Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #328238

Complaint Review: Paul Randle-Jolliffe - Ryde Internet

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Durban Other
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Paul Randle-Jolliffe Isle Of Wight Internet United Kingdom

Paul Randle-Jolliffe Liars, Emotional Blackmailers, Con Artists, Thiefs', Scam Merchants, Crooks and Bandits Ryde United Kingdom Internet

*REBUTTAL Individual responds: Peter Hulbet the Fraudster

*REBUTTAL Individual responds: Accessories and Abettors Act 1861

*REBUTTAL Individual responds: Peter Hulbert Hoax

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Mr Jolliffe as anyone who knows him will testify him to be a crook of the most convincing type.

He has been rejected by his family, friends and all who know him. He is a convicted drug user and a well known scrounger. He pays for nothing that he can get the state to pay for first, if he can't secure money from the Dole, he will secure a victim to subscribe to his next big con and use the money to pay his way through.
Mr Jolliffe to date has extracted money from people investing in his Telecom business's, Venture Capital Business's and so on.

Many people know the name and all will testify him to be a Lazy Bast*rd of the worst kind. He refuses to work and pay for his kid's, he refuses to pay his rent and secures the funds from the Tax payer and in short is a dirty, pervy lazy Bast*rd who will try Blackmail or whatever to extract money from all who enters his zone.
He pretends to be a religious person, but the only person he worships is the Devil.

His Mother refuses to have anything to do with him as he lefts her with a 2,000 phone bill to which she could not pay and was disconnected and blacklisted, his ex wife has been reduced to mental torture by this idiot and worse still he can't accept that whilst all and sundry have offered him advice of "Get a Job and Work like the rest of us", he simply sleeps the days away and refuses to get out of bed before 1-1.30 pm every day and as such can't take a job as he wont wake up.

This person is a drain on the world, he simply takes and never gives. He is a liar a thief and con artist.
I have seen him take and spend over 14,000 from people round the country and world, I'm reliably informed it's much more.

My advice is keep well away from his charm and his Bullsh*t as that's all it is. Ask him for track record and he will run. He has none.

Solon Nicholos
Durban
South Africa

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 04/23/2008 03:06 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/paul-randle-jolliffe/internet/paul-randle-jolliffe-liars-emotional-blackmailers-con-artists-thiefs-scam-merchants-328238. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
0Consumer
3Employee/Owner

#3 REBUTTAL Individual responds

Peter Hulbet the Fraudster

AUTHOR: Peter the Fraud - ()

POSTED: Saturday, November 23, 2013

walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/fraudster-jailed-over-600000-welsh-5907959

 

Fraudster jailed over £600,000 Welsh Government hovercraft racing scam

11 Sep 2013 15:17

Peter Hulbert, 54, from Sheffield, sentenced to four years in prison after trying to convince the Welsh Government to back a racing hovercraft scheme

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 REBUTTAL Individual responds

Accessories and Abettors Act 1861

AUTHOR: Fraud by poster - ()

POSTED: Saturday, November 23, 2013
In English Law the above and others posts about me are criminal offences under the Malicious Communications Act 1988 as they are 1 filed in false names and 2 are false and misleading.
 
THE REAL POSTER IS ONE PETER HULBERT OF SHEFFiELD UK
 
In English Law  any assistance to a criminal in this case by Rippoffreport and Google etc are offenders under the 

Accessories and Abettors Act 1861

8Abettors in misdemeanors.

Whosoever shall aid, abet, counsel, or procure the commission of [F1any indictable offence] , whether the same be [F1an offence] at common law or by virtue of any Act passed or to be passed, shall be liable to be tried, indicted, and punished as a principal offender. 

This serves as notice that they should be removed by Google and Ripoffreport.

1Offence of sending letters etc. with intent to cause distress or anxiety.

(1)Any person who sends to another person—

(a)a [F1letter, electronic communication or article of any description] which conveys—

(i)a message which is indecent or grossly offensive;

(ii)a threat; or

(iii)information which is false and known or believed to be false by the sender; or

 
And
 
Protection from Harassment Act 1997 CHAPTER 40 and as amended by 
 
s44 Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001, ss1(1A)
 

s1 Prohibition of harassment

(1) A person must not pursue a course of conduct-

(a) which amounts to harassment of another, and

(b) which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other.

(1A) A person must not pursue a course of conduct -

(a) which involves harassment of two or more persons, and

(b) which he knows or ought to know involves harassment of those persons, and

(c) by which he intends to persuade any person (whether or not one of those mentioned above)-

(i) not to do something that he is entitled or required to do, or

(ii) to do something that he is not under any obligation to do

 

I.E. TO STOP ME PERUSING MY LAWFUL RIGHTS IN COURT which also constitutes and attempt by him to pervert the course of justice.

 

2A Offence of stalking

(1)A person is guilty of an offence if—

(a)the person pursues a course of conduct in breach of section 1(1), and

(b)the course of conduct amounts to stalking.

(2)For the purposes of subsection (1)(b) (and section 4A(1)(a)) a person’s course of conduct amounts to stalking of another person if—

(a)it amounts to harassment of that person,

(b)the acts or omissions involved are ones associated with stalking, and

(c)the person whose course of conduct it is knows or ought to know that the course of conduct amounts to harassment of the other person.

(3)The following are examples of acts or omissions which, in particular circumstances, are ones associated with stalking—

(a)following a person,

(b)contacting, or attempting to contact, a person by any means,

(c)publishing any statement or other material—

(i)relating or purporting to relate to a person, or

(ii)purporting to originate from a person,

(d)monitoring the use by a person of the internet, email or any other form of electronic communication,

 
You will see I am accused of serious criminal offences and yet no report has been made to the police.
 
 
They are all posted by one Person Peter Hulbert of Sheffield 
 
As the posts have directly affected my ability to earn money, IE caused a loss of income to me the posts also constitute fraud under section 2 of the Fraud Act 2006
 
2 Fraud by false representation
 
(1)A person is in breach of this section if he—
(a)dishonestly makes a false representation, and
(b)intends, by making the representation—
(i)to make a gain for himself or another, or
(ii)to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.
(2)A representation is false if—
(a)it is untrue or misleading, and
(b)the person making it knows that it is, or might be, untrue or misleading.
(3)“Representation” means any representation as to fact or law, including a representation as to the state of mind of—
(a)the person making the representation, or
(b)any other person.
(4)A representation may be express or implied.
(5)For the purposes of this section a representation may be regarded as made if it (or anything implying it) is submitted in any form to any system or device designed to receive, convey or respond to communications (with or without human intervention).
 
“Loss” includes a loss by not getting what one might get, as well as a loss by parting with what one has.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 REBUTTAL Individual responds

Peter Hulbert Hoax

AUTHOR: Myconcept - (United Kingdom)

POSTED: Monday, June 09, 2008

This has all the hall marks of a Peter Hulbert Hoax.

As does /Brokerage-Companies/Paul-Randle-Jolliffe/paul-randle-jolliffe-ecademy-W7E46.htm

Who George bertram is I dont know.

Likely filed in response to my post on
http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/258/RipOff0258336.htm#302122

I also emailed Bernard of Discovery Beach about this but no reply, I have no issues with Bernard Chris Brammel or Discovery Beach

I knew Solon Nicholas about 15 years ago and he was an old gentleman then, I would question if he is still alive, certainly he would never write in such terms and he never knew me as married. If he is still alive I would love to talk to him he is greatly missed.

Who the poster Mark evans is I do not know, but Solon was from Johanasburg not Durban.

However Peter Hulbert posts this about Mark Evens http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/266/RipOff0266623.htm

So I suspect Peter Hulbert is just using peoples names and not got the balls to say its him.

Perhaps the ripof report could check the IP of the postings I expect you will find they are a sheffied IP which is where Peter is from.

Peter always boasted to me how he liked to destroy people that crossed him, but then he made the mistake of getting involved in a marital dispute thinking he was doing the right thing.

CLICK here to see why Rip-off Report, as a matter of policy, deleted either a phone number, link or e-mail address from this Report.

Above $1M sales. I think I am dues some idea royalties Peter.

What Peter does not know is that he does not know a lot about me, an upset ex wife is probobly the last person to trust expecially if they are passing the buck, you got this one 100% wrong Peter and I can show you documents to prove it.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now