- Report: #606864
Report - Rebuttal - Arbitrate
Complaint Review: St. Andrews Legal Clinic - Connie Lukes
St. Andrews Legal Clinic - Connie Lukes807 NE Alberta St. Portland Oregon Portland, Oregon United States of America
St. Andrews Legal Clinic - Connie Lukes Minimalist at best. gross neglegence seems appropriate Portland, Oregon
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
Click here now..
Clue 2: when I forwarded the emails from the opposing and former attorney to Ms. Lukes, she told me she would not read them because it was too expensive. Nor would she listen to prior hearings, video and audio evidence of abuse, read confession sent by abuser, etc.
Clue 3: her stating that she refused to work on the case until the custody evaluator finished their report, despite hearings between when she was retained and the still pending custody evaluation.
Clue 4: refusing to provide a corrected cost estimate on the case
Clue 5: providing 2 business hours notice of the cost of a critical expert witness, and her anger with me that I could not come up with $750 between 4pm on Monday and 9am the following morning for the hearing.
Clue 6: not responding to simple emails asking basic questions (i.e. what does the most recent order say? what documents do I need to provide? how much money do you need to start working on the case)
Clue 7: telling me to present my case to the custody evaluator INSTEAD of her, and not bothering to mention up front that everything I gave to the custody evaluator would be given to opposing counsel. Eventually, she did mention it, but after I had already turned over some documents I didn't want opposing counsel to take out of context.
She represented me at one hearing. She was COMPLETELY FOCUSED on proving that an order signed previously was done so without valid cause. I told her (based on the opposing counsel's witness list) what I expected the other side to present at that hearing. She disregarded and did not adequately prepare. Within the first few minutes of the hearing, at opposing counsel's request, the judge agreed not to revisit the prior hearing. Ms. Lukes was completely un-prepared for the 6 hours of hearing to follow.
I had provided her physical evidence for defense of my position. She did not use any of it. I'm not an attorney, and I know pro-se is NOT THE WAY TO GO, but in this case, I would have been better off if I had.
For the record she dropped me as a client when I asked how much it would cost for her to start actually representing me.
To The Battered Wives of Rich Men: Don't bother with SALC. Have no faith in the legal system. Money is all that truly matters there. Do whatever necessary to get it. Fight for your children, no one else will. Once the courts are involved, it's all strategy about winning or loosing, not what is best for the children.
If he beats you or the children before a custody case is established, take the kids, run and hide, however you can.
~the former Buddhist.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 05/24/2010 05:48 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/St-Andrews-Legal-Clinic-Connie-Lukes/Portland-Oregon-/St-Andrews-Legal-Clinic-Connie-Lukes-Minimalist-at-best-gross-neglegence-seems-approp-606864. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:Search Tips
In order to assure the best results in your search:
- Keep the name short & simple, and try different variations of the name.
- Do not include ".com", "S", "Inc.", "Corp", or "LLC" at the end of the Company name.
- Use only the first/main part of a name to get best results.
- Only search one name at a time if Company has many AKA's.
Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.