rule?".A point of reference is that the Terms of Use make no mention of that attempt to enforce a non existent ruling. The next morning a receive a message from admin that any future behaviors like would result in my suspension.I made mention that I was not going to be stifled and that I had been kicked out of better places than this.Go ahead if you find it necessary to send me to what is known as buddyland-suspension. I was only 5 months into my subscription and I received no refund because the TOU states that there will be no refunds for violations of the rules. All fine and good but an arbitrary making of the rules as one goes is hardly an established Standard Operating Procedure.This was nothing but exercising authority and kicking me off  just because he could.


To be fair, Forward Observer aka Lawrence A Dickerson complained about the Sing Snap COMPLAINT site :
http://www.ripoffreport.com/questionable-activities/manthissitesucks-com/manthissitesucks-com-singsnaps-68fad.htm
Submitted: Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Reported By: forward observer Bremerton Washington USA
MANTHISSITESUCKS.com singsnapsucks2.com Malicious and Libelous Activity Internet


He was a member of both.
http://boardreader.com/thread/Banned_Member_Lawrence_A_Dickerson_884irX3b.html


Finally Singin' Sam aka Lawrence A Dickerson said about the PATCHEN et al v. MCGUIRE et al video :
http://www.complaintsboard.com/complaints/singsnap-trevor-mcguire-ottawa-ontario-c462156.html
Singsnap Trevor McGuire, Ottawa, Ontario
7th of Jun, 2011 by   Singin' Sam
That video was hilarious and I downloaded a copy to use at some point and time I will say on e thing that sexy it ain't.Who wants to see some old lady prancing around in a thong attempting to bolster her self image of someone who is young and hot.Old and cold is more like..I may submit it to 'America's Funniest Home Videos'.The subject in that video posted it on a public web site to begin with and now the coppers are coming to some-body's door.Those constant threats to sue and have everybody arrested is sure getting old like the gal in that video.Now that klittle pup in the picture is sexier than the bag lady in that video.


Is it over yet Forward "Lawrence A Dickerson" Observer?

actually, you'd be amazingly wrong ma'am.

I read a report back in may on a site called about us where you said the exact same thing as this complaint here.  It may even be verbatim.

I saw that there were two contributors to the article.  when there are more then one contributor that means those people share an acct and also share a password.

you and dickerson did it together, so WTF lady?  youre lying right here in front of thousands and the entire internet.

I remember seeing that someone removed that report also.  the owner perhaps???

also, when a plaintiff in a large serious federal civil case sues someone and in this case four people, Im guessing theyve spent thousands upon thousands so far. point being theyre dedicated to seeing the case thru to the end and theyll have forensics trace any fake acct, or fake ip, or fake name back to you.

If youve never been thru a case like this then you have no idea what can be done to sink your boat lady.

they'll subpoena anyone and everyone to gain the information they need.  they'll trace a fake ip back to you also and by the time thats all been done, your computers will have been removed from your home by this time as well.  forensics can do anything.

when it gets to that point, and youve destroyed hard drives or anything else, the judge will come down on you very very hard.  you dont want to attempt anything like that.

I just dont think youre really seeing whats going on in front of you.  blabbering all over the net gives them handfuls of your own words to use against you.

no one is intimidating you or even trying to.  theyre more then likely telling you to shut up cos thats in your best interest.

why in gods name you fly around on the internet blabbing away is beyond me.  do you see any of the other defendants doing that?  no.  theyre smart.  lol

youre really being stupid.

Quote:

"It doesn't matter if you say you're not guilty of anything. Typing it here all day long wont change that. Spelling out key words in capitol letters wont change that.

It's not up to you. It's up to a judge and a jury. Since you're representing yourself you may want to figure out how you're going to go up against an actual lawyer, so good luck with that."

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So many people appear to know all sorts of stuff about a civil case in which they are not involved. My point from the beginning is to just leave things about that case the hell alone. Oh, and, just because motions are filed does not mean they will be granted. These are assumptions from ignorant people. Bringing that information about the lawsuit here was unnecessary and proves nothing except someone wants me to feel intimidated. It is a scare tactic... an obvious bully action.

A pricey lawyer is great if you can afford one but that pricey lawyer still has to prove there has been wrong doing. Evidence is key! I've seen the evidence and I doubt any of you here have unless you are a plaintiff, defendant, or one of the attorneys involved in the case.

I am not trying to stir things up here. I am merely defending myself and I believe I have been as civil as possible under the circumstances. I've had my name slandered all over complaint sites by a bunch of cowardly bullies. I maintain innocence of their ridiculous allegations against me and will for all eternity. My hands are clean. There are several other people who can never say that. They have to live with it and, if they have a conscience, I feel sorry for them.

Also, once again, this complaint is the only complaint I have made toward a particular website. I stand by my original complaint here and here alone! I don't know who spammed my complaint to other sites but it cannot be traced to me and that is a fact.

It doesn't matter if you say you're not guilty of anything.  Typing it here all day long wont change that.  Spelling out key words in capitol letters wont change that.

It's not up to you.  It's up to a judge and a jury.  Since you're representing yourself you may want to figure out how you're going to go up against an actual lawyer, so good luck with that.

I did state in my last post that I would not post again.

The amount of paranoia in here is just hilarious.

All I can see reading here, is desperation.

I get notification in my email for any rebuttals here because, in case you forgot, THIS is MY complaint.



You have once again proven I am being stalked by copying my words from another site!



You can say allllll you like. I'm not reading it if it is just full of insults and ignorance. I am not Boo Boo. Go hire someone in computer forensics if you want. I have only ever posted here under my own IP address so it matters me not.



Again, stop stalking me; it will come back to haunt you in the end. Me? I don't have a d**n thing to worry about because I've not broken any copyright ANYWHERE. I have also not assaulted, harassed, or committed libel against ANYONE. On the other hand, it HAS BEEN DONE TO ME. That will all come out in the wash... :)



As for the terms on SingSnap? No one here shall decide who is the owner of what and, unless you are a part of this 'thing', you should keep your ignorant mouths (typing fingers) closed.

well, I'm also gonna put a damper on the day by letting you know shanda that just because singsnap claims that "anything recorded on singsnap, belongs to singsnap" doesnt make it true.

legally they sorta do but only in a very small way.  singsnap has a right to keep your videos on their site and to even use them on their site long after youve gone or decided to leave your account.  I'd even go as far as to say they can do that if theyve banned someone too, but it would be in extremely bad taste.

It does not mean they own the videos.  no.  It only mean if a member records a video using singsnaps software to do so, then singsnap can keep the video on their site.  singsnap MAY NOT however use those videos on any other site.  only the singsnap site alone.

legally, singsnap does not have the right to take your recorded videos and pluck them down any ol' place on the internet, or sell them, or make money from them commercially anywhere except the singsnap domain.

also?  singsnap only has the right to keep your video on the site.  thats the extent of it.  they do not OWN the video.
actually, neither does the person who recorded it UNLESS they go through the proper channels and PAY the large fee for a copyright in their own name.  just because joe schmo records a song, joe does not own the video.  neither does trevor or singsnap.

joe schmo MUST pay for his copyright through the proper legal services offered.  these services can be found in a few places.  singsnap could never "own" every members video.  in that same regard, every member would more then likely never own all of theirs either because theyre very expensive.
hell, the average cost of buying a copyright for a video youve recorded is in the upper hundreds.  unless you shell out several hundred bucks, all videos are up for grabs for ownership.

no one can go to their profile page and claim they own the copyright on their songs unless theyve paid the exceptionally high fee and have the paperwork.

just because singsnap puts information in their terns of service and makes everyone agree to it, doesnt mean that everything they put into the terms are legal and it doesnt mean that everything put in their terms is actually correct. 

If singsnaps terms of service said "anything you record here belongs to the owner of singsnap and singsnap can do whatever the hell they want with your videos" wouldnt make it true and because thats not true singsnap could NEVER do what they wanted with the members videos EVEN IF THE MEMBER AGREES TO THE TERMS.

If it's not legal, then even agreeing to the terms it makes no difference.  the only thing snap can do is keep your video in their servers long after youre gone.  thats about the extent of what theyre allowed to do.

you cant ask members to agree to terms that are legally incorrect.  when singsnaps terms say "anything recorded on singsnap, belongs to singsnap" that legally means, singsnap can hold it within the singsnap walls.  THAT is the only thing legally singsnap can do.

dont believe rodge?  ask a lawyer.

First, you answer a post that Booboo should have replied to if she wasn't Shanda.  You shouldn't have.

I mean, shouldn't Booboo sign in and say who she is?  Major f**k up

Then?  I go to check on my song comments and then hit the message board for the latest and you post this?  OMG!!!


Reply by ShandaGOLD on November 27, 2011 at 7:37
PMNever count your chickens before they hatch. :)

You CAN put them on youtube but you'd be breaking copyright law. When you
sign up with SingSnap you agree with their terms of use which state (and
have always stated) anything recorded on SingSnap belongs to SingSnap. In
other words, you can but you should not.
http://www.singsnap.com/karaoke/home/terms
4. Intellectual Property.
Acknowledgement of Ownership.

You agree that the SingSnap website and Services, including but not
limited to graphics, text, audio clips, video clips, pictures and editorial
content (collectively, "Materials"), contains proprietary information and
material that is owned by SingSnap and/or its licensors, and is protected by
applicable intellectual property and other laws, including but not limited
to copyright, and that you will not use such proprietary information or
materials in any way whatsoever except for use of the Service in compliance
with the terms of this Agreement. No portion of the Service may be
reproduced in any form or by any means. You agree not to modify, rent,
lease, loan, sell, distribute, or create derivative works based on the
Service, in any manner, and you shall not exploit the Service in any
unauthorized way whatsoever, including but not limited to, by trespass or
burdening network capacity.
Removal of SingSnap Content or Other
Materials.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, SingSnap and its
licensors reserve the right to change, suspend, remove, or disable access to
any services, content, or other materials comprising a part of the Service
at any time without notice. In no event will SingSnap be liable for the
removal of or disabling of access to any such Services, content or materials
under this Agreement. SingSnap may also impose limits on the use of or
access to certain features or portions of the Service, in any case and
without notice or liability.
Copyrights.
All copyrights in and to the Service, including but not limited to,
SingSnap.com (including the compilation of content, postings, links to other
Internet resources, and descriptions of those resources), and software, are
owned by SingSnap and/or its licensors. THE USE OF THE SOFTWARE OR ANY PART
OF THE SERVICE, EXCEPT FOR USE OF THE SERVICE AS PERMITTED IN THESE TERMS OF
SERVICE, IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED AND INFRINGES ON THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
RIGHTS OF OTHERS AND MAY SUBJECT YOU TO CIVIL AND CRIMINAL PENALTIES,
INCLUDING POSSIBLE MONETARY DAMAGES, FOR COPYRIGHT
INFRINGEMENT.

Have you lost your ever loving mind Shanda?  This statement will come back to haunt you.  You're being sued for copyright infringement and here you're preaching the terms of use to members?  How f**ked up is that?
You have got to learn to shut your mouth.  You're making things so much worse for yourself.  I'd be s**+**ing my pants if I were you.  Holy cow.

You also can't argur your points of why this or why that on these sites OR singsnap because that's not where it matters.  Once an attorney goes for your jugular, you're doomed.  What is it you said before on one of your posts?  "You pooped in your own nest?"

You just did that. 

Guess again. My only sign in name here is my own (I changed my original screen name) and no one else speaks for me. I have nothing to add other than people would do well not to count their chickens before they hatch.

Peace.

well booboo, since I'm ALLOWED to post my opinion and my opinion is you're a pea brain, I'll go a head and say it's pretty clear you're SHANDA LANCASTER.

now, come on back and try to wiggle outta that one.  see, it's just that you're so insanely addicted you WILL come back...(another opinion I'm allowed to have).

people know your writing habits and you cant help yourself.  there is no way you could ever stay off of a computer.  there just isn't any way.  when you finally go to bed at night, or morning, or whenever you crush out that last ciggy, you HAVE to believe you got in the last word and that you know it all.

you're obsessed with the computer and feel the need to create a nick and speak your mind thinking none of it can be used against you because you're hiding behind a fake nic.  you may even be actually using your real ip address because rip off does not allow free proxy use on their site. 

are you absolutely sure no one can track you?  are you absolutely sure subpeonas havent already gone out?  I mean, they probably dont need anymore on you since you continued to post libel all over the net AFTER you were sued and did it in your real name.  In my opinion, which Im entitled to have, youre a ditsy twit for doing that.

sure, go ahead and come back and post your opinion boo boo/shanda lancaster, but youre being sued, Im not, so be very very careful.

no matter what,

you'd never, ever be able to stay of the internet.  you would have to be removed by force.  gee, wonder if thats in the works???

you shouldnt insult me or anyone else by saying youll sue them either.  you cant even pay for a door knob,  let alone even find a lawyer who would only tell you im giving you my opinion and my opinion is YOURE BOO BOO.

stop posting as yourself.  stop using fake nics. 

SHANDA LANCASTER IS BOO BOO IN MY OPINION THAT I AM ENTITLED TO.

What you are saying here is that because I have passed some remarks on what is being said about these defendant's and this case, that I am considered a defendant? that is ridiculous, do you honestly believe that they do not have any support out there in the big wide internet world? by support, I mean people who do not agree with the ridiculous accusations you continue to make, do you honestly believe that you can come here and keep on and on about this rubbish and for nobody to retaliate? The same could be said for all the anonymous names posting comment's against the defendant's, a person could think that it is the plaintiff's doing this, or their friend's, so it works both ways, although, that is not what I am saying.

I have no need to stop posting here, I have not said anything against either party, I have made a total of around half a dozen post's on this whole site, and just because I do not agree with what you are doing here or saying does not mean that I am a defendant or on anyone's side.

Believe it or not, there are many people following this case, I do not think it is wise for anyone, no matter who they are, to be publicly harrassing the defendant's or the plaintiff's, it will do neither of them any good. You are correct nobody here has a degree in law, it is all ignorant innuendo and assumption.

I like that you have at least been civil, which is more than can be said of others and I am certainly not wound up, why would I be, it is not my a** on the line.

This site has very strong view's with regards to giving away peoples anonymity, there would need to be a valid reason why someone would ask for a poster to be disclosed, also, they would need to also drag it through the court's, I very much doubt I have said anything that would merit these action's.

I will however, in future, keep my opinion's to myself as I can see that it is causing upset to some people. I hope that the others here can do the same, but I doubt it. Lets see.

Looks to me like some people here are trying to cover their tracks.  Or they are just stupid? 

The fact is that not one person here is an attorney or a judge and jury. Being your own attorney can work no doubt. Hell you save a wad of cash going it alone. On the other hand if things get complicated as in the case of Ted Bundy lol. That cracked me up by the way as an example of someone not getting an attorney.  Although in his case he would have lost either way. Ted Bundy although a serial murderer was also a brilliant law studen. He could one minute be at a country club discussing the law while the next minute killing a woman. He got carried away on the murders. He may never have got caught. I digress. 

This is to Boo Boo. A lot of the cases you posted other than murder, are cases that a person would and could typically go pro se.  I myself did that on a land lord tenant situation. There are some cases that are open and shut. My ceiling was leaking onto my bed for months and I told the land lord but they did nothing about it and expected me to pay rent. I held back the rent, they wanted me out. They filed a complaint in court. I was served to appear in court. I spoke to the judge and explained I would be out of that hole in 2 months time. I pointed out the numerous times I told the land lord about this problem. I mentioned I couldn't sleep in my bed and the worst of it all was the newly fresh smell of mildew. Which by the way was making me sick. So I presented my side they theirs and the judge said I find for the plaintiff and the land lord is not entitled to back rent nor will they collect rent for the next 2 months. It is pretty well known that judges will rarely find for the plaintiff in land lord tenant court only because most land lords are looked upon as slum lords. 

If you are suing a corporation as mentioned in your list the little guy has a better chance of winning. In the windshield wiper case. We all know about that case. It was a patent case. Open and shut. 

When you get involved in more complicated cases any court would advise you to seek out an attorney or at least the assistance of someone who can guide a pro se defendant. To try for instance in a court of law if it is a trial can lead to disaster when  up against great legal minds and litigators. Judges will not give pity on a pro se defendant other than on the fact they are not attorneys and will no doubt make mistakes. The judge will allow for that. Just realize that to be too lazy or confident that a person can always defend themselves can lead to a loss. 

As far as all this who is who here posting. I sure hope you are not a defendant in this case. The mere fact that you are posting here and getting all wound up and speaking on behalf of pro se seems like you are either a defendant or a friend of one of them. Fact is you don't know who is who here. You say they monitor this site so then you too can be found out correct? 

I agree anyone who is their own attorney has a fool for a client. Of course again that depends on the case. 

You just have not made your case here on pro se as far as I am concerned. Not for this type of case. 

Quid Pro Quo 

well of course the site is being monitored and who cares?  If youre not one of the defendants being sued who gives a flying frack if people come around and post their opinion.  why do you see it as someone getting worked up over someones decision to represent themselves?  Its a ridiculous thing to do.  even the famous quote calls people who do it fools so there ya go.  bill is allowed to express his opinion in any way he wishes just as much as any other person who feels the desire to comment.

I also think its bloody stupid to represent yourself.  I also would like a ticket to that show.  my opinion and im entitled to it boo boo.  so was everyone else who decided to comment here, with the exception of any of the defendants like shanda lancaster maddox and lawrence a. dickerson.  both of those defendants continued to post libel even after being sued.

before even going to court, they were making the case against them much worse by continuing to print things in public that will be used against them.  you dont think thats stupid?  I do and I would imagine so would many many others.

tell them to shut up.  not the general public.  the general public has a right to say whatever the hell they want to say, so back off. 

me thinks your actually one of the defendants trying to intimidate the plaintiffs, so there ya go.  you come back over and over and over again always having to have the last say.  why is that?  using a fake name because perhaps you are one of the defendants and you think you can say whatever the hell you want while you hide behind the name of a cartoon character?

and who are you talking to about readers wondering what whos motives are?  you have several readers posting their opinions.  this last post of yours is very apparent that you are slinging out accusations left and right.  you need be careful.  I honestly hope youre not one of the defendants.  If the plaintiff decide to have forensics pick apart your posts and track the information back to who you are with a subpeona to rip off, then youre a dead duck in the water.


Its almost like you hang around here ready to jump on anyone who decides to stop by and post.  you attack nearly anyone who has a negative comment or even a suggestion.  If you dont like what you read, just walk away.  In MY OPINION, youre the one getting all worked up sweetheart.

stop hanging around here if youre not liking what you read.  this garbage has been around for what a year and a half now?  I used to read all the crap back on singsnapsucks as one of their more frequent lurkers so I happen to have 50 opinions and maybe even more.

you gonna lurk here and jump on everyone that happens by with a thought of their own?  get over yourself. 

youre asking the posters to shut up???  why???  which one are you talking to exactly?  who are you to tell people reading to shut up?  then you say theyre incapable of that.  me thinks you cant stay away either.  you have how many posts now?

I think its apparent that youre one of the defendants.  you may wanna rethink this strategy of yours always jumping on folks with a valid opinion.  all kinds of people have opinions and not all of them are positive ones.  please stop jumping on someone who has been reading here when they post their thoughts.  theyre allowed to do it.

If posters jump on things the defendants do then maybe they just simply believe theyre stupid decisions.  lol

I dont see anything as "helping" the plaintiffs.  no one cares.  opinion are just that opinions.  sounds to me like you need some camomile tea hon...

and I have no doubt youll be back yet again jumping on the back of another poor unsuspecting poster with an opinion as well.

Omg! You lot certainly have got all worked up lol

Why the attitude? My point was to the poster who stated that a defendant cannot represent themselves. They can and people do it all the time, there are a lot more reason's for doing that than what you have stated here though. I am sure the defendant's know what they are doing, I doubt they need advice from the idiot's here who have only one aim in mind, would you like me to point out (again) what that aim is?

It seems to me, that the more you post this rubbish and the more you say, all you appear to do is make the reader's here wonder what your motive's actually are? it is very obvious to anyone reading here what you are trying to do. It is also very obvious who you are and that could come back to haunt you. Do you think that these site's are not being monitored? think again.

If you think by continually coming here and mixing, that you are helping the plaintiff's in this case, think again, you could very well complicate matter's even further. So why not just shut up? could it be that you are just incapable of doing that? could it be that you are using the detail's of this case to continually harrass these defendant's in this case? that is what it looks like, that is what it will look like to a courtroom too, although they may see it differently, they may see it as you trying to intimidate them.

ANYONE who represents themselves are the dumbest, most idiotic people out there and wont make it very far.  youll be torn apart limb by limb and left gasping for breath by the time a seasoned attorney gets a hold of you.  who gave you the insane idea that you could EVER possibly get anywhere?  thanks to boo boo or whatever that stupid name is who copy and pasted the entire wikipedia online pro se page.

no kidding its a snore fest.  who in the hell cares to read all that blabbering nonsense?  anyone can get representation by filling out forms if youre on state disability or cant afford an attorney, but NEVER, EVER represent yourself.

It is well known that defendants who choose to appear pro se may do so because they believe they may gain tactical advantages against the prosecutor.  uh no...youll look like your nukkin futz to the judge and jury.  I for one want a ticket to THIS show!!!!!!!!!

famous quote

"the attorney who represents himself in court has a fool for a client"

Notorious serial killer and former law student Ted Bundy represented himself during his 1979 murder trial. Bundy was convicted, and ultimately executed, as a result of that case.

too bad they can electrocute you crazy a*s insane people on a federal case.   It would get your stupid a*ses off the internet for good. god youre all off yur rockers

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

If the four A-holes deserve whats coming to them, then good.  glad theres justice in the world.  in the meantime, dont copy and past boring crap about pro se who in the f*k cares?????

In the U.S. Federal Court system for the year 2010 approximately 26% of actions filed, 93% of prisoner petitions and 10.5% of non-prisoner petitions were filed by pro se litigants.

Section 1654 of title 28 of the United States Code provides: "In all courts of the United States the parties may plead and conduct their own cases personally or by counsel as, by the rules of such courts, respectively, are permitted to manage and conduct causes therein."
Laws and organizations charged with regulating judicial conduct may also impact pro se litigants. For example, The State of California Judicial Council has addressed through published materials the need of the Judiciary to act in the interests of fairness to self-represented litigants.
The California rules express a preference for resolution of every case on the merits, even if resolution requires excusing inadvertence by a pro se litigant that would otherwise result in a dismissal. The Judicial Council justifies this position based on the idea that "Judges are charged with ascertaining the truth, not just playing referee... A lawsuit is not a game, where the party with the cleverest lawyer prevails regardless of the merits."

There is evidence that self-representation is common in Civil Cases:
In New Hampshire one party is pro se in 85% of all civil cases in the district court and 48% of all civil cases in the superior court in 2004.[11] In probate court, both sides are unrepresented by lawyers in 38% of cases. In superior court domestic relations cases, almost 70% of cases have one pro se party, while in district court domestic violence cases, 97% of the cases have one pro se party. One party appeared pro se in California study of family matters in 2/3 of all domestic relations cases and in 40% of all child custody cases in 1991-95. California reports in 2001 that over 50% of the filings in custody and visitation are by pro se litigants. Urban courts report that approximately 80% of the new divorce filings are filed pro se. In Maricopa County in Arizona the incidence of pro se litigants doubled in the period between 1980 (24% of cases had 1 pro se litigant) and 1985 (where the rate had reached 47%). By 1990, 88% of the cases involved at least one pro se litigant and no lawyers were involved in more than half of the divorces. In Chicago 30% (in 1994 and 25% in 1995) of all new general civil actions field for less than $10,000 of damages were filed pro se. Landlord tenant actions were filed pro se 28% of the time. Utah Judicial Council reports that in 2006 for divorce cases, 49 percent of petitioners and 81 percent of respondents are self-represented. For small-claims cases, 99 percent of petitioners and 99 percent of respondents are self-represented. According to Boston Bar Association Task Force 1998 report in every court studied by the task force, litigants without lawyers are present in surprising numbers. In some counties, over 75% of the cases in Probate and Family Courts have at least one party unrepresented. In the Northeast Housing Court, over 50% of the landlords and 92% of the tenants appear without lawyers in summary process cases. University of Illinois Law School's Professor Robert Lawless, a national expert in personal credit and bankruptcy, showed that, the rateof non-attorney filings in bankruptcy courts by debtors was 13.8% for chapter 13 cases, and 10.1% for chapter 7 cases. The rate was as high as 30% to 45% for major urban areas, such as California and New York city. There are some notable records of pro se litigants winning more than $2,000 as plaintiffs: Robert Kearns, inventor of the intermittent windshield wiper who won more than $10 million from Ford for patent infringement; Reginald and Roxanna Bailey (District of Missouri 08-cv-1456), a married couple, who together won $140,000 from Allstate Insurance in a federal jury trial; George M. Cofield, a pro se janitor, won $30,000 from the City of Atlanta in 1980; and Jonathan Odom, a pro se prisoner, who while still a prisoner, won $19,999 from the State of New York in a jury trial.Timothy-Allen Albertson, who appeared in pro. per., was awarded $3,500 in 1981 in a judgment by the San Francisco Municipal Court entered against the Universal Life Church for defamation by of its ministers.

been folloowing this nonsense from day one and I for one would like to know where all these cookie cutter replies are coming from???????  I mean lololololol, are these peeps using exact copy and pastes of someone else replies to this lawsuit?

its like mcguire responds and the others use copies of everything he just responded with  they just filled in their own name instead. lololololol  has anyone else noticed this going on???????

no one can defend themselves.  get yur own attorney ladies and stop stealing someone elses replies without using an attorney of yur own

good lord

Your paperwork looks correct ms. teller, but this doesnt necessarily mean shes in default.....just yet.  you still have to consider all the paperwork hasnt caught up with everything and things may not entirely be settled yet.

you have to let things run their course on their own.  maybe the court would allow a late entry...who knows...but what youve shown here so far is not an absolute.

give ti time and let it play out.  in the meantime, since ms lancaster responded in some sort of way, she is now claiming to be the person she recently said she wasnt here.  lol

if you werent that person why did you respond then????? lol  anyways, I reccomend you stay away from these report sites ms lancaster and not speak.  it will be used against you if you cant control yourself ans you say the wrong things while theres an open case against you going on...just walk away and do something else.

dont respond.  no one should.

After going around and reading a few of these reports I looked at some court documents on the case at Pacer (anyone can view by having the case number and creating an account). 

It seems there has been an amendment to the original complaint.  (This is common in many cases where additional defendants are added at a later date).

It seems, eatsleepmusic the corporation has been added as a defendant also.

In addition I had noticed over the past several days a discussion between Mrs. Lancaster and several other people whether or not she was in default and had lost her case.  I will post the official court information here and then in lamens terms explain it for the general public who may happen to read my report.

Here is the amended complaint adding eatsleepmusic cooperation as a defendant:
 
Office: Philadelphia
 
Filed: 08/25/2011

Jury Demand: Plaintiff
    
Demand:

Nature of Suit: 320
    
Cause: 28:1338
Copyright Infringement

Jurisdiction: Federal Question
    
Disposition:

County: Montgomery
Terminated:

Origin: 1    
Reopened:


Lead Case:
None

Related Case:
None
Other Court Case: None

Def Custody Status:

Flag: STANDARD




Plaintiff: DIANE PATCHEN
 represented by 
FRANCIS X. TANEY, JR. 

Phone:
215-665-6700

Email:
taneyfx@bipc.com

Plaintiff: ROBERT J. SMIK
 represented by 
FRANCIS X. TANEY, JR. 

Phone:
215-665-6700

Email:
taneyfx@bipc.com

Defendant: TREVOR MCGUIRE
 represented by 
MICHAEL E. BAUGHMAN 

Phone:
215-981-4000

Email:
baughmam@pepperlaw.com

Defendant: SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX

Defendant: LAWRENCE DICKERSON
 represented by 
THOMAS E. WEAVER, JR. 

Phone:
360-792-9345

Email:
tweaver@tomweaverlaw.com

Defendant: CATHERINE LOUDON

Defendant: JOHN DOE NUMBER 1

Defendant: JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100

Defendant: EATSLEEPMUSIC CORP.

Mrs. Lancaster sent in a reply to her lawsuit November 18th ( original lawsuit complaint was time stamped on August 25, 2011) and asked for dismissal as "pro se" (meaning she is representing herself).

First, here is the submission by the plaintiff's to file the default against Mrs. Lancaster:

11/16/2011

14

Request for Default , Affidavit in Support of       Request for Entry of Default with Exhibit A, Affidavit of Service with       Exhibit 1 ROBERT J.       SMIK, DIANE PATCHEN against SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX, SHANDA LANCASTER       MADDOX. (TANEY, FRANCIS) (Entered: 11/16/2011)

11/16/2011

DEFAULT BY SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR,       PLEAD OR OTHERWISE DEFEND. (gn, ) (Entered: 11/22/2011)

11/16/2011
 
Default Entered (gn, ) (Entered: 11/22/2011)

Now, after Mrs. Lancaster sent in her request for dismissal, the judge dismissed it as moot, meaning..."there isn't an issue to be decided".  Request denied and dismissed as moot.  Included is a screen shot of the original document where the judge orders Shanda Lancaster's motion to dismiss as moot.  (Please see screen shot)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DIANE PATCHEN, ET AL. : CIVIL ACTION
::
vs. : NO. 11cv5388
:
TREVOR MC GUIRE, ET AL. :
O R D E R
AND NOW, this 21 day of November, 2011, Plaintiff having filed an amended st d complaint
on November 17, 2011, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to dismiss Plaintiffs
complaint filed by Defendant Shanda Lancaster on November 18, 2011 is dismissed as moot.
/s/William H. Yohn Jr.,
William H. Yohn Jr., Judge
Case 2:11-cv-05388-WY Document 18 Filed 11/22/11 Page 1 of 1

Mrs. Lancaster?  I am sorry.  The other posters were correct.  You have lost the case against you and are indeed in default.  Unfortunately, you are guilty of all the complaints against you.  Assault, Libel, Slander, Copyright Infringement.  If by chance you were given false information on how to proceed with the case against you, I would discontinue following any further advice from them and seek an attorney in all your future endeavors.

Anyone at any time can use pacer to view public court documents.  There is a mandatory registration requirement and a small fee per page viewed. 

I agree.  dont listen to anyone else.  call or even email the plaintiffs attorney and find out where you stand.

take care of yourself.  dont think someone else is looking out for your best interest.  what if its the opposite?

what if theyre only looking out for themselves and screwing you in the process?????

just find out.  call or email.  then youll know for sure.

you just blow me away with your statements.  I mean hell, you're funny.  you would like to see where you told the plaintiff to bring on the lawyers?  lololololololololololololol

scroll back up this page to #6.

she did not "attempt" to sue you.  you were sued and lost by default for evading service.  look, the paperwork WILL catch up to you.  there were posters who told you to call the plaintiff's office for that information and then you'll know for sure unless you think an attorney would lie to you.  lol

tell you what, if you call the plaintiff's attorney and find out that there was only an attempt to sue you and that you're completely in the clear, then I will retract everything I said in public and I'll do it in capitol letters.  I also bet, that every other poster here that gave you legal information will also retract anything they said and if you were truly not served and there was only an "attempt" to serve you, then I'm sure they'll retract their statements as well.  I will post a public apology to you also.

see the thing is shanda, someone is feeding you wrong information.  I mean who is telling you this garbage?  unless you have legal representation, you cannot posssibly know what legal position youre in and what lies ahead for you.

there is either one of two things going on here.  either youre truly in denial and pretending nothing is happening to you and already has, OR someone is deceiving you terribly and if that later is true, please don't listen to them any longer and get representation of your own.
if youre listening to someone and continue to go down this path of untrue information, it will be disasterous for you in the end. youre already in a hellova lotta trouble and its just going to get much worse and if youre listening to bad advice and incorrect information. you'll go downhill even faster.

I hope this isnt the case.  youre being thrown under the bus if its true.  get advice from your family but stop listening to whoever is directing you now.  theyre 100% dead wrong.  just make a call to the plaintiffs office.  If you cant at least do that and try to help yourself then theres nothing anyone can do for you anymore.  you'll just have to take what's coming to you full force.

remember your quote?  

"Please, have your attorney contact me.  I have waited for months for this threat of yours to come to fruition.  I've grown tired of waiting.  Could it be you are afraid the table will be turned on you?"

It DOES take quite a bit of time for losses and paperwork to catch up with the court documents and submissions, but I assure you, it will catch up with you.  It is not a threat.  It is the truth and if you had any smarts in you somewhere deep deep down, you would make that call.  find out about where you stand.

shanda, it is not true that if a process server cannot physically hand you a document, you're in the clear.

shanda, it is not true that not signing for a ups certified letter means youre in the clear.

shanda, it is not true that if you simply ignore a federal lawsuit it will "go away"

shanda, it is not true that if a law firm uses a previously used married name of yours on a lawsuit makes it null and void even if you do not currently use that name now.  just because you do not use that name now is of no consequence.  It is all legal.  

If you had true legal representation, you would know this, but because youre listening to bad advice, youre being royally screwed.

youre legal name is ANYTHING you use now or have used in the past.  do you think every person here just goes around and lies?  well, then dont listen to any of us.  make that call.  If I were lying to you , I would neevr advise you to place a call to the plaintiffs office and seek help.  Unfortunately, I know what the answers are going to be.  If you dont call and try and get some kind of help in where you stand, then your future is terribly bleak.


no one views you as "kind"  I really dont think there is anyone who considers you kind or ever has.  that is the last word that could or would ever be associated with you or be used as an adjective regarding you.  you can describe yourself any way you wish but no one else thinks of you that way.

It also doesnt matter anymore if you say you never uploaded a video or blah blah.  youve been found guilty of it, so saying you didnt do it doesnt matter anymore.  Its a done deal.  you had your chance to fight it and you chose not to.  Is there a possibility that someone told all this bad information in order to help their own case?  It may be possible that while theyre protecting themselves, they're screwing you in the process.  shanda, you were found guilty of these crimes in a federal court.  someone really kept you in the dark. 


This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but people loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that their deeds will be exposed. But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what they have done has been done in the sight of God (John 3:19-21)


How about:

Romans 13:1-2 tell us to be in subjection to the superior authorities even as we are to God. further, we are to be in relative subjection to kings and governors as they have their positions due to God's allowance. (1Peter 2:13-17)

Considering it as obeying God, we would want to view obeying tax laws and traffic laws as the same whether someone is watching or not. That is part of what Christian integrity means.

Only when man's laws conflict with God's as when early Christians were ordered by Jewish and Roman courts to stop preaching about Christ did they refuse. (Acts 5:41)

Or by taking part in the governments. Matt. 6:24 shows we can not serve 2 masters. John 18:36 shows Jesus talking to the Roman government that his Kingdom was no part of this world so his followers were not either. (Mark 12:17; John 15:19; 17:16) Romans 13:1-5 - God ordained governing authorities. To resist them is to resist God's ordinance. Those who disobey may be punished by the authorities, but they also have harmed their conscience toward God.

again, for your own sake, just pick up the phone and call.  If anyone in your family or in your cap cared about you, they would suggest the same thing.  you can get the attorneys phone number from any paperwork youve received since the law requires you get copies of all updates and replies or look online.  If you dont feel the need to straighten out your own life and whats REALLY going on then no one can assist you any longer.

look, no insults, no lsinging the mud back and forth.  I sincerely believe you were fed incorrect and untrue legal information and because of this, you lost big time shanda.

you WERE sued.

you have subsequently lost that case due to evasion of the process and....several times.  the plaintiff's legal representation went through all the necessary steps to ensure the federal suit was served accordingly and went by the courts guidelines to do so.

you were found guilty of all the complaints against you.  It doesnt matter now if you say you never did this or never did that anymore.  Its finished.  Its done.

things may go a tad slower due to the upcoming US holidays, but the courts will catch up to you because of this recent guilty conviction and loss.


"If the judgment is for the plaintiff, then the defendant must comply under penalty of law with the judgment, which will usually be a monetary award. If the defendant fails to pay, the court has various powers to seize any of the defendant's assets located within its jurisdiction, such as: Writ of execution~Bank account garnishment~Liens~Wage garnishment".

I hope you do not continue to listen to who or should I say whomever is giving you bad advice while in the process perhaps allegedly attempting to protect themselves.  instead of waiting, you could find out the answers much sooner then waiting for the paperwork and the courts to catch up to you.  place that call shanda and find out.  I'd be pretty pissed if I found out someone was giving me bad advice that made ME lose a case because of it.  dont make it any worse for yourself.
make the call.

You: nice new cover for all your charity work.. Taking in animals.. being an advocate against bullying.. Did you go there so you could learn to stop being an online bully? Are you taking classes to learn how to stop??? My response: I've been taking in animals for quite a while. This is why I have nine of my own. Yes, working with rescue groups is new. I have never been in a position to be able to do this before now. I am also an advocate against bullying, yes. I have been bullied throughout my life because people tend to mistake 'kind' for 'stupid/easy target'. I am not a bully nor have I ever been. I am also an advocate for diabetes and a few other charities because I want to help make positive changes in the world. You: no one else posting was sued in a federal court for assault. no one else posting was sued for libel and slander. no one else posting was sued for copyright infringement. My response: There was an attempt to sue me. You: no one else posting was sued and lost. just you. My response: Again, there was an attempt to sue me but I have not lost anything. You: youre the one who stalked, harassed and posted horrid, libelous statements and then uploaded a video set to private from singsnap. My response: I have never stalked, harassed, nor posted horrid, libelous statements about anyone. I also have never uploaded anyone's private video from SingSnap. I don't know who did and I don't care who did. The video in question was public on SingSnap for a very long time by the choice of the person who made the video. You: then you had the audacity to tell the plaintiff to bring on the attorney's. you asked where are they cause I sure dont see them. My response: I would like to see a quote from me where I supposedly said this. You: well, now that theyre here and sued your a*s, instead of facing your crimes, you hid in a corner like a coward. My response: How I chose to handle any situation is really no one's business but my own. I will say I certainly did not hide in a corner like a coward. My legal name has never been on any summons. You: then instead of just walking away from these sites, you keep posting and making it worse for yourself. theres bound to be people upset with you. it goes with the territory, but that doesnt mean YOU have to keep replying. My response: I will not sit by while people lie about me and my actions therefore I respond with my side of things. I have the right to defend myself. Responding to false accusations certainly do make things worse for me. Ignoring false accusations, however, would make things even worse. You: but please continue. you only make a bigger case against yourself. dont claim to have stalkers when you were busted for being one yourself. hypocrite. My response: If I choose to continue posting, I will. I certainly do not need anyone's permission. I am not 'claiming' to have stalkers. I DO have stalkers. When my own words from another site show up here (or anywhere else on the Internet) it clearly shows I am being stalked. I have not been 'busted' (as you so eloquently put it) for stalking anyone because I HAVE NOT.

nice new cover for all your charity work.. Taking in animals.. being an advocate against bullying.. Did you go there so you could learn to stop being an online bully? Are you taking classes to learn how to stop???

no one else posting was sued in a federal court for assault.  no one else posting was sued for libel and slander.  no one else posting was sued for copyright infringement.

no one else posting was sued and lost.  just you.

youre the one who stalked, harassed and posted horrid, libelous statements and then uploaded a video set to private from singsnap.

then you had the audacity to tell the plaintiff to bring on the attorney's.  you asked where are they cause I sure dont see them.

well, now that theyre here and sued your a*s, instead of facing your crimes, you hid in a corner like a coward.

then instead of just walking away from these sites, you keep posting and making it worse for yourself.  theres bound to be people upset with you.  it goes with the territory, but that doesnt mean YOU have to keep replying.

but please continue.  you only make a bigger case against yourself.  dont claim to have stalkers when you were busted for being one yourself.  hypocrite.

shanda, shut the f**k up.  for once in your miserable life, just shut the f**k up.  If you try real real real hard, you just may be able to muster up enough strength to do it but if not and your feelin weak, just push the stfu panic button.  

So, you are stalking me on the Internet. Really, find something better to do with your time (like learning a bit more about the English language perhaps). Typing lessons would be a good thing too. Then again, maybe it is time for you to step away from the Internet and into real life. Have you visited your local animal shelter lately? Do you even know where it is? Is it a kill shelter? Do you care? No need to answer, bonnie, since it is just food for thought (do you understand what that means?). :)

Reply by ShandaGOLD on November 8, 2011 at 11:31 PM
...as sure as God made black and white what's done in the dark will be brought to the light...

It sounds like they were amazed with the pink camo coat you had on the dog. But I can understand how someone taking a pic of you out of the blue like that would be unsettling.Jubi


As long as they weren't in a black SUV with tinted windows, I wouldn't worry about it!!!Marshall_Dillon

No, but a black limo tinted car visited my driveway a few months back. Private investigator... I reported it to my local Sheriff's dept. I know who hired them. Go figure why that person chose to waste their money and other people's time chasing after something which doesn't exist. I have no trespassing signs up now (per my Sheriff Department's recommendation). If they return I can have them arrested for trespassing (and I would). 

Reply by ShandaGOLD on November 9, 2011 at 2:44 AM
...as sure as God made black and white what's done in the dark will be brought to the light...

Oh, and it wasn't a limo, it was a muscle car, jet black, with limo tinting. When I called the police they said they had one just like it on their fleet but it was not out at the moment. It was the police who told me it was a P.I. I know it sounds like I should be wearing a tinfoil hat but it is the truth, hand to God.


_______________________________________________________________________________


Holy frackking mother of Gawd you're such an a*****e.  You are by far the dumbest moron out there.
I'm having such a difficult time believing there is someone out there so incredibly STUPID, but there truly is!


Let's see, a poor lost limo driver who wanders down your street (in utter distress at the thought of being gunned down in this neck of the hick woods) and needs a quick driveway to turn around in, or to stop for a moment to look at a map perhaps. 

Hmmmm, could it be a private investigator?  I KNOW the answer to that, but you never will.  Now, how about the slight possibility of a PROCESS SERVER THAT YOU EVADED SEVERAL TIMES AND AS A RESULT HAS PUT YOU IN  FEDERAL DEFAULT???  (Have fun with the repercussion's from that btw.  Happy Holiday's from the US Federal court system!)

Ahhhhhh!!!!!!! Yes.  A process server who's biz is soooooooooooooooo successful that they get to drive limo's around!!!!!   Keep mouthing off.  It's all being used against you and will be used against you in a court of law.

Hand to God!!!

Lanny is correct.  This lawsuit has nothing to do with a Ms. Holland.  I looked at Google and then found one of Rip Off's latest reports.

http://www.ripoffreport.com/news-media/singsnap-members-sue/singsnap-members-sued-for-assa-adf12.htm

Sir,

I'm not sure who Ms. Holland is, but if you look at the legal lawsuit public record presented on this page, you will see that you sir are a defendant and are being sued along with three other individuals.

Your name along with Trevor McGuire, Shanda Lancaster Maddox and Catherine Loudon are all being sued in federal court.

Apparently you have not been served as of yet.  As soon as a complaint has been time stamped in a federal court it becomes public record.  This means you will be served your lawsuit shortly.

Since you seem to not understand the presentation before you, let me clarify.  Two people (the plaintiffs)  Ms. Diane Patchen and Mr. Robert J. Smik are suing you Lawrence Dickerson and three others.

This particular suit also shows a defendant by the name of John Doe followed by John Doe's 2-100.  This leaves room for other names to be added at a later date.  This is standard.

This is not a lawsuit from Ms. Holland.  This is a lawsuit by Ms. Diane Patchen.  This particular lawsuit has nothing to do with Ms. Holland.  This lawsuit is in Pennsylvania where I assume Ms. Patchen and Mr. Smik live.

When you're served sir, you will be able to read the complaint in full detail before hiring an attorney of your own.  I hope perhaps this clears things up for you.

Now, if Ms. Holland decides to sue as well for defamation, libel etc... similar to this lawsuit presented, then you have much more to worry about.  That would be double hit.

It should be noted that Ms.Lancaster's full name and personal information was bandied about on the original web site hosted by Ms.Holland known as Singsnapsucks2.This personal info was before Ms.Lancaster decided to also post names which were obtained from the WWW and the ownership of that web site.There is no expectation of privacy when information is posted on the web.

That Ms.Lancaster was personally attacked by a small group of spiteful and hateful individuals to the point that it cost her many hardships.I should think that a court room would be a welcome venue to present facts in a consistent and provable manner beyond any shadow of a  doubt.That tables are oft turned is well remembered.Again:

"H**l hath no fury like a woman scorned".

PATCHEN et al v. MCGUIRE et al


Filed: August 25, 2011
as 2:2011cv05388

Plaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN  and ROBERT J. SMIK Defendants: CATHERINE LOUDON, JOHN DOE NUMBER 1, JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE DICKERSON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX and othersCause Of Action: Copyright Infringement

Court:
Third Circuit >
Pennsylvania >
Eastern District Court

Type:
Torts - Injury >
Assault Libel & Slander

_______________________________________________________________________________

v. MCGUIRE et al

Track this case

Case Number:
2:11-cv-05388
Court:
Pennsylvania Eastern
Nature of Suit:
320(Assault Libel & Slander)

Cause 28:1338 Copyright Infringement

Judge:
HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR

Firms
Buchanan Ingersoll

Complaint

View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.


Parties

Defendant
LAWRENCE DICKERSON

Represented by:




Defendant
JOHN DOE NUMBER 1

Represented by:




Defendant
JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100

Represented by:




Defendant
CATHERINE LOUDON

Represented by:


Defendant
SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX

Represented by:




Defendant
TREVOR MCGUIRE


Represented by:


Plaintiff
DIANE PATCHEN

Represented by:
FRANCIS X. TANEY, JR., BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC


Plaintiff
ROBERT J. SMIK

Represented by:
FRANCIS X. TANEY, JR., BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC


My consumer suggestion to all who read these posts is to seriously consider the consequence of your actions before you post anything. 

Search Results

Assault, Libel, and Slander Cases filed in the Pennsylvania Eastern ...dockets.justia.com ... Torts - Injury - CachedPlaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK ... JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE DICKERSON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX and others ...

Cases filed in the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court :: Justia ...dockets.justia.com Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania - CachedPlaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK ... JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE DICKERSON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX and others ...

Assault, Libel, and Slander Cases filed in Pennsylvania :: Justia ...dockets.justia.com ... Third Circuit Pennsylvania Torts - Injury - CachedPlaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK ... JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE DICKERSON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX and others ...

Cases filed matching "John Does 1-19" :: Justia Dockets & Filingsdockets.justia.com Dockets & Filings - Cached1 day ago Plaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK ... THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE DICKERSON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX and others ...

Cases filed matching "JOHN DOES (1-20)" :: Justia Dockets & Filingsdockets.justia.com Dockets & Filings - CachedPlaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK ... JOHN DOE NUMBER 1, JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE DICKERSON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX and others ...

Cases filed matching "J. H." :: Justia Dockets & Filingsdockets.justia.com Dockets & Filings - CachedPlaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK ... JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE DICKERSON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX and others ...

Cases filed matching "John 2 Doe" :: Justia Dockets & Filingsdockets.justia.com Dockets & Filings - CachedPlaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK ... JOHN DOE NUMBER 1, JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE DICKERSON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX and others ...

Cases filed matching "JOHN DOE" :: Justia Dockets & Filingsdockets.justia.com Dockets & Filings - Cached4 days ago Plaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK ... JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE DICKERSON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX and others ...

Cases filed matching "FRANCIS" :: Justia Dockets & Filingsdockets.justia.com Dockets & Filings - CachedPlaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK ... JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE DICKERSON, SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX and others ...

PATCHEN et al v. MCGUIRE et alwww.law360.com/cases/4e57bd15df270801ea000002 - Cached5 days ago PATCHEN et al v. MCGUIRE et al. You will be tracking all: ... Defendant. SHANDA LANCASTER MADDOX ... Plaintiff. DIANE PATCHEN ...

Assault, Libel, and Slander Cases filed in the Pennsylvania Eastern ...dockets.justia.com ... Torts - Injury - CachedPlaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK. Defendants: CATHERINE LOUDON, JOHN DOE NUMBER 1, JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE ...

?Cases filed in the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court :: Justia ...dockets.justia.com Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania - CachedPlaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK. Defendants: CATHERINE LOUDON, JOHN DOE NUMBER 1, JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE ...
Assault, Libel, and Slander Cases filed in Pennsylvania :: Justia ...dockets.justia.com ... Third Circuit Pennsylvania Torts - Injury - CachedPlaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK.

Defendants: CATHERINE LOUDON, JOHN DOE NUMBER 1, JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH 100, LAWRENCE ...
Cases filed matching "John Does 1-19" :: Justia Dockets & Filingsdockets.justia.com Dockets & Filings - Cached1 day ago Plaintiffs: DIANE PATCHEN and ROBERT J. SMIK. Defendants: CATHERINE LOUDON, JOHN DOE NUMBER 1, JOHN DOES 2 THROUGH ...

PATCHEN et al v. MCGUIRE et alwww.law360.com/cases/4e57bd15df270801ea000002 - Cached5 days ago MCGUIRE et al, case number 2:11-cv-05388, from Pennsylvania Eastern ... Defendant. TREVOR MCGUIRE. Represented by: Plaintiff. DIANE PATCHEN ...

No matter how many smear campaigns you launch against me and others, I will continue to tell the truth.  The people who matter already know the truth and those who do not know me will also learn the truth.

Let's talk in terms of reality here.  My report is NOT against manthissitesucks.com because there IS NO manthissitesucks.com.  You bought a domain name but are not technically savvy enough to transfer your site to this new URL.  Therefore, my report is against http://singsnapsucks2.com  Using a copyrighted name in your URL is not legal, no matter how many 'loopholes' in the law you attempt to find and/or apply.  You're planning a legal battle with someone from a different country and who has very deep pockets.  Perhaps you should just cease and desist?

It is typical for members of your site to latch onto half truths then divide and multiply them into out and out LIES.  You rely on rumor, innuendo, and pure FANTASY fueled by maliciousness to fill your pathetic hate site.  It is really quite sad.

A person who recently held dual memberships had every opportunity in the world to rebuke your site full of hate, lies, and vengeance, to stay among people who cared about them.  I was one person who cared about that member although she, obviously, thought otherwise.  It just goes to show how easily the truly evil can manipulate even the best and most intelligent people.

So you took my name and attempted to smear it; I hope it made you feel somewhat better and that it won't disappoint you too badly to know it had no effect on me whatsoever.  I have not done anything remotely illegal and do not plan to in the future.  As the kids tend to say these days 'Get a life!'. 

I have a life and it is just as I always dreamed.  Perfection is not about what you have, it is about how your perceive what you have.  I thank God every day for my blessings and, yes, I will walk a path like Jesus for all my days... every burden, all pain, terrible heartache... because I know my reward awaits me in Heaven.  Can any of you on http://singsnapsucks2.com say the same?  I hope so.  I pray for you daily to let go of your hate and face God.  No one can do that except you.

In the meantime, you attempt to smear people with lies just as SATAN would do... I simply tell the truth as the righteous are destined to do.  GOD is by my side and you can do me no harm.

You post from their TOU yet you seemed to have left out that this site is not to be used for malicious intent. Did you not read that Shanda? This site is for consumers, look up the definition please who have been ripped off. 

You with your frivolous little temper tantrums all over the Internet just proves how scared you are. Do you really think after all you have done that anyone gives a d**n what you say here? We are just here to amuse you and to make you come back even when you say your job is done and so are you. That is how very predictable you are Shanda. 

And again for heavens sake please look up libel. No one here is posting libel against you. If you put the information out there on the internet from meds to depression and you write it and say it. It is fact or you are committing libel against yourself lol. Maybe you want to sue yourself lol. 

Really though, knock off your hubby is hahahahaha-ing and your son? Wow you let your son read this crap? Nice going their Mom of a 9 yr old. And who cares what your knife throwing twit of a husband thinks about anyone. 


Why not go in your metaphor basement and chill. Walking the dog are you? Any pepper spray or on that walk? Knives? See these are things you post on a public site. It is not libel it is fact. 


You should be ashamed of yourself as a Mother to expose your child to this. Why not take the time you waste telling lies on the Internet and have a family picnic. Take your child to the Zoo. Sign him up for little league. Things a caring Mother does. Don't let your son suffer for your obession and hate for people you don't know. It is not a good lesson for a child. In fact if you don't stop he may grow up to be like you and that would be a shame. 

Oh and because your daughter made you a Grand Mother doesn't mean anything. She got pregnant and we can't pick family now can we. Why not go call your Daddy and visit him. I mean really there is so much you can be doing that is healthy for you. This surely isn't. 


But I fear you will let this go on and on because you are so hell bent on the attention you think it brings you. The world doesn't revolve around you although you sure as hell think it does. Reality check. It doesn't. God Bless you my child. Tell God the next time he speaks to you personally and i don't mean in thought. I mean in Japanese. Tell him we all went out and got those tattoo's as well because you said to lol. 

Your bible quotes on singsnap look so ridiculous I wish you could understand what people there are saying about you. Your only friend there just may be the owner and that doesn't say much lol

NICE REPORT!!!

You did NOT just let your young son read all of this and actually respond?  How old is he? 
You're kidding right?
Someone needs to call Child Protective Services.

Please note that rebuttals should NOT contain any of the following:
Profanity, obscenity, threats of violence, racist remarks, false
statements, personal information (i.e., social security numbers, credit
card numbers, home address(es) or phone numbers), or any other
information which violates Ripoff Report's Terms of Service;Rumors, speculation, or innuendo unless you have personal knowledge that your statements are true;Trivial comments (i.e., Nice report!) which do not add anything useful to the discussion.

Honestly lady,

You're using a rip off report site and several other consumer sites to harass others by the multiple use of their names.
All I see from everything I've read is how ill you are.

There's good help out there if you ask for it.

You did not just post this on one of the other sites right? 

Shanda L.



I break and divide every demonic confederacy against my life in the name of Jesus. I bind and rebuke all demonic reinforcements sent by Satan to attack my life in the name of Jesus.


You're a nut case

You've got to be very careful when combining several antidepressants at the same time, including other medications that can cause adverse reactions.



Seratonin Syndrome is something that has to be watched for very carefully when you're as ill as you are and taking multiple monoamine oxidase inhibitors.

Causes, incidence, and risk factorsSerotonin

syndrome most often occurs when two drugs that affect the body's level

of serotonin are taken together at the same time. The drugs cause too

much serotonin to be released or to remain in the brain area.For

example, you can develop this syndrome if you take migraine medicines

called triptans together with antidepressants called selective serotonin

reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and selective serotonin/norepinephrine

reuptake inhibitors (SSNRIs). Popular SSRI's include Celexa, Zoloft,

Prozac, Zoloft, Paxil, and Lexapro. SNRI's include Cymbalta and Effexor.

Brand names of triptans include Imitrex, Zomig, Frova, Maxalt, Axert,

Amerge, and Relpax.The FDA recently asked the manufacturers of

these types of drugs to include warning labels on their products that

tell you about the potential risk of serotonin syndrome. Talk to your

doctor before stopping any medication.Serotonin syndrome is more likely to occur when you first start or increase the medicine.Older

antidepressants called monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) can also

cause serotonin syndrome with the medicines describe above, as well as meperidine (Demerol, a painkiller) or dextromethorphan (cough medicine).Drugs of abuse, such as ecstasy and LSD have also been associated with serotonin syndrome.







SymptomsSymptoms occur within minutes to hours, and may include:Agitation or restlessness, Diarrhea, Fast heart beat, Hallucinations, Increased body temperature, Loss of coordination, Nausea, Overactive reflexes, Rapid changes in blood pressure and Vomiting.

Signs and testsThe diagnosis is usually made by asking questions about your medical history, including the types of drugs you take.



To be diagnosed with serotonin syndrome, you must have been taking a drug

that changes the body's serotonin levels (serotonergic drug) and have at

least three of the following signs or symptoms:Agitation, Diarrhea, Heavy sweating not due to activity, Fever, Mental status changes, such as confusion or hypomania, Muscle spasms (myoclonus), Overactive reflexes (hyperreflexia), Shivering, Tremor, and Uncoordinated movements (ataxia).





Hopefully these multiple medication are being prescribed by only one physician and you are being closely monitored.

You caught me red handed... NOT.  I read your rantings out loud to my husband and son and here is our response to you:

My husband:  Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahaha!!!!!!!!

My son:  Peace out.  :)

Me:  Grasping at straws and making fools of yourselves.

I have to go walk my dog now but thanks for the laughs.  :))))

You Miss Tenn. seem to either be in denial or you have a terrible memory. You know when a person lies and doesn't write down their lies or forgets emails or private messages she sent, oops on your part. 

You have gone through many manic states over the past yr it seems. And you blame this site you posted about when the truth is you have been ill long before this site began. 

It is clear you are just a vindictive woman who is not very intelligent. 

You have an attorney for what? The only attorney it seems you will need after you illegal criminal actions will be a defense attorney to get your fat a*s out of jail. 

You keep on with your pretend Christian woman act. And praying for everyone. I guess maybe karma is coming to bite that fat a*s of yours. 

You seem so confident that you DID NOTHING WRONG you say it in every one of your posts. But from our point of view and what we have all witnessed you sure did a lot wrong. 

If I were you I would be praying for God for forgiveness of your sins. You are one piece of work lady. Remember there are people you are not aware of who have witnessed your crimes. And again this is not only about your trespassing and hacking into a site that banned you. 


Keep denying on a consumer site lol. It won't help you once you are standing before a judge with handcuffs on. 



I see you on singsnap posting away and lady you are in no chronic depression. And not one legitimate Dr. would in a court of law lie on your behalf. 


This is to let you know the people on singsnap are so tired of your medical issues too. Who the hell cares if you can't sleep or had glue stuck to your head? We think your head is filled with glue and that is why your brain doesn't function. 

Keep up the lies and keep digging yourself a grave. Oh we thought you were done here. You said your work was done. Another OCD problem you have or is it just you lie about that too?

Tell your Dr. you know the one who is trying to figure out why you can't sleep. So you don't waste their time. You can't sleep because you spend every waking moment online causing havoc in peoples lives. If you have such a happy marriage and a son to take care of you would actually be living a life. Do you even cook for your family? Clean? You look like a hoarder to me. Posting pictures of your house which needs some work and that fridge of yours looks like it needs a good food shopping to feed your child. 

See if you just shut up no one would be posting to you. But you can't shut up can you? LOL

I think what they meant was you said you didn't mention anyone's name here until they confronted you and the you replied correct?

That is your statement above.

The point that was trying to be made was you indeed used people's complete first and last names on other sites way before they saw these reports or replied back to you.
They said they called the owner of aboutus and he told them that two people were contributing editors for only one post.

I dont think he gave away private account information because I went there to give you a chance and all I did was click on the accounts of the two editors (from the date the post was submitted not the people responding afterwards) and sure enough it shows you and a Lawrence Dickerson created that account and made up that report using those peoples names.

The evidence that was shown you is that you were using names in public way before they ever knew of these reports and responded.

If anyone clicks around, there are (or were) 10 or 11 of these similar reports.  Eveerything all the other contributing posts here on this site and the others make perfect sense to me but you seem tp spin things your own way.  Why is that?

The post by the Chicago attorney?  you should have left it at that and not said anything.  Youre giving more and more to the people prosecuting you.
If you are truly on all those medications that you say you are on, my non medical opinion is youre very ill and need help.  Whatever youre doing now is not working.

There is no evidence of wrongdoing against me, period.  You, supposedly a criminal lawyer for 20 years, cannot comprehend there is no evidence of illegal activity on my part?  Every report I've made and every response I've made ONLY concerns alerting the public to the true intent and nature of manthissitesucks.com AKA singsnapsucks2.com.  I told my story.  I have not lied.  I will put my hand on a Bible, happily, speak and continue to speak truth.  Truth is not illegal. 

If you are indeed a lawyer (yes, of course, I have strong doubt a criminal attorney of 20 years would be the least interested in these posts), you know there has been no libel, no slander, no defamation on my part toward manthissitesuck.com AKA singsnapsucks2.com.  There is, however, proof of wrongdoing toward me by their site.

I choose to not post my proof but it is the hands of the proper people which is just where it should be.  Where is their proof?  No where because they have none.

Thanks for your 'concern' and 'advice' but I don't believe you are who you say you are.  Even a civil attorney would not bother reading, let alone posting, about this 'he said she said' mess.

Now, go about your business and I'll go about mine.  I'll take advice from my own attorney, thank you.

Have a nice day.

Lady, stop giving them evidence against you.  You just lied to a criminal attorney and were caught.

Stop talking.

so, they called it right. 

people knew you would either come back on and say 1) this was a fake acct to try and detour from the wrongdoings of others or 2) that you'd flat out lie and deny you posted Ms. Patchen or Ms. Hollands name until they posted first.

can you not keep up with what youve read ma'am?

the owner of aboutus.org Mark Dilley was on the phone with these people and told them that TWO people created and edited the one post (identical spam) on his site.

the two authors of this post were Lawrence A. Dickerson and Layne Wright.  Everyone knew it was you Shanda.  there was only one post created by both of you. (attached photo taken from manthissitesucks web site)
no one needed a court order to find out that you hand you hand in that post however because you went back into your aboutus.org account and changed your name from Layne Wright back to Shanda L.  they have the screen shots from what Ive read. you have some nerve lying to an attorney but at the end if the day does it matter?

youre in so much trouble you conspired with larry behind the scenes in emails to spam these consumer reports using peoples names as many times in the posts as possible. do you think Larry will keep your secret when it comes down to either him or you? never.

of course you dont need to post anymore.  youve screwed yourself royally this time and like he said, it doesnt matter if you have a record or not.once a judeg hears and sees everything youve done in the past year I and many others have no doubt that youll be charged to the full extent of the law. my personal opinion is you should be locked away in an institution, but thats just me.

I forgot to mention, criminal attorney from Chicago, that I have no criminal history.  I don't even have a speeding ticket on my record.  :)

Thank you for your advice.  Simply put, they have no case, therefore I am not concerned in the least.  This woman has a vendetta against me and is grasping at straws to tie me to things other people have supposedly done to her; it is simply not possible since those things were not done by me.

Her name was not mentioned by me here until she mentioned her name herself.  I merely replied to her.  She has sent countless emails to several people to the point they have reported and blocked her.  She hounds people based on her assumptions.  If one person or more did indeed harass her, she should get concrete facts before accusing.  I have blocked her from two email accounts so far.

The report I have made here is factual and backed up by a report made by my local police department.  There is no guess work, no false accusations... it is all documented.

I am tired of this whole thing.  I feel no need to continue here because manthissitesucks.com AKA singsnapsucks2.com cannot bring any proof they've done nothing wrong and now people are aware of the site's true intent.  My job is done.

Best wishes and blessings to you and yours.

I am a practicing "Criminal Attorney" for 20 yrs. I thought I would enlighten you on a few things.

The district attorney's office ordinarily has no record
of a defendant's history of civil litigation, so if you are suing someone or
being sued the D.A. would have no record of that unless someone told the office
or if the records were specifically requested. The D.A. only has the defendant's
criminal background information.

So what this boils down to is this. If someone here is suing you the D.A. would not know that.

If you are arrested due to someone wanting you prosecuted and with proof of a crime committed the D.A. would assign an "Assistant D.A" to prosecute you. Assistants are hungry and looking to chalk up as many convictions as they can. You would need to hire yourself a criminal attorney to defend you. The D.A. is not on your side. They are out to convict and depending on the crime convince the Judge to give you the maximum penalty. Of course that all depends on the severity of the crime and if you have any criminal background or if you have a clean record. 

Because a person has no record doesn't guarantee they will not serve jail time or probation or both. In some cases restitution is ordered by the Judge to the victim. It all depends on the case. 


Hopefully for you they have no case. If they do, I wish you luck. I do suggest of course to always find the best defense attorney you can afford.  If of course a person can't afford an attorney the court will assign a public defender or you can also get legal aid. 

I would also suggest as I have been reading quite a bit here. To refrain as much as possible discussing the person on a public site. You would be giving this person more grounds.

Have a good day. I do hope I was helpful. 

This is not about me.  This is about manthissitesucks.com AKA singsnapsucks2.com being at hate site.  It is clear as sunshine you are grasping at straws.

I am not being 'prosecuted' just persecuted.  Frankly, I must say, s**t or get off the pot with all of that.  I haven't heard one single peep from anyone credible about these claims of a lawsuit against me.  I called the D.A.'s office myself and, sure enough, the only record to be found is the report I filed against manthissitesucks.com AKA singsnapsucks2.com.

Stop wasting people's time.  If you have nothing pertinent to say, please, say nothing at all.

I think these points to make are connected to this very strongly.  youre claiming to be an advocate against hate/hate speak towards other people.

no one in their right mind would think your an advocate against hate.  its been clear from the beginning your trying (and failing) to "out" people when first of all who cares and second of all regardless of who is whom its not illegal.

I think its been pointed out to you that youre being prosecuted and you choose to not believe it.
why? doesnt your husband sit you down and say that you should stop??
She already said she it wasnt worth pressing charges until that video came out and now with her name plastered all over these reports, you made things worse for yourself.
what will you son say when youre spending time in court and you have to hire a defense attorney??

I know from the past it take forever to bring charges against someone. hell, when i used to call my attorney a few years back he was in court during the day and didnt even have a min to return my call until the following day, sometimes two.

I do not believe your an advocate against hate.  thats the point they were bringing up by posting the personl messgae you sent someone, and I believe it.

again, I look at whats in front of me and form my own opinion.  I think your mad because you trespass onto their forum daily and havent stopped for more then 4 months.  and Katie, this is printed on their forum as well thats how I know.  lol

you have driven a bazillion people over to that site and gave them tons more exposure and new members.  im sure theyre silently thanking you.  they just got done saying how all these different countries are requesting accts.

no one is pueposely trying to get off topic.  I think theyre looking at whats in front of them and they dont give a rats a*s.

aside from all of this a suggestion and you can tell me to go to hell if you want to.

consider the fact that you may indeed be prosecuted.  I would never ever in a hundred years be posting this stuff that you are with a very very angry woman on  my tail.
I mean, just consider it for a moment

who owns what or who did what isnt any biggie in the real world.  its stupid.

You are still trying to distract from the issue at hand.  What you are posting has nothing at all to do with manthissitesucks.com AKA singsnapsucks2.com.  You are simply copying and pasting things from other places which proves nothing, absolutely nothing.

I will quote Shanda "Let me set you straight.  I have said this before but it is apparently not sinking in: I am an advocate against bullying and hate/hate speak towards other people.  Go on (as I am certain you will) and continue to say whatever
disgusting stuff you want about me.  I am not the least bit bothered because I know the truth (as do many others).  In fact, PLEASE, continue to prove the point of this:  to show your site is nothing but a bunch of disgruntled, hate filled, vengeful people.  Everything you say screams to the rooftop just how hateful you all are."

I will now post loving kind thoughts towards others from Shanda.  This one is in the form of a private message.

From SL2dalM (Shanda (fake acct) on sss  before being banned and deleted)
Sent 2011-01-16 22:49:41
Subject
<Empty>

I don't think I held a gun to anyone's head to watch the Shamwow parody which merely says "Jesus Christ, this thing works
great!".

You are a f*****g two faced old b***h, (Name removed). I am going to be certain everyone on SingSnap knows it too. You just couldn't shut your toothless gob could you? Why am I calling you out (Name removed)? Cause you have made my life a f*****g living hell you old C***.

I've  already asked Michael for a ban so I don't give a s**t what anyone says. Go on, take it to your buddies who like making face in the hole pics of me like a bunch of elementary school brats. You are a f*****g curse to the d**n world
you old b***h and SSS2 is just where you belong.. a site full of illiterate losers.

You better f*****g believe SSS2 is going to be visited by my pd and there isn't a d**n thing they can do to stop them from seeing every little tidbit of slander toward me. Laugh... go on, enjoy it while you can. This is all going to bite you in your flabby wrinkled a*s.

Screen shots, I'm getting 'em. I'll take their supposed hacking of the site and raise it with unconscionable liable toward me. Let's see who winsthe game shall we?

YOU ARE A MISERABLE C***.

Note:  If RR has word censors and the "C" word was edited with something else, then know that she used the word C**T.

Let's move on...

The email letting us know that she had posted the video of Diane on "Youtube". 

ALLhatersSUCK sent you a video: "This Old Black Swan Makes Me LOL"InboxXReplyYouTube Service to me show details Apr 22 Images are not displayed. Display images below - Always display images from service@youtube.com

help center
| e-mail options
| report spam

ALLhatersSUCK has shared a video with you on Youtube.

This Old Black Swan Makes Me LOL

This is a hilarious example of someone way too old trying to be something she so obviously is not - hot!

LMAO

It is embarrassing - this could be your Grandmother!

An advocate AGAINST hate????????

...will not work.  Quit trying to change the topic.  Defend your site with proof. 

My son is fed, dosed, clean, and safely tucked in bed asleep. For the benefit of readers here, I do bring up my son's illness because it is chronic and there is no cure.  I am trying to bring awareness to others about Juvenile diabetes and just how serious it is.  Do you know my son could easily die if I, just once, didn't do what I need to do for him?  If I am so irresponsible as you claim, explain how my son is as healthy as a horse despite his diabetes?  Let me also mention I have a grown daughter who just had her own daughter and they are both happy and thriving.  Yeah, I am a horrible person!  Geesh.

Now, get back back to the topic and stop the childishness.  All you are doing is going in circles.  PROOF!  Let us see your proof that what we have said is inaccurate, please?

Don't you have a very  very sick son??  you say that on snap constantly.

GO TAKE CARE OF HIM AND GET OFF THE d**n COMPUTER.

youre spamming this same message on the other consumer sites as well.  you know the ones im talking about??
the ones you say you never posted anything regarding spamming??

the medication thread hasnt been there on that forum for weeks now.  youre talking about an old google link twit.

go hack in and try and find the thread now.  not there you stupid idiot.  I do my research before opening my mouth as should you.

you are a hateful woman full of hate yourself.  I think God is embarrassed to have you posting scripture all the time.

Ladies and gents.  Welcome to Shanda's HATE SITE

Here is a Google cached page just to give readers an idea what manthissitesucks.com AKA singsnapsucks2.com is really all about:



http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:jX8TN8tWsLUJ:www.singsnapsucks2.com/private-f8.html+MANTHISSITESUCKS.com&cd=6&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&source=www.google.com



I wonder how innocent members of SingSnap feel about having their videos
linked on manthissitesucks.com AKA singsnapsucks2.com for the sole
purpose of being made fun of? I imagine the folder: "Medications
Possibly Needed To Be A Singsnap Volunteer" on manthissitesucks.com AKA
singsnapsucks2.com is full of hate speak about those who have generously
given their time to SingSnap.



The continued denial by the owner, monetary contributors, and members of
manthissitesucks.com AKA singsnapsucks2.com is desperate at best. The
proof is out there for the world to see, if you just take the time to
look, and it is irrefutable this site is a HATE SITE.

Please, have your attorney contact me.  I have waited for months for this threat of yours to come to fruition.  I've grown tired of waiting.  Could it be you are afraid the table will be turned on you?

Your actions, from the beginning of this whole mess, have bordered on criminal.  I, on the other hand, have done nothing worse than call it as I see it.  Myself and others gave proof of your intent to commit corporate treason to the proper people.  I have to give you a bit of credit- your manipulation skills are top notch.  Many others, unfortunately, would have to agree.  The havoc you have reeked has hurt many people.  I wonder how that makes you feel?

A friend of mine used to be fond of saying:  "You pooped your own nest".  That is what you did.  No one else is responsible for the position you are currently in except for you.  Your thirst for vengeance has driven you to the point of insanity.  Do you know the definition of insanity, Diane?  It is 'doing the same thing(s) over and over expecting different results'. 

Tell Judy Holland and Sally Matzke hello for me.  I wonder over their absence here... why are they not defending themselves?  I find it very telling.

By the way, I spoke with the Detective yesterday and I am now quite clear on what was really said.  Per usual, your little gang took things out of context.  I will not bother that Detective again since he now has the link to this site and everything said concerning manthissitesucks.com AKA singsnapsucks2.com.

Have a lovely day.  I will include you all in my prayers as usual.

Shanda

The Detective you are speaking of is grieving a fallen Trooper today.  Rest in peace to that Trooper.  The Detective will be made aware of your accusations on this site as soon as he is back.  I am nearly 100% certain he will be extremely interested in what you have said.

Thank you, I shall have a very nice day.

We are 100% confident the comment and term "fruitcake" while referring to you Mrs. Lancaster will hold up in court under oath.

Have a good day.

Your claims are full of lies, twisted truths, and huge holes.  The only reason I am dignifying your insane rantings with a response is to say the Detective who filed the report against your site, on my behalf, will not be very happy to read the lie you have said about him.

It is one thing to annoy, harass, stalk, lie about, and bully a citizen such as myself but an entirely different matter when you commit defamation against an officer of the law.  You have just done this whether you realize it or not.

You have also used hate speak in your rant such as 'wishing I (me) would commit suicide' and 'yes, we hate you'.  Everything you have said basically backs up everything I have said in my complaint against you.

I DID ask you to remove my name.  You deleted the post and banned me in an instant.  I do, however, have emails saved asking you to remove my name along with my request on the OTHER site (which you posted yourself) to remove my name.

I NEVER said the Detective told me to view your site and take screen shots.  I said the police told me to... the police officer who took the initial report.  The Detective is aware of this since we discussed it on the phone weeks ago.

You do not intimidate me, folks, because I have done nothing illegal, PERIOD.  A detective, an FBI agent, the assistant D.A. in my county, and two separate attorneys have made it clear to me that you are all just trying to frighten me.  I'm not frightened by you AT ALL.

As for the YouTube video posted of member of your site?  I hate to disappoint you but it was not me.  Investigation will prove this.  I did comment on the video once.  'lol' was my comment... the lol was for the prior comments made, not the video itself, not that it matters.

Yes, indeed, my husband and the president of SingSnap ARE QUITE AWARE OF EVERYTHING.  Chris took the time to read every last word here.

My therapist and psychiatrist are also willing to write letters of testimony regarding the distress you caused me with the hate speak against me on your site.  Now I am back to chronic depression rather than major depression.  You will never hurt me again.

"God bless and protect those I love- my family, my friends, and my enemies.  Guide them with your loving and gentle hand so they may find a path of peace and contentment.".

Shanda

Mrs. Lawrence, you did not request we remove your name from our site nor did you ask.

We banned your ip (which never stopped you) because of the following post created with one of your 20 fake accounts.

Topher2010 Yesterday 23:59:19Topher2010
Member
Online
Registered: 2010-11-26
Posts: 26
Re:
New Songs For SS Sucks,So Says MembersMichael, with your permission I
would like to post a cease and desist here in regard to SSS2.

TO ALL MEMBERS OF SSS2, THIS IS A LEGAL STATEMENT:

CEASE AND DESIST TO USE SHANDAS NAME ON YOUR SITE.

THANK YOU.

You
may remove this post if it is inappropriate in your opinion. No person
has my permission to use my name anywhere on the Internet and especially
not in a derogatory manner.

FYI, I am NOT involved in any
lawsuits, nor will I be unless I am forced to file one against SSS2 for
not following my C&D. Believe me, you SSS2 lurkers, I WILL.

___________________________________________________________

We did however remove your name because A)  We do not own the forum we use.  It does not generate income, therefore it is not necessary or practical to build a web site.

And B) Because we didn't have a need to use your pictures and felt it fine to remove your name.  It was of no consequence to us.

_________________________________________________________________

It would be absolutely impossible for you to have chronic depression or anxiety by the manner in which you conduct yourself online.
Anyone with chronic depression would be in bed with the covers pulled up over their head for weeks at a time.

If you are truly suicidal, please shoot yourself and save Diane the attorney fees. 

When you contacted the police, I believe the Detective in question called you a fruitcake and dismissed the both of you right out of their station.
You followed up with that by sending us an email lying about an officer of the law.  The email is as follows:

Re: In Response To Your EmailFrom:Shanda Jofiel <shandajofiel@yahoo.com>   To:Singsnapsucks Two <singsnapsucks2@yahoo.com>
To Whom It May Concern:

No
one on your site has known me for "4 years or more" because I didn't
know SingSnap existed 4 years ago.  I joined the site March 26, 2008 but
did not begin using the site until around September-October of 2008.  I
was unaware of a message board until November-December of 2008.

If a C&D by court order is what you require it can be done.

"Unfortunately, we have spent most of our online time keeping you from trespassing onto the site and getting around your ban." 
You mean the ban you placed on me for demanding you to remove my name
immediately?  Yes, that is all in the police report with Detective John
Patterson.  Trespassing?  If doing as I was told by my police department
"Keep an eye on what they say and screen shot anything pertaining to
you." then I guess that is trespassing.  Illegal?  No.

_________________________________________________________________

Not only did you lie about a police officer, you admitted to trespassing on our site and you are ignorant of the fact it is indeed illegal.  Multiple trespassing is felony harassment dear.

No where on our site does the forum Crazy Mental Psycho Chicks,  use your name nor do we ever publicly say "who we're referring to".
Ever.  I insist you prove it.

Certain forums are set to a password on our site because of you.  Would you like to mention you tried hacking passed that password twice?

If "people" with access kept you informed then they were assisting a banned member and thank you for admitting that.  We do not need proof.  All of your hard drives will be taken from your home.  If you attempt to delete or erase them, you will fry.

We were emailed a video with Mr. Lancaster threatening us that things will get "nasty and to proceed at our own peril".
The video was made for us and about us.  Nowhere on the video does it say Singsnap and it does not contain the musical Singsnap logo in the beginning of the recording.  However, during your deposition or formal statement with the recorder on, you may at that time deny the video was made to us or for us.  That's more then fine.

_________________________________________________________________

Are you so scared and leery that you dont share information online?  Really?

How about the information you post in public about your many mental illnesses and the medications you take for them?
How about the entire contents of your refrigerator posted online?
The pictures of your house online?
The name of your dog Bear?  The fact that you will be obtaining a taser to take on those long walks of yours?  The knife you carry on these walks?
How a car came after you and asked you if you wanted a ride? you give the exact route you take.
Everything you post shatters you rpivacy.  You have none.  You post your entire life online.
The affairs you have with other Snap members?  How he insists on buying your Gold memberships?
The pm's you send to others calling them vile, filthy names?
The fact that you've never paid for a computer.  You build them?
How you throw knives as a hobby and allow your young son to do the same.  The police in your county say "Gee, they usually just shoot each other".

Leery? I could go on and on and on and on and on and on.

C'mon.

How about every detailed piece of information about Lucas's illness?  How about complain that your ex-husband is after you because of us when you're posting your entire life online for thousands to see?
Posting about your weight loss.  Your gray hair and how you can't color it because you want to donate it to charity.


Leery?

No Mrs. Lancaster.  You have not stayed away from our site.  The use of multiple anonymous proxies to hack passed your ban are a daily chore for us.  Regardless of the fact that many people told you to stay away, you have not taken their advice.

Honestly.  Yes.  We hate you.

You are the focal point of a serious set of charges coming your way.  You forced a woman and her fiancee several hundred dollars an hour and the task of pouring through hundreds of pages of your filth to press criminal and civil charges against you.
You've gone so far overboard that you cannot get out of this one Shanda.
What will you tell Chris when he has to come up with anywhere from several hundred dollars to a few thousand to bail you out of jail?
What will you tell him when he asks you about getting a hold of a private video from a long since banned member on Singsnap and posted it on Youtube?
How will you worm your way out of HOW you got that video?
Does Trevor know about this?  He will.

You are in a lot of trouble.

Believe it.

Please spare the readers of your BS.. you contradict yourself here.. I am leery of posting on any sites about myself yet you post here you were suicidal.. Why don't you stop telling lies? You were banned but forgot to mention you trespass daily and have for months to read the site. You also told the the site your detective told you to trespass didn't you? 

You have the nerve to discuss a youtube video that was a public video on SS being posted on youtube? That is odd for the fact you created a fake account to post a video of me from SS which has been given to my attorney.. I wonder where you got a hold of a private video? And from a member who has been off that site well over a year. Did you or SS know it is a federal crime to create a fake account to harm or harass someone ? I did not think so.. But you will soon enough.. Why are you and Larry posting this nonsense on a site for consumers who were ripped off? 

Go post it where it can't be found out.. Although the owner of the other site you posted this same garbage was willing to reveal the creators in a NY minute once I said attorney. He deleted it. 


You need to cover your tracks when creating fake accounts. Don't use the same fake names on oh let's say your SS profile or FB.. And then try to re use them to harass and post libel. 

You will be hearing shortly from an attorney.. Please don't use the I am suicidal card after the harassment you caused me for a year. Really don't.